This comprehensive review synthesizes scholarly research on intimate partner violence (IPV) and restraining/protection orders (POs), addressing various dimensions including age, gender, race/ethnicity, and legal issues. Results show ongoing disparities in men’s accessibility to POs despite experiencing IPV at comparable rates to women and men’s experiences continue to be severely underrepresented in research. Similarly, no studies were found regarding the experiences of LGBTQ+ individuals. Consistent with previous research, gender biases in PO issuances were found, while historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups’ racial and ethnic minorities continue to encounter systemic difficulties. The review also highlights the importance of comprehensive studies on firearm dispossession in IPV contexts and the interplay of legal and extralegal factors influencing PO outcomes and victim experiences. Further, legislative reforms are crucial to address age and gender disparities in accessing POs, with variations in definitions of dating violence and access to specialized courts. Tailored interventions based on offender demographics are critical for effective IPV prevention, requiring further research on diverse populations. Despite progress, barriers to reporting and help-seeking persist, hindering survivor access to support services and legal protection. International studies reveal differing patterns of service utilization and legal outcomes, demonstrating the global challenge of IPV.
Read full abstract