Discontinuation Of Acetylsalicylic Acid Research Articles

Current Management of Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures Receiving Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy

Proximal femur fractures (PFF) pose a major challenge in elderly patients with severe comorbidities and receiving antithrombotic therapy since according to the latest guidelines the surgery should be performed as soon as possible, preferably within 24 hours, to reduce mortality and morbidity. This review outlines the practical approach to surgical management of PFF that relies on increasing evidence of safety of early surgery in patients with PFF receiving antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. We have also used information from the existing evidence-based guidelines for elective/planned surgery in patients with antithrombotic therapy. The practical approach can be summarised as follows: • Antiplatelet therapy - discontinuation of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel in monotherapy or in combination is not necessary prior to surgery. In case of bleeding, antifibrinolytic therapy is recommended as well as administration of platelet concentrate which is rarely needed. • In patients taking warfarin, reversal of its effects is recommended by early administration of vitamin K to allow surgery to be performed within 24 hours. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) as a second-line drug is reserved for extreme cases only. Warfarin therapy is resumed 24 hours after surgery. • Direct oral anticoagulants must be discontinued 24-48 hours prior to surgery, possibly longer depending on the type of drug, time of administration of the last dose, and renal function. In extreme cases, an antidote (idarucizumab, off-label andexanet) can be administered prior to surgery, or PCC in case they are unavailable. Anticoagulation therapy is resumed in 24-48 hours. • Neuraxial anaesthesia is possible when ASA is taken by the patient and in case of effective warfarin reversal. • In early surgery and rapid restart of anticoagulant therapy, bridging therapy with LMWH is not indicated except for in cases with extreme risk of thrombosis. Key words: proximal femur fracture, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, perioperative management.

Monoterapia com inibidores dos receptores P2Y12 em pacientes tratados por meio de intervenção coronária percutânea

Since the mid-1990s, the dual antiplatelet therapy, consisting of the association between acetylsalicylic acid and a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the core of thrombosis prevention after coronary stent implantation, regardless of the models used. It is also used to prevent the occurrence of atherothrombotic events in the late phase after the intervention. The clinical presentation of coronary artery disease influences the duration of dual therapy, which tends to be longer in treated cases of acute coronary syndrome (usually for one year), when compared to cases of chronic coronary disease (often for up to 6 months). After this period, the P2Y12 inhibitor is usually discontinued, and monotherapy with aspirin is maintained. However, in the last two decades, it has been observed that prolonged use of two associated antiplatelet agents predisposes treated cases to bleeding complications, with potentially severe consequences – including increased mortality. Thus, alternatives that minimize this risk have been considered and evaluated, such as early discontinuation of acetylsalicylic acid (between 1 and 3 months after discharge), or the so-called monotherapy with P2Y12 inhibitors, aiming to reduce bleeding without compromising prevention of ischemic events. In the last decade, a series of randomized clinical trials evaluated this hypothesis, generally resulting in reduced bleeding complications, although not necessarily of those classified as major, with no significant increase in the most relevant cardiovascular events. This review discusses the main results of these clinical trials and their potential clinical implications for routine cardiology practice.

Aspirin withdrawal: A risk factor for ischemic stroke severity.

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) cessation, is suggestive of a rebound phenomenon laying the ground for ischemic stroke (IS) re-occurrence but nothing is known about its implication for IS severity (ISS). Thus, the aim of our study is to examine whether or not aspirin withdrawal is a risk factor for ISS. This study, recruited patients having presented an IS in the following 2 weeks of ASA withdrawal, matched with treatment free cases. ISS was evaluated in all patients at admission using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months' follow-up. Fifty cases were included in this study and fifty, manually matched, controls. ISS analysis found that the case group had a more severe stroke at admission (mean NIHSS: 12.76 (±7.319) in cases vs 10.04 (±5.562) in controls, P=0.039), with ASA discontinuation judged as a risk factor directly related to ISS regardless of the underlying cardiovascular risk factors (using the multivariate analysis). Our study's findings suggest that aspirin interruption over a 15-days period could result in a more severe IS in the acute phase. To our knowledge, no study has ever discussed this outcome, shedding the light on the pressing need for larger studies with various withdrawal periods to support these data.

Impact of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) on postoperative hemorrhage in spinal lumbar surgery: Should preoperative ASA be discontinued for elective surgery?

ObjectiveThe application of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) represents high evidence in the aging society due to primary and secondary prevention in cardiovascular disease and stroke. However, this presents a challenge for neurosurgeons in terms of preoperative and postoperative management of care. This study aimed to analyze the risk of bleeding by applying ASA before lumbar spinal surgery. MethodsRetrospective analysis of medical records of 3051 patients was performed from 2008 to 2018 who underwent lumbar surgery at our institution. The risk of postoperative hemorrhage was compared in patients treated with ASA versus patients without ASA treatment. Additionally, the relationship between discontinuation of ASA preoperatively (≥7 days) or no previous history of ASA versus continuation with ASA (<7 days) on postoperative hemorrhage was analyzed. ResultsPostoperative hemorrhagic were observed in 2.1% (n = 63) of all lumbar operations. In 421 patients, the effect of ASA (<7 days) was still persistent at the time of surgery (ASA impact group). Of these, 12 (2.85%) patients had a hemorrhage. No significant differences were found in comparison to the No ASA impact group (p = 0.272). Sex (p = 0.003), hypertension (p = 0.015), recurrent surgery (p = 0.001) and use of hemostatic agents (p = 0.023) had a significant impact on postoperative hemorrhage. ConclusionThe continuation of ASA medication is not associated with increased risk of postoperative hemorrhage after spinal surgery. However, sex, hypertension, recurrent surgery and the use of hemostatic agents under continued ASA treatment were found to be associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage.

Early discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy via acetylsalicylic acid cessation in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions to reduce the bleeding risk

Early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and long-term aggressive antithrombotic treatment based on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are the most important elements in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The most studied and recommended for ACS is the 12-month DAPT (combination of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and P2Y 12 receptor antagonist). Bleeding events due to DAPT after ACS and after PCI forced the search for approaches aimed at reducing the risk of such complications, especially noticeable when using a powerful blocker of the P2Y 12 receptor of platelets. One of the recently identified solutions turned out to be early (1-3 months after the therapy initiation) discontinuation of ASA with continued administration of one antiplatelet agent (P2Y 12 receptor antagonist). The article provides arguments in favor of this approach.

AB0621 TOLERABILITY AND SAFETY OF ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Background:Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by an increased incidence of macro- and microvascular complications. Current evidences on efficacy, safety and tolerability of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in SSc patients are limited, and the indication to this treatment is based on the experience of each single centre or physician. Esophagus and stomach are the portions of the digestive tract that are more frequently affected by adverse events due to ASA exposure.Objectives:We evaluated the incidence of adverse events associated with low-dose ASA treatment in a cohort of patients affected by SSc.Methods:Demographic data and disease features of 302 patients affected by SSc treated with low-dose ASA were collected and patients were followed-up for a median period of 6.9 years (range: 0-20 years). The proportion of patients taking ASA for secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease was also noted. The incidence of discontinuation of the drug, gastrointestinal intolerance, bleeding and death in the observation period was recorded.Results:Patients had a median age of 54.0 years (19.6-89.4); 91.9% were female, 13.2% were smokers and 44.0% had a BMI≥30Kg/m2. The prevalence of ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and stroke was of 8.6%, 5.3% and 3.3%, respectively; 48.7% of the patient took ASA in primary cardiovascular prevention. Therapy started after a median disease duration of 4.8 years (range: 0.0- 30.1 years) since the first non-Raynaud symptom and 56.6% of patients had an early disease (less than three years of disease duration). During the observation period, 30 patients (14.3 per 1000 person-years) discontinued ASA after an average period of assumption of 4.6 years (range: 0.3-18.0 years). The main adverse events were heartburn, dyspepsia and hematochezia, recorded in 18 patients (8.6 per 1000 person-years). Eight of them (3.8 per 1000 person-years) had evidence of digestive tract bleeding. Five patients (2.4 per 1000 person-years) discontinued ASA due to recurrent epistaxis. Twenty-eight patients (13.4 per 1000 person-years) died in the follow-up period, 16 of these (7.6 per 1000 person-years) because of SSc-related causes. None of them had evidence of major bleeding. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the incidence of ASA discontinuation. The history of digital ulcers (Log rank test X24.7, p=0.037) and male sex (Log rank test X24.3, p=0.03) were associated with a higher cumulative ASA discontinuation rate due to gastrointestinal intolerance.Conclusion:In our cohort of SSc patients, ASA resulted safe and well tolerated in most cases, despite the risk of gastroesophageal abnormalities due to disease. Although this comforting results, taking in account the lack of controlled-randomized trials about efficacy and safety, the choice to start antiplatelet therapy with ASA should be mandatorily preceded by a careful evaluation of risks and benefits. Furthermore, an attentive monitoring for possible adverse effects is needed during ASA treatment. Patients with digital ulcers and male sex could present less drug tolerability.

Symptom Control of Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Under Maintenance Therapy With Daily Acetylsalicylic Acid.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) is defined by intolerance to cyclooxygenase 1 inhibitors, chronic rhinosinusitis with recurrent nasal polyps, and/or intrinsic bronchial asthma. Long-term administration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) after desensitization has been used to mitigate these sequelae, but the optimal dose and balancing symptom relief and side effects remain unsettled. Retrospective data analysis of 85 patients with NERD receiving maintenance therapy of 300 mg ASA was followed by questionnaires (our own, not validated and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20). We received responses from 55 patients and examined 30 of them clinically. Patients with no ASA-associated side effects were 56.4% (56 of 85 patients) of the cohort. In this study, 60% (33 of 55 patients) continued prophylaxis of 300 mg ASA daily for an average of 34.7 months. Elective surgery was the most frequent cause of discontinuation of ASA (21.8%; 12 of 55 patients). Rhinomanometry values were significantly improved with ASA (P < .05; Wilcoxon), but there was no significant reduction in nasal polyposis or improvement in olfaction at the time of follow-up examination. Minor clinical improvements were identified. Side effects were well tolerated by most patients, and no serious sequelae occurred. The indications for long-term ASA therapy in NERD patients remain unsettled.

Timing of Low-Dose Aspirin Discontinuation and the Influence on Clinical Outcome of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma

An appropriate time (5-7 days) of discontinuation of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in patients undergoing surgery for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is recommended. However, patient clinical deterioration often does not allow to wait the recommended time for surgery. Clear guidelines regarding the perioperative management of patients with ASA therapy are still lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcome, complications, and mortality of patients suffering from CSDHs who underwent urgent surgery or before and after 5 days of discontinuation of low-dose ASA. A retrospective 3-center study included patients treated for CSDH taking low-dose ASA. Aspirin was discontinued on hospital admission. Based on the timing of discontinuation, we classified patients in 3 groups: urgent (surgery at admission), surgery within 5 days, and surgery 5 days after discontinuation. Surgery consisted of minicraniotomy or burr holes. Variables analyzed were age, comorbidities, modified Rankin Scale, complications, rebleedings, and mortality. Outcome measures were acute rebleeding requiring surgery, recurrence, mortality, complications, and clinical conditions. The χ2 test and the Fisher exact test were used to compare variables. Logistic regression analysis was used for defining the impact on outcome measures. We enrolled 164 patients. After aspirin discontinuation, patients underwent surgery: on admission (69 cases [42.1%]), within 5 days (59 patients [36%]), and after 5 days (36 cases [22%]). No correlation was observed between time of discontinuation and outcome measures, including having a worse clinical outcome. Our data showed that the time of discontinuation of ASA does not influence outcome.

Burr-Hole Drainage for Chronic Subdural Hematoma Under Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid: A Comparative Risk Analysis Study.

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases typically affecting older people. Many of these patients have coronary artery disease and receive antiplatelet therapy, usually acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Despite growing clinical relevance, there is still a lack of data focusing on the perioperative management of such patients. The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative and postoperative bleeding and cardiovascular complication rates of patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH with and without discontinuation of low-dose ASA. Of 963 consecutive patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH, 198 (20.5%) patients were receiving low-dose ASA treatment. In 26 patients (13.1%), ASA was not discontinued (ASA group; ASA discontinuation ≤7 days); in the remaining patients (n= 172; 86.9%), ASA was discontinued at least for 7 days (control group). The primary outcome measure was recurrent cSDH that required revision surgery owing to clinical symptoms, whereas secondary outcome measures were postoperative cardiovascular and thromboembolic events, other complications, operation and hospitalization time, morbidity, and mortality. No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding recurrence of cSDH (P= 1). Cardiovascular event rates, surgical morbidity, and mortality did not significantly differ between patients with and without discontinuation of low-dose ASA. Given the lack of guidelines regarding perioperative management with antiplatelet therapy, our findings elucidate one issue, showing comparable recurrence rates with and without discontinuation of low-dose ASA in patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH.

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and bleeding risks with ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.

OBJECTIVE Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is a common procedure for the treatment of hydrocephalus following diverse neurosurgical conditions. Most of the patients present with other comorbidities and receive antiplatelet therapy, usually acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Despite its clinical relevance, the perioperative management of these patients has not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the peri- and postoperative bleeding complication rates associated with ASA intake in patients undergoing VP shunt placement. METHODS Of 172 consecutive patients undergoing VP shunt placement between June 2009 and December 2015, 40 (23.3%) patients were receiving low-dose ASA treatment. The primary outcome measure was bleeding events in ASA users versus nonusers, whereas secondary outcome measures were postoperative cardiovascular events, hematological findings, morbidity, and mortality. A subgroup analysis was conducted in patients who discontinued ASA treatment for < 7 days (n = 4, ASA Group 1) and for ≥ 7 days (n = 36, ASA Group 2). RESULTS No statistically significant difference for bleeding events was observed between ASA users and nonusers (p = 0.30). Cardiovascular complications, surgical morbidity, and mortality did not differ significantly between the groups either. Moreover, there was no association between ASA discontinuation regimens (< 7 days and ≥ 7 days) and hemorrhagic events. CONCLUSIONS Given the lack of guidelines regarding perioperative management of neurosurgical patients with antiplatelet therapy, these findings elucidate one issue, showing comparable bleeding rates in ASA users and nonusers undergoing VP shunt placement.

Association between low-dose acetylsalicylic acid reinitiation and the risk of myocardial infarction or coronary heart disease death.

In secondary cardiovascular prevention, discontinuation of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This study assessed the impact of ASA reinitiation on the risk of myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease death. Patients prescribed ASA for secondary cardiovascular prevention and who had had a period of ASA discontinuation of ≥90 days in 2000-2007 were identified from The Health Improvement Network (N = 10,453). Incidence of myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease death was calculated. Survival analyses using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were performed to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the risk of myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease death associated with ASA use patterns after the initial period of discontinuation. Individuals who were prescribed ASA during follow-up were considered reinitiators. The incidence of myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease death was 8.90 cases per 1000 person-years. Risk of myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease death was similar for current ASA users, who had been continuously exposed since reinitiation, and patients who had not reinitiated ASA (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.73). Among reinitiators, an additional period of ASA discontinuation was associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease death compared with no reinitiation (current users: hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.90; noncurrent users: hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.31-2.21). ASA reinitiation was not associated with a decreased risk of myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease death. This may be explained by confounding by indication/comorbidity, whereby higher-risk patients are more likely to reinitiate therapy. An additional period of ASA discontinuation among reinitiators was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease death.

Effect of esomeprazole on gastroduodenal erosions in patients at increased gastrointestinal risk treated with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid: A post-hoc analysis of the OBERON trial

Low-dose oral acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is associated with gastrointestinal (GI) effects, including gastroduodenal ulcers and erosions [1], which can impact on treatment success through non-adherence and ASA discontinuation [2,3]. The OBERON study showed that once-daily esomeprazole 40mg or 20mg reduced the occurrence of peptic ulcers in patients at risk for ulcer development taking low-dose ASA for the prevention of cardiovascular events [4]. In order to understand if this gastroprotective benefit was conferred to other relevant ASA-induced GI effects, additional analyses were conducted to examine the gastroprotective efficacy of esomeprazole.

Should patients taking aspirin for secondary prevention continue or discontinue the medication prior to elective, abdominal surgery? Best evidence topic (BET)

This best evidence topic was investigated according to a described protocol. The question asked was: should patients on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for secondary prevention stop or continue the medication prior to elective, abdominal surgery. Using the reported search 826 papers were found of which five represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The strongest evidence was from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) specifically looking at elective abdominal surgery, which showed no statistically significant difference between ASA continuation and discontinuation in terms of haemorrhagic or thrombotic events. Two other RCT's examined elective non-cardiac surgery but only a minor proportion (20.6% and 23.6%) of patients underwent abdominal surgery and data were unavailable regarding adverse events in these patients. However, one of these trials did show a 7.2% absolute risk reduction in postoperative cardiac adverse events when ASA was continued. One prospective cohort study found no difference between ASA maintenance and cessation except for longer duration of surgery in the ASA continuation group. Finally one recent retrospective cohort study revealed similar bleeding rates between ASA-treated and non-ASA-treated patients but increased cardiac complication rates in the ASA group.Only two studies compared continuation versus discontinuation of ASA, while the remaining three looked at patients on ASA versus those not on ASA. This heterogeneity in methodology makes it difficult to draw justifiable conclusions from the data. However, it appears that continuing ASA isn't associated with excessive bleeding. Further adequately powered trials with well-defined end points are needed to answer this important clinical question.

Cardiovascular and upper gastrointestinal bleeding consequences of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid discontinuation

It was the aim of this study to investigate whether low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) therapy for secondary cardiovascular prevention should continue, despite the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. We aimed to make a clinically meaningful benefit-risk assessment regarding the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal consequences of ASA discontinuation.This case-control study usedThe Health Improvement Network UK primary care database to identify patients aged 50-84 years during 2000-2007 with a first ASA prescription for secondary cardiovascular prevention (N = 39,513). New cases of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI)/coronary death (n=1,222), ischaemic stroke (IS)/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) (n= 673) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) (n = 169) were identified after a mean follow-up of 3.2, 3.4 and 4.0 years, respectively. ASA discontinuers before the index date were identified. Attributable risks associated with ASA discontinuation were calculated and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence annual economic data were used to estimate healthcare costs. The cumulative incidences of non-fatal MI/coronary death, IS/TIA and UGIB among ASA discontinuers within the first year of follow-up were 17, 11 and 1.6 per 1,000 persons, respectively. This corresponds to eight extra cardiovascular events, and a reduction of 0.4 UGIB events per year compared with current ASA users. Extrapolating to the UK population aged over 50 years, avoiding discontinuation of ASA could prevent 12,786 coronary and 7,672 cerebrovascular events/year, at the expense of 1023 extra UGIB events, saving approximately £100 million/year. In conclusion, preventing patients with cardiovascular disease from discontinuing ASA could result in substantial clinical and economic gains.

Discontinuation of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid therapy in UK primary care: incidence and predictors in patients with cardiovascular disease.

BackgroundDiscontinuation of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients taking low-dose ASA for secondary cardiovascular prevention. However, little is known about the rate of discontinuation in everyday clinical practice.ObjectivesTo assess the rate of low-dose ASA discontinuation in primary care, and identify factors that predict discontinuation.MethodsThe Health Improvement Network, a large UK primary care database, was used to identify patients aged 50–84 years who received at least two consecutive prescriptions for low-dose ASA for secondary cardiovascular or cerebrovascular prevention in 2000–2007 (n = 35,639). Discontinuation was defined as a period of at least 90 days after completion of the last prescribed course of ASA during which no repeat prescription was issued.ResultsDuring the study, 11,729 patients (32.9%) discontinued ASA therapy (mean follow-up 2.5 years). The discontinuation rate was lower in patients with ASA indicated for myocardial infarction than for other indications. The diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders during the study (overall odds ratio: 1.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.61–1.88) was associated with increased rates of ASA discontinuation, whereas co-prescription of a proton pump inhibitor from the start of ASA therapy was associated with a decreased rate of discontinuation (odds ratio: 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.75–0.86). Co-prescription of several other cardioprotective medications was also associated with a reduced risk of discontinuation, as were increasing age, prior hospitalization and overall number of co-medications.ConclusionContinuous co-prescription of a PPI with low-dose ASA may improve adherence and outcomes, particularly in patients at both cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risk.

A randomised controlled pilot trial to evaluate and optimize the use of anti-platelet agents in the perioperative management in patients undergoing general and abdominal surgery—the APAP trial (ISRCTN45810007)

Surgeons are increasingly confronted by patients on long-term low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). However, owing to a lack of evidence-based data, a widely accepted consensus on the perioperative management of these patients in the setting of non-cardiac surgery has not yet been reached. Primary objective was to evaluate the safety of continuous versus discontinuous use of ASA in the perioperative period in elective general or abdominal surgery. Fifty-two patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair or colonic/colorectal surgery were recruited to this pilot study. According to cardiological evaluation, non-high-risk patients who were on long-term treatment with low-dose ASA were eligible for inclusion. Patients were allocated randomly to continuous use of ASA or discontinuation of ASA intake for 5days before until 5days after surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of major haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications within 30days after surgery. A total of 26 patients were allocated to each study group. One patient (3.8%) in the ASA continuation group required re-operation due to post-operative haemorrhage. In neither study group, further bleeding complications occurred. No clinically apparent thromboembolic events were reported in the ASA continuation and the ASA discontinuation group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between both study groups in the secondary endpoints. Perioperative intake of ASA does not seem to influence the incidence of severe bleeding in non-high-risk patients undergoing elective general or abdominal surgery. Further, adequately powered trials are required to confirm the findings of this study.

Impact of Gastrointestinal Disease on the Risk of Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid Discontinuation

Impact of Gastrointestinal Disease on the Risk of Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid Discontinuation

A randomised controlled trial to evaluate and optimize the use of antiplatelet agents in the perioperative management in patients undergoing general and abdominal surgery- the APAP trial (ISRCTN45810007)

BackgroundDue to the increase of cardiovascular diseases acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has become one of the most frequently prescribed drugs these days. Despite the rising number of patients with ASA medication presenting for elective general and abdominal surgery and the potentially increased risk of hemorrhage in these patients, there are no clear, evidence-based guidelines for the perioperative use of antiplatelet agents. The present randomised controlled trial was designed to evaluate the safety and optimize the use of ASA in the perioperative management of patients undergoing general and abdominal surgery.Methods/DesignThis is a two-arm, monocenter randomised controlled trial. Patients scheduled for elective surgical treatment (i.e. inguinal hernia repair, cholecystectomy and colorectal resections) with ASA as a permanent medication are randomised equally to perioperative continuation or discontinuation of ASA. Patients who are randomised in the discontinuation group stop the administration of ASA five days prior to surgical treatment and start intake of ASA on postoperative day 5. Fifty-two patients will be enrolled in this trial. The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative bleeding and cardiovascular events at 30 days after surgery. In addition a set of general as well as surgical variables are analysed.DiscussionThis is a randomised controlled two-group parallel trial designed to assess the safety and optimize the use of ASA in the perioperative management of patients undergoing general and abdominal surgery. The results of this pilot study build the basis for a confirmative randomised controlled trial that may help to clarify the use and potential risk/benefits of perioperative ASA medication in patients undergoing elective surgery.Trial registrationThe trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN45810007.

PP-023: A VERY LATE STENT THROMBOSIS ASSOCIATED WITH DISCONTINUATION OF ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID

Objective: A 75 years old diabetic, hypertensive patient would go to modified radical mastectomy surgery because of her mammarian cancer. A drug eluting stent (cypher, sirolimus eluting stent) was implanted 4 years ago. She had used dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year and continued to use aspirin. She had no chest pain, dyspnea in the preoperative evaluation, her exercise capacity was equivocal so a coronary computerized tomography (CT) was performed before the surgery: the Left anterior descending (LAD) stent was patent and there were hemodynamicly significant lesions in the distal parts of right coronary artery (RCA) and noncritic plaques in circumflex artery (Cx). But because delaying the surgery would increase the stage of cancer and low risk of surgery she had gone to mastectomy. Aspirin was stopped 3 daysbefore the surgery. Methods: After the successful mastectomy, routine ECG was performed. There was ST segment elevation in Leads V1–6, DI and AVL. She had no chest pain because of analgesics. Her cardiac enzymes were elevated. Results: Coronary angiography was performed and there was noncritic lesions in RCA, a 70–80% lesion in the proximal of the Cx, LAD stent was full of thrombus and there was no flow to the distal of the stent (figure 1). 6000 IU heparin bolus was given and 12IU/kg heparin was continued, clopidogrel 300 mg loading dose and 75 mg maintainance dose and aspirin 100 mg was started. 0.014 inch floppy wire was used to pass the thrombus, dilatation was performed by 2.0 × 20 mm and 3.0 × 20 mm (monorail maverick) balloons and 3.5x 30 mm bare metal stent (biotronik lekton motion) was implanted. Conclusions: Very late stent thrombosis is an uncommon but life-threatening complication after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease. Discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy is reported to be the most powerful predictor of stent thrombosis. PP-024 CORONARY ARTERY ANEURYSM AFTER DRUG ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION: CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Increased risk of stroke after discontinuation of acetylsalicylic acid

Discontinuation of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) therapy may increase the risk of ischemic events. This study evaluated the risk of ischemic stroke (IS) and TIA after low-dose ASA discontinuation in patients with cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease. The Health Improvement Network UK primary care database was used to identify a cohort of individuals aged 50-84 years with a first prescription for low-dose ASA (75-300 mg/day) for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events in 2000-2007 (n = 39,512). Individuals were followed up for a mean of 3.4 years to identify cases of IS/TIA. Nested case-control analyses were used to assess risk factors for IS/TIA, including low-dose ASA discontinuation. The overall incidence of IS/TIA was 5.0 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-5.4). IS/TIA was significantly more common in patients with a previous diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (relative risk [RR] 2.79; 95% CI 2.05-3.80) or atrial fibrillation (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.28-2.29) than in those without these conditions. Compared with current users of low-dose ASA, those who discontinued treatment 31-180 days before the index date had a significantly increased overall risk of IS/TIA (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.03-1.92). The most common reason for discontinuation was patient nonadherence. In patients prescribed low-dose ASA for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, discontinuation of low-dose ASA was associated with a 40% increase in the risk of IS/TIA compared with continuation of therapy. This study provides Class III evidence that discontinuation of low-dose ASA is associated with a 40% increased risk of stroke within 31-180 days of discontinuation.