Abstract BACKGROUND In Crohn’s disease (CD), dose escalation on biologic therapy may be required to maintain effectiveness, while adverse events or non-response, among other factors, may lead to lack of persistence. Understanding persistence while on labeled maintenance dose is particularly important in bio-experienced patients with CD, as they may have reduced response to subsequent lines of therapy. This analysis compared persistence while on labeled maintenance dose among bio-experienced patients on ustekinumab versus adalimumab in the United States (US). METHODS Adults with CD initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date) between 09/23/2016 (ustekinumab approval for CD in the US) and 08/01/2019 were selected from IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database. Patients were bio-experienced (≥1 claim for another CD-indicated biologic in the 12 months baseline period pre-index date). Patients with other auto-immune diseases at baseline were excluded. Cohorts were balanced on baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weights. Persistence to the index agent while on labeled maintenance dose was defined as (1) no gaps between days of therapy supply >120 days for ustekinumab (2 x 8-week on-label maintenance dose interval) or >60 days for adalimumab (2 x days of supply mode) and (2) no dose change relative to the US label maintenance dose. It was assessed from index date until the earliest of discontinuation (event), dose change during maintenance phase (censoring), or last day of supply (censoring). Weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline classes of biologics were used to assess the outcome at 12 months post-index. RESULTS 903 bio-experienced patients with CD were included in the ustekinumab cohort (mean age 40.9 years old; 57.1% female) and 525 in the adalimumab cohort (mean age 41.3; 56.3% female). During the baseline period, 71.1% and 72.6% used corticosteroids, 41.2% and 40.8% used immunomodulators, and 11.1% and 12.6% had a prior CD-related surgery, in the ustekinumab and adalimumab cohorts, respectively. At 12 months post-index, the probability of persisting on the index biologic while on labeled maintenance dose was higher in the ustekinumab cohort versus adalimumab cohort (78.8% vs. 67.8%; Fig. 1). Patients in the ustekinumab versus adalimumab cohort had a 71% higher rate of persistence while on labeled maintenance dose (hazard ratio [HR] 1.71; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-2.23; P-value: <0.001*). CONCLUSIONS Bio-experienced patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab were significantly more persistent while on labeled maintenance dose compared to patients initiated on adalimumab. These results confirm results on persistence to biologics in bio-experienced patients with CD from a prior study.
Read full abstract