You have accessJournal of UrologyLower-Tract Reconstruction II: ED/Infertility & Transgender Surgery (V07)1 Apr 2020V07-12 DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH FIDELITY 3-PIECE INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHETIC (IPP) MODEL USING 3D-PRINTING AND HYDROGEL MOLDING Patrick Saba, Rachel Melnyk, Michael Witthaus*, Gareth Warren, Divya Ajay, Alexander Cranwell, Ricardo Munarriz, and Ahmed Ghazi Patrick SabaPatrick Saba More articles by this author , Rachel MelnykRachel Melnyk More articles by this author , Michael Witthaus*Michael Witthaus* More articles by this author , Gareth WarrenGareth Warren More articles by this author , Divya AjayDivya Ajay More articles by this author , Alexander CranwellAlexander Cranwell More articles by this author , Ricardo MunarrizRicardo Munarriz More articles by this author , and Ahmed GhaziAhmed Ghazi More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000897.012AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: This video demonstrates a high-fidelity, anatomical, full procedural simulation for placement of a 3-piece IPP. METHODS: Anatomical penile models consisting of a male pelvis, penis, urethra, corporal bodies, inguinal canals, iliac vessels and relevant adjacent structures were created using 3D-printed injection molds. The molds are filled with a poly-vinyl alcohol, a hydrogel that can be modified to replicate realistic tissue consistency. Relevant procedural steps: corporal exposure, dilation, measurement, scrotal pump placement, reservoir placement, prosthesis assembly and closure can be simulated using both an infrapubic or penoscrotal approach. The model has the ability to detect surgical errors including perforation of corpora during dilation, damage to iliac vessels or urethra and improper prosthesis placement. Twelve surgeons: three experts (>250 caseload), three low volume faculty (>50 caseload) and six novices (residents), completed an IPP insertion on the model under operating room conditions, after which a survey assessing realism and usefulness as a training tool was completed. RESULTS: When compared to live surgery, over 83.3% of the participants agreed that the model realistically replicated the skin retraction, placement of corporal stay sutures, corporotomy, distal dilation, prosthesis measurement, and IPP placement (Figure 1). Skin incision, proximal dilation, reservoir placement, corporal closure and skin closure was found to be realistic in above 66.7% of participants. On average experts agreed that the model could function as a training tool, assessment tool, prerequisite for IPP accreditation, and a requirement prior to live surgery. Experts stated ideally, they would have their trainees complete an average of 3.33 models before live surgical training. CONCLUSIONS: This video presents a high-fidelity, anatomical, hydrogel simulation platform for 3 piece IPP placement. With the ability to replicate surgical errors, its educational effectiveness as a training tool is further supported. This platform requires no specialized facilities and offers the basis for future male genital reconstruction simulations such as correction of Peyronie’s disease and artificial urinary sphincter insertions. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e646-e646 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Patrick Saba More articles by this author Rachel Melnyk More articles by this author Michael Witthaus* More articles by this author Gareth Warren More articles by this author Divya Ajay More articles by this author Alexander Cranwell More articles by this author Ricardo Munarriz More articles by this author Ahmed Ghazi More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...