Like sociologists who use “class” and “stratification”, and physicists who use “black hole”, researchers who investigate homelessness and housing issues use metaphors. To name just a few, we hear of “sliding” into homelessness, “pathways”, “revolving doors”, “exit points” and homeless and housing “careers”. “Pathways” and “careers” are very popular among researchers and regularly appear in national and international journals, and in the titles of funded research. This paper examines the use of such metaphors in research about homelessness as it is influenced by, and contributes to, the general discourse about its explanation, the alleged characteristics of people who are homeless and how they are expected to change their circumstances. It poses several questions, including: What social function do such metaphors perform? Do they contribute to the discourse of homelessness and, if so, how? What is conveyed about people who are homeless when such figures of speech are used about them and their circumstances? Do the metaphors reflect the stated experience of people who are homeless? The analysis applies the work of George Lakoff who, for at least two decades, has investigated the role of metaphors in such varied circumstances as the Gulf Wars, debates between liberals and conservatives over “family values”, and welfare and social security policy issues in the United States. The paper will also briefly mention the metaphors used in policies such as “Mutual Obligation” in Australia, thus exploring the intersections between unemployment and homelessness discourses. While acknowledging their diverse meanings, and valorizing and acknowledging the necessity of metaphors in any learning, including research, the perspective is advanced that many metaphors are part of a certain way of perceiving and explaining homelessness which are not always neutral. Simultaneously, some metaphors may contradict that part of the research which demonstrates that homelessness has its antecedents in structural factors while reinforcing the dominant discourse which claims that homelessness is a “choice” and the residualist explanations associated with it.