Discussion Of Advance Directives Research Articles

Advance Directives

This study assessed nurses' knowledge, attitudes, experience, and confidence in discussing advance directives with patients. Concepts were measured using a questionnaire administered to 87 acute care registered nurses. Results indicated lack of knowledge about laws regarding advance directives, moderately negative attitudes toward advance directives, moderate confidence, and moderate experience with advance directives. The study supports the need to explore ways to assist nurses to be comfortable with advance directives discussions to improve quality patient care.

Evaluation of an Educational Intervention To Encourage Advance Directive Discussions between Medicine Residents and Patients

Most medical schools are remiss in preparing physicians in end-of-life communication skills. As a result, many residents are uncomfortable with approaching the patient, have not developed the skills required to discuss the patients' wishes, and avoid end-of-life conversations. To evaluate an educational intervention focused on teaching residents skills to discuss advance directives. Medicine Residents attended a morning report consisting of both didactic training and participation in a role-play exercise. Charts of inpatients were audited ten days prior to and five days subsequent to the intervention to ascertain if there was a documented do-not-resuscitate (DNR) discussion. Seventy-nine records of patients assigned to eight physicians who attended the intervention and who were responsible for patients before and after the intervention were reviewed. Of the patients assigned to these residents before the intervention, 32% had a documented DNR discussion. Thirty-four (34%) of the physicians had discussions after the intervention, demonstrating only minimal improvement. A single intervention may be inadequate to affect physician practices related to DNR discussions. Physicians may need more interactive, experiential learning opportunities and related supervision over the course of their training in order to improve these communication skills. A chart review that only records if a DNR discussion was documented in the medical record may not be the best tool to evaluate the success of this educational intervention. Improvement in attitudes and knowledge were not able to be measured.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Predictors of Advance Directive Discussions of Registered Nurses

The purpose of this study was to describe nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding advance directives. A secondary purpose was to examine predictors of advance directive discussions between nurses and patients. Seven-hundred and nineteen respondents, randomly selected from a list of registered nurses in the state of Ohio, completed mailed questionnaires. Descriptive t test, chi-square, and logistic regression statistics were used in the data analyses. The respondents were knowledgeable and possessed positive attitudes about advance directives. Higher self-perceived confidence in advance directive discussion skills and the experience of caring for at least one patient with a current advance directive were found to be significant predictors of advance directive discussions. These findings suggest that experience with advance directives documents is critical for nurses' comfort and that developing interventions to further nurses' confidence in their discussion skills may increase advance directive discussions.

Long-Term Care Experience in an Internal Medicine Residency Program

To assess the impact of long- term care experience on internal medicine residents through prequestionnaires and postquestionnaires. A prospective study conducted from February 1999 to March 2000. "Daughters of Israel," a 300-bed, long-term care institution in West Orange, New Jersey. Twenty-five 3rd-year medical residents (PGY3) from Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, and Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey, who each rotated in a long-term care setting. Medical residents completed validated questionnaires before and after their rotation. The questionnaire integrated three subcategories: self-reported skills, knowledge, and attitudes. Self-reported skills in performing: (a) Histories and physicals increased from mean of 3.65 to 4.48 (1 = low; 5 = high). P < 0.0005; (b) Functional assessment from mean of 3.47 to 4.53, P < 0.0005; and (c) Advance directive discussion from 3.78 to 4.37, P < 0.0005. All self-reported measures of knowledge in geriatrics increased significantly. All self-reported measures of attitudes toward the elderly also improved significantly. Career choice of geriatrics was not significantly altered by this experience. There was improvement in self-reported skills, knowledge, and attitudes for medical residents completing a rotation in the nursing home. These conclusions were based on validated questionnaires and prospective data. Our results support recommendations by the American Medical Directors Association (AMDA)the American Geriatric Society (AGS) to include the long-term care setting as a site for the geriatric education of medical residents.

Improving Rates of Advance Directive Discussions Among Managed Care Nursing Home Enrollees

Background Discussions about advance directives should be offered to all nursing home residents. Managed Medicare programs for nursing home residents allow for the development of performance improvement initiatives to ensure that these discussions occur and are documented. Purpose To assess the effectiveness of an intervention to increase discussion and documentation of advance directives for enrollees in a managed Medicare program for nursing home residents, and to evaluate whether this intervention affected preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and hospitalization among enrollees. Subjects Participants were 4,248 enrollees in a managed Medicare program in 1996, and 6,598 enrollees in 1997, in Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. Design Descriptive study of a quality improvement initiative. Methods A chart review was conducted in the fall of 1996 to determine the prevalence of documented advance directive discussions among all enrollees, and the preferences regarding CPR and hospitalization. Because the discussion rates varied across sites, and were lower than expected, each site developed strategies to improve advance directive discussion and documentation. One year later, a similar survey was conducted to determine the efficacy of the interventions, as well as to assess the impact, if any, on rates of desire for CPR and hospitalization. Results Documented discussions of advance directives increased across the six sites from 73% to 85% (P < 0.001). The overall percentage of patients desiring CPR did not change following the intervention (18%). However, there were geographical differences in the desire for CPR among enrollees, with those in Minnesota (8%), Arizona (11%), and Florida (12%) desiring it the least, and those in Massachusetts (20%), Georgia (29%), and Maryland (29%) desiring it the most. The overall percentage of desire for hospitalization decreased from 65% to 62% (P < 0.001). Enrollees in Georgia were most likely to want hospitalization (87%), and enrollees in Minnesota were the least likely to want hospitalization (57%). Conclusions In a managed care program, documentation of advance directive discussions can be increased with focused efforts. Overall, most enrollees did not desire CPR, but a majority desired hospitalization. Despite the similarity of interventions and program philosophy across sites, significant geographic variations in desire for CPR and hospitalization remained. Discussions about advance directives should be offered to all nursing home residents. Managed Medicare programs for nursing home residents allow for the development of performance improvement initiatives to ensure that these discussions occur and are documented. To assess the effectiveness of an intervention to increase discussion and documentation of advance directives for enrollees in a managed Medicare program for nursing home residents, and to evaluate whether this intervention affected preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and hospitalization among enrollees. Participants were 4,248 enrollees in a managed Medicare program in 1996, and 6,598 enrollees in 1997, in Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. Descriptive study of a quality improvement initiative. A chart review was conducted in the fall of 1996 to determine the prevalence of documented advance directive discussions among all enrollees, and the preferences regarding CPR and hospitalization. Because the discussion rates varied across sites, and were lower than expected, each site developed strategies to improve advance directive discussion and documentation. One year later, a similar survey was conducted to determine the efficacy of the interventions, as well as to assess the impact, if any, on rates of desire for CPR and hospitalization. Documented discussions of advance directives increased across the six sites from 73% to 85% (P < 0.001). The overall percentage of patients desiring CPR did not change following the intervention (18%). However, there were geographical differences in the desire for CPR among enrollees, with those in Minnesota (8%), Arizona (11%), and Florida (12%) desiring it the least, and those in Massachusetts (20%), Georgia (29%), and Maryland (29%) desiring it the most. The overall percentage of desire for hospitalization decreased from 65% to 62% (P < 0.001). Enrollees in Georgia were most likely to want hospitalization (87%), and enrollees in Minnesota were the least likely to want hospitalization (57%). In a managed care program, documentation of advance directive discussions can be increased with focused efforts. Overall, most enrollees did not desire CPR, but a majority desired hospitalization. Despite the similarity of interventions and program philosophy across sites, significant geographic variations in desire for CPR and hospitalization remained.

Improving Rates of Advance Directive Discussions Among Managed Care Nursing Home Enrollees

Discussions about advance directives should be offered to all nursing home residents. Managed Medicare programs for nursing home residents allow for the development of performance improvement initiatives to ensure that these discussions occur and are documented. To assess the effectiveness of an intervention to increase discussion and documentation of advance directives for enrollees in a managed Medicare program for nursing home residents, and to evaluate whether this intervention affected preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and hospitalization among enrollees. Participants were 4,248 enrollees in a managed Medicare program in 1996, and 6,598 enrollees in 1997, in Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. Descriptive study of a quality improvement initiative. A chart review was conducted in the fall of 1996 to determine the prevalence of documented advance directive discussions among all enrollees, and the preferences regarding CPR and hospitalization. Because the discussion rates varied across sites, and were lower than expected, each site developed strategies to improve advance directive discussion and documentation. One year later, a similar survey was conducted to determine the efficacy of the interventions, as well as to assess the impact, if any, on rates of desire for CPR and hospitalization. Documented discussions of advance directives increased across the six sites from 73% to 85% (P < 0.001). The overall percentage of patients desiring CPR did not change following the intervention (18%). However, there were geographical differences in the desire for CPR among enrollees, with those in Minnesota (8%), Arizona (11%), and Florida (12%) desiring it the least, and those in Massachusetts (20%), Georgia (29%), and Maryland (29%) desiring it the most. The overall percentage of desire for hospitalization decreased from 65% to 62% (P < 0.001). Enrollees in Georgia were most likely to want hospitalization (87%), and enrollees in Minnesota were the least likely to want hospitalization (57%). In a managed care program, documentation of advance directive discussions can be increased with focused efforts. Overall, most enrollees did not desire CPR, but a majority desired hospitalization. Despite the similarity of interventions and program philosophy across sites, significant geographic variations in desire for CPR and hospitalization remained.

Assessing capacity to participate in discussions of advance directives in nursing homes: findings from a study of the Patient Self Determination Act.

To better understand the implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) in long-term care, with a focus on the informing process as it affects advance directives. Retrospective cohort study of nursing home admissions, using medical record reviews, and a companion qualitative survey using key informant interviews. Eleven nursing homes in Connecticut. A total of 600 residents randomly selected from six randomly chosen nursing homes and 19 key informants selected from five purposely sampled nursing homes in Connecticut. Institutional compliance with the PSDA requirement to provide written information about advance directives at admission and aspects of the informing process, including to whom the information is given. Compliance with the PSDA requirement to provide information at admission is high (90.7 of admissions in the post-PSDA cohort received information within 1 week of admission). However, in nearly 70% of admissions in which information was provided, someone other than the residents received the information. Staff often cited the resident's cognitive impairment as a reason for excluding residents from this informing process. However, even among those residents judged to be alert and oriented at admission, someone other than the resident received the information 47.7% of the time. Substantial numbers of residents may be inappropriately excluded from participating in discussions because of difficulties in determining decisional capacity to discuss future treatment wishes. The research highlights the difficulties of enhancing resident participation and autonomy in long-term care through procedural regulations such as the PSDA. More reliable methods of determining resident decisional capacity are needed to integrate the full intent of the PSDA into clinical practice in long-term care.

Decisions about Enteral Tube Feeding among the Elderly

To determine choices about enteral tube feeding and factors associated with deciding to accept or forego this intervention in a group of ambulatory non-demented older individuals. Descriptive survey. Thirty four volunteers from a senior adult day center and 34 volunteers from the residential care section of a multilevel long-term care institution, mean age 77.8. Structured interview using a hypothetical clinical vignette in simplified language, story-book format depicting an irreversibly and severely impaired state of health. Choice of whether to accept or forego enteral tube feeding based on the clinical vignette. Thirty four (50%) decided to accept and 34 (50%) chose to forego enteral tube feeding in the situation presented in the vignette. No demographic, cognitive, or affective factors were associated with the decision. Presentation of the vignette and associated questions were not anxiety-provoking or upsetting to the vast majority of participants. A hypothetical clinical vignette depicting a state of severely impaired health resulted in 34 (50%) of 68 ambulatory non-demented older individuals deciding to accept enteral tube feeding. No factors we examined were strongly associated with the decision. The vignette and discussion were not anxiety-provoking when presented in the format used in this study. Advance-directive discussions about enteral tube feeding and other health care decisions, using understandable hypothetical clinical vignettes that describe risks and benefits that might influence decisions, should be encouraged in the practice of geriatric medicine.