Discontinuation Criteria Research Articles

Phase 2 randomized study evaluating safety, efficacy, and optimal dose of ABBV-400 in combination with fluorouracil, folinic acid, and bevacizumab in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

TPS308 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer. In the metastatic (m) setting, the 5-year relative overall survival is approximately 15%. Conventional treatment comprises fluorouracil (5-FU)–based chemotherapy. Recently, targeted therapies have been studied for specific molecular subtypes. c-Met overexpression frequently occurs in a variety of tumors, including CRC. ABBV-400 is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate composed of the monoclonal antibody telisotuzumab conjugated to a potent topoisomerase 1 inhibitor payload. Preliminary data from the first-in-human study of ABBV-400 in patients with advanced solid tumors indicate encouraging efficacy of ABBV-400 monotherapy in patients with third-line or later mCRC. This phase 2 randomized study evaluates the safety, efficacy, and optimal dose of ABBV-400 in combination with 5-FU, folinic acid (FA), and bevacizumab (bev) in patients with mCRC with progression after first line (1L) treatment. Methods: Global, open-label, phase 2 randomized controlled study (NCT06107413). Eligible patients (≥18 years) have confirmed unresectable mCRC and measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, are microsatellite stable or mismatch repair proficient, BRAF V600E wild type, and have progression after 1L combination chemotherapy ± an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody. Primary objectives are (a) optimize ABBV-400 dose in combination with 5-FU, FA, and bev; (b) evaluate the efficacy of the combination, using objective response and progression-free survival as dual primary endpoints; (c) evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination. Approximately 206 patients planned for enrollment in 2 stages: safety lead-in dose escalation (stage 1; n=30) and dose optimization (stage 2; n=176). In stage 1, patients receive escalating doses of ABBV-400 either every 2 weeks (Q2W; 0.8–2.4 mg/kg) or every 4 weeks (Q4W; 1.6–3.0 mg/kg) in combination with Q2W 5-FU (2400 mg/m 2 infusion), FA (200 mg/m 2 ), and bev (5 mg/kg) in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation of ABBV-400 uses a Bayesian optimal interval design, with target toxicity rate of 30%. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are assessed during cycle 1, with ≥6 DLT evaluable patients required to declare a dose safe for the dose-optimization stage. In stage 2, patients are randomized to up to 4 ABBV-400 dose cohorts (2 with Q2W and 2 with Q4W ABBV-400 schedule; all in combination with Q2W 5-FU, FA, and bev) and a comparator cohort (irinotecan [180 mg/m 2 ] + 5-FU [400 mg/m 2 bolus and 2400 mg/m 2 infusion] + FA [200 mg/m 2 ] + bev [5 mg/kg]; all Q2W). Patients are treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria are met. Enrollment was initiated in November 2023, with 3 patients enrolled as of January 4, 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT06107413 .

P-2258. Characterizing real world infection risk in multiple myeloma patients receiving teclistamab

Abstract Background Teclistamab is an anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) bispecific antibody used in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (MM) that induces durable responses but is associated with high rates of infectious complications. Real world data are needed to further characterize infection risk in patients receiving teclistamab.Table 1.Patient characteristics between infected and non-infected patients Methods A retrospective single-center study of teclistamab treated patients with relapsed, refractory MM from 1/1/2023 to 11/20/2023. Patients received teclistamab according to a step-up dosing regimen, with Day 0 defined as first step-up dose. The primary objective was to report the incidence, type, and timing of infection. Differences in demographics and clinical characteristics were described between infected and non-infected patients.Table 2.Patient outcomes on teclistamab between infected and non-infected patients Results 19 patients received teclistamab; median age 72 years, 73.7% white, and 26.3% with Karnofsky performance status ≥ 80 (Table 1). 11 (57.9%) patients developed infections and 5 had more than one infection. There were 3 bacteremias, 6 other bacterial infections (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, cholangitis, osteomyelitis, sinusitis), 6 respiratory viral infections, and 2 cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations. There were no documented infections with herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, Pneumocystis jirovecii, or fungal pathogens. The median time to any infection was 17 days (range 2, 266), with a median of 20 days (range 2, 123) to bacterial infection and 31 days (range 3, 266) to viral infection (Figure 1). Patient characteristics and antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies were largely similar between infected and non-infected patients (Table 1). There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and increased use of steroids in the infected group. 10 patients in the infected group discontinued teclistamab (p=0.013) and 3 died (p=0.108, Table 2).Figure 1.Cumulative incidence of any infection (A), bacterial infection (B), and viral infection (C). Conclusion The incidence of infection was high amongst patients receiving teclistamab and increased with time. Individuals with infections were more likely to discontinue teclistamab. Further data are needed to inform guidance regarding infection prevention strategies and criteria for teclistamab interruption or discontinuation in this MM population with few other treatment options. Disclosures Kevin Rakszawski, MD, AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau|Pfizer: Speakers Bureau Seema Naik, MD, ADC Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|ADC Therapeutics: Board Member|ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Board Member|Janssen: Honoraria|Onclive: Honoraria|Onclive: Speaker

Response to ritlecitinib with or without narrow-band ultraviolet B add-on therapy in patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo: Results from a phase 2b extension study.

Ritlecitinib demonstrated efficacy in a phase 2b trial of nonsegmental vitiligo. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ritlecitinib with add-on narrow-band ultraviolet B (nbUVB) phototherapy in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo. Following a 24-week, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging period, patients received ritlecitinib 200mg for 4weeks then 50mg for 20weeks, with or without nbUVB phototherapy 2x/week. Missing data were handled using last observation carried forward and observed case (OC). Forty-three patients received ritlecitinib+nbUVB and 187 received ritlecitinib-monotherapy. Nine patients receiving ritlecitinib+nbUVB discontinued due to nbUVB group-specific efficacy criteria requiring >10% improvement in % change from baseline (% change from baseline) in Total-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index at week 12. At week 24, mean % change from baseline in Facial-VASI score was -57.0 vs -51.5 (last observation carried forward; P=.158) and -69.6 vs -55.1 (OC; P=.009), for ritlecitinib+nbUVB vs ritlecitinib-monotherapy, respectively. Mean % change from baseline in Total-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index at week 24 was -29.4 vs -21.2 (last observation carried forward; P=.043) and -46.8 vs -24.5 (OC; P<.001), respectively. nbUVB addition to ritlecitinib was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Exploratory analysis; discontinuation criterion applied only to the ritlecitinib+nbUVB group; small sample size. Ritlecitinib alone and with nbUVB therapy improved facial and total body repigmentation and was well tolerated. Adding nbUVB may improve ritlecitinib efficacy.

Risk assessment of persistent incidental pulmonary subsolid nodules to guide appropriate surveillance interval and endpoints.

Guidelines for the follow-up of pulmonary subsolid nodule (SSN) vary in terms of frequency and criteria for discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate the growth risk of SSNs and define appropriate follow-up intervals and endpoints. The immediate risk (IR) and cumulative risk (CR) of SSN growth were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method according to nodule consistency and size. Follow-up plans were proposed based on optimal growth risk threshold of 5%. 892 SSNs, comprising 833 pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) and 59 part-solid nodules (PSNs) were included. For pGGNs ≤ 6.6 mm, the CR exceeded 5% at every 3-year interval in the first 9 years. For pGGNs measuring 6.6-8.8 mm and >8.8 mm, the IR remained above 5% for the first 2-7 years, and the 2-year CR for pGGNs measuring 6.6-8.8 mm in the 8th and 9th years achieved 6.66%. For PSNs, the IR peaked in the 4th year (44%) and then declined. Therefore, triennial follow-up for 9 years is recommended for pGGNs ≤ 6.6 mm, annual follow-up for 7 years followed by biennial follow-up for 2 years for pGGNs measuring 6.6-8.8 mm, annual follow-up for 7 years for pGGNs > 8.8 mm, and continuous annual follow-up until nodule growth for PSNs.

Efficacy and Safety of a Therapy Combining Sintilimab and Chemotherapy With Cryoablation in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Protocol for a Phase II, Pilot, Single-Arm, Single-Center Study.

Immunotherapy has significantly advanced lung cancer treatment, particularly in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with overall response rates between 50% and 60%. However, about 30% of patients only achieve a stable disease state. Cryoablation has shown potential to enhance immunotherapy by modifying the tumor's immune microenvironment through the release of antigens and immune factors. Addressing how to boost the immune response in these patients is critical. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of immunochemotherapy in combination with cryoablation as a first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. This is a phase II, pilot, open-label, single arm, single center, interventional study. Patients with stage IIIB to IIIC or IV NSCLC with T staging ranging from T1 to T2b will receive sintilimab (200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and chemotherapy. After 2 cycles, the feasibility of cryoablation will be considered for those with stable disease by a multidisciplinary team. Cryoablation with 3 freeze-thaw cycles will be performed for the main lesion. The third cycle of systemic therapy will begin 7 (SD 3) days after cryoablation. A total of 20 patients will be enrolled. Treatment will continue until the disease progresses, there is unacceptable toxicity, a participant withdraws consent, other discontinuation criteria are met, or the study reaches completion. The primary objective is to assess progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary objective is to assess efficacy through duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and the safety profile. The exploratory objective is to investigate and compare immune factor changes after 2 cycles of immunochemotherapy and at 1, 3, and 7 days after cryoablation. Survival time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate median PFS and OS. Any adverse events that occur during the trial will be promptly recorded. The project was funded in 2024, and enrollment will be completed in 2025. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2027. This study will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of the combination of immunochemotherapy and cryoablation as a first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. Although it has a limited sample size, the findings of this study will be used in the future to inform the design of a fully powered, 2-arm, larger-scale study. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06483009; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06483009. PRR1-10.2196/64950.

Burosumab (Crysvita)

Canada’s Drug Agency recommends that Crysvita be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) in adult patients if certain conditions are met. The previous recommendation for Crysvita when initiated in pediatric patients who are at least 1 year of age and in whom epiphyseal closure has not yet occurred, continues to apply to those patients. Crysvita should only be covered to treat patients aged 18 years or older who have a diagnosis of XLH supported by classic clinical features of adult XLH and a confirmed PHEX gene variant, and who have not previously received it. Patients should also have a specific threshold for kidney function or reduced kidney function if it is confirmed not to be due to nephrocalcinosis, bone pain that is caused by XLH or osteomalacia, and have not had a sufficient response to conventional therapy (therapy with active vitamin D and oral phosphate). If a PHEX gene variant is not confirmed, XLH diagnosis can be confirmed with a serum intact fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) level by a Kainos assay. Crysvita should only be reimbursed if it is prescribed by a physician who works in a comprehensive team of health care providers experienced in the diagnosis and management of XLH and if the cost of Crysvita is reduced. Reimbursement may be renewed on an annual basis for patients who do not meet any of the discontinuation criteria, which are the development of hyperparathyroidism, nephrocalcinosis, fasting hypophosphatemia, or fractures or pseudofractures based on X-ray.

7220 Menopause Has a Beneficial Influence on the Evolution of Prolactinomas: a Study in 95 Patients

Abstract Disclosure: S. Constantinescu: None. C. Nava: None. F. Chasseloup: None. P. Chanson: Consulting Fee; Self; Eli Lilly &amp; Company, Recordati, Ipsen, Novo Nordisk. O. Alexopoulou: None. D.M. Maiter: Consulting Fee; Self; Ipsen, Recordati, Pfizer, Inc. The natural occurrence of menopause is considered to have beneficial effects in women with a prolactinoma and represents a window of opportunity for successful dopamine agonist (DA) withdrawal. Strong evidence for these effects remains however scarce. We retrospectively analyzed data from 95 women undergoing menopause (Mp) (FSH&amp;gt;35 U/L) while still treated with DA (cabergoline (CAB) in 82) for a prolactinoma diagnosed at a mean age of 38.0 ± 8.0 years. The pituitary tumor was a microadenoma in 66 and a macroadenoma in 29 (invasive in 12). Our objectives were to identify the influence of menopause on the evolution of treated prolactinomas and on the risk of recurrence after DA withdrawal. In post-menopausal women still treated with DA (median dose of 0.50 mg CAB/week or equivalent), a significant decrease in median prolactin (PRL) was observed from a premenopausal value of 15.1 µg/L to 10.7 µg/L 3-6 months after Mp (n=64, P=0.05) and to 7.7 µg/L 24 months after Mp (n=43, P &amp;lt; 0.001). There was also a significant reduction in median coronal tumor surface at 24 months, from 12.6 to 7.1 mm² (p &amp;lt; 0. 01). DA treatment was withdrawn in 53 women (56%) after a median interval of 26 months after menopause (range: 3-262). Strict criteria for discontinuation were fulfilled in 52 of them: a normal PRL for at least 24 months under a cabergoline dose ≤ 0.50 mg/week and a more than 50%-reduction in tumor surface area for macroadenomas. Among them, 37 women (71%) remained in remission during a median follow-up period of 26 months (range: 6-176), while 15 (29%) had an asymptomatic biological recurrence after a median duration of 6 months (range: 2-47). Only one woman showed minimal tumor regrowth. 12/15 of the biological recurrences of hyperprolactinemia occurred within the first year after withdrawal and the estimated probability of remission at 5 years was 66%. Multivariate analysis showed that the only independent predictor of recurrence was the PRL value observed 3 to 6 months after DA discontinuation (p = 0.028). Estrogen-progestin replacement therapy, given in 21 women, did not influence these outcomes. In conclusion, we confirm that menopause has a beneficial effect on the evolution of treated and untreated prolactinomas. When using strict criteria for DA withdrawal in the post-menopausal period, a sustained clinical and biological remission can be expected in two-thirds of women, and when recurrence occurs, it is usually mild and asymptomatic. Presentation: 6/2/2024

9281 Menopause Has a Beneficial Influence on the Evolution of Prolactinomas: a Study in 95 Patients

Abstract Disclosure: S. Constantinescu: None. C. Nava: None. F. Chasseloup: None. P. Chanson: Consulting Fee; Self; Eli Lilly &amp; Company, Recordati, Ipsen, Novo Nordisk. O. Alexopoulou: None. D.M. Maiter: Consulting Fee; Self; Ipsen, Recordati, Pfizer, Inc. The natural occurrence of menopause is considered to have beneficial effects in women with a prolactinoma and represents a window of opportunity for successful dopamine agonist (DA) withdrawal. Strong evidence for these effects remains however scarce. We retrospectively analyzed data from 95 women undergoing menopause (Mp) (FSH&amp;gt;35 U/L) while still treated with DA (cabergoline (CAB) in 82) for a prolactinoma diagnosed at a mean age of 38.0 ± 8.0 years. The pituitary tumor was a microadenoma in 66 and a macroadenoma in 29 (invasive in 12). Our objectives were to identify the influence of menopause on the evolution of treated prolactinomas and on the risk of recurrence after DA withdrawal. In post-menopausal women still treated with DA (median dose of 0.50 mg CAB/week or equivalent), a significant decrease in median prolactin (PRL) was observed from a premenopausal value of 15.1 µg/L to 10.7 µg/L 3-6 months after Mp (n=64, P=0.05) and to 7.7 µg/L 24 months after Mp (n=43, P &amp;lt; 0.001). There was also a significant reduction in median coronal tumor surface at 24 months, from 12.6 to 7.1 mm² (p &amp;lt; 0. 01). DA treatment was withdrawn in 53 women (56%) after a median interval of 26 months after menopause (range: 3-262). Strict criteria for discontinuation were fulfilled in 52 of them: a normal PRL for at least 24 months under a cabergoline dose ≤ 0.50 mg/week and a more than 50%-reduction in tumor surface area for macroadenomas. Among them, 37 women (71%) remained in remission during a median follow-up period of 26 months (range: 6-176), while 15 (29%) had an asymptomatic biological recurrence after a median duration of 6 months (range: 2-47). Only one woman showed minimal tumor regrowth. 12/15 of the biological recurrences of hyperprolactinemia occurred within the first year after withdrawal and the estimated probability of remission at 5 years was 66%. Multivariate analysis showed that the only independent predictor of recurrence was the PRL value observed 3 to 6 months after DA discontinuation (p = 0.028). Estrogen-progestin replacement therapy, given in 21 women, did not influence these outcomes. In conclusion, we confirm that menopause has a beneficial effect on the evolution of treated and untreated prolactinomas. When using strict criteria for DA withdrawal in the post-menopausal period, a sustained clinical and biological remission can be expected in two-thirds of women, and when recurrence occurs, it is usually mild and asymptomatic. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Expert consensus on clinical application of Fufang Ejiao Syrup in treating syndrome of Qi and blood deficiency in cancer-related fatigue

Fufang Ejiao Syrup has shown promising clinical effectiveness and safety in treating the syndrome of Qi and blood deficiency in cancer-related fatigue. Expert consensus on clinical application of Fufang Ejiao Syrup in treating syndrome of Qi and blood deficiency in cancer-related fatigue was formulated by a panel of 33 multidisciplinary experts in Chinese and western clinical medicine, methodology, and pharmacy fields from China. They conducted a questionnaire survey among clinicians and systematically reviewed the existing literature on Fufang Ejiao Syrup. The consensus was grounded in the best available evidence, enriched by the experts' expe-rience. It has been reviewed and published by the China Association of Chinese Medicine, with the reference number GS/CACM 340-2023. The internationally recognized GRADE system was used to evaluate the evidence quality of the consensus, resulting in the deve-lopment of 7 recommendations and 20 consensus suggestions through the nominal group technique. The document outlined the indications, traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis, timing of intervention, dosage, criteria for discontinuation, and safety profile of Fufang Ejiao Syrup for treating cancer-related fatigue. Finally, the consensus underwent extensive national consultation and peer review through expert meetings and correspondence reviews. This consensus is applicable to healthcare professionals at all levels of medical institutions and serves as a reference for the rational use of drugs in clinical practices.

FLAIR: A Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Treatment-Naïve NSCLC Patients Harboring EGFR 21L858R Mutation

IntroductionOsimertinib, the 3rd generation EGFR-TKI, has emerged as standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with exon 21 L858R mutation showed lower efficacy with EGFR-TKIs than those with 19Del mutation, even with osimertinib, it remains an unmet medical need to further improve the efficacy in L858R population. We present the rationale and design for FLAIR (NCT04988607), which will investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab versus osimertinib monotherapy in treatment-naïve recurrent or metastatic NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation. Materials and MethodsFLAIR is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open label study, which is initiated by Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (CTONG2002). Patients age ≥18 years with primary recurrent or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC who are treatment-naïve with documented EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation is eligible. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily plus bevacizumab 15mg/kg every 3 weeks or osimertinib monotherapy 80 mg once daily until progression or another discontinuation criterion is met. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include: overall survival rate at 24 months, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), central nervous system (CNS) PFS, CNS ORR and safety. ResultsFLAIR has completed the enrollment, and results are expected in the fourth quarter of 2025 (depending on the actual event rate). ConclusionsThis study will offer better perspectives on the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy in treatment-naïve recurrent or metastatic NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, providing valuable guidance for clinical practice.

Emergent fault friction and supershear in a continuum model of geophysical rupture

Important physical observations in rupture dynamics such as static fault friction, short-slip, self-healing, and the supershear phenomenon in cracks are studied. A continuum model of rupture dynamics is developed using the field dislocation mechanics (FDM) theory. The energy density function in our model encodes accepted and simple physical facts related to rocks and granular materials under compression. We work within a 2-dimensional ansatz of FDM where the rupture front is allowed to move only in a horizontal fault layer sandwiched between elastic blocks. Damage via the degradation of elastic modulus is allowed to occur only in the fault layer, characterized by the amount of plastic slip. The theory dictates the evolution equation of the plastic shear strain to be a Hamilton–Jacobi (H-J) equation, resulting in the representation of a propagating rupture front. A Central-Upwind scheme is used to solve the H-J equation. The rupture propagation is fully coupled to elastodynamics in the whole domain, and our simulations recover static friction laws as emergent features of our continuum model, without putting in by hand any such discontinuous criteria in the formulation. Estimates of material parameters of cohesion and friction angle are deduced. Short-slip and slip-weakening (crack-like) behaviors are also reproduced as a function of the degree of damage behind the rupture front. The long-time behavior of a moving rupture front is probed, and it is deduced that equilibrium profiles under no shear stress are not traveling wave profiles under non-zero shear load in our model. However, it is shown that a traveling wave structure is likely attained in the limit of long times. Finally, a crack-like damage front is driven by an initial impact loading, and it is observed in our numerical simulations that an upper bound to the crack speed is the dilatational wave speed of the material unless the material is put under pre-stressed conditions, in which case supersonic motion can be obtained. Without pre-stress, intersonic (supershear) motion is recovered under appropriate conditions.

Long-term hepatitis B surface antigen kinetics after nucleos(t)ide analog discontinuation in patients with noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis B

Background and aimFew studies have reported hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) kinetics after nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) discontinuation in patients with noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The study specifically investigated long-term HBsAg kinetics after NA discontinuation. MethodsBetween January 2014 to January 2024, this study prospectively enrolled 106 outpatients with noncirrhotic CHB who met the discontinuation criteria after NA consolidation treatment. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed after NA discontinuation. ResultsNinety-six patients who finished 5 years of follow-up were included. HBsAg remained undetectable in 29 patients with end of treatment (EOT) HBsAg negativity. Among 67 patients with EOT HBsAg positivity, HBsAg seroclearance occurred in 12 (17.9%) patients with an estimated annual incidence of HBsAg seroclearance of 3.6%. Patients with EOT HBsAg levels of ≤1000 IU/mL had a higher HBsAg seroclearance rate than those with EOT HBsAg levels of >1000 IU/mL (33.3% vs. 5.4%). The proportion of patients with HBsAg ≤1000 IU/mL increased during follow-up. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the EOT HBsAg level was an independent factor for HBsAg seroclearance and an HBsAg level decline exceeding 1 log10 IU/mL. The optimal EOT HBsAg cutoff for both HBsAg seroclearance and an HBsAg level decline exceeding 1 log10 IU/mL was 359 IU/mL. ConclusionsPatients with EOT HBsAg negativity experienced no relapse and maintained HBsAg seroclearance during 5 years of follow-up after NA discontinuation. A higher HBsAg seroclearance rate can be obtained in patients with EOT HBsAg levels of ≤1000 IU/mL during 5 years of follow-up after NA discontinuation. Close monitoring and proper NA retreatment are recommended to guarantee the safety of NA discontinuation. Clinical trial numberClinicaltrials.gov number NCT02883647.

Reasonability of Frequent Laboratory Analyses during Therapy with Nivolumab and Nivolumab+Ipilimumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma during the Phase 2 Clinical Trial TITAN-RCC.

In clinical trials, laboratory values are assessed with high frequency. This can be stressful for patients, resource intensive, and difficult to implement, for example in office-based settings. In the prospective, multicentre phase 2 TITAN-RCC trial (NCT02917772), we investigated how many relevant changes in laboratory values would have been missed if laboratory values had been assessed less frequently. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (n = 207) received a response-based approach with nivolumab and nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts for non-response. We simulated that laboratory values were obtained before every second dose instead of every dose of the study drug(s). We assessed elevated leukocyte counts, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, creatinine, amylase, lipase, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Dose delay and discontinuation criteria were defined according to the study protocol. With the reduced frequency of laboratory analyses, dose delay criteria were rarely missed: in a maximum of <0.1% (3/4382) of assessments (1% [2/207] of patients) during nivolumab monotherapy and in a maximum of 0.2% (1/465) of assessments (1% [1/132] of patients) during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts. An exception was lipase-related dose delay which would have been missed in 0.6% (25/4204) of assessments (7% [15/207] of patients) during nivolumab monotherapy and in 0.8% (4/480) of assessments (3% [4/134] of patients) during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts, but would have required the presence of symptoms. Discontinuation criteria would have only been missed for amylase (<0.1% [1/3965] of assessments [0.5% (1/207) of patients] during nivolumab monotherapy, none during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts) and lipase (0.1% [5/4204] of assessments [2% (4/207) of patients] during nivolumab monotherapy; 0.2% [1/480] of assessments [0.7% (1/134) of patients] during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts). However, only symptomatic patients would have had to discontinue treatment due to amylase or lipase laboratory values. In conclusion, a reduced frequency of laboratory testing appears to be acceptable in asymptomatic patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab.

Vandetanib in locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer refractory to radioiodine therapy.

The VERIFY study aimed to determine the efficacy of vandetanib in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) that is either locally advanced or metastatic and refractory to radioiodine (RAI) therapy. Specifically, VERIFY is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase III trial aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of vandetanib in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic RAI-refractory DTC with documented progression (NCT01876784). Patients were randomized 1:1 to vandetanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included best objective response rate, overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. Patients continued to receive randomized treatment until disease progression or for as long as they were receiving clinical benefit unless criteria for treatment discontinuation were met. Following randomization, 117 patients received vandetanib, and 118 patients received a placebo. Median PFS was 10.0 months in the vandetanib group and 5.7 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.55-1.03; P = 0.080). OS was not significantly different between treatment arms. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) of grade ≥3 were reported in 55.6% of patients in the vandetanib arm and 25.4% in the placebo arm. Thirty-three deaths (28.2%; one related to study treatment) occurred in the vandetanib arm compared with 16 deaths (13.6%; two related to treatment) in the placebo arm. No statistically significant improvement was observed in PFS in treatment versus placebo in patients with locally advanced or metastatic, RAI-refractory DTC. Moreover, active treatment was associated with more adverse events and more deaths than placebo, though the difference in OS was not statistically significant.

Final overall survival results from phase 3 SPOTLIGHT study evaluating zolbetuximab + mFOLFOX6 as first-line (1L) treatment for patients (pts) with claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2)+, HER2−, locally advanced (LA) unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

4036 Background: The phase 3 SPOTLIGHT study showed statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with 1L zolbetuximab + modified folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin regimen (mFOLFOX6) vs placebo (PBO) + mFOLFOX6 in pts with CLDN18.2+, HER2−, LA unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma at prespecified interim and later updated analyses. We present the prespecified final OS analysis. Methods: Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to zolbetuximab IV 800 mg/m2 (cycle 1, day [D] 1) followed by 600 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks) + mFOLFOX6 IV (D1, D15, D29) for four 42-day cycles or to PBO + mFOLFOX6; pts without PD continued with zolbetuximab or PBO, + folinic acid and 5-FU at investigator’s discretion, until PD or discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST v1.1 by IRC. OS was a key secondary endpoint; additional secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Ad hoc analyses examined PFS and OS in per-protocol set population (PPS; pts adherent to protocol) and time to progression (TTP) by best overall response (BOR). Results: At data cutoff (September 8, 2023), 565 pts were assigned to zolbetuximab arm (n = 283) or PBO arm (n = 282). In zolbetuximab vs PBO arms, median follow-up was 18.04 vs 17.91 mo for PFS and 33.28 vs 31.38 mo for OS, respectively. Efficacy results are summarized in Table. Median PFS and OS were significantly longer in zolbetuximab vs PBO arms. Separation of PFS and OS curves occurred earlier in the PPS population analysis (excluded majority of early withdrawals) compared with the ITT population. ORR was similar between treatment arms in ITT and pts with measurable lesions – despite this, TTP for patients with BOR of CR/PR was numerically longer in zolbetuximab vs PBO arms. Safety and tolerability were maintained with no new findings. Conclusions: Zolbetuximab + mFOLFOX6 continued to demonstrate statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS vs PBO + mFOLFOX6, with no new safety signals—supporting zolbetuximab + mFOLFOX6 as a new standard of care option for 1L treatment of pts with CLDN18.2+, HER2–, LA unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03504397 . [Table: see text]

Phase 2 study of livmoniplimab in combination with budigalimab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

TPS4189 Background: Patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often present with unresectable advanced/metastatic disease and have a poor prognosis. Gene expression profiles of HCC tumors suggest transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling as a possible mechanism of immune escape. First-in-class monoclonal antibody (mAb) livmoniplimab (livmo; ABBV-151) targets the GARP–TGF-β1 complex and prevents release of active TGF-β1. Budigalimab (budi) is an anti–PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) mAb. Promising clinical activity was seen with livmo + budi in a phase 1 study (NCT03821935); overall response rate=42% (5/12; n=4 per RECIST v1.1, n=5 per iRECIST) in pts with advanced HCC that progressed on/after a first-line (1L) systemic therapy not including a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. Approved ICI combinations have low response rates of ~20–30% in pts with 1L HCC; most will eventually experience relapse and require additional treatment options. This phase 2 trial will investigate dosing, safety, and efficacy of livmo + budi in pts with locally advanced/metastatic HCC that progressed after a 1L ICI-containing regimen. Methods: This open-label, randomized study (EU CT: 2022-502948-13-00) will enroll pts ≥18 years with locally advanced/metastatic HCC, evaluable or measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS ≤1, who experienced failure of an ICI-containing regimen in 1L HCC and completed a ≥28-day washout period for prior systemic treatment. Pts with active/untreated central nervous system metastases will be excluded. Primary objectives include identifying the optimal livmo dose in combination with budi and determining the recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D), and evaluating efficacy (best overall response rate) of livmo + budi. Secondary and exploratory objectives are to evaluate efficacy (duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival), safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), predictive biomarkers, and pt-reported symptoms and tolerability. Pts (n=120) will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive 400mg sorafenib BID/8-12mg lenvatinib QD orally (control; investigator choice), low- or high-dose IV livmo (selected based on mode of action, clinical efficacy and safety, and clinical PK/PD modeling) + IV budi Q3W in 21-day cycles. Pts will be treated until confirmed disease progression, other discontinuation criteria are met, or for 2 years (whichever comes first). A nonbinding futility interim analysis will be conducted after 60 pts (20 per cohort) are enrolled and had ≥2 tumor assessments, a primary analysis at ≥4 months after first dosing of the last enrolled pt, and the final analysis at completion of a 90-day safety follow-up after ≤2 years of study treatment. The RP3D for livmo will be selected based on all available preclinical and clinical data. Enrollment began in July 2023 and up to 60 sites in ~7 countries will be included. Clinical trial information: 2022-502948-13-00.

Molecular residual disease (MRD) analysis from the ADAURA trial of adjuvant (adj) osimertinib in patients (pts) with resected EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) stage IB–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8005 Background: Osimertinib (osi) is a third-generation, central nervous system-active EGFR-TKI, that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. Adj osi (3 years [yrs]) is recommended for resected EGFRm stage IB–IIIA NSCLC, based on significant improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the Phase III ADAURA study (NCT02511106). A trend towards an increased DFS event rate beyond 3 yrs suggests some pts may benefit from longer adj osi treatment (tx). We explored if plasma ctDNA-based, tumor-informed MRD could predict disease recurrence. Methods: Eligible pts (≥18 yrs [≥20 in Japan/Taiwan], WHO PS 0/1 with completely resected EGFRm [Ex19del/L858R] stage IB, II or IIIA [AJCC 7th edition] NSCLC) were randomized 1:1 to osi 80 mg once daily or placebo (pbo) until disease recurrence, tx completion (up to 3 yrs), or a discontinuation criterion was met. Personalized MRD panels (RaDaR, NeoGenomics) were used, comprised of ≤50 tumor-specific variants, based on whole exome sequencing of resected tumor tissue (variants identified in germline DNA removed). Plasma sample collection: baseline (BL; at randomization surgery and adj Ctx, if received), on tx (every 12 weeks [wks]), tx discontinuation, and post-tx completion (wk 12, wk 24, then every 24 wks until 5 yrs). Plasma samples were analyzed for detection of ctDNA (MRD+). Molecular recurrence or DFS (MRD/DFS) was defined as time from randomization to post-BL MRD+, disease recurrence, or death and was compared across arms. DFS was investigator-assessed. Results: Of 682 pts randomized, 245 (36%) had samples required to produce MRD panels, which were evaluable for 220 (32%) pts across both arms. In the osi vs pbo arms, 5/112 (4%) vs 13/108 (12%) pts were MRD+ at BL; 4/5 pts became MRD– during osi tx vs 0/13 pts on pbo. On tx, MRD detection had clinical sensitivity of 65% (62 MRD+/96 DFS+), specificity of 95% (118 MRD–/124 DFS–) and preceded a DFS event by a median (95% CI) of 4.7 (2.2, 5.6) months (mos) across both arms. Median follow-up time from randomization was 44.2 (95% CI 42.4, 49.1) and 19.1 (95% CI 11.1, 28.3) mos for osi and pbo arms, respectively. Overall, 86% (95% CI 78, 92) vs 36% (95% CI 27, 45) pts in the osi vs pbo arms were MRD/DFS event free at 36 mos (HR: 0.23; 95% CI 0.15, 0.36). MRD/DFS events in the osi arm were detected at any time post-BL in 28 (25%) pts, of whom 19/28 (68%) had events post-adj osi. Most (11/19 [58%]) MRD/DFS events detected occurred within 12 mos of osi tx completion. Conclusions: MRD+ preceded DFS events in most pts with a median lead time of 4.7 mos across both arms. MRD– was maintained for most pts during adj osi tx with the majority of MRD/DFS events occurring after osi tx completion. MRD detection could potentially identify a subset of pts likely to benefit from longer adj osi. Clinical trial information: NCT02511106 .

PRIMROSE: A modular phase 1/2a study of AZD3470, an MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor, in patients with MTAP deficient advanced solid tumors.

TPS3179 Background: Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is an epigenetic enzyme that catalyzes symmetric dimethylation of arginine substrates, regulating multiple cell processes. Deletion of the methylthioadenosine phosphorylase gene MTAP in tumor cells results in accumulation of the metabolite methylthioadenosine (MTA), a partial inhibitor of PRMT5, potentially rendering tumor cells susceptible to further PRMT5 targeting. Clinical activity of first-generation, non-selective PRMT5 inhibitors (PRMT5i) is limited by bone marrow toxicity due to lack of selectivity between normal cells and MTAP-deficient tumor cells. Second-generation PRMT5i, including AZD3470, should selectively target MTAP-deficient tumor cells whilst sparing normal cells. AZD3470 preferentially binds PRMT5 in the presence of MTA in MTAP-deficient tumor cells, inhibiting PRMT5 methylation activity, and is less effective in MTAP-proficient cells. PRIMROSE (NCT06130553) is a first-in-human, Phase 1/2a, open-label, multicenter study of AZD3470 as monotherapy and in combination with anti-cancer agents in patients with MTAP-deficient advanced / metastatic solid tumors. Methods: Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with MTAP-deficient advanced or refractory solid tumors, ≥1 prior line of treatment in the recurrent / metastatic setting, ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1, ECOG performance status 0/1, adequate organ and bone marrow function, and no prior treatment with PRMT5i. Module 1 will evaluate AZD3470 monotherapy. Part A (dose escalation) will enroll up to ~54 patients and follow a modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) design with once-daily dosing in 21-day cycles. Treatment will be given until progression or discontinuation criteria are met. Part B (dose optimization and expansion) will expand specific patient populations and / or tumor types, with up to ~30 patients per cohort; dosing will be based on safety and tolerability data from Part A. Further modules for combination treatments may be added based on emerging supportive data. The primary objectives are to assess safety and tolerability, including dose-limiting toxicities, and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of AZD3470. The secondary objective is evaluation of efficacy, including objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, change in tumor size, progression-free survival, and overall survival. An additional secondary objective in Module 1 is to assess pharmacokinetics. The study is planned to take place in ~20 centers across eight countries. The study was opened to enrollment in December 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT06130553 .

TOURMALINE: A phase 3b study of durvalumab with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens in advanced biliary tract cancer.

TPS4188 Background: In the Phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study (NCT03875235), durvalumab plus gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo + GC in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) with a manageable safety profile. To expand on TOPAZ-1, there is a need to further assess the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in combination with other gemcitabine (G)-based chemotherapy regimens used in aBTC, and in a more diverse population to reflect real-world clinical practice. Methods: TOURMALINE (NCT05771480) is a Phase 3b, single-arm, multicenter, international study. Approximately 140 adults with aBTC (intra- or extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder or ampulla of Vater carcinoma) will be enrolled. Key inclusion criteria include unresectable disease (advanced, metastatic), WHO/ECOG PS of 0–2, and no prior systemic therapy. Key exclusion criteria include any prior immune-mediated therapy and history of another primary malignancy. Participants will receive durvalumab 1500 mg IV plus an investigator-selected, G-based background chemotherapy; durvalumab will be administered Q3W when combined with a G-based chemotherapy Q3W (8 cycles of durvalumab) except for when combined with GC + S-1 Q2W, in which case durvalumab will be administered Q4W (4 cycles of durvalumab/8 cycles of chemotherapy). G-based chemotherapy will consist of G monotherapy, GC (for WHO/ECOG PS 2 participants only), G + oxaliplatin, G + carboplatin, GC + S-1, G + S-1, and GC + albumin-bound paclitaxel. Following the treatment period, durvalumab Q4W +/- chemotherapy (except for paclitaxel) may continue, at the investigator’s discretion, until discontinuation criteria are met. The primary endpoint is the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, assessed by the investigator to be possibly related to any study treatment within 6 months after initiation of durvalumab. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, progression-free survival, and duration of response. Enrollment is ongoing and planned in France, Germany, United States, Spain, Italy, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore. Clinical trial information: NCT05771480 .

BELLWAVE-010: A phase 3 study of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax versus venetoclax plus rituximab (VR) in previously treated patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).

TPS7089 Background: VR is a standard of care option for pts with CLL/SLL who have relapsed after ≥1 line of prior therapy. However, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of CLL. Nemtabrutinib is a BTK inhibitor that targets both wild type and C481-mutant forms of BTK. In the ongoing BELLWAVE-001 study, nemtabrutinib demonstrated manageable safety and durable antitumor activity in pts with R/R CLL/SLL with and without C481 mutations. The randomized, open-label, phase 3 BELLWAVE-010 study (NCT05947851) is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax versus VR as second-line or later treatment for pts with R/R CLL/SLL. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 years with active R/R CLL/SLL after ≥1 prior therapy per iwCLL 2018 criteria and an ECOG PS of 0-2. Approximately 720 pts will be enrolled in 2 parts. Part 1 is an open-label, nonrandomized dose escalation and confirmation phase to evaluate safety and determine the optimal dose of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax. Part 1 will enroll 30 pts to establish the dose of nemtabrutinib using a modified toxicity probability interval design. Pts will receive nemtabrutinib at 2 dose levels (45 mg PO QD starting dose, escalating to 65 mg PO QD) for 28 days, followed by nemtabrutinib + venetoclax (20-400 mg PO QD ramp up over 4 weeks). Part 2 is an open-label, parallel-group, randomized phase comparing the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax with VR. In part 2, approximately 690 pts will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either nemtabrutinib at the recommended dose for 28 days followed by the nemtabrutinib + venetoclax or venetoclax + rituximab (or rituximab biosimilar; 375 mg/m2 at week 6, followed by 500 mg/m2 every 4 weeks starting at week 10 until week 26 [total 6 doses]). Study treatment will continue for approximately 2 years or until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or other discontinuation criteria are met. Randomization will be stratified by BTK-C481 mutation status (detected vs not detected), geographic region (US/Canada vs Europe vs rest of world) and risk (high risk [del(17p) and/or TP53-mutated and/or IGHV-unmutated] vs low risk [absence of high-risk factors]). The primary end point for part 2 is progression-free survival by blinded independent central review (BICR) per iwCLL 2018 criteria. Secondary end points for part 2 are undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow at month 14 by central laboratory assessment, objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response by BICR per iwCLL 2018 criteria, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory end points are ORR including partial response with lymphocytosis, pharmacokinetics, and health-related quality of life. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05947851 .