Few recent manuscript discoveries have aroused as much excitement and curiosity, both within academia and among the general public, as the Bristol Merlin fragments (identified for the first time in 2019). Tether, Chuhan-Campbell, and Pohl’s edition presents the seven fragments in a format that is accessible and easy to navigate, introducing the reader both to the fragments themselves and the principles that underlie processes of editing and translation. Through exploring the possible, as well as the probable, Tether, Chuhan-Campbell, and Pohl provide a vivid and compelling narrative that illustrates the importance of interdisciplinary scholarship while remaining aware of its limitations. The approach taken, which draws upon palaeographic, codicological, historical, and linguistic analysis, in combination with the extensive visual apparatus provided, offers a robust introduction to the Bristol Merlin fragments that is suitable for a diverse readership. Chapter one, ‘Codicological and Palaeographic Analysis’, sets the Bristol Merlin fragments in the context of other contemporary manuscripts of the Suite Vulgate du Merlin. Having identified two distinct hands at work, the editors use palaeographical evidence to substantiate their suggested date for the manuscript (1250–1275). The editors describe the differences between the two hands, alongside a comparative table of letters, and images of the junctures between hands. The chapter subsequently explores the fragments’ use first as pastedowns (evidenced by extant glue residue on the manuscript leaves) and then as flyleaves for a four-volume edition of Jean Gerson’s complete works (88-91/SR39). This analysis is supported with diagrams that show the order, orientation, and movement of the fragments, and images of the book clasps. The section closes with one of the chapter’s central ideas, that ‘it is just possible – if unprovable – that the manuscript from which the fragments derive had been intended, or at least was used, as an exemplar for the production of further copies’ (16).