Disparities In Utilization Research Articles

The Impact of Race/Ethnicity on Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Neuraxial Anesthesia for Hip and Femoral Shaft Fractures.

Background/Objectives: The use of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery remains an active area of research, with recent studies demonstrating mixed findings supporting neuraxial over general anesthesia. The benefits of neuraxial anesthesia have been documented in associated surgeries, including total joint arthroplasty. However, racial disparities in the administration of neuraxial anesthesia have been identified in numerous procedures. We aimed to examine the association of race/ethnicity with neuraxial anesthesia use and the effect of neuraxial anesthesia on length of stay, non-home discharge, 30-day severe adverse events, and rates of readmission among patients undergoing isolated hip and femoral shaft fracture operations. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database was queried for isolated hip or femoral shaft fractures from 2015 to 2019. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between race/ethnicity and neuraxial anesthesia use. Within each sex-race stratum, neuraxial anesthesia recipients were propensity-matched to general anesthesia recipients in a 1:2 ratio. Logistic regression and negative binomial regression were performed on the propensity-matched cohort. Results: A total of 12,004 neuraxial and 64,250 general anesthesia hip and femoral shaft fracture patients were identified. Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were between 0.64 and 0.61 times less likely to receive neuraxial anesthesia over general anesthesia, respectively (p < 0.05). 11,993 patients who received neuraxial anesthesia were propensity matched to 23,946 patients who received general anesthesia. Propensity-matched logistic regressions found that neuraxial anesthesia was associated with decreased length of stay, 30-day severe adverse events, and acute rehab/skilled nursing facility discharge for White patients (p < 0.05 for all), but only decreased length of stay in Black and Hispanic patients (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Notable disparities exist in the administration of neuraxial anesthesia for isolated hip and femoral shaft fracture patients. Hispanic and Black race/ethnicity in particular influences provision of neuraxial anesthesia. Further research is required to understand the degree of effect modification and root causes of regional anesthesia access and benefits for this high-volume patient population.

Sociodemographic variation in the utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches for pancreatic cancer

Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS), when selectively utilized, has been shown to hasten recovery with outcomes comparable to open approaches, but access may not be equitable. This study explored variation in utilization of MIPS for pancreatic cancer. The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with a primary pancreatic neoplasm from 2010 to 2020. Study participants had diagnoses of clinical or pathologic stage 1-3 disease and received curative-intent surgery. Multivariable analyses assessed the association between surgical approach and patient and disease factors. Inclusion criteria identified 73,137 patients: 51,408 underwent open surgery and 21,729 received MIPS. In our multivariable analysis, Black race was associated with reduced odds of MIPS (AOR 0.88; p=0.02), while older age (AOR 1.17; p=0.01), later year of diagnosis (AOR 1.57; p<0.001), and private insurance coverage (AOR 1.30; p=0.05) were associated with increased odds. When patients with adenocarcinoma were analyzed in isolation, disparities in MIPS utilization persisted even when controlling for disease stage. Sociodemographic factors like age, race, and insurance coverage appear to vary in the utilization of MIPS technologies for the treatment of pancreatic malignancy. Addressing variation with robust mixed methods approaches in the future is proposed to incorporate prospective interventions with highly annotated outcomes for additional study.

Economic Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Structural Heart Disease Interventions in the United States

BackgroundDisparities in access to care cause negative health consequences for underserved populations. Economic disparities in structural heart disease (SHD) interventions are not well characterized. ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate economic disparities in the utilization and outcomes of SHD interventions in the United States. MethodsWe queried the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020) to examine economic disparities in the utilization, in-hospital outcomes, length of stay, and cost of SHD interventions among patients ≥65 years of age. Outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. ResultsA total of 401,005 weighted hospitalizations for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, left atrial appendage occlusion, transcatheter mitral valve repair, and transcatheter mitral valve replacement were included. Utilization rates (number of procedures performed per 100,000 hospitalizations) were higher in patients with high income compared with medium and low income for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (559 vs 456 vs 338), left atrial appendage occlusion (148 vs 136 vs 99), transcatheter mitral valve repair (65 vs 54 vs 41), and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (7.7 vs 6.7 vs 1.2) (all P < 0.01). Low- and medium-income patients had distinctive demographic and clinical risk profiles compared with high-income patients. There were no significant differences in the adjusted in-hospital mortality, key complications, or length of stay between high-, medium-, and low-income patients following any of the 4 SHD interventions. High-income patients incurred a modestly higher cost with any of the 4 SHD interventions compared with medium- and low-income patients. ConclusionsEconomic disparities exist in the utilization of SHD interventions in the United States. Nonetheless, adjusted in-hospital outcomes were comparable among high-, medium-, and low-income patients. Multifaceted implementation strategies are needed to attenuate these utilization disparities.

Association of Language Preference with Therapeutic Care for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

There is a paucity of research investigating disparities in utilization of inpatient therapeutics for COVID-19 by language preference. The primary aim of this study was to assess if the likelihood of treatment with novel COVID-19 therapies differed for patients using a language other than English (LOE) relative to English-speaking patients. This was a retrospective observational cohort study of COVID-19 patients hospitalized between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022, across 11 hospitals within a single not-for-profit health system. Multivariable relative risks were estimated for the impact of preferred language on the receipt of novel COVID-19 therapies: baricitinib, remdesivir, tocilizumab, and convalescent plasma. This study included 12,510 hospitalized adults with English as the most common preferred language (92.3%) followed by Spanish (3.1%), Somali (1.3%), Russian (0.9%), and Hmong (0.6%). Spanish speakers were more likely to receive any of the novel COVID-19 therapies compared to English speakers (RR 1.45; CI 1.32-1.59). Estimates for Hmong, Somali, Russian, and Other language groups were not statistically significant and closer to the null (aRR range, 0.89-1.12). Linguistic patterns in health outcomes expose inherent heterogeneity within racial and ethnic groups. Our study found that Spanish speakers were nearly 1.5 times more likely to receive any of the four novel inpatient COVID-19 therapeutics in comparison to English speakers. Future research is needed to explore the reasons for the heterogeneous findings including temporal influence, cultural factors, informed consent comprehension, and therapeutic hesitancy in all groups.

Racial Disparities Exist in 90-Day Unplanned Return to the Emergency Department Following Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

Racial disparities in healthcare outcomes exist, including in orthopaedic trauma care. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of race, social deprivation, and payor status on 90-day emergency department (ED) revisits among orthopaedic trauma surgery patients at a Level 1 trauma academic medical center. Retrospective chart review analysis. Level 1 trauma academic center in Durham, NC. Adult patients undergoing orthopaedic trauma surgery between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome of this retrospective cohort study was 90-day return to the ED. Logistic regression analysis was performed for variables of interest [race, social deprivation (measured by the Area Deprivation Index), and payor status] separately and combined, with each model adjusting for distance to the hospital. Results were interpreted as odds ratios (ORs) of 90-day ED revisits comparing levels of the respective variables. Statistical significance was assessed at α = 0.05. A total of 3120 adult patients who underwent orthopaedic trauma surgery between 2017 and 2021 were included in the analysis. Black race (OR = 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.84, P < 0.001) and Medicaid coverage (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.20-2.21, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with higher odds of return to ED compared with non-Black or non-Medicaid-covered patients. While ethnic minority (Hispanic/Latino or non-White) was statistically significant while adjusting only for distance to the hospital (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.00-1.50, P = 0.047), it was no longer significant after adjusting for the other sociodemographic variables (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.91-1.39, P = 0.27). The weighted Area Deprivation Index was not associated with a difference in odds of return to ED in any adjusted models. The results highlight the presence of racial and socioeconomic disparities in ED utilization, with Black race and Medicaid coverage significantly associated with higher odds of return to the ED. Future research should delve deeper into comprehending the root causes contributing to these racial and socioeconomic utilization disparities and evaluate the effectiveness of targeted interventions to reduce them. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Rotator Cuff Repair: Racial Disparities in Operative Time and Utilization of Arthroscopic Techniques.

Background Racial disparities are prevalentwithin the field of orthopedics and include the utilization of varying resources as well as outcomes following surgery. This study investigates racial differences between Black and White patients in the surgical treatment of rotator cuff repair (RCR) and 30-day postoperative complications following RCR. Materials and methods Data were drawn from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to create a study population consisting of Black and White patients who underwent RCR between 2015 and 2019. A bivariate analysis was conducted to compare patient demographics and comorbidities. Multivariate logistic regression, controlling for all significantly linked patient demographics and comorbidities, was performed to examine the relationships between Black race and complications. Results Our analysis included 32,073 patients, of whom 3,318 (10.3%) were Black and 28,755 (89.7%) were White. The female gender, younger age groups, greater BMI groups, ASA classification ≥3, cigarette use, and comorbid congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, and hypertension were all significantly associated with patients who identified as Black. We found no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complications between Black and White patients. Furthermore, Black patients were found to be independently associated with a greater likelihood of undergoing arthroscopic RCR versus open RCR, as well as experiencing a longer total operation time of ≥80 minutes. Conclusions We report no differences in 30-day postoperative complications between Black and White patients undergoing RCR between 2015 and 2019. However, Black race was independently associated with higher rates of arthroscopic RCR and longer operative times.

Corneal Opacity in the United States: An American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Study

This study assesses the case frequencies, underlying causes, and vision outcomes in patients with a diagnosis of corneal opacity in the United States. Retrospective cohort study. Patients in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) who received a diagnosis of corneal opacity between January 1, 2013, and November 30,2020. The IRIS Registry contains demographic and clinical data of 79 887 324 patients who sought treatment at eye clinics during the study period. We identified patients with corneal opacity using International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Ninth and Tenth Revisions, codes of 371 (corneal scar) and H17 (corneal opacity), respectively. The analyzed data comprised demographic parameters including age, sex, race, ethnicity, and geographical location. We evaluated clinical data including laterality, cause, disease descriptors, and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) up to 1 year before the onset (± 30 days), at the time of diagnosis, and at 1 year after diagnosis (± 30 days). Case frequencies, causes, and vision outcomes in patients with a diagnosis of corneal opacity. We identified 5 220 382 patients who received a diagnosis of corneal opacity and scars using H17 (ICD, Tenth Revision) and 371.0 (ICD, Ninth Revision) codes over 7 years. The case frequency of corneal opacity during the study period was 6535 cases per 100 000 patients (6.5%). The mean age of the patients was 63.36 ± 18.14 years, and most were female (57.6%). In the cohort, 38.39% and 30.00% of patients had bilateral and unilateral corneal opacity, respectively. Most of the patients affected by corneal opacity were White (69.13%), followed by Black or African American (6.84%). Corneal dystrophies (64.66%) were the most common cause of corneal opacity in the study cohort. Visual acuity of the patients worsened significantly because of corneal opacity (0.46 ± 0.74 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) and did not improve to the baseline (0.37 ± 0.68 logMAR) after management (0.43 ± 0.77 logMAR). The multiple linear regression analysis showed worse vision outcomes in female patients (compared with male patients), and Asian, Black or African American, and American Indian or Alaska Native (compared with White) patients. Additionally, worse vision outcomes were observed in patients with opacity associated with corneal malformation, degenerative disorders, edema, injury, and ulcer compared with those with hereditary corneal dystrophy. Our study showed that corneal opacity was diagnosed in 6.5% of patients in the IRIS Registry and primarily associated with corneal dystrophies. The final vision outcomes in patients with corneal opacity were significantly worse compared with baseline. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes After Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis delved into the impact of race and ethnicity on outcomes following foot and ankle surgery, an area garnering increasing attention within the medical community. Despite significant literature on postsurgical clinical and functional outcomes, limited research has explored the influence of racial and ethnic factors on postoperative outcomes. In this study, data from 33 relevant studies, involving a total of 557,734 patients, were analyzed to assess outcomes across different racial and ethnic groups. Notably, only 6 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the final meta-analysis due to variations in outcome reporting. Findings revealed disparities in functional scores, pain levels, and resource utilization among different racial and ethnic cohorts. Specifically, non-White and minority patients exhibited higher rates of foot and ankle fractures and lower extremity surgeries, worse functional outcomes, increased pain, longer hospital stays, and a greater incidence of complications compared to their White counterparts. However, some studies presented contradictory results, emphasizing the necessity for further investigation to elucidate these discrepancies fully. This research underscores the importance of considering racial and ethnic factors in foot and ankle surgery outcomes and highlights the need for targeted interventions to address existing disparities.

M105 - Racial Disparities in Buprenorphine and Methadone Utilization Among Reproductive-Age Women With Opioid Use Disorder: An Analysis of Multi-State Insurance Claims in the USA (2006-2016)

M105 - Racial Disparities in Buprenorphine and Methadone Utilization Among Reproductive-Age Women With Opioid Use Disorder: An Analysis of Multi-State Insurance Claims in the USA (2006-2016)

Frailty, Specialized Care, and Sociodemographic Factors: Disparities in Oral Pharmacotherapy Class Utilization Among Medicare Part D Beneficiaries With Overactive Bladder in the United States

ObjectivesTo describe the prevalence of frailty among Medicare beneficiaries with overactive bladder (OAB), analyze oral therapy patterns, and examine potential disparities in treatment. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized the 20% Research Identifiable File Medicare Part D prescription claims dataset (2013-2018). Using the Claims-Based Frailty Index (CFI), Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old with OAB were categorized as not frail (CFI <0.15), prefrail (0.15 ≤CFI <0.25), and frail (CFI >0.25). Logistic regression models assessed associations between frailty and pharmacotherapy utilization. ResultsAmong 111,761 patients (15.8% of the OAB cohort) receiving oral pharmacotherapy (anticholinergic oral medications or mirabegron), 71% were women, 83% were White, and 11.9% were frail. After controlling for age, co-payments and dual eligibility status, frail status (OR 1.16; 95% CI [1.09 - 1.24]), urology (OR 2.05 (95% CI [1.94 - 2.16]) or gynecology (OR 1.74; 95% CI [1.6 - 1.9]) prescribers and residing in the Southern United States (OR 1.53; CI [1.49 - 1.61]) were associated with higher likelihood of mirabegron utilization. Black (OR 0.79; 95% CI ([0.74 - 0.85]) and American Indian/Alaska Native (OR 0.54, 95% CI ([0.39 - 0.74]) patients were less likely to utilize mirabegron than White beneficiaries. ConclusionFrail beneficiaries and those with urology and gynecology prescribers showed higher likelihoods of beta-3 agonist utilization. Despite adjustments, Black and AI/AN patients were less likely to fill mirabegron prescriptions, suggesting disparities in treatment. Our findings highlight the need for policies, interventions, and initiatives to promote equitable OAB oral therapy utilization in vulnerable populations.

Regional And Socioeconomic Disparities In Coronary Calcium Scan Utilization Across The United States

Regional And Socioeconomic Disparities In Coronary Calcium Scan Utilization Across The United States

Impact of race and socioeconomic deprivation on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in pediatric multiple sclerosis.

Health disparities in adult-onset multiple sclerosis have been identified in the Black/African American (AA) population. A higher relapse rate has been suggested in Black/AA patients with pediatric-onset MS (POMS), but little work explores healthcare utilization and social determinants of health (SDOH). To evaluate racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in POMS outcomes. Retrospective chart review identified 31 eligible patients diagnosed with POMS at Children's of Alabama between 2013 and 2023. Demographics, outcomes, and healthcare utilization over 2 years from diagnosis were collected. Patient addresses were connected to SDOH measures from the US Census. Bivariate analysis was performed using Fisher's Exact Test, Wilcoxin Test, and 2-sided t-test. Black/AA children had a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at first presentation (p = 0.0276) and were more likely to initiate fingolimod vs. glatiramer acetate (p = 0.0464). Living further from Children's of Alabama was associated with a higher most recent EDSS (p = 0.0301) and fewer neurology appointments (p = 0.0167). Families living in more socioeconomically deprived census tracts had significantly more hospital admissions. Black/AA POMS patients had a more severe initial presentation and were started on higher efficacy medication. We identified disparities in EDSS and healthcare utilization based on SDOH data linked to a child's home address.

Healthcare Disparities Among Older Adults: Exploring Social Determinants of Health and Cognition Levels.

The purpose was to investigate the impact of sociodemographic factors on healthcare utilization among adults with different cognition levels (normal and impairment/dementia). We used cross-sectional data from the Health and Retirement Study (N=17,698) to assess healthcare utilization: hospital stay, nursing home stay, hospice care, and doctor visits. A cohort comparison between normal and dementia/impaired cognition groups revealed significant differences. The dementia/impaired group had lower education levels, higher single/widowed status, and more racial and ethnic minorities. They experienced longer hospital and nursing home stays, varied doctor visit frequencies, and had higher mean age, greater loneliness scores, and lower family social support scores. Differences in hospitalization, nursing home, hospice care, and doctor visits were influenced by factors such as race, age, marital status, education, and rurality. There were disparities in healthcare utilization based on participants' characteristics and cognition levels, especially in terms of race/ethnicity, education, and rural location.

Disparities in dental healthcare utilization based on regional characteristics in Korea

Disparities in dental healthcare utilization based on regional characteristics in Korea

Race disparities in emergency department utilization: Analyzing the role of value-based payment among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries

Race disparities in emergency department utilization: Analyzing the role of value-based payment among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries

Healthcare utilization in Ghana: Insights from the 2017 Ghana Living Standard Survey.

The persistence of healthcare utilization disparities in Ghana despite several policy efforts highlights the urgency of understanding its determinants to enhance equitable health access. We sought to examine the determinants of healthcare utilization in Ghana. We used the 2017 Ghana Living Standard Survey (GLSS) data. This was a cross-sectional design, which employed a stratified two-stage random sampling technique. We analyzed data involving 8,298 respondents with information on visits to healthcare facilities for services on account of illness or injury two weeks prior to the survey. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to assess the distribution of healthcare utilization across background characteristics. Further, we used multivariable Poisson regression model with robust standard error to identify factors independently associated with healthcare utilization. Among the 8,298, the median age was 24 years (interquartile range = 7-47), 45% were males, and 45% had no education. About 42% of respondents utilized health services during an episode of illness or injury. Age, sex, educational level, marital status, wealth quintile, health insurance and severity of illness/injury were independently associated with healthcare utilization. Healthcare utilization increased significantly with wealth quintiles-those in the highest wealth quintiles had about 22% increased utilization compared to those in the lowest wealth quintiles (aPR = 1.22; 95%CI = 1.13-1.32) while it was about 77% higher among those who had valid health insurance compared to those without (aPR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.68-1.86). Regarding severity of illness or injury, those with severe conditions were about 65% more likely to utilize healthcare services compared to those with acute conditions (aPR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.53-1.78). Our study underscores the importance of socio-economic factors and health insurance in healthcare utilization in Ghana. Addressing these can pave the way for more equitable access to healthcare services across all segments of the population.

Tele-Mental Health Service: Unveiling the Disparity and Impact on Healthcare Access and Expenditures during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mississippi.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, tele-mental health (TMH) was a viable approach for providing accessible mental and behavioral health (MBH) services. This study examines the sociodemographic disparities in TMH utilization and its effects on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and medical expenditures in Mississippi. Utilizing a cohort of 6787 insured adult patients at the University of Mississippi Medical Center and its affiliated sites between January 2020 and June 2023, including 3065 who accessed TMH services, we observed sociodemographic disparities between TMH and non-TMH cohorts. The TMH cohort was more likely to be younger, female, White/Caucasian, using payment methods other than Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial insurers, residing in rural areas, and with higher household income compared to the non-TMH cohort. Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, TMH utilization was associated with a 190% increase in MBH-related outpatient visits, a 17% increase in MBH-related medical expenditures, and a 12% decrease in all-cause medical expenditures (all p < 0.001). Among rural residents, TMH utilization was associated with a 205% increase in MBH-related outpatient visits and a 19% decrease in all-cause medical expenditures (both p < 0.001). This study underscores the importance of addressing sociodemographic disparities in TMH services to promote equitable healthcare access while reducing overall medical expenditures.

Optimizing Resource Consumption and Reducing Power Usage in Data Centers, A Novel Mathematical VM Replacement Model and Efficient Algorithm

This study addresses the issue of power consumption in virtualized cloud data centers by proposing a virtual machine (VM) replacement model and a corresponding algorithm. The model incorporates multi-objective functions, aiming to optimize VM selection based on weights and minimize resource utilization disparities across hosts. Constraints are incorporated to ensure that CPU utilization remains close to the average CPU usage while mitigating overutilization in memory and network bandwidth usage. The proposed algorithm offers a fast and efficient solution with minimal VM replacements. The experimental simulation results demonstrate significant reductions in power consumption compared with a benchmark model. The proposed model and algorithm have been implemented and operated within a real-world cloud infrastructure, emphasizing their practicality.

Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of specialty treatment across risk profiles of adults with heavy alcohol use.

Variation in specialty treatment utilization for alcohol use disorder (AUD) by patient subgroups is poorly understood. This study examined whether and how patient risk profiles predict receipt of specialty treatment and whether there are disparities by race and ethnicity. This cohort study included 206,956 adults with heavy alcohol use (that which exceeded National Instituteon Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism guidelines) between June 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014, using electronic health record data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Five risk profiles (characterized by daily or weekly heavy drinking and level of health risks) were identified in latent class analysis. Logistic regression models were fit to examine associations between risk profiles, race, ethnicity, and receipt of specialty treatment (including addiction medicine, psychiatry, or integrated behavioral health visits, and AUD pharmacotherapy), adjusting for other patient characteristics. Variation in the association between risk profiles and receipt of specialty treatment by race/ethnicity was also examined. Overall, 4.0% of patients received specialty treatment. Latino/Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander patients had lower odds of receiving specialty treatment than White patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] = 0.80 [0.75, 0.85], and 0.64 [0.59, 0.70], respectively). The substance use disorder and mental health disorder (SUD/MH) risk profile had the highest odds of receiving specialty treatment (10.46 [9.65, 11.34]). Associations between risk profiles and receipt of specialty treatment significantly differed by race/ethnicity. Black patients in the SUD/MH risk profile, and Hispanic/Latino patients in the risk profile with heavy daily drinking and more health risks, had lower odds of receiving specialty treatment than their White counterparts (adjusted ratio of odds ratios [aROR] [95% CI] = 0.69 [0.50, 0.94], and 0.79 [0.67, 0.92], respectively). This study provides new insights into racial/ethnic disparities in specialty treatment utilization for alcohol problems. Findings may help inform strategies for tailoring interventions to address heavy alcohol use.

Beyond Discharge Disposition: A Scoping Review on Sociodemographic Disparities in Rehabilitation Use after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The aims of this scoping review were to summarize the evidence regarding sex, racial, ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic disparities in post-acute rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). Literature searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PEDro. Studies were included if they were original research articles published 1993 or later; used data from the US; included patients after THA and/or TKA; presented results according to relevant sociodemographic variables, including sex, race, ethnicity, geography, or socioeconomic status; and studied utilization of post-acute rehabilitation as an outcome. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Five examined disparities in inpatient rehabilitation and found that Black patients and women experience longer lengths of stay after arthroplasty, and women are less likely than men to be discharged home after inpatient THA rehabilitation. Four studies examined data from skilled nursing facilities and found that insurance type and dual eligibility impact length of stay and rates of community discharge but found conflicting results regarding racial disparities in skilled nursing facility utilization after TKA. Five studies examined home health data and noted that rural agencies provide less care after TKA. Results regarding racial disparities in home health utilization after arthroplasty were conflicting. Six studies of outpatient rehabilitation noted geographic differences in timing of outpatient rehabilitation but mixed results regarding race differences in outpatient rehabilitation. Current evidence indicates that sex, race, ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status are associated with disparities in post-acute rehabilitation use after arthroplasty. Rehabilitation providers across the post-acute continuum should be aware of disparities in the population of patients after arthroplasty and regularly assess social determinants of health and other factors that may contribute to disparities. Customized care plans should ensure optimal timing and amount of rehabilitation is provided, and advocate for patients who need additional care to achieve the desired functional outcome.