Disclosure Statement Research Articles

Full-Thickness Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft Harvest

Background: Despite extensive evidence of excellent biomechanical and clinical outcomes of ligament reconstructions with bone-patellar tendon-bone, hamstring tendon, and quadriceps tendon autografts, these are not without limitations, including knee-related donor site morbidity, decreased range of motion, and potential for anterior knee pain. Therefore, researchers have explored other options, including the peroneus longus (PL) autograft. Indication: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (both primary and revision), as well as multiligament reconstruction, particularly in areas where access to allografts is limited. Surgical Technique: A 3-cm longitudinal skin incision is placed 2 fingerbreadths (or 3 cm) proximal to the tip of the lateral malleolus, and 3 mm posterior to the fibula. The PL and peroneus brevis tendons are identified and isolated, followed by a tenodesis at the distal limit of the incision. The PL is whipstitched proximal to the tenodesis site, and then incised between the tenodesis and whipstitched portion. A closed tendon stripper is inserted and advanced proximally until the PL graft is released. Discussion/Conclusion: PL autograft harvest has been shown to generate thicker and longer grafts relative to the semitendinosus, with demonstrated efficacy in terms of both biomechanical and clinical outcomes. Current literature points largely to a good safety profile, although there is still conflicting evidence in terms of foot and ankle morbidity and no mid- to long-term follow-up data available. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form.

Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and the Posterolateral Corner With a Single Combined Femoral Tunnel

Background: Posterolateral knee injuries can occur in 16% of patients with acute ligament injuries, and up to 70% have a combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. Studies have shown that, in different populations, the distance between the insertion of the popliteus tendon and the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) may be smaller than the 18.5 mm previously reported in the literature. When we have an associated injury of the ACL and the posterolateral corner (PLC), the confluence of tunnels in the lateral femoral condyle can be a potential problem during reconstruction surgery. Indications: The indication of this technique is the combined injury of the ACL and the PLC. Technique Description: The reconstruction is performed with 2 semitendinosus tendons and 1 gracilis tendon. The technique consists of making a tunnel in the lateral wall of the femur, from the outside-in, at the isometric point between the origin of the LCL and insertion of the popliteus tendon, and emerging in the inner wall of the lateral femoral condyle at the anatomic point of the ACL. The graft is passed from the tibia to the femur with the doubled gracilis tendon and the 2 simple semitendinosus tendons for the ACL graft. The remaining portions of the semitendinosus tendons are left for reconstruction of the PLC structures, with one of them going straight to the posterolateral tibial tunnel (reconstructing the popliteus tendon), and the other passing through the fibular head tunnel (reconstructing the LCL) and continuing from the fibular head to the posterolateral tibial tunnel (reconstructing the popliteofibular ligament). Results: Patients undergoing this technique achieved good functional outcomes and a failure rate similar to that reported in the literature for combined ACL and PLC reconstruction. Discussion/Conclusion: This technique is an excellent option for patients with the combined injury of the ACL and the PLC, avoiding the confluence of tunnels in the lateral femoral condyle. It presents good results and acceptable complication rates, compatible with the severity of this lesion. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Tibial-Sling Triangular Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Posterior Oblique Ligament Limb

Background: While most medial-sided knee injuries can be managed conservatively, high-grade injuries of the posteromedial corner have been reported to have less than optimal outcomes with conservative approaches, resulting in residual valgus and rotational instability. Consensus among experts postulates that treatment should be based on reconstructing both the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and the posterior oblique ligament (POL). We present a modified technique of a tibial-sling anatomic MCL reconstruction with a POL limb. Indications: High-grade injuries of the posteromedial corner, specifically injuries with medial joint gapping in extension or grade 3 medial-sided tears. Technique Description: The MCL is reconstructed with a semitendinosus autograft in a tibial sling, created by converging perpendicular bone tunnels at its anatomic tibial insertion, and fixed to a femoral tunnel in the isometric point just posterior and proximal to the medial epicondyle with the knee at 30° of flexion. That same single femoral tunnel will be shared by the two strands of the semitendinosus graft and a limb of gracilis autograft to reproduce the POL, passed through a tibial tunnel in the posteromedial margin of medial tibial condyle, and fixed in extension. Discussion/Conclusion: As recent evidence suggests that medial reconstruction should be preferred over repair, due to favorable complication and failure rates, we describe a technique that is both anatomic-based, reproducing the 2 main medial knee structures (sMCL, POL), and also cost-saving, with decreased need of fixation devices. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Harvesting the Quadriceps Tendon With a Minimally Invasive Approach

Background: This article describes a standardized, minimally invasive approach for harvesting the quadriceps tendon through a 2 to 3 cm transverse skin incision, presenting it as a viable option. Indications: This procedure is indicated for patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, or lateral collateral ligament reconstruction surgery using soft tissue quadriceps grafts. Technique Description: A transverse incision is made on the anterior face of the knee, followed by a longitudinal incision of the central third of the rectus femoris. We perform the distal detachment of the patella of the same tendon. Then, the tendon is extracted using a closed stripper. The graft is prepared and folded on itself, resulting in a double graft. Results: Twenty patients, 16 male and 4 female with complete rupture of ACL, were submitted to an ACL reconstruction using the quadriceps soft tissue graft with minimally invasive harvesting technique. The results were satisfactory for all patients. All patients showed good evolution in the immediate and late postoperative period, with no cases of joint stiffness, wound dehiscence, and no infections. Discussion/Conclusion: We can conclude that harvesting the quadriceps tendon with a minimally invasive approach is a valid and reliable option for the treatment of ligament tears of the knee. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form.

Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament With a Single Combined Femoral Tunnel

Background: Lesions of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) are the most common knee ligament injuries and, when they occur in isolation, they often progress with satisfactory outcomes using conservative treatment. However, MCL lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries in knee dislocations should be reconstructed to prevent failure of the central pivot. In knees with combined injuries involving the PCL and the MCL, the confluence of tunnels in the medial femoral condyle can be a potential problem during reconstruction surgery. Indications: The indication of this technique is the combined injury of the PCL and the MCL. Technique Description: The technique consists in the reconstruction of the PCL and the MCL with an Achilles tendon allograft. The bone plug of the graft is fixed on the tibial bed with the inlay technique. The graft passes through a single femoral tunnel drilled in the medial femoral condyle, with entrance point on the footprint of the PCL on the inner wall of the condyle and exit on the origin of the native MCL, near to the medial epicondyle. The graft is fixed in the femoral tunnel with an interference screw and continues to the isometric point of the anatomic insertion of the MCL in the tibia, where an interference screw is used to fix it. Results: Results from our group using this technique have shown good clinical outcomes, with complications and failure rates similar to other series in the literature. Discussion/Conclusion: This technique is an excellent option for surgeons, when an Achilles tendon allograft is available, to avoid confluence of tunnels in the medial femoral condyle. It presents good results and acceptable complication rates, compatible with the severity of this lesion. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Weave Technique for Reconstruction of Medial Collateral Ligament and Posterior Oblique Ligament: A Functional Percutaneous Approach Using Gracilis Tendon

Background: Injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is common. MCL injuries, with impairment of its superficial portion, associated with the deep portion, lead to valgus instability and extrusion of the medial meniscus, resulting in instability and increased pressure in the medial compartment, with consequent damage to the cartilage. We can synthesize this set of structures as the medial meniscocapsular complex. Treating medial, superficial, and deep capsular meniscal complex together aims to restore the normal anatomy, stability, and function of the medial meniscus. Indications: • Anterior cruciate ligament with MCL grade III or MCL grade II • MCL grade III or grade II with clinical instability Technique Description: An arthroscopic examination was performed to assess the “floating meniscus” sign and to confirm a tear of the MCL. The gracilis tendon is harvested in a usual fashion, leaving its distal insertion pedicle fixed to the tibial bone. An incision over the medial epicondyle is made, and a 6-mm drill is used to create a 2.5-cm bone tunnel. The passage of the medial subfascial graft is made toward the medial epicondyle. At this point, its fixation is performed with an interference screw. After fixing the anterior arm, we will return with the free portion of the graft in the most posterior portion and also percutaneously. This posterior arm is biologically fixed, closing the sartorius fascia over the 2 arms of the reconstruction with periosteal stitches. Results: Reconstruction tests were performed on cadaver models, obtaining a graft tension without compromising the range of motion (ROM) and a good result in their final analysis. We ended up publishing our results in a clinical study, with good functional results in both the Lysholm and Tegner scores, at a follow-up of 2 years. Discussion/Conclusion: We present an arthroscopic-assisted technique for a medial, percutaneous, aesthetic, and extremely functional approach. A technical limitation of our procedure is the absence of a biomechanical test for the gracilis double reconstruction: a strong point is that we performed some reconstruction tests on cadaver models, obtained good visual results and graft tension without compromising the ROM, and performed a positive clinical study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. In conclusion, a simple and inexpensive technique that uses known anatomic principles of graft placement, without compromising ROM was performed. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Posterior Proximal Cartilage of the Lateral Femoral Condyle as a Reference for Positioning the Femoral Tunnel in ACL Reconstruction

Background: Due to the similarity among specimens in the height of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) on the distal proximal axis in relation to the proximal posterior cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle (point C), it is known this point can be used as an arthroscopic intraoperative parameter to define the position of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction. Indications: For ACL reconstruction, point C can be used as an arthroscopic intraoperative parameter to define the position of the femoral tunnel on the distal proximal and anteroposterior axes. Technique Description: For access to the joint, standard arthroscopic ports, both anterolateral (AL) and anteromedial (AM), are used. By directing the camera toward the posterior region of the lateral femoral condyle through the AM port, it is possible to visualize the end of the posterior and proximal articular cartilage, the so-called C point. In this case, we sought to position the center of the femoral tunnel in the center of the AM band of the ACL. Holding the camera through the AM portal and visualizing point C, a millimeter-scale femoral guide is introduced through the AL portal toward the posterior femoral cartilage (point C) and positioned over it, creating a line between point C and the lateral distal femoral cartilage. The distance between point C and the distal femoral cartilage is measured. At this time, an accessory AM portal 1.5 cm from the AM port is constructed. Through it, with the aid of an ice pick or radiofrequency tip, a marking is made in the deep to shallow axis at 35% of this distance. Then, approximately 2 mm above the imaginary line formed by the union of point C and the lateral distal femoral cartilage, the center of the femoral tunnel is marked. Results: Point C is an anatomical landmark that is easy to view and is present in all knees; thus, it can be used as a reference during surgery for positioning the femoral tunnel. Discussion/Conclusion: Point C can be used as an arthroscopic intraoperative parameter to define the position of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Iliotibial Band Autograft in Skeletally Immature Prepubescent Children: A Physeal-Sparing Technique

Background: As there has been an increasing incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in children and adolescents in the past few decades, nonoperative management is seen to result in less favorable clinical outcomes, resulting in meniscal and cartilage damage, and arthritic changes. Despite the risk of iatrogenic physeal injuries with operative approach, several reconstruction options, such as physeal-sparing techniques for skeletally immature patients, are described to restore joint stability. Indications: We bring a combined extra-articular and intra-articular ACL reconstruction technique using autogenous iliotibial band (ITB), which is indicated for prepubescent patients (Tanner stages 1 or 2) with open physes, significant growth potential (≤11 years for girls and ≤12 years for boys) and smaller knees, where an all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction would lack epiphyseal space Technique Description: The technique consists of a modified MacIntosh intra-articular and extra-articular ITB reconstruction, described by Micheli and further characterized by Kocher. The central portion of the ITB is harvested proximally (at least 15 cm) and left attached to Gerdy's tubercle distally. The harvested graft is brought from over-the-top posteriorly and passed under the intermeniscal ligament anteriorly through an epiphyseal groove on the tibia. Results: The outcomes shown for the Kocher ITB ACL reconstruction technique are favorable at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years: from 44 patients, 41 returned to sports involving cutting or pivoting, and the revision rate was low at 4.5%. Discussion/Conclusion: The awareness of physeal injury related to the operative treatment of ACL tears in the pediatric population has resulted in several physeal-sparing and physeal-respecting techniques of reconstruction. Some of these have shown to reduce the risk of physeal damage, maintaining stability and providing excellent functional outcomes, with low revision rates in long-term follow-up and minimal risk of growth disturbance. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Accountability Mechanism in Village Owned Financial Institutions: A Case Study on Communal-Based Financial Institutions in West Sumatra

This study aims to determine how the accountability mechanism practised by Village Owned Financial Institutions (called LPN) of Limau Manis Padang is viewed from the perspective of a disclosure statement and report, performance assessment and evaluation, participation, self-regulation, and social auditing. LPN is a communal-based microfinance institution that once experienced its glory in West Sumatra during the 1970s and 1990s. This research uses an interpretive qualitative paradigm. The data used in this study are primary. Data was collected by in-depth interviews (in-depth interviews), observations, and document reviews. Informants are selected using snowball sampling patterns. This research found that LPN Accountability has not been implemented perfectly, especially in reporting and disclosure accountability. The public cannot easily access information on the LPN report. In addition, LPN has not practised aspects of social audits that provide opportunities for the public to conduct voluntary audits and assessments of LPN's internal processes.

Analysis of Conflicts of Interest in Studies Related to Robotics in Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Wall Surgery.

Industry payments to physicians represent a potential conflict of interest (COI) and can influence the study conclusions. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the COIs reported in major surgical journals. Studies with at least one American author published between 2016 and 2021 that discussed observational and intervention studies assessing robotic surgery were included in the analysis. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Open Payments database was used to collect the industry payments. A COI is defined as receiving funding from a robotics company while publishing research directly related to the company's products. A COI statement was defined as disclosed (or accurate) if the disclosure statement for the study in question acknowledged funding from the robotics companies. A COI was defined as undisclosed (or inaccurate) if the disclosure statement for the study in question did not acknowledge funding from the robotics companies. A total of 314 studies and 1978 authors were analyzed. Only 13.6% of the studies had accurate COI statements, whereas the majority (86.4%) had inaccurate COI disclosures. Additionally, 48.9% of the authors who received funding of $10,000 to $100,000 failed to report this amount in their disclosures, and 18% of the authors who received funding of $100,000 or more did not report it in their disclosures. There was a significant discordance between the self-reported COI in gastrointestinal and abdominal wall surgeries. This study calls for continued efforts to improve the definitions of what constitutes a relevant COI and encourages a standardized reporting process. It is imperative for investigators to make accurate disclosure statements.

Return to Sport Following ACL Reconstruction With Slope-Correcting High Tibial Osteotomy in the Elite Athlete

Background: Increased posterior tibial slope is a strong predictor of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft re-injury. A concomitant slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) has been suggested to decrease re-tear risk in these cases although little is known regarding outcomes following ACL reconstruction with HTO, especially in elite athletic patients. Indications: A 19-year-old National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) Division 1 running back presented with an ACL tear, lateral meniscus tear, and posterior tibial slope of 19° (case 1). A 19-year-old NCAA Division 1 soccer forward presented with an ACL graft re-tear and posterior tibial slope of 21° (case 2). Technique: Anterior closing wedge HTOs were performed along with a primary ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft (case 1) and a revision ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft (case 2). Following the arthroscopic procedures, an anterior approach was used to insert the first guide wire distal to the patellar tendon insertion from anterior to posterior aiming toward the posterior curve of the tibia. A second guide wire was placed at the previously templated distance. The osteotomy was then performed utilizing a saw and then osteotome. The reduction was performed by gently lifting the ankle anteriorly and applying axial pressure, and a new posterior tibial slope was calculated. After the osteotomy site was reduced, a preliminary reduction was performed by applying a clamp to both wires followed by placing a wire across the osteotomy site aiming from anterolateral to posteromedial. An anterolateral proximal tibial plate was applied, as well as a lag screw across the osteotomy site. Results: At 6 months after surgery, case 1 demonstrated >90% Limb Symmetry Indices (LSI) with quadriceps strength, single leg hop tests, and change of direction tests. At 12 months after surgery, case 2 demonstrated >90% LSI with all functional testing and competed in 17 games. Both patients returned to preinjury performance metrics including top speed and vertical jump height. No significant postoperative complications or instability was observed. Discussion/Conclusion: Primary or revision ACL reconstruction with HTO shows potential to assist athletes in returning to high-level sport while reducing posterior slope. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Medial Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: The Bone Plug Technique

Background: The medial and lateral menisci act as shock absorbers for the knee joint by converting and redistributing axial load into circumferential hoop stresses. Disruptions of these hoop stresses occur in the setting of meniscal deficiency and lead to long-term degenerative changes. Therefore, maintaining the distinctive composition and organization of the menisci is essential. In selective cases of meniscal deficiency, meniscus allograft transplantation can be a valuable treatment option. Indications: Meniscus transplantation should be considered in patients with symptomatic meniscal deficiency, without the presence of advanced degenerative pathologies, who have failed all conservative treatments. Technique description: We can divide the surgery into 4 steps: (1) graft preparation, (2) arthroscopic joint preparation, (3) allograft attachment preparation, and (4) graft fixation. Results: Meniscus allograft transplantation yields good to excellent results in up to 85% of cases. Improvement of pain and knee function occurs in approximately 70% of the patients at 10 years. The associated complications are mainly joint stiffness, early osteoarthritis, and incomplete healing accompanied by graft failure. Graft failure is the most feared complication, yet shows good results over the midterm. Conclusion: The bone plug technique we have shown here is a hybrid approach combining soft tissue and bone fixation techniques. It provides synergistic advantages with good osseous integration and is minimally invasive through arthroscopy without true arthrotomy. In our experience, this approach elegantly eases the complexity of this demanding surgery while yielding excellent results for patients. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Allogenous Bone Grafting Technique for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

Background: Tunnel widening, slightly malplaced former tunnels or bone loss due to hardware removal might prevent a 1-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision procedure due to tunnel convergence or challenging graft fixation. A range of graft sources and bone grafting techniques are described—all with their strengths and limitations. Common autograft techniques come with substantial donor site morbidity that might hinder postoperative rehabilitation. Indications: Graft tunnel issues might prompt the need for structural grafts and a 2-stage ACL revision approach. The use of the current dowel allograft technique gives a flexible approach where 1 or several cylindrical grafts can be placed in prepared sockets for reliable bony ingrowth. Technique Description: Using femoral head allografts and cannulated coring reamers, multiple bone dowels (up to 6) can give a flexible and adaptable bone grafting situation. The intra-articular tunnels are dilated, and dowels are produced to allow a press-fit fixation that facilitates good bone healing. Removal of sclerotic bone and microfracture is key to allow optimal bone-to-bone healing. Use of cannulas inserted through the arthroscopic portals and tamps plug advancement will give a reliable graft deployment without dowel breakage. Results: The current authors have used this uniform technique for 119 patients since 2014. All cases displayed good bony healing at 5 months after surgery on computed tomography and radiographs, and 115 out of 119 went on to have a stage 2 revision ACL surgery at 6 months spacing from the bone grafting. The most common reason for not going through the second-stage revision was improvement of symptoms due to graft removal and bone grafting during the first surgery. Discussion/Conclusion: The current allograft dowel bone grafting allows for a flexible bone grafting in cases where a 1-step ACL revision procedure is not feasible. Reliable bony ingrowth is seen in the current cohort allowing the final step of ACL revision at 6 months spacing from bone grafting. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Mini-Invasive Harvesting of Quadriceps Tendon Graft With Patellar Bone Block for ACL Reconstruction Using a Dedicated Harvester

Background: The selection of the type of graft used to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remains a matter of debate. In the past, the quadriceps tendon (QT) was associated with considerable morbidity and less favorable outcomes than other grafts. Improvements in harvesting methods have decreased morbidity of the surgical procedure and led to an increase in the use of QT in recent years. Indications: The QT graft with patellar bone block is a viable option for all patients with closed physis undergoing ACL reconstruction. It is especially suitable for young and active patients who practice activities that require kneeling or athletes in which hamstrings preservation is advisable. Technique Description: A vertical mini-invasive longitudinal incision starts 1 cm proximal to the middle of the patellar pole. After dissection, the bone block is marked and detached with an oscillating saw. A drill hole is performed in the bone block to serve for the passage of a traction suture. The bone block is lifted with the help of the traction suture, and the graft is trimmed to the desired diameter. The layer between tendon and capsule is separated by blunt dissection to spare the capsule of the suprapatellar pouch. Harvesting is achieved using a dedicated QT harvester. Usually, a graft length of 8 cm is harvested. The defect in the QT is closed using a suture passer at the proximal end. Finally, the graft is prepared and calibrated according to the planned technique for ACL reconstruction. Results: There was no major intraoperative complication in the senior author's series (more than 50 patients) using the dedicated QT harvester. On rare occasions (<10% of the cases), the device opened the suprapatellar joint capsule, creating the additional need for capsular repair during defect closure. On two occasions, the graft was shorter than expected, which may have been caused by insufficient dissection or improper use of the harvester. Discussion/Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with minimally invasive QT graft harvesting methods has shown very good clinical outcomes with few complications. It can be recommended for primary and revision ACL reconstruction. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Surgical Treatment of an Unusual Ski Injury: Combined Tibial Fracture With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion and Segond Lesion

Background: Alpine skiing is considered to be a high-risk sport due to frequent knee injuries and lower limb fractures. The most common lower limb fracture is tibial shaft fracture, while the most common ligament injuries include anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or medial collateral ligament tears. An injury rarely described in the literature is the association of a bony leg fracture with an ACL injury and Segond fracture. Indications: While the tibial fracture can be managed with intermedullary nailing and proximal ACL tears can be managed with primary repair, the combination of treatments including fixation of the Segond fracture is uncommon. Technique Description: We report combination treatment with nailing for the tibial fracture, primary repair for the ACL avulsion, and primary fixation of Segond fracture. Results: Simultaneous reduction and fixation of the fracture and stabilization of the knee with ACL and anterolateral ligament repair in a single stage resulted in an excellent outcome with complete healing of tibial fracture, ACL repair, and Segond fixation at final follow-up. Discussion/Conclusion: Even if combined leg fracture associated with ipsilateral ACL tear and Segond fracture is a very rare injury, the described technique based on 1-stage fixation of the 3 injuries is a viable option. This surgical technique can be considered a reparative treatment, with the goal of preserving the joint. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Tips and Tricks for Anatomic ACL Reconstruction With Soft-Tissue Quadriceps Tendon and Remnant Repair

Background: Quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft represents an excellent option for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), with minimal donor site morbidity and failure rates comparable with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. This video aims to provide technical tips for ACLR using all-soft-tissue QT autograft. Indications: ACLR with QT autograft is indicated in young, active ACL-injured patients who desire a return to sport. It represents a viable option in both primary and revision ACLR, as well as in skeletally immature patients. It is particularly indicated in those who kneel frequently, such as wrestlers or laborers, due to the lower incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain. Technique Description: A vertical incision is used to harvest a 10 mm × 70 mm partial thickness, all-soft-tissue QT graft. Care is taken not to violate the capsule or musculature. If necessary, graft size is modified based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement of the notch width. The graft is then prepared with continuous loop suspensory fixation on the femoral side and draw sutures on the tibial side. The lateral femoral notch is debrided to allow for visualization of the posterior wall to enable anatomic tunnel placement. When possible, the tibial stump is preserved. The femoral tunnel is drilled via an anteromedial portal and the tibial tunnel via a tibial guide. The graft is then passed through the tibial stump into the femur. It is fixed on the tibial side with a PEEK interference screw in full extension with application of a posterior drawer. Results: Outcomes following ACLR with QT autograft are excellent, with laxity and patient-reported outcomes comparable with those following ACLR with BPTB and hamstring autograft. Furthermore, QT ACLR has been shown to result in less donor site morbidity than BPTB autograft, and lower rates of failure and infection compared with hamstring autograft. Conclusion: ACLR with QT autograft is a good option in young, active patients in both the primary and revision settings. Advantages of QT ACLR include less donor site morbidity than BPTB, and lower rates of failure compared with hamstring autograft in young patients. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

ALL Repair and Reconstruction: Techniques From the SANTI Study Group

Background: Combining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with an anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction results in significant advantages including reduced graft rupture rates, a lower risk of reoperation for secondary meniscectomy, improved knee stability, and higher rates of return to preinjury levels of sport. Indications: The previously reported indications for combined ACL and ALL reconstruction are as follows: ACL reconstruction revision; high-grade pivot shift test; long-term ACL rupture; young patients; pivoting activities; concomitant medial meniscus repair, and, specifically, regarding the ALL repair, it must be an acute surgery (within 15 days from injury). Technique Description: Several modern techniques have been described to repair and reconstruct the ALL. This technical note details a number of these techniques performed by the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International (SANTI) Study Group. Results: First, we describe a combined ACL reconstruction and double-bundle ALL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. Secondly, we describe a single-bundle ALL reconstruction using gracilis autograft. Thirdly, we describe an ALL reconstruction technique using a knotless soft anchor, which provides shallow fixation and prevents tunnel convergence. Finally, we describe a technique for ALL repair. Conclusion: Several techniques have been described to repair and reconstruct the ALL, all offering significant advantages over an isolated ACL reconstruction. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Two-Stage Revision ACL Reconstruction with Arthroscopic Tunnel Bone Grafting

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopedic surgery, and due to the increased number of primary reconstructions being performed, the number of revision ACL reconstructions is also increasing. Indications: Two-stage revision ACL reconstruction has lower failure rates compared to 1-stage and is indicated when significant tunnel expansion has occurred or malpositioned tunnels prohibit an adequate reconstruction. In this presentation, 2-stage revision ACL reconstruction was performed with an arthroscopic bone grafting technique of both the femoral and tibial tunnels secondary to tunnel osteolysis. Technique Description: Standard diagnostic arthroscopy is performed, and any chondral or meniscal pathology is addressed. The remnant ACL graft and all hardware are removed. The tunnels are debrided thoroughly. Using a modified syringe, the tunnels are packed with a mixture of cancellous bone chips and cortical fibers that have been hydrated with whole blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The patient is placed into a brace postoperatively, and a computed tomography (CT) is obtained approximately 4 to 6 months postoperatively to assess for bone healing. Revision ACL reconstruction is performed once indicated with standard rehabilitation and return to play protocol. Results: Both 1-stage and 2-stage revision ACL reconstructions have been demonstrated to have significant improvement in outcomes scores preoperatively to postoperatively. However, 2-stage has lower failure rates compared to single-stage and has a high return to level of play. Discussion/Conclusion: Revision ACL reconstruction is becoming more commonly performed, and 2-stage revision is frequently required due to multiple factors. In this video, we demonstrate bone grafting for revision ACL reconstruction for tunnel osteolysis. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

A New Algorithm to Treat Chronic Combined ACL/MCL Injuries: Let's Come Back to the “Rotatory Instability Test”

Background: Chronic combined medial collateral ligament (MCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent. Medial residual laxity is a risk factor for ACL rerupture. It should be treated at the same time as the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) if necessary, but there are still questions surrounding the indications for abstention or surgery of the medial plan, especially for grade 2 MCL injuries of the Fetto and Marshall classification. Indications: The purpose is to come back to a simple test, the “Rotatory Instability Test” as described by Slocum and Larson in 1968 for systematic clinical examination of the knee to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the deep MCL (dMCL) and superficial MCL (sMCL) examination and to propose a decision-making algorithm for the treatment of the chronic combined ACL/MCL injuries based on the assessment of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Technique Description: Examination of the ACL with Lachman test, anterior drawer in neutral rotation, and pivot shift test confirm the ACL injury. Valgus laxity is tested in extension and at 20° of flexion. Then, an anterior drawer test at 90° of flexion with external rotation is done (the anterior drawer in external rotation [ADER] test) allowing to identify isolated dMCL, dMCL + sMCL, or MCL + posterior oblique ligament (POL) injuries. Discussion: As persistent medial laxity is a risk factor for ACL graft failure and there is no reliable method of instrumented laxity assessment, careful clinical examination remains essential. Systematic examination of the medial side with valgus laxity testing at 0° and 20° flexion combined with the ADER test assessment of AMRI can guide treatment of the MCL injury component. Where there is no valgus laxity and the ADER test is negative, isolated ACLR is indicated. If there is significant medial laxity at 0°, this suggests combining sMCL and POL reconstruction with ACLR. Where the knee is stable at 0° but there is valgus laxity at 20° and a positive ADER test, the dMCL can be reconstructed using a gracilis graft or a combined sMCL and dMCL reconstruction can be added to the ACLR depending on the degree of laxity. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Anatomic Double-Bundle 2-in-1 Guide System

Background: In double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, tunnel coalition may occur intraoperatively or during the postoperative course. Tibial tunnel coalition is more common compared with femoral tunnel coalition. Once tunnel coalition occurs on the tibial side, rotatory knee laxity may not be controlled as expected. We have developed a new device to avoid tibial tunnel coalition with consistency. The purpose of this video is to present the surgical technique for double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a new drill guide. Indications: The novel guide may be used in all cases with confirmed ACL tear in a physically active patient, identical to indications for current ACL reconstruction using the double-bundle technique. Technique Description: The hamstring tendon is harvested for the ACL grafts. Two guide pins for the anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle for the tibial tunnel are inserted through the Anatomic Double-Bundle 2-in-1 Guide System. Cannulated drills and dilators are used to create the tunnel to the final diameter. Next, femoral tunnels are created by the outside-in technique using the Anatomic Double-Bundle 2-in-1 Guide System. Grafts are inserted from the tibia and passed through the femur. The grafts are fixed with a post screw and/or interference screw. Results: Two weeks after surgery, no tibial or femoral coalition (0/20 cases) were confirmed and tibial bony bridge at the intraarticular surface was measured 2.7 ± 0.9 mm using computed tomography (CT). One year after surgery, tibial coalition was confirmed in 13.3% (2/15 cases), and femoral coalition in 6.7% (1/15 cases) on CT image mainly due to tunnel widening. The 2 cases with tibial coalition had tibial bony bridge of less than 2 mm on immediate postoperative CT. Discussion/Conclusion: Using the novel guide, 2 tibial tunnels were created easily and accurately compared with the conventional independent drilling technique. The 2 tunnels can also be created simultaneously with single placement of the guide. Two separate tunnels help maintain expected rotatory knee stability after double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.