Distal Clavicle Resection Research Articles

Cost of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs Is Primarily Driven by Procedure-Level Factors: A Single-Institution Analysis of an Ambulatory Surgery Center

To identify intraoperative drivers of cost associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) through analysis of an institutional database. This was a single-institution retrospective review of arthroscopic RCRs performed at an ambulatory surgical center between November 2016 and July 2019. Patient-level factors analyzed included age, sex, insurance type (private, Medicare, Medicaid, self-pay, and other government), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (I, II, III, and missing), and Charlson comorbidity index (0, 1, 2, and ≥3). Procedure-level factors included use of biologics (decellularized dermal allograft or bioinductive healing implant), anesthesia type (regional block, monitored anesthesia care, or general), number of anchors and sutures, additional procedures (biceps tenodesis, distal clavicle resection, subacromial decompression), and operative time. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify factors significantly associated with higher or lower charges. A total of 712 arthroscopic RCRs were included. The risk-adjusted operative charges were $19,728 (95% confidence interval $16,543 to $22,913). The above factors predicted nearly 65% of the variability in operative charges. The only patient-level factor significantly associated with lower charges was female sex (- $1,339; P= .002). Procedure-level factors significantly associated with higher charges were use of biologics (+ $17,791; P < .001), concurrent open biceps tenodesis (+ $4,027; P < .001), distal clavicle resection (+ $2,266; P= .039), use of regional block (+ $1,256; P= .004), number of anchors (+ $2,245/anchor; P<.001), and increasing operative time ($26/min). Other factors had no significant association. Procedural factors are the most significant drivers of operative cost in arthroscopic RCRs, such as quantity and type of implants; additional procedures such as biceps tenodesis and distal clavicle resection; and perioperative conditions such as type of anesthesia and total operating room time. Overall, patient-level factors were not shown to correlate well with operative costs, other than lower charges with female sex. IV, economic study.

New possibilities: the LockDown device for distal clavicle fractures.

Background and hypothesisThe majority of distal clavicle fractures are displaced fractures and constitute a treatment challenge because they have a 30% chance of delayed union or nonunion. Although several options for surgical reconstruction have been described, in patients with a comminuted and/or small distal fragment, these reconstructive options have proved to be prone to failure. Moreover, secondary surgery for removal is necessary in most cases. We hypothesized that the LockDown device, a braided synthetic ligament device, combined with resection of the distal fracture fragment is a suitable alternative in specified patients with distal clavicle fractures.MethodsEleven patients with distal clavicle fractures were treated with distal fracture resection and the LockDown procedure. All patients underwent regular follow-up with data collection; additionally, 7 were assessed at 1-year follow-up according to the study protocol. On the basis of radiography, these patients had a clear coracoclavicular ligament disruption and subsequent cranial dislocation of the medial fragment. Regular follow-up was performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Control radiographs were taken at 3 and 6 months. Furthermore, the 7 enrolled patients were assessed at 1 year, when the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, Constant shoulder score, Nottingham Clavicle Score, and range of motion were recorded. Residual pain was ascertained by a visual analog scale score.ResultsIn total, 11 patients were treated with distal clavicle resection and the LockDown procedure. Eight patients underwent surgery within 3 weeks after presentation at the emergency department. The other 3 patients were operated on after a trial of conservative treatment (due to persisting pain and delayed union). None of the patients had postoperative complications. At 3 months, 9 of the 11 patients had made a full recovery.DiscussionAll 11 patients had good short-term clinical outcomes. None showed acromioclavicular instability. Furthermore, secondary surgery was avoided, and hardware complications did not occur. In low-demand patients or patients with a high risk of nonunion, this technique may be a favorable alternative to other known techniques.

Benefits of distal clavicle resection during rotator cuff repair: Prospective randomized single-blind study

IntroductionRotator cuff tears often occur in combination with acromioclavicular (AC) arthropathy. But it can be difficult to separate pain caused by the rotator cuff tear from pain caused by the AC joint, despite clinical and other examinations. Distal clavicle resection (DCR) is increasingly being done at the same time as arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between patients who simultaneously undergo DCR and patients who do not. The primary hypothesis was that DCR improves the clinical outcomes. Material and methodsThis was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind study of 200 patients who underwent isolated supraspinatus repair using the same technique. The patients were randomized into two groups: 97 patients who also underwent DCR and 103 patients who did not. The patients were followed until 1 year postoperative according to a standardized radiological and clinical review protocol. ResultsAt 1 year postoperative, all the clinical outcomes were worse in the DCR group, although only external rotation with elbow at side (53° vs. 59°, p=0.04) and the SSV (86.5 vs. 90.1, p=0.04) were statistically different. Overall shoulder pain was higher in the DCR group during the first 3 months postoperative (p=0.04). At 1 year, the DCR group had more residual pain; this pain was mainly located on the superior side of the shoulder (p=0.03), especially when more than 11 mm was resected (p=0.01). More of the shoulders in the DCR group had failures in rotator cuff healing based on ultrasonography (p=0.5). ConclusionOur hypothesis was not confirmed. We do not recommend doing routine DCR with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Level of evidenceI, prospective randomized simple blind study.

Increased T2 signal intensity in the distal clavicle does not justify acromioclavicular resection arthroplasty during rotator cuff repair

IntroductionAcromioclavicular (AC) arthropathy can contribute to shoulder pain; it can be treated surgically by distal clavicle resection (DCR). The aim of this study was to determine whether increased T2 signal intensity in the clavicle on MRI is an argument in favour of AC resection arthroplasty by DCR during rotator cuff repair. MethodsThe MRI images from 107 shoulders in 107 patients were analysed. We looked for statistical relationships and correlations between shoulders with T2 hyperintensity (HI+) and those without (HI−) before surgery and then in shoulders with T2 hyperintensity (HI+) that underwent AC resection arthroplasty (AC+) and those who did not (AC−). ResultsOn MRI, T2 hyperintensity in the AC joint was correlated with sex (more often found in men) and radiological signs of AC arthropathy. There was no statistical correlation before surgery, particularly with AC pain, or after surgery, with outcomes in shoulders undergoing DCR. ConclusionWhen repairing rotator cuff tears, the presence of T2 hyperintensity on MRI in the distal clavicle is not a predictor of better clinical outcomes after AC resection arthroplasty is done. The AC pain may be related to the rotator cuff tear instead. Level of evidenceII, prospective randomised study.

Characterizing opioid consumption in the 30-day post-operative period following shoulder surgery: are we over prescribing?

ABSTRACT Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to characterize opioid consumption in the first 30 days after shoulder surgery. Secondary aims were to assess patient expectations, pain tolerance, risk factors for increase opioid consumption, and proper disposal of narcotics. Methods: Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR), anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), distal clavicle resection, or labral surgery were prospectively enrolled. Collected data included demographics, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), pain tolerance surveys, narcotic use, adverse effects, and disposal method. Results: Eighty patients were included in this study. At 28 days, RCR patients took significantly more 5 mg oxycodone-equivalent pills than RSA patients (18.4 vs. 7.5; p = 0.001). Number of days on narcotics did not differ between groups. By day 14, 73 (92.5%) patients had stopped taking narcotics entirely, with 872 5 mg oxycodone-equivalent pills prescribed in surplus. Ten (14.3%) patients required an additional prescription. There was a significant difference in tobacco use (20% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.04), psychiatric history (50% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.0004) and PCS (12.7 vs. 7.1; p = 0.027) in these patients, with PCS of 12.5 as predictive of requiring another prescription. Conclusion: All patients achieved adequate pain control, with 60 (75%) patients having excess pills. Opioid utilization differed based on surgery – significantly lower use in RSA patients compared to RCR. Only 13 (16.25%) patients required more than 20 5 mg oxycodone-equivalent pills. Tobacco use, history of psychiatric illness, and PCS were risk factors for requiring more prescriptions.

Cost comparison of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic vs. open biceps tenodesis

To use a nationwide database to determine differences in cost between patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff tear with open vs. arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (BT). The 2014 State Ambulatory Surgical and Services Databases from 6 US states was utilized. All cases with CPT codes 29827 (arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [RCR]) and either 23430 (tenodesis of long tendon of biceps) or 29828 (arthroscopic BT) were selected. Cases that included both 23430 and 29828 were excluded, as were those missing demographic data. Generalized linear models were used to model costs based on the surgical and patient variables that were significant in the initial bivariate analysis (P < .05). A total of 3635 RCR and BTcases were identified. There were 2847 (78.3%) with arthroscopic BTand 788 (21.7%) with open BT. Patients undergoing arthroscopic BT were 3.1 years older than patients undergoing open BT (P < .001). For arthroscopic BT, 39.2% of the cases were women compared with 22.6% of the open cases (P < .001). For operative variables, arthroscopic BT required 9 fewer minutes in the OR than open cases (P = .002). Concomitant distal clavicle resection was performed in 35.5% of arthroscopic BT cases compared with 29.8% of open cases (P = .004). While controlling for other significant factors, open BT was associated with $5542 lower costs than arthroscopic BT in the setting of RCR (P < .001). In either case, concomitant subacromial decompression added $10,669 (P < .001), and distal clavicle resection added $3210 (P < .001). High-volume surgical facilities were associated with $4107 lower costs (P < .001). In a large series of patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR with open vs. arthroscopic BT, open BT was associated with $5542 lower costs than arthroscopic. Given that both techniques have been shown to be similarly effective in long-term follow-up, surgeons should be aware of opportunities for cost saving, particularly with the advent of bundled surgical reimbursements.

Surgical techniques for management of acromioclavicular joint separations: review and update for radiologists.

Imaging plays a central role in the postoperative management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations. There are more than 150 described techniques for the surgical management of AC joint injuries. These procedures can be categorized as varying combinations of the following basic techniques: a) soft-tissue repair, b) trans-articular AC joint fixation, c) coracoclavicular (CC) fixation, d) non-anatomic reconstruction of the CC ligaments, e) anatomic reconstruction of the CC ligaments, f) distal clavicle resection, and g) dynamic muscle transfer. The goals of this article are to describe the basic techniques for the surgical management of AC joint separations with an emphasis on technique-specific complications and postoperative imaging assessment.

Synovial cyst of the acromioclavicular joint with and without rotator cuff tear: A case series of two patients

IntroductionAcromioclavicular joint cyst (AJC) is a very uncommon condition of the shoulder observed in elderly patients, caused by a degenerative acromioclavicular (AC) joint, frequently associated to a rotator cuff tendon tear. There are two possible cause for the cyst formation. We report two different cases of a AC synovial cyst, with and without rotator cuff tear. Presentation of casesWe report two cases, in patients aged respectively 80 and 77 years, with a very large AJC. In one case, the cyst was associated to a rotator cuff tear, while in the other case, the rotator cuff did not present any evident lesion. Both cysts were successfully surgical excised and a distal clavicle resection was performed. DiscussionAJC is a rare complication observed in degenerative AC joint and in the majority of cases is associated to a rotator cuff tear. The diagnosis may be made by ultrasound and conventional radiographic examination, although MRI of the shoulder is generally preferred as it allows to better identify the condition of the rotator cuff. Generally, local aspiration of the cyst and corticosteroid injection fails with recurrence of the cyst and surgically treatment is indicated, especially in painful cases. ConclusionPainful AJC should be surgically treated by excision of the cyst associated to a lateral clavicle resection; when a symptomatic massive rotator cuff is present, a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may be considered. However, in elderly patients, who have no discomfort, watchful waiting may be the treatment of choice.

Management of Acromioclavicular Osteoarthritis in Rotator Cuff Tears: A Scoping Review.

Purpose The treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis during shoulder arthroscopy is a discussed topic. The aim of this scoping review is to report the current recommendations regarding the management of this disorder in patients undergoing surgery for rotator cuff tears. Methods A scoping review was performed in Pubmed\\Medline and Embase in March 2017, restricted to English language literature. The following keywords were used: (“rotator cuff tear” OR ” rotator cuff” OR “rotator cuff repair”) AND (“acromioclavicular joint arthritis” OR “ac joint arthritis” OR “ac joint” OR “acromioclavicular joint”). Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective trials, and therapeutic case series. Exclusion criteria were reviews, meta-analyses, and expert opinions. Results Two retrospective studies and three randomized controlled trials were identified. Clinical studies reported results of 443 shoulders, with an average age of 60.48 years and a mean follow-up of 31.7 months. Many differences were found regarding the design of the studies, patient's selection, surgical procedures, and instrumental and clinical evaluations. No statistically significant differences were found in clinical outcome scores between patients that underwent rotator cuff repair in association with distal clavicular resection and patients with isolated rotator cuff repair. Conclusion Results of this scoping review underline a lack of evidence-based recommendations about the management of ACJ osteoarthritis in association with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Surgical procedures such as distal clavicle resection (DCR) should be performed carefully in this cohort of patients. More prospective randomized studies are needed to reach a consensus about the correct surgical approach to DCR in patients with signs of ACJ osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears. Level of Evidence Level III.

Anatomic Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Semitendinosus Autograft With Suture Augmentation: Surgical Technique

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations are common injuries and account for 3.2% of shoulder injuries. These injuries typically occur among adolescent and young adult athletes during contact sports, such as hockey, wrestling, and rugby. Low-grade AC joint separations (Rockwood grade I-II) are often successfully treated nonoperatively. High-grade AC joint separations (Rockwood grade IV-VI) have the potential to alter scapular kinematics, causing painful and restricted motion, and are often treated surgically. Over 150 surgical techniques have been described to treat AC joint separations. Techniques vary in the types of implants used (screws, pins), use of anatomic or nonanatomic reconstructions, number of drill holes used, use of arthroscopic or open procedures, use of distal clavicle resection, and types of augmentation (allografts, autografts, sutures). The procedure can be expensive, with the implants and grafts costing varied amounts and, at times, thousands of dollars. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe an inexpensive method of open anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a single bone tunnel, suture tape, and a semitendinosus autograft.

Preoperative Factors Associated With Subsequent Distal Clavicle Resection After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Background:Acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears are commonly coincident.Purpose:To determine the rate of subsequent distal clavicle excision (DCE) when rotator cuff repair (RCR) is performed without DCE and the risk factors for subsequent DCE after RCR.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The operative logs of 2 surgeons from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent RCR with or without DCE. Preoperative demographic data, symptoms, physical examination, and standardized outcomes (visual analog scale for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) were noted. Acromioclavicular (AC) arthritis was classified on preoperative radiographs. The rate of subsequent surgery on the AC joint was determined via chart review, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine risk factors for revision.Results:In total, 894 patients underwent isolated RCR, and 46 underwent concomitant RCR and DCE. On retrospective chart review, of those who underwent isolated RCR, the revision rate for any reason was 7.5% (67 patients), and the rate of subsequent AC surgery was 1.1% (10 patients). Preoperatively, 88% of the total cohort was considered to have a radiographically normal AC joint. On multivariate analysis of patients who underwent isolated RCR, the risk factors for subsequent AC surgery included preoperative tenderness to palpation at the AC joint (10% vs 63%, P < .001), female sex (35% vs 80%, P < .001), and surgery on the dominant side (60% vs 100%, P = .002). On multivariate analysis, these 3 factors explained 50% of the variance in revision AC surgery. When these 3 factors were present in combination, there was a 40% rate of revision AC surgery.Conclusion:This records review found that 10 of 894 (1.1%) rotator cuff repairs underwent subsequent distal clavicle resection. Risk factors for subsequent DCE included tenderness to palpation at the AC joint, female sex, and surgery on the dominant side, with subsequent DCE performed in 40% of cases with a combination of these 3 factors. Because the duration of follow-up was short and the number of reoperations small, some caution is recommended in interpreting these results, as the analyses may be underpowered.

Facteurs de risque influençant la douleur postopératoire dans les trois premières semaines après chirurgie de l’épaule arthroscopique ou à ciel ouvert

IntroductionShoulder surgery is a painful procedure. Adequate postoperative pain control increases patient satisfaction. The objectives of this study were to investigate postoperative pain development in shoulder surgery and to assess risk factors for high postoperative pain. HypothesisPatients who undergo rotator cuff repair are more painful than patients who undergo different kinds of shoulder surgery. Material and methodsFour hundred and fifty-five patients who underwent shoulder surgery were included in this retrospective cohort study. A linear mixed model analysis was used to compare NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) for pain between different kinds of shoulder surgery in the first three weeks postoperatively. To assess risk factors for high postoperative pain odds ratios were calculated. ResultsPain development in the first 3 weeks differed between procedures with rotator cuff repair being the most painful procedure. Risk factors for high postoperative pain were female sex and subacromial decompression with distal clavicle resection. DiscussionPatients who undergo rotator cuff repair are indeed more painful than patients who undergo different kinds of shoulder surgery. With identifying these differences in pain development and the risk factors for high postoperative pain after shoulder surgery, we can optimize postoperative pain treatment. However, further research is needed to support these results. Level of evidenceIV, retrospective cohort study.

Do intra-articular pathologies accompanying symptomatic acromioclavicular joint degeneration vary across age groups?

This study aims to evaluate the accompanying intra-articular pathologies in patients who underwent arthroscopic distal clavicle resection (DCR) for symptomatic acromioclavicular (AC) joint degeneration based on age groups and to reveal which additional pathologies should be considered across different age groups during physical examination of patients suspected of AC joint degeneration. The study included 156 patients (55 males, 101 females; mean age 57.2±10.0 years; range, 35 to 80 years) who underwent arthroscopic DCR between January 2006 and December 2017 and had at least one clinical positive test for AC joint degeneration during the preoperative physical examination. The patients were divided into three groups as those aged <50 years (group 1), between 50-65 years (group 2), and >65 years (group 3). The concomitant intra-articular pathologies were evaluated across different age groups and compared between the groups. Concomitant intra-articular pathologies were detected in 117 (75%) of a total of 156 patients. Additional pathology rate increased with increasing age (p=0.002). More than one concomitant intra-articular pathologies were detected in 37 patients (23.7%). This rate increased with increasing age (p=0.002). The number of patients with superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesion as the only additional pathology was 33 (21.2%). This rate decreased with increasing age (p=0.015). In group 1, the rate of concomitant SLAP lesion was 44.1%. The high incidence of intra-articular pathologies accompanying symptomatic AC joint degeneration raises the importance of careful physical examination, detailed imaging, and arthroscopic surgery to obtain good results in patients scheduled for DCR. The frequency of AC joint degeneration and concomitant SLAP lesions, particularly in younger patients, should be considered during clinical examinations.

Risk factors for postoperative pain in the first three weeks after arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery

IntroductionShoulder surgery is a painful procedure. Adequate postoperative pain control increases patient satisfaction. The objectives of this study were to investigate postoperative pain development in shoulder surgery and to assess risk factors for high postoperative pain. HypothesisPatients who undergo rotator cuff repair are more painful than patients who undergo different kinds of shoulder surgery. Material and methodsFour hundred and sixty five patients who underwent shoulder surgery were included in this retrospective cohort study. A linear mixed model analysis was used to compare NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) for pain between different kinds of shoulder surgery in the first three weeks postoperatively. To assess risk factors for high postoperative pain odds ratios were calculated. ResultsPain development in the first 3 weeks differed between procedures with rotator cuff repair being the most painful procedure. Risk factors for high postoperative pain were female sex and subacromial decompression with distal clavicle resection. DiscussionPatients who undergo rotator cuff repair are indeed more painful than patients who undergo different kinds of shoulder surgery. With identifying these differences in pain development and the risk factors for high postoperative pain after shoulder surgery, we can optimize postoperative pain treatment. However, further research is needed to support these results. Level of evidenceIV, retrospective cohort study.

Does Distal Clavicle Resection Decrease Pain or Improve Shoulder Function in Patients With Acromioclavicular Joint Arthritis and Rotator Cuff Tears? A Meta-analysis.

Acromioclavicular joint arthritis is a common, painful, and often missed diagnosis, and it often accompanies other shoulder conditions such as rotator cuff disease. Whether distal clavicle resection is important to perform in patients undergoing surgery for rotator cuff tears and concomitant acromioclavicular joint arthritis is controversial. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of distal clavicle resection on (1) outcome scores; (2) shoulder ROM, joint pain or tenderness, and joint instability; and (3) risk of reoperation among patients treated surgically for rotator cuff tears who had concomitant acromioclavicular joint arthritis. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to find RCTs that met our eligibility criteria, which, in summary, (1) compared rotator cuff repair plus distal clavicle resection with isolated rotator cuff repair for patients who sustained a full- or partial-thickness rotator cuff tear and concomitant acromioclavicular joint arthritis; and (2) the followup period was at least 2 years. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality, and performed data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was quantitatively evaluated with the I index. No heterogeneity was detected (I = 0%; p = 0.75) in terms of acromioclavicular joint pain or tenderness, Constant score, forward flexion, external rotation, and risk of reoperation, so fixed-effect models were used in these endpoints. Heterogeneity was moderate for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (I = 53%; p = 0.12) and low for the visual analog scale (VAS) score (I = 35%; p = 0.22), so random-effect models were used in these endpoints. Subgroup analysis was stratified by the symptom of acromioclavicular joint arthritis. Three RCTs with 208 patients were included. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool; in aggregate, the three RCTs included showed low to intermediate risk, although not all parameters of the Cochrane tool could be assessed for all studies. There was no difference between the distal clavicle resection plus rotator cuff repair group and the isolated rotator cuff repair group in ASES score (mean difference =1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.37 to 6.18; p = 0.56) nor in terms of the VAS score and Constant score. Likewise, we found no difference in ROM of the shoulder (forward flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation) or acromioclavicular joint pain or tenderness between the groups (pooled results of acromioclavicular joint pain or tenderness: risk ratio [RR], 1.59; 95% CI, 0.67-3.78; p = 0.30). Acromioclavicular joint instability was only detected in the rotator cuff repair plus distal clavicle resection group. Finally, we found no difference in the proportion of patients undergoing repeat surgery between the study groups (pooled results of risk of reoperation for the rotator cuff repair plus distal clavicle resection and isolated rotator cuff repair: one of 52 versus two of 78; RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.11-6.48; p = 0.88). Distal clavicle resection in patients with rotator cuff tears did not result in better clinical outcome scores or shoulder ROM and was not associated with a lower risk of reoperation. Distal clavicle resection might cause acromioclavicular joint instability in patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant asymptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis. Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection is not recommended in patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant acromioclavicular joint arthritis. Additional well-designed RCTs with more participants, long-term followup, and data on patient-reported outcomes are needed. Level I, therapeutic study.

CORR Insights®: Does Distal Clavicle Resection Decrease Pain or Improve Shoulder Function in Patients With Acromioclavicular Joint Arthritis and Rotator Cuff Tears? A Meta-analysis.

CORR Insights®: Does Distal Clavicle Resection Decrease Pain or Improve Shoulder Function in Patients With Acromioclavicular Joint Arthritis and Rotator Cuff Tears? A Meta-analysis.

Risk Factors for Biceps Related Complications Following Arthroscopic Tenotomy of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon

Objectives:Our objective was to evaluate complications after arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) and identify patient-related factors associated with postoperative cosmetic (Popeye) deformity, subjective weakness, and residual anterior shoulder pain.Methods:After obtaining IRB approval, the records of patients who underwent an arthroscopic LHBT tenotomy, between 2008 and 2015, at an integrated multi-center (14) and multi-surgeon (55) were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria included LHBT tenodesis, arthroplasty, neoplastic, or fracture surgery, age below 18, or indata. Demographic data, concomitant procedures, the appearance of the biceps tendon (presence or absence of hypertrophy) at time of arthroscopy, and postoperative complications were recorded. The development of each postoperative complication was compared by age, gender, hand dominance, workers’ compensation status, and intra-operative LHBT morphology.Results:192 patients met our inclusion criteria. The average age was 60.6 ± 9.5 years and 55% were male. Average follow-up was 10.6 ± 13.6 months. The most common concomitant procedures were subacromial decompression (82%), rotator cuff repair (72%), distal clavicle resection (26%), and glenohumeral debridement (18%). LHBT morphology based on arthroscopic images was as follows: normal (56%), mildly hypertrophic (24%), severely hypertrophic (20%). Postoperative complications cosmetic deformity (14%), subjective weakness (10.4%), persistent (residual) anterior shoulder pain (7.8%), conversion to tenodesis (3.6%), venous thromboembolism (1%). Seven (3.6%) patients underwent a revision surgery to convert the LHBT tenotomy to a tenodesis, most commonly for postoperative cosmetic deformity (6 patients, 86%). Male gender was significantly associated with the development of postoperative cosmetic deformity (Odds Ratio of 3.21, P<0.05). Biceps tenotomy on the dominant shoulder was significantly associated with postoperative subjective weakness (Odds Ratio 3.17, P<0.05). Patients with workers’ compensation injuries were more likely to have continued postoperative anterior shoulder pain (6.57, P<0.05). A full list of individual patient-related factors association with postoperative complications is presented in Table 1.Conclusion:In our series, in patients undergoing LHBT tenotomy, 14% developed a cosmetic deformity, 10% subjective reported weakness and 8% had persistent (residual) anterior shoulder pain. Male gender was associated with developing a cosmetic deformity, the dominant shoulder was associated with postoperative subjective weakness, and workers’ compensation status was associated with residual anterior shoulder pain. Older age and a hypertrophic biceps tendon demonstrated decreased odds of developing a postoperative cosmetic deformity but did not reach statistical significance. Surgeons who perform LHBT tenotomy should take these risk factors under consideration to minimize complications.Table 1Association of Patient-Related Characteristics with Postoperative Complications.Postoperative ComplicationPatient-Related CharacteristicDevelopment of Cosmetic DeformityReported Subjective WeaknessResidual Anterior Shoulder PainAverage AgeYes= 58 years oldYes= 59.6 years oldYes= 56.64No= 61 years oldNo= 60.7 years oldNo= 60.99P= 0.120P= 0.316P= 0.100GenderMale= 19%Male= 11%Male= 6.7%Female= 6.9%Female= 9.2%Female= 9.2%P= 0.013*P= 0.614P= 0.528Dominant ArmYes= 16.9%Yes= 14.2%Yes= 7.2%No=10%No= 5.0%No= 8.6%P= 0.171P= 0.038*P= 0.696Workers' CompensationYes= 28%Yes= 0%Yes= 42.8%No=13%No= 10.8%No= 6.5%P= 0.261P= 0.358P= 0.001*Biceps Tendon HypertrophyYes= 0%Yes= 0%Yes= 0%No= 19.4%No= 11.1%No= 8.3%P= 0.150P= 0.294P= 0.370* Indicates statistical significance

Functional outcome of open acromioclavicular joint stabilization for instability following distal clavicle resection

BackgroundAcromioclavicular joint instability following distal clavicle resection can result in considerable pain and dysfunction. MethodWe present a review of 13 patients who underwent ACJ stabilization following one or more distal clavicle resection procedures. ResultsThe mean Quick DASH and CM scores were 26(0–57) and 73(46–100) respectively. All but one patient reported an improvement in the pain component of their CM score and in the work component of the Quick DASH score. DiscussionOpen ACJ stabilization to treat instability following distal clavicle resection resulted in improved functional scores, pain scores and facilitated return to work in most patients.Level of evidence IV.

Bipolar Acromioclavicular Joint Resection

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint arthropathy remains one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. In the case of AC joint arthropathy resistant to conservative treatment, most authors have recognized distal clavicle resection as the gold-standard treatment. However, some challenges remain to be solved. One is the difficulty in visualization of the superior and posterior part of the distal clavicle from the midlateral portal, causing an incomplete resection of the distal clavicle. This could potentially lead to unresolved pain and therefore surgical failure. We propose a technique for arthroscopic resection of the distal clavicle and the medial portion of the acromion, without any added portal: bipolar AC joint resection. The term “bipolar” is used because both the acromion and the clavicle are resected, without injuring the superior capsule.

Is routine distal clavicle resection necessary in rotator cuff repair surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials looking at the effect of distal clavicle resection in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR). A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials looking at RCR +/- distal clavicle resection. Primary clinical outcome measures included in the meta-analysis were American Shoulder Elbow Society (ASES) score, pain on visual analogue scale and range of motion in forward elevation. The systematic review identified three studies with a total of 203 participants. Those who underwent distal clavicle resection in conjunction with RCR had worse pain and acromioclavicular joint tenderness at 3-month follow-up. This difference, however, was not observed at the 24-month follow-up. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) for the ASES score was 0.45 (-3.67 to 4.58) and pain on visual analogue scale was - 0.27 (-0.70 to 0.16). Routine distal clavicle resection in the setting of rotator cuff repair does not result in improved outcomes for patients with no difference being observed at 24 months post surgery. The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis do not support routine distal clavicle resection when performing RCR.