SESSION TITLE: Critical Care Posters SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Posters PRESENTED ON: October 18-21, 2020 PURPOSE: Vasopressin (AVP) discontinuation strategies vary significantly despite its widespread use as an adjunctive agent in the treatment of vasodilatory shock. Several studies have looked at clinical outcomes associated with the discontinuation sequence of norepinephrine and AVP; however, these studies do not specify AVP de-escalation strategy. The purpose of our study is to compare the effect of gradual taper (GT) versus abrupt discontinuation (ADC) on the rates of clinically significant hypotension in patients recovering from vasodilatory shock. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective chart review of critically ill adult patients admitted to medical and surgical intensive care units from January 2016 to December 2019. The inclusion criterion was the confirmed administration of AVP infusion as an adjunct to catecholamine-based vasopressor therapy for at least one hour. Exclusion criteria included a primary diagnosis of cardiogenic shock, treatment with vasopressin as a sole vasopressor agent, vasopressin use for diabetes insipidus or organ donation, or transition to comfort care. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically significant hypotension after the initiation of vasopressin titration. Clinically significant hypotension was defined as hypotension requiring an increase or re-initiation of vasopressin, increase or re-initiation of catecholamine vasopressor, administration of fluid bolus, or a combination of these interventions. Secondary endpoints included duration of therapy and the number of vasopressors required. Additionally, ICU length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients screened, a total of 46 patients were analyzed (15 in GT and 31 in ADC). Overall, the ADC group had a higher incidence of clinically significant hypotension, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (51.6% vs 26.7%, p = 0.11). While there were no differences in demographics or SOFA scores, the GT group tended to be on more vasopressors (3 vs 2, p = 0.05). In addition, of the 11 patients who received phenylephrine, the duration of therapy (59 hours vs 5 hours, p = 0.008) and the maximum dose (380 mcg/min vs 100 mcg/min, p = 0.0226) was higher in the GT group. There were no differences in ICU LOS or mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that, upon shock recovery, the abrupt discontinuation of vasopressin infusion was associated with numerically higher rates of clinically significant hypotension than gradual taper, although not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in LOS or in-hospital mortality. A larger study is needed to confirm these findings. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The abrupt discontinuation of vasopressin may be relatively safe as it did not increase LOS or mortality. However, a gradual taper approach may be preferred in more profound shock, given the reduced rate of rebound hypotension. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Ola Elnadoury, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Bhaskara Garimella, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Andrew Lehr, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Anthony Lubinsky, source=Web Response