Background: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and a distal common bile duct (CBD) stricture in whom surgery is not a favorable option, often need frequent exchanges of conventional plastic stents because of stent clogging. In this selected group of patients insertion of a Wallstent may prove to be a valuable alternative to achieve long-term biliary drainage. Methods: All patients presenting with CP and a distal CBD stricture from December 89 to March 99 in whom we inserted a Wallstent were included in this retrospective study. Patients who were alive were contacted and interviewed. Additional information was obtained from family members, general practitioners, and referring physicians. Results: During the study period we inserted 15 Wallstents (1 cm ɸ, 7.8 cm length) in 15 patients (10 men and 5 women, mean age 57 years SD 11). Prior to insertion of the Wallstent, patients had a median of 2 (range 2-27) exchanges of conventional plastic stents. Median patency of these conventional stents was 13 weeks (range 1-47). The primary considerations for placement of a Wallstent were: failure of conventional stent therapy and/or considered not fit for surgery (n=10), patient preference (n=2), suspected malignancy which turned out to be CP (n=2) and unrelated terminal illness (n=1). Median patency of the Wallstent until closure date of the study was 50 weeks (range 1-211). In twelve patients (80%) the Wallstent remained patent until death (n=3, all unrelated causes) or closure date of the study (median follow up 58 weeks, range 6-211) In two patients (13%) the Wallstent became obstructed (1 week, 26 weeks). In one of these patients a conventional plastic stent was inserted through the Wallstent, while in the other patient the Wallstent was removed (the only patient in whom a covered Wallstent was placed) before a conventional plastic stent was reinserted. In one patient (6%) the Wallstent migrated and was retrieved with an overtube. All three patients in whom the Wallstent failed finally underwent a hepaticojejunostomy. The presence of a Wallstent did not hamper the surgical procedure and the final outcomes were uneventful. Conclusions: In a selected group of patients with distal CBD strictures caused by CP in whom conventional stenting is no longer a desirable option and who are not favorable candidates for surgery, insertion of a selfexpandable Wallstent seems to be a safe and effective treatment option. Background: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and a distal common bile duct (CBD) stricture in whom surgery is not a favorable option, often need frequent exchanges of conventional plastic stents because of stent clogging. In this selected group of patients insertion of a Wallstent may prove to be a valuable alternative to achieve long-term biliary drainage. Methods: All patients presenting with CP and a distal CBD stricture from December 89 to March 99 in whom we inserted a Wallstent were included in this retrospective study. Patients who were alive were contacted and interviewed. Additional information was obtained from family members, general practitioners, and referring physicians. Results: During the study period we inserted 15 Wallstents (1 cm ɸ, 7.8 cm length) in 15 patients (10 men and 5 women, mean age 57 years SD 11). Prior to insertion of the Wallstent, patients had a median of 2 (range 2-27) exchanges of conventional plastic stents. Median patency of these conventional stents was 13 weeks (range 1-47). The primary considerations for placement of a Wallstent were: failure of conventional stent therapy and/or considered not fit for surgery (n=10), patient preference (n=2), suspected malignancy which turned out to be CP (n=2) and unrelated terminal illness (n=1). Median patency of the Wallstent until closure date of the study was 50 weeks (range 1-211). In twelve patients (80%) the Wallstent remained patent until death (n=3, all unrelated causes) or closure date of the study (median follow up 58 weeks, range 6-211) In two patients (13%) the Wallstent became obstructed (1 week, 26 weeks). In one of these patients a conventional plastic stent was inserted through the Wallstent, while in the other patient the Wallstent was removed (the only patient in whom a covered Wallstent was placed) before a conventional plastic stent was reinserted. In one patient (6%) the Wallstent migrated and was retrieved with an overtube. All three patients in whom the Wallstent failed finally underwent a hepaticojejunostomy. The presence of a Wallstent did not hamper the surgical procedure and the final outcomes were uneventful. Conclusions: In a selected group of patients with distal CBD strictures caused by CP in whom conventional stenting is no longer a desirable option and who are not favorable candidates for surgery, insertion of a selfexpandable Wallstent seems to be a safe and effective treatment option.
Read full abstract