No AccessSIG 12 Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationArticle1 Jan 2018A Glossary of Behavior Analytic Terms for Speech-Language Pathologists' Considerations for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Tracy Vail Tracy Vail Department of Speech Language Pathology, Let's Talk Speech & Language Services, Inc.Raleigh, NC Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG12.80 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In At its core, productive collaboration between speech-language pathologists and behavior analysts requires effective communication between both parties. Successful communication can be gained in part through mutual training on terminology, principles, and practices of each field. The purpose of this article is to familiarize speech-language pathologists with key behavior analytic terms and principles as they relate to practices in augmentative and alternative communication. Where possible, parallel terms and practices within speech-language pathology are presented to highlight commonalities between the fields. In addition, this article will detail important considerations for augmentative and alternative communication intervention as guided by the behavior analytic terms and principles discussed. References American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP). Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/Practice/Interprofessional-Education-Practice/ Google Scholar Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. (2014). Professional and ethical compliance code for behavior analysts [Ethical compliance code]. Retrieved from https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/170706-compliance-code-english.pdf Google Scholar Brady, N. C., Bruce, S., Goldman, A., Erickson, K., Mineo, B., Ogletree, B. T., … Wilkinson, K. (2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention.American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Carbone, V. J., Morgenstern, B., Zecchin-Tirri, G., & Kolberg, L. (2010). The role of the reflexive-conditioned motivating operation (CMO-R) during discrete trial instruction of children with autism.Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(2), 110–124. Google Scholar Cardon, T. (2017). Speech-language pathologists and behavior analysts: Perspectives regarding theories and treatment of autism spectrum disorder.Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 2(1), 27–46. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Esch, B. E., Carr, J. E., & Grow, L. L. (2009). Evaluation of an enhanced stimulus–stimulus pairing procedure to increase early vocalizations of children with autism.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 225–241. Google Scholar Finke, E., Davis, J., Benedict, M., Goga, L., Kelly, J., Palumbo, L., … Waters, S. (2017). Effects of a least-to-most prompting procedure on multisymbol message production in children with autism spectrum disorder who use augmentative and alternative communication.American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 26, 18. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0187 Google Scholar Hanlon, E., Larson, L., Bellone, B., Hansalia, S., & Hutt, L. (2005). Incidental teaching: What is it? How do I do it? Do you take data on that? [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Events/convention/handouts/2008/2158_Hanlon_Erin Google Scholar Hartzheim, D. (2017). Augmentative and alternative communication in autism.In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Handbook of treatments for autism spectrum disorder (pp. 269–288). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. Google Scholar Koegel, R. L., Openden, D., & Koegel, L. K. (2004). A systematic desensitization paradigm to treat hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli in children with autism in family contexts.Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29(2), 122–134. Google Scholar Koehler-Platten, K., Grow, L. L., Schulze, K. A., & Bertone, T. (2013). Using a lag reinforcement schedule to increase phonemic variability in children with autism spectrum disorders.The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29(1), 71–83. Google Scholar Lodi, S., & Greer, R. D. (1989). The speaker as listener.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51(3), 353–359. Google Scholar MacDuff, G. S., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism.In C. Maruice, G. Green, & R. M. Fox (Eds.), Making a difference: Behavioral interventions for autism (pp. 37–50). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Google Scholar Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations.The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 191–206. Google Scholar Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 248–264. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Miltenberger, G. R. (2001). Behavior modification principles and procedures (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Google Scholar National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Persons With Severe Disabilities. (n.d.) Definition of communication and appropriate targets. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/NJC/Definition-of-Communication-and-Appropriate-Targets/ Google Scholar Newman, B., Reeve, K., Reeve, S., & Ryan, C. (2003). Behaviorspeak: A glossary of terms in applied behavior analysis. New York, NY: Dove and Orca. Google Scholar Schielfelbusch, R. L. (1969). Preface.In F. L. Girardeau & J. E. Spradlin (Eds.), A functional analysis approach to speech and language (ASHA Monograph 14). Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/Monographs14.pdf Google Scholar Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: AVB Press. Google Scholar Tsiouri, I., Schoen Simmons, E., & Paul, R. (2012). Enhancing the application and evaluation of a discrete trial intervention package for eliciting first words in preverbal preschoolers with ASD.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(7), 1281–1293. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research.Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6 Google Scholar Zangari, C. (2012, July18). PrAACtical suggestions: Writing goals for people learning AAC. Retrieved from http://praacticalaac.org/praactical/praactical-suggestions-writing-goals-for-people-learning-aac/ Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 3Issue 12January 2018Pages: 80-98 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Nov 23, 2017Revised: Jan 19, 2018Accepted: Jan 23, 2018 Published in issue: Jan 1, 2018 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2018 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...