Disparities In Incarceration Rates Research Articles

Race differences in the impact of juvenile detention on likelihood of young adult incarceration of males aging out of care

Youth involved in the child welfare system are more likely to be involved in the juvenile justice system, and juvenile justice involvement is linked to increased likelihood of subsequent incarceration. For these reasons, overrepresentation of Black youth in the child welfare system contributes to racial disparities in incarceration rates. It is, therefore, important to study youth transitioning out of foster care to examine how their young adult outcomes differ by race. Employing the National Youth in Transition Database (NYTD), this study compared the incarceration experiences of non-Hispanic White and Black males aging out of foster care. Specifically, this study examined the impact of juvenile detention on the likelihood of incarceration ages 19 to 21and factors that mediated this relationship. Notably, 33.5% of White males and 30.7% of Black males in the sample experienced juvenile detention. Findings indicate that juvenile detention disproportionately impacts Black males who age out of foster care compared to their White counterparts. The direct effect of juvenile detention on reported incarceration between age 19–21 for Black males in the sample was OR = 2.31 compared to OR = 1.91 for White males. Reported incarceration between age 17–19 significantly mediated the relationship between juvenile confinement and incarceration age 19–21 for both Black and White males in the sample, although this effect was substantially stronger for Black males. Research and policy implications are discussed.

Understanding the Interplay of Race in the Criminal Justice System

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate and understand the interplay of race in the criminal justice system. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the interplay of race, class and gender in the criminal justice system. Preliminary empirical review revealed that that pervasive racial disparities exist within this institution, as evidenced by disproportionate treatment of racial minorities at various stages of the criminal justice process. It found that despite efforts to promote fairness and equity, implicit biases and systemic racism continued to influence decision-making, leading to disparities in arrests, prosecutions, and sentencing. The study highlighted the interconnectedness of race with other social factors such as socioeconomic status and neighborhood characteristics and underscored the urgency of implementing evidence-based interventions and policy reforms to address racial disparities effectively. Recommendations included diversifying law enforcement agencies, implementing implicit bias training programs, and reforming sentencing guidelines to promote fairness and reduce disparities in incarceration rates. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Critical Race theory, Labeling theory and Structural Functionalism may be used to anchor future studies on the interplay between race and the outcomes within criminal justice. The study provided recommendations that contributed to theory, practice, and policy. It integrated critical race theory into the analysis to explore systemic racism's role in perpetuating racial disparities. Practically, evidence-based policing strategies and procedural justice principles were emphasized, alongside community policing initiatives and accountability measures to address bias and misconduct. Policy recommendations included reforming sentencing laws, investing in alternatives to incarceration, and addressing social determinants of crime. The study contributed to theory by examining intersecting identities' impact and advocated for community-driven interventions, trauma-informed approaches, and reforms to reduce racial bias and enhance accountability within the criminal justice system.

Developing the "Oppression-to-Incarceration Cycle" of Black American and First Nations Australian Trans Women: Applying the Intersectionality Research for Transgender Health Justice Framework.

Trans women are disproportionately incarcerated in the United States and Australia relative to the general population. Stark racial and ethnic disparities in incarceration rates mean that Black American and First Nations Australian trans women are overrepresented in incarceration relative to White and non-Indigenous cisgender and trans people. Informed by the Intersectionality Research for Transgender Health Justice (IRTHJ) framework, the current study drew upon lived experiences of Black American and First Nations Australian trans women to develop a conceptual model demonstrating how interlocking forces of oppression inform, maintain, and exacerbate pathways to incarceration and postrelease experiences. Using a flexible, iterative, and reflexive thematic analytic approach, we analyzed qualitative data from 12 semistructured interviews with formerly incarcerated trans women who had been incarcerated in sex-segregated male facilities. Three primary domains-pathways to incarceration, experiences during incarceration, and postrelease experiences-were used to develop the "oppression-to-incarceration cycle." This study represents a novel application of the IRTHJ framework that seeks to name intersecting power relations, disrupt the status quo, and center embodied knowledge in the lived realities of formerly incarcerated Black American and First Nations Australian trans women.

Incarceration risk, asset pricing, and black‐white wealth inequality

AbstractIntroductionHistorically, black Americans have been disproportionately at the bottom quantiles of the wealth distribution. As the choice of making any investment that can increase future wealth requires equating an asset's price to its return adjusted by a stochastic discount factor, this article considers if black‐white differences in the risk of incarceration, which can reduce the intertemporal marginal rate of substitution in consumption, matters for black‐white differences in wealth.MethodsWith repeated cross‐section data from the U.S. General Social Survey, we estimate the parameters of ordinal regression treatment specifications of individual wealth levels to measure the effects of incarceration risk on wealth.ResultsParameter estimates reveal that individual wealth levels vary inversely with incarceration risk. As black Americans have relatively higher incarceration risks, this suggests that at least part of the black‐white wealth gap can be explained by racial differences in incarceration risk.ConclusionCriminal justice reforms that reduce black‐white disparities in incarceration rates could also reduce black‐white disparities in wealth.

Sentencing scorecards: Reducing racial disparities in prison sentences at their source

Research SummaryScorecards have become an increasingly common tool for public policy decision making about important issues in education, finance, and health care. Few scorecards have been applied in criminal justice and none has been developed to highlight racial disparities in incarceration. We constructed county‐level scorecards for racial disparities in incarceration rates for the New York State Permanent Commission on Sentencing. Using detailed data on felony cases in New York State between 2000 and 2014, including the specific penal law criminal offense, features of the underlying charges, and criminal history, we assembled a set of White defendants within each county that collectively resembled Black and Hispanic defendants in that county. Statewide, Black defendants were more likely to receive prison sentences than similar White defendants (43% vs. 40%). Some individual counties had much greater racial disparities with relative risks of prison as high as 1.36. We found similar results for Hispanic defendants.Policy ImplicationsEarly institutional support for our scorecard receded once racial disparities were flagged in specific, named counties. The scorecard was never deployed by the Commission. Commission members and the research team met with individual counties but the Commission was disbanded during this process. New York State still lacks a formal sentencing commission. We recommend future scorecard efforts come from legislative or executive mandates, requiring rigorous methods and public presentations.

Were California’s Decarceration Efforts Smart? A Quasi-Experimental Examination of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities

Over the last decade, California has undertaken one of the largest criminal justice reform efforts in recent U.S. history. However, little is known about the causal impact of these reforms on the overall incarceration rate and disparities in incarceration rates across demographic subgroups. Using a quasi-experimental synthetic control method and data from the Vera Institute of Justice and the U.S. Census Bureau, our results provide strong evidence that California’s reforms have substantially reduced the state’s overall incarceration rate, but that they have resulted in an increase in Latinx-White incarceration disparities. We also find suggestive evidence that the reforms have exacerbated Black-White incarceration disparities and disparities between men and women. Our study is especially relevant at a time when the United States is increasingly interested in reducing the population of people incarcerated and suggests that care must be taken to ensure that reform efforts do not increase incarceration disparities among demographic subgroups.

Revisiting Hawes: Social Capital and Racial Disparity in Incarceration Rates

Over the past twenty-five years, the U.S prison system has experienced continuous substantial increment in the prison population. At the same time, incarceration rates have risen by more than 300%, a phenomenon that many analysts have referred to as mass incarceration (DeFina & Hannon, 2013). This study investigates the various divergent impacts of social capital on policy egalitarianism in state outcomes. Notably, this paper reviews the relationships connecting social capital and incarceration rates, while analyzing the level of racial disparities in incarceration rates in the American states using a state-level panel data spanning 1980 to 2015. Building on work by Hawes (2017), we present a theoretical description and empirical examination for how social capital functions uniquely under different racial contexts using a newer dataset. The results suggest that there is a positive correlation between social capital and the incarceration of many African American which is more profound in some states than others.

Social Capital, Racial Context, and Incarcerations in the American States

AbstractThis article examines the differential effects of social capital on policy equity in state outcomes. Specifically, it explores the relationship between social capital and incarceration rates in the American states paying particular attention to racial disparities in incarceration rates. Building on work by Hero, I present a theoretical explanation and empirical support for how social capital operates differently under different racial contexts. I argue that social capital enhances social empathy in homogeneous contexts and social controls in diverse contexts. Using state-level longitudinal data on the contiguous states, I find that social capital is positively associated with incarcerations, but only for African Americans. Furthermore, the effects of social capital appear to be conditional on racial context where this relationship is stronger as minority group size increases.

Addressing the Race Gap in Incarceration Rates: An Agent Based Model

ABSTRACTUsing an agent-based model of incarceration, the authors conduct a series of simulation experiments testing the efficacy of policy interventions designed to address racial disparities in incarceration rates. The first experiment eliminates race-based sentencing disparities, and additional experiments eliminate race-based sentencing disparities and disrupt the clustering of incarcerated individuals in their social networks. Findings suggest that eliminating race-based sentencing disparities will not result in a substantial closing of the incarceration gap because the clustering of ex-offenders contributes to offender recidivism and disparities in incarceration rates. The model suggests that addressing sentencing biases combined with interventions designed to disrupt the clustering of incarcerated individuals would reduce race-based incarceration gaps. Policy implications based on these findings are discussed.

The contagious nature of imprisonment: an agent-based model to explain racial disparities in incarceration rates.

We build an agent-based model of incarceration based on the susceptible–infected–suspectible (SIS) model of infectious disease propagation. Our central hypothesis is that the observed racial disparities in incarceration rates between Black and White Americans can be explained as the result of differential sentencing between the two demographic groups. We demonstrate that if incarceration can be spread through a social influence network, then even relatively small differences in sentencing can result in large disparities in incarceration rates. Controlling for effects of transmissibility, susceptibility and influence network structure, our model reproduces the observed large disparities in incarceration rates given the differences in sentence lengths for White and Black drug offenders in the USA without extensive parameter tuning. We further establish the suitability of the SIS model as applied to incarceration by demonstrating that the observed structural patterns of recidivism are an emergent property of the model. In fact, our model shows a remarkably close correspondence with California incarceration data. This work advances efforts to combine the theories and methods of epidemiology and criminology.

Hispanics, Incarceration, and TB/HIV Screening: A Missed Opportunity for Prevention

Disparities in incarceration rates and in prison-based TB/HIV testing may contribute to health disparities in the communities most affected by incarceration. We analyzed Bureau of Justice Statistics surveys of federal and state prison inmates to assess TB and HIV screening rates for US-born Hispanics, foreign-born Hispanics, non-Hispanic blacks, and non-Hispanic whites. Screening rates were high overall but foreign-born Hispanic inmates had significantly lower odds of being tested for TB in both state (AOR 0.55) and federal prisons (AOR 0.31) compared to white inmates. Foreign-born Hispanics also had lower odds of being tested for HIV in state prisons and Hispanics had lower odds of being tested for HIV in federal prisons compared to white inmates. Screening for infectious diseases in state and federal prisons is high but Hispanics have higher odds of going untested; this has important consequences for prevention of further transmission in the communities to which they return.

Teaching & Learning Guide for: ‘Basic Challenges to Prisoner Reentry’

Teaching & Learning Guide for: ‘Basic Challenges to Prisoner Reentry’

SHOULD CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDS BE UNIVERSALLY AVAILABLE?

At current incarceration rates, roughly 9% of all males born today will serve time in prison at some point in their lives. By race and ethnicity, the comparable figures are 4% for white males, 16% for Hispanic males, and 28% for black males (U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1997). Ample research now documents that having spent time in prison worsens one’s employment prospects through several potential channels. First, employers are strongly averse to hiring ex-offenders, a finding that has been born out in both audit studies (Pager, 2003) as well as employer interviews (Holzer et al., 2004). Second, spending time in prison may prohibit the accumulation of valuable work experience and even erode one’s labor market skills. In conjunction with the large increases in U.S. incarceration rates in recent decades, these facts suggest that criminal history records represent an increasingly important barrier to employment for young, less-skilled men. Moreover, given racial disparities in incarceration rates, the increasing salience of this characteristic is likely to exacerbate racial inequality in employment and earnings. In their provocative analysis, Kurlychek et al. (2006) raise the important question of whether unfettered employer access can be justified by the legitimate concerns of employers. More specifically, they assess whether the rate at which young offenders desist from offending with time since the last offense merits limiting employer access to arrest and conviction information for sufficiently distant past offenses. This question is important and timely given the large increase in the pool of ex-offenders (by some estimates nearly 5% of the adult male population). Moreover, as policies governing access have liberalized and information systems have advanced to the point where now several private firms offer cheap and quick criminal background checks, employers are checking the criminal history records of applicants at rates that are historically unprecedented (Holzer et al., 2004). Kurlychek et al. (2006) demonstrate that for a cohort of young men in Philadelphia the likelihood of a repeat offense declines precipitously with the time that has elapsed since the last offense. This pattern is consistent with both a causal effect of staying clean as well as a remaining population of former offenders that becomes increasingly selected with time since the