The ontology of the body has been an ongoing object of discussion within various contexts, in particular those concerning the corporeal and its relation to gender or culture. To date, there are two main schools of thought concerning body and gender relations that posit the body and its gender as distinct, suggesting the autonomy of the body and conversely asserting that the body is always already a mark of culture. In this regard, this paper discusses these two schools of thoughts through a close examination of texts selected from three main collections – The Body: Classic and Contemporary Readings, Body and Flesh: A Philosophical Reader and The Body Reader: Essential Social and Cultural Readings. The critical reading of these selected texts forms part of a large body of research that informs the development of a critical framework for reading images of the gendered body. Although the texts examined in this paper are limited to the above sources, it is sufficient to illustrate that there is a consistent pattern of argument that constitutes the two lines of thought. I include reference to Judith Butler's ideas concerning the body as a discursive construct and Foucault's theory of power relations in the context of formulating the idea of the body, discourses pertinent to the corporeal and its enculturation. On the whole, this paper aims to initiate a comparative reading of the two lines of argument concerning the body and its gendering in order to propose the body as an open text rather than enforcing a resolution that would either privilege the body as autonomous to culture or the purely textual body devoid of its flesh.
Read full abstract