Disclosure Statement Research Articles

Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis With Interference Screw Fixation: A Technique Video

Background: Management of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology is accomplished through a biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. While both modalities provide beneficial outcomes, a biceps tenodesis may confer improved cosmesis, functional outcomes, and decreased muscle cramping postoperatively. Many procedural considerations are undertaken prior to a tenodesis, such as the surgical approach and fixation device. While similar clinical outcomes are achieved between an open subpectoral and arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (ASPBT) with interference screw (IS) fixation, the latter technique offers a minimally invasive modality. Indications: The primary indications for an ASPBT include superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears, LHBT tears, biceps instability, bicipital tunnel disease, biceps pulley lesions, and biceps tenosynovitis. Contraindications to the arthroscopic approach include a distal lesion of the biceps tendon below the pectoralis major tendon (PMT). The IS may be used to create a biomechanically stiffer construct. Technique Description: With the arthroscope in the lateral portal, the distal aspect of the bicipital groove proximal to the superior border of the PMT is identified and opened. The LHBT is subsequently mobilized and released. An anterosuperolateral portal is localized with a spinal needle positioned perpendicular to the bicipital tunnel, 1.5 cm proximal to the superior border of the PMT. The biceps is then removed ex vivo and whip-stitches are sewn beginning 1 cm proximal to the myotendinous junction of the LHBT. After firmly associating the LHBT with the tip of the IS, a guidewire is placed 1.5 cm superior to the superior border of the PMT, perpendicular to the humerus, and a reamer is used to prepare a 6-, 7-, or 8-mm diameter socket. The tendon is inserted through the accessory portal into the tunnel, followed by screw fixation. Suture tails are tied with 5 alternating half hitches, each secured via an arthroscopic knot pusher. Results: ASPBT with IS fixation provides significant pain relief, improves range of motion (ROM), and enhances quality of life. Discussion: ASPBT with IS fixation provides significant improvements in patient-reported and functional outcomes and thus can be an acceptable treatment for LHBT pathology. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Snapping Biceps Femoris Repair: A Rare Cause of Lateral Knee Pain

Background: Snapping biceps femoris syndrome (SFS) represents a rare clinical entity in which the biceps femoris subluxates over the fibular head in deep flexion. Two primary pathophysiologies have been described including a prominent or abnormal fibular head morphology. Others have implicated an anomalous biceps femoris insertion. The diagnosis is made clinically, with operative and nonoperative intervention strategies available for treatment. Indications: SFS often results in audible snapping and associated pain at the lateral fibular head. When recalcitrant to nonoperative management, surgical intervention can lead to resolution of symptoms. We present the case of a college-aged male who has bilateral symptoms, worse on the right, which have resulted in significant activity modification and daily discomfort recalcitrant to anti-inflammatory medication and physical therapy. Technique Description: The patient was placed supine on the operating room table with an ipsilateral bump under the hip to assist in exposure of the lateral aspect of the knee. Examination under anesthesia (EUA) confirmed the snapping biceps femoris. A lateral approach to the knee and a common peroneal neurolysis was performed. The biceps femoris insertional anatomy was examined for anomalous tendon insertion or insertional tearing. The prominent fibular head was exposed and resected, with careful attention not to disrupt the lateral collateral ligament or popliteofibular ligament insertion sites. The biceps femoris was then repaired to the prepared bony bed of the fibula with one double-loaded suture anchor. Repeat EUA confirmed complete resolution of snapping even with maximal internal rotation of the tibia; this was carefully examined again with the tourniquet deflated to ensure its compressive effect was not partially responsible for the resolution. Results: Published data pertaining to SFS is limited to case reports and small case series. With appropriate indications, surgical intervention yields promising results with a high percentage of patients returning to prior level of activity or prior participation level in sport. Discussion/Conclusion: SFS can be diagnosed with a careful clinical assessment. When recalcitrant to nonoperative management, it is effectively treated with surgical intervention to restore normal fibular anatomy, and prevent recurrent instability and persistent pain. The presented technique allows for appropriate management of these rare injuries. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Fibrin Clot–Augmented Meniscal Repair

Background: Failure rate of meniscal repair can reach 25%. Multiple techniques have been used to increase meniscal healing, notably biological augmentation techniques. One of them is fibrin clot–augmented meniscal repair, which will be described in this video. Indications: This technique is indicated mainly for the lesions with a high failure rate. This includes large, horizontal, and radial tears and even for meniscal cysts, especially in a stable knee. This technique can also be used in revision meniscal suture when failure is no longer an option. Surgical Technique: Fibrin clot is prepared from sterile peripheral venous blood from the patient. A plastic syringe is used to stir the blood in a sterile glass container. The fibrin clot is then formed and washed rigorously with saline solution. Rolling the fibrin clot which is fixed to the syringe allows to give the fibrillar aspect of the clot. The formed fibrin clot is now solid enough to be manipulated and can be fixed to a vicryl suture thread allowing it to enter the knee and be fixed inside the meniscal lesion. The clot is wrapped inside the meniscal lesion with inside-out or outside-in suture technique. Results: We used this technique for multiple types of lesions, like bucket handle meniscal tear, horizontal meniscal cleavage, parrot beak tear, and even in lesions within white-white zone. The postoperative protocol is the same as standard inside-out meniscal repair. This technique has been used in the literature with promising results. Conclusion: The fibrin clot–augmented meniscal repair is a demanding but promising technique. We need further follow-up to confirm its effectiveness. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Stage I Revision ACL Reconstruction With Allograft Bone Dowels

Background: When evaluating a patient with a failed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, a detailed history and physical examination is paramount. The position and size of original femoral and tibial tunnels are critical in the surgical decision-making in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction. This video presents a case of stage I revision ACL reconstruction with the use of allograft bone dowels due to increased size and poor position of original fixation tunnels. Indications: Indications for staging revision ACL reconstruction include significant tunnel osteolysis or dilation (>14 mm), or any situation in which the previous bone tunnels will interfere with anatomic graft placement and fixation. Technique Description: The patient is placed in the supine position with a standard setup for knee arthroscopy, including lateral thigh post and foot stop for maintained knee flexion at 90°. After diagnostic arthroscopy, the ACL graft remnant is debrided. The femoral tunnel is then debrided and re-cannulated, followed by reaming with cannulated reamers until adequate cortical chatter is achieved, ensuring the presence of a bleeding rim of bone throughout the tunnel to confirm that the correct diameter reamer has been reached. The appropriately sized bone dowel is inserted along the guide pin until fully seated and flush with lateral wall of the notch. This process is then repeated for the tibial tunnel, accessing the tunnel from the previous incision along the medial tibia. Results: This video presents a technique to achieve adequate bone grafting of previously used tunnels that are not suitable for single-stage revision ACL reconstruction. Patients undergo second-stage revision ACL reconstruction at roughly 4 to 6 months following stage I, when bone graft has fully incorporated on radiographs. Discussion/Conclusion: Stage I revision ACL reconstruction with tunnel grafting using allograft bone dowels is a minimally invasive method of grafting previously used fixation tunnels to allow for anatomic second-stage graft placement and fixation. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Open Approach for Repair of Tibial PCL Avulsion

Background: Tibial avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) often requires operative fixation, which frequently results in successful outcomes if identified acutely. Open or arthroscopic techniques are most commonly used. Indications: Primary surgical indications for open fixation include acute tibial avulsion of the PCL. Secondary indications include grade 2 to grade 3 posterior drawer test and radiographic posterior subluxation of the tibia. Ideally, the joint space and articular cartilage should be well preserved. Technique Description: In the simplified approach initially described by Burks and Schaffer, the patient is placed prone, and an inverted L-shaped incision is made over the posteromedial corner of the knee. A plane is developed between the medial head of the gastrocnemius and the semimembranosus down to the knee joint capsule. The gastrocnemius is retracted laterally to protect neurovascular structures and a vertical capsulotomy is performed. The tibial attachment of the PCL is reduced and held with K (Kirschner) wires and then fixated with screw and washer. Results: Six months post operation, our patient achieved full active and passive range of motion with a stable posterior drawer test. He returned to work without difficulty. Multiple studies have shown success with open PCL fixation and decreased rates of arthrofibrosis when compared with arthroscopic approach. In this case, the patient did not develop arthrofibrosis. Discussion/Conclusion: PCL tibial avulsions can be safely treated with an open approach. Contrary to other ligaments that favor reconstruction over repair, PCL avulsions may be better treated with early repair, so it is important to avoid delay in intervention. The most common complication in both open and arthroscopic approaches is arthrofibrosis, which is less common in the open approach. Early range of motion is encouraged to prevent arthrofibrosis. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Does Assisted Living Provide Assistance And Promote Living?

Assisted living has promised assistance and quality of living to older adults for more than eighty years. It is the largest residential provider of long-term care in the United States, serving more than 918,000 older adults as of 2018. As assisted living has evolved, the needs of residents have become more challenging; staffing shortages have worsened; regulations have become complex; the need for consumer support, education, and advocacy has grown; and financing and accessibility have become insufficient. Together, these factors have limited the extent to which today's assisted living adequately provides assistance and promotes living, with negative consequences for aging in place and well-being. This Commentary provides recommendations in four areas to help assisted living meet its promise: workforce; regulations and government; consumer needs and roles; and financing and accessibility. Policies that may be helpful include those that would increase staffing and boost wages and training; establish staffing standards with appropriate skill mix; promulgate state regulations that enable greater use of third-party services; encourage uniform data reporting; provide funds supporting family involvement; make community disclosure statements more accessible; and offer owners and operators incentives to facilitate access for consumers with fewer resources. Attention to these and other recommendations may help assisted living live up to its name.

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Novel Re-Tensionable All-Suture Anchor

Background: Medial meniscal root repairs are devastating injuries that can cause long-term knee problems if not properly addressed. Some common issues when addressing these injuries surgically include the “bungee-cord” effect seen with implants that sit too far from the tibial plateau surface and loss of tension on the sutures after cycling of the knee after the repair. This video will discuss the presentation of a patient with a medial meniscal root repair treated with a novel technique to counteract these aforementioned issues. Indications: Based on the patient’s medial meniscal root tear and minimal arthritis seen on radiograph, he was indicated for a meniscal root repair to prevent meniscal extrusion and reinforce normal meniscal hoop stresses to limit progression of his arthritis. Technique Description: This technique uses a novel re-tensionable all-suture anchor through a transtibial tunnel with 2 repair sutures through the meniscal root that sits just below the tibial plateau, allowing the surgeon the ability to re-tension the implant after cycling the knee. Results: Arthroscopic repair of the medial meniscal root allowed the patient to return to his previous level of activity. Discussion/Conclusion: In this case, arthroscopic medial meniscal root repair can yield good results in patients to get them back to their previous level of activity while minimizing the chance of rapid arthritic progression that is typically seen with nonoperative management of these injuries. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Anterior Opening-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy for Slope Correction of Genu Recurvatum

Background: Symptomatic genu recurvatum is defined as greater than 5° of knee hyperextension and can be caused by osseous deformity, soft tissue laxity, or a combination. Common symptoms include pain, weakness, instability, decreased range of motion, leg length discrepancy, and stretching of the posterior capsuloligamentous structures of the knee. In instances where the genu recurvatum is caused by reverse tibial slope, literature supports the use of anterior opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (OW PTO) to treat genu recurvatum by increasing tibial slope. Correction of anterior slope to a more anatomic, posterior orientation allows any stressed ligaments to return to their normal tension and restores the native biomechanics of the knee. Indications: The primary indication for OW PTO is genu recurvatum that is nonresponsive to physical therapy or genu recurvatum with concurrent ligamentous injury. The heel-height test provides an objective assessment for the identification and measurement of knee hyperextension. Technique Description: 2 guide pins are placed parallel to the tibial plateau, engaging the posterior cortex. A small micro sagittal saw is used to cut the anterior cortex. Osteotomes are used to complete the osteotomy, preserving a posterior hinge. An opening spreader device is placed and opened slowly while keeping the posterior cortex intact. The new slope is maintained by use of an opening wedge osteotomy plate and screws. Allograft bone graft is packed thoroughly into the osteotomy site. Fluoroscopy is used throughout the case to assess appropriate orientation and depth of the osteotomy, as well as the final opening width. Results: A review of 5 studies demonstrated adequate reduction in hyperextension, with a mean knee hyperextension ranging from 17° to 32° preoperatively and 0° to 7° postoperatively. Patients had significantly improved postoperative clinical outcomes compared with the preoperative state. Discussion/Conclusion: Anterior OW PTO has been shown to be a safe method of accurately correcting tibial plateau slope for the treatment of genu recurvatum. Patients can expect correction of knee hyperextension, restoration of anatomic posterior tibial slope, decreased posterior tibial translation, and increased subjective outcome scores. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attest that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

How Biofeedback With Surface EMG Can Contribute to the Diagnosis and Treatment of AMI in the Knee

Background: Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a complex neurological phenomenon that is actually very common. AMI can appear following a knee injury or knee surgery. If it is not addressed, the patient's function can be negatively affected. There is currently no specific tool for the diagnosis and treatment of AMI. Indications: Following surgery or injury to the knee, AMI causes defective activation of the quadriceps, sometimes combined with a knee extension deficit. A clinical classification of AMI has been proposed recently to help with making the diagnosis and to guide treatment. In this article, we describe how biofeedback and surface electromyography (EMG) can be used in the early diagnosis and treatment of knee AMI. Technique Description: Biofeedback is based on transformation of physiological variables into a visual or auditory signal. This allows the patient to learn how to control physical and bodily functions, which were previously considered as involuntary processes. This technique requires the use of a specific device that transforms the measured physiological signals—neuromuscular activation in this instance—into visual signals. This tool incorporates surface EMG, with electrodes connected to a measuring unit. This unit is connected to a screen that shows the neuromuscular activation in real time. Thus, EMG biofeedback can be used to help clinicians make a diagnosis and to specifically treat the AMI. Results: We have used biofeedback in patients who have a knee injury or who have undergone knee surgery. Both the therapist and patient were able to objectively see the presence of AMI using the biofeedback device. For treatment, the therapist works with a patient by providing clear instructions and increasingly more challenging goals. We show examples of how patients were able to eliminate their AMI by using biofeedback. Discussion/Conclusion: EMG biofeedback is a promising tool for the diagnosis and treatment of AMI after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and ACL reconstruction surgery. The next steps are to define thresholds and a rehabilitation protocol that will be used in a clinical trial. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Hepatic Ablation Technology: Assessment of Conflicts of Interest in Recent Literature.

Collaboration between the health care industry and surgeons is critical in modern medicine. Conflict of interest (COI) has the risk of introducing bias into research studies. We investigated the accuracy of self-disclosed COI for studies that researched the use of microwave ablation for liver metastasis. A literature search identified studies that investigated the use of microwave ablation for liver cancer between 2016 and 2022. We utilized the Open Payments Database to query individual authors' financial contributions from the industry. The accuracy of the disclosure statement and financial contribution for each study and author was calculated. We compared the amount of financial contribution authors received based on the accuracy of their COI statement. Twenty-five studies of interest were identified. The mean number of authors was 8.24. A disclosure statement was present in 52% of studies. Of those, 28% had an incongruent disclosure statement. 9/25 (36%) of studies had a conflict of interest based on financial payments provided by industry. Overall, authors received an average of $440,483.41 (SD $1,889,375.34). We did not find a difference in the financial contribution's value based on the disclosure statement's accuracy (P = .55). Over a quarter of studies in our review of microwave ablation literature had discrepancies in the reporting of conflicts of interest, highlighting the need for improved reporting of potential conflicts of interest to protect the integrity of clinical research. Compared to other fields of surgery, we found a lower rate of undisclosed COI, suggesting that the scope of cancer-directed surgery may be more resistant to industry influence.

Disclosure of Origin in European Biotechnology Patent Law: A Social Network Analysis Perspective

Abstract Recital 27 of the European Union Directive 98/44/EC on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Innovations mandates the disclosure of the geographical origin of biological material when the invention is based on or incorporates such material. This requirement seeks to monitor the origin of biological materials, often linked to indigenous and local communities, to ensure prior informed consent and equitable benefit-sharing with resource providers. Several European countries, such as Switzerland and Norway, legally require this disclosure, and the Draft International Instrument of the World Intellectual Property Organization is poised to expand the list of nations with such requirements. However, the definition of ‘origin’ presents challenges for patent applicants, as it may refer to the primary source (e.g. indigenous and local communities, the country of origin) or secondary sources (e.g. ex situ plant collections or commercial suppliers). Moreover, defining the information to be disclosed as the origin is crucial for the credibility of disclosure statements. To address this issue, this article pioneers a social network analysis approach to the issue of biopiracy and disclosure of origin. It introduces the network-centric narratives of 30 prominent cases of biopiracy from South and Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa, and unveils the average distance between the nodes previously accused of biopiracy and the nodes that correspond to the origin of the biological material in question. By highlighting the role of intermediaries in distorting information within material distribution networks, the findings contest the feasibility of requiring patent applicants to provide information on both primary and secondary sources.

Revision Anterior Glenoid Reconstruction With Distal Tibia Allograft Combined With Open Capsular Shift

Background: Managing patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bony deficiency remains a challenge. Multiple graft options, including iliac crest, distal clavicle, coracoid, and distal tibia allograft have been used. There is a growing body of evidence that supports distal tibia allograft for glenoid restoration in patients with shoulder instability due to its ability to restore the articular surface as well as the glenoid depth and curvature. Indications: Surgical indications for anterior glenoid reconstruction with distal tibia allograft combined with open capsular shift include patients with recurrent shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss. Technique Description: A deltopectoral interval is utilized and the subscapularis is split in lines with its fibers. The subscapularis and capsule are split together in a horizontal fashion and tagged together. Any prior hardware is then removed utilizing appropriate removal sets, a burr, and a broken screw set if necessary. The anterior glenoid is then prepared and the defect is measured. Bone marrow aspirate is then harvested from the proximal humerus using a vortex needle. The distal tibia allograft is then cut to size and prepared utilizing pulsed lavage, pressurized sterile carbon dioxide, and the bone marrow aspirate. The allograft is then fixed with solid stainless steel 3.5-mm cortical screws with washers. The medial, glenoid based capsular repair it completed by placing 1.8-mm knotless FiberTak anchor at the bottom of the distal tibia allograft. A free needle is utilized to place a horizontal mattress stitch from the anchor to the inferior capsule, which is then loaded onto a shuttling suture, to repair it to the anterior inferior glenoid. A knotless anchor is then placed right off the chondral margin of the humeral head, and this is used to repair both the capsule and subscapularis in the correct position by passing through both inferior and superior leaflets. This is then loaded onto the knotless anchor and reduced, which shifts the subscapularis and capsule laterally. The remainder of the subscapularis split is then closed. Patients are then placed in a sling with an abduction pillow with no shoulder range of motion for 6 weeks. They can then progress their therapy with a goal of returning to sport at 6 months. Results: Several large systemic reviews have shown that return to sport rates after anterior glenoid reconstruction range between 80% and 90%, with returning to the same level of play in the 70% range. Discussion: Anterior glenoid reconstruction utilizing distal tibia allograft combined with an open capsular shift is a durable surgical option for patients presenting with shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Looking at Patent Law: Patenting an Invention for Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide and Electrooxidation of Hydrocarbons: A Case Study…Procedure for Continuing Prosecution of a Patent Application After Final Rejection…

In this installment of the “Looking at Patent Law” series, we present a case study of the prosecution events of U.S. Patent No. 11,788,193 directed towards simultaneous “Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide and Electrooxidation of Hydrocarbons." The subject invention aligns with the research interest in sustainability matters by The Electrochemical Society and its members. The case study begins with a brief synopsis of the background of the invention followed by 1) summary of the drawing and the specification of the invention, 2) inventor assignment and power of attorney designations, 3) submission of the Invention Disclosure Statement (IDS) and associated Duty of Candor, 4) summary of the multiple non-final/final office actions rejecting the patent application, and 5) applicant response and allowance of the patent application. The case study illustrates the use of Request for Continued Examination (RCE) to continue the prosecution of the subject patent application after the USPTO issues a final rejection. With this case study, we hope to de-mystify the patent prosecution process and better prepare electrochemical and solid-state scientists, engineers and technologists to interact with their patent counsel regarding their inventions.

Anatomic Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Internal Brace Augmentation in Throwing Athletes

Background: Injury to the medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) is a common setback experienced by many throwing athletes often requiring reconstruction with 12 to 18 months of rehabilitation. Current reconstructive techniques fail to anatomically restore the MUCL. This presentation demonstrates the “anatomic technique” for reconstruction of the MUCL supplemented by internal brace augmentation. Indications: Initial injuries of the MUCL can often be managed conservatively; however, many complete tears and those failing nonoperative management are frequently treated with MUCL reconstruction. Technique Description: After graft harvest, a 6-cm incision is created over the medial epicondyle to expose the sublime tubercle and medial epicondyle. Sutures are placed through the torn ligament which are used to formally repair the native ligament. A 4-mm socket is drilled in the MUCL origin of the medial epicondyle, and two 2-mm penetrating sockets are drilled toward the base of the 4-mm socket. The sutures in the native ligament are passed through the sockets and later tied over the bone bridge to complete the native ligament repair. A tight rope is shuttled through the medial epicondyle socket and assembled. The palmaris longus autograft and a suture tape are loaded onto the tightrope and reduced into the humeral socket. On the ulna, soft suture anchors are placed on either side of the sublime tubercle. The distal end of the graft is then sutured utilizing a FiberWire. The graft is secured to the sublime tubercle by tying down the previously placed suture anchors. The suture tapes and internal brace are loaded into a SwiveLock suture anchor, which is fixed distally along the sublime tubercle ridge creating an anatomic reconstruction. Then, the native ligament sutures and tight rope are re-tensioned and tied across the humeral bone bridge for final fixation. Results: In our cohort of 26 professional and amateur throwers, >90% returned to play at the same level at a mean of 9.9 months postoperatively. Discussion/Conclusion: Anatomic reconstruction of the MUCL with internal bracing is a viable option for MUCL injuries and may allow expedited return to sport for most athletes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Endoscopic Repair of Ischial Tuberosity Avulsion Fracture

Background: The ischial tuberosity apophysis serves as an attachment site for the hamstring muscle complex in the pediatric pelvis. Once the apophysis begins to ossify around age 13 to 15 years, decreasing elasticity makes the physis the weakest part of the hamstring attachment to the pelvis. An avulsion injury of the hamstring muscle group in the adolescent therefore results in a fracture in the adolescent and is the functional equivalent to a 3-tendon proximal hamstring injury in an adult. Ischial tuberosity fractures have a higher rate of non-union than other pelvic apophyseal injuries. Endoscopic surgery offers the advantage of smaller incisions, reduced wound complications, and expedited recovery compared with an open procedure. Indications: Controversy exists over which fractures benefit from surgical fixation. Patients with an ischial tuberosity avulsion fracture that is displaced more than 20 mm or that remains symptomatic despite at least 3 months of conservative management are common indications for surgery. Technique Description: The patient is positioned in the prone position and under fluoroscopic guidance 2 endoscopic portals are created. The sciatic nerve is visualized, neurolysis performed, and then protected throughout the remainder of the case. The ischial tuberosity is located along with the avulsed apophysis and hamstring tendon. The bony surfaces are prepared. The fracture fragment is reduced and 3 partially threaded cannulated screws are percutaneously passed across the fracture. The interval between the semimembranosus and conjoined tendons was closed with a suture. Results: There are no results published specific to this technique. Outcome papers are lacking, but cohort studies show significant displacement increases risk for non-union. Displaced ischial tuberosity fractures are also thought to risk sciatic nerve irritation and decreased hamstring strength. Discussion/Conclusion: Recent advancements in periarticular endoscopic surgery of the hip have enabled this historically open procedure to be performed in a minimally invasive fashion. This technique achieves robust fixation of the avulsed fragment and the benefits of anatomic repair of the hamstring origin while avoiding the larger incision and soft tissue dissection required for an open procedure. In time, this technique may become standard of care much like other sports medicine procedures which have transitioned from open to arthroscopic with the development of suitable tools and techniques. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The PIVOT App: A User Guide

Background: While the pivot shift examination is often regarded as the gold standard test for diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, one of the pitfalls of the pivot shift test is that it lacks standardization among physicians. The PIVOT App is a validated application to quantify the amount of tibial translation during the pivot shift maneuver and improve standardization of clinical measurement. Indications: The PIVOT App can be used in both clinic and operating room settings for patients who sustained injury to the ACL. The PIVOT App may assist in identifying the amount of rotatory knee laxity in patients with ACL deficiency or following ACL reconstruction. Technique Description: The PIVOT App works by quantifying the amount of translation in the lateral tibia relative to a marker on the lateral femoral epicondyle. To use the PIVOT App, 3 yellow circle stickers are placed on the bony prominences of the lateral knee: the lateral epicondyle, Gerdy’s tubercle, and the “pivot point” 3 cm posterior to Gerdy’s tubercle parallel to the joint line. Once placed, the pivot shift flexion maneuver can be recorded in the PIVOT App and analyzed to identify both the distance of spontaneous tibial reduction during the pivot shift maneuver and the time of reduction in seconds. The most common problems encountered while using the application include (1) improper marker placement, (2) interference of marker tracking with yellow color in the background, (3) interference of marker tracking with overhead lighting, and (4) extraneous data collection before and after pivot shift flexion. Results: Previous studies have validated the PIVOT App to accurately distinguish normal, low-grade, and high-grade pivot shifts with resultant increasing tibial translation in the lateral compartment of the knee. The PIVOT App has been used at institutions worldwide to quantify and standardize measurement of the pivot shift. Conclusion: The PIVOT App is a validated application to quantify the amount of lateral tibial translation and reduction during the pivot shift maneuver. Proper use and avoidance of complications while using the application can aid clinicians in accurate diagnosis of rotatory knee laxity in patients following ACL injury. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

All-Inside ACL Reconstruction: Short Femoral and Tibial Socket Technique

Background: Recently, there has been an increase in interest in all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Regarding graft maturity, graft contact with the bone tunnel is important. All-inside ACLR with short femoral and tibial sockets might allow to increase the contact between the graft and the socket (ie, no interference screw and contact between the graft and bottom of the socket) and can improve graft maturing. Indications: All-inside ACLR with short sockets technique is indicated in patients with primary ACL rupture or ACL graft re-rupture. Technique Description: The patient was placed in supine position. Following examination under anesthesia, diagnostic arthroscopy was performed to assess for meniscus injuries and chondral defects. The surgical technique required 6 steps: (1) graft preparation (4-strand semitendinosus tendon, graft length was about 45 mm, grafts larger than 8 mm), (2) creating femoral socket (5-10 mm), (3) creating tibial tunnel socket (10-15 mm), (4) passing the graft, (5) tensioning the graft, and (6) graft fixation and skin closure. Patients were partial weightbearing with crutches for 3 weeks and used a hinged knee brace for 6 weeks after surgery. Return to activities was based on functional strength recovery, with a return to running targeted at 4 to 5 months after surgery. Results: All-inside ACLR with short sockets technique provides a better chance of return to preinjury level of activity with accompanied patient satisfaction as compared with anteromedial portal technique at 2 years of follow-up. This technique has favorable functional and clinical outcomes with improvement of graft maturing. Discussion/Conclusion: In conclusion, we propose that ACLR with short tibial and femoral socket technique is simple and safe with favorable clinical outcomes. This is an advantageous ACLR technique that can preserve the gracilis muscle and reduce muscle strength loss of affected limbs. In addition, the all-inside technique is circumferential filling of the socket with the graft, which might increase bone to graft contact compared with interference screws. Further study is needed to show the better clinical outcome and the earlier graft maturation compared with ordinary ACLR. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic Repair of a Lateral Meniscus Oblique Radial Tear

Background: Lateral meniscal oblique radial tears (LMORTs) are the most common type of lateral meniscal tears and occur concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in up to 12% of cases. Four types of LMORTs have been classified in the literature based on proximity to the meniscal root and extent of the tear. Type 1 and 2 LMORTs represent partial and complete posterior root tears less than 10 mm from the root insertion. Type 3 and 4 LMORTs are partial and complete posterior radial meniscus tears greater than 10 mm from the root insertion. Indications: Type 3 and 4 LMORTs can and should be addressed with an all-inside side-to-side repair at the time of ACL reconstruction. LMORTs that are not repaired at the time of ACL reconstruction can contribute to persistent instability and meniscal extrusion. Technique Description: Diagnostic arthroscopy is performed to evaluate the posterior aspects of both the medial and lateral meniscus. The medial leaflet is commonly flipped into the notch and scarred to ACL remnant. After identifying and isolating the medial leaflet, an arthroscopic suture passer is used to pass a suture from inferior to superior through the medial leaflet. A second suture is passed from inferior to superior through the lateral leaflet. This is used to shuttle the suture pass through the medial leaflet to the bottom of the meniscus, where it can be tied in a horizontal mattress fashion. The sutures are tied down with aide of an arthroscopic knot pusher. A second set of sutures is passed and used to shuttle a second suture that would be tied posterior to the first suture, again in a horizontal mattress fashion. This allows reduction of the fragments in apposition across the tear. Postoperatively, patients are allowed range of motion from 0° to 90° and to toe touch weightbearing for the first 4 weeks. Patients are advanced to weightbearing as tolerated at 5 weeks. Typical return to sport ranges from 6 to 9 months postoperatively. Results: Results have been published for 2-year outcomes of type 3 and 4 LMORT repairs and have demonstrated persistent improved patient-reported outcomes as well as healing rates that are greater than 80% and in some series approach nearly 100%. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic all-inside side-to-side surgical repair is a durable and reliable treatment option for patients presenting for ACL reconstruction with concomitant type 3 or 4 LMORT. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 3-Incision Technique With Allograft Quad Tendon ACL Reconstruction

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are becoming more common in younger and older athletes. Approximately 250,000 ACL injuries occur each year, requiring the need for an effective and reproducible surgical technique. Indications: The 3-incision outside-in technique utilizes the donor quadriceps tendon, an extraordinarily strong graft, without damage from autogenous harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstrings. While some data suggest higher re-rupture risk with donor tissue, this is counterbalanced by avoiding secondary surgical site damage. Technique Description: The ruptured ACL is removed and the intercondylar notch is cleaned to visualize the anatomical ACL insertion site. Using the 3-tunnel technique a gaff is passed through the intercondylar notch, through a puncture hole (incision 1) and a rear entry guide hooked to its tip. The guide point is pulled into the knee and placed in posterior aspect of the anatomic footprint of the native ACL. Through incision 2, a guide pin is drilled to this point and overdrilled with a 10-mm drill. The edges of the hole in the intercodylar notch are smoothed with a currette. The tibial footprint is cleared, a tibial aiming guide placed. Through incision 3, a guide pin is placed and over drilled with a 10-mm drill followed by a Gore-Tex reamer to ensure no impingement would inhibit graft passage. The proximal bone of a quadriceps tendon graft is sized through a 10-mm sizer and compacted. Two holes are drilled to hold sutures for the proximal aspect of the femoral graft. The quadriceps tendon graft is sized to fit through a 9-mm tunnel and the free end whipped with a stitch before being passed from outside-in through the smoothed tunnels. The femoral bone block is tapped to have a press fit initially and then is fixed with a Milagro screw. The knee is cycled ten times to remove slack and the interference fit guide pin is placed on the anterior aspect of the graft, and fixed with the knee at 15° to 30° of flexion. Stability is tested with confirmation of no impingement, and then an extra-articular reconstruction with a semitendinosus allograft is performed. The extra articular reconstruction is placed at the point between Gerdy's tubercle and the fibular head, passed under the skin and the iliotibial band, and then inserted just anterior and superior to the ACL femoral drill hole. Results: Patient outcomes in our initial experience are comparable to our autogenous bone-tendon-bone (BTB) procedures without anterior knee pain. Return to sport is similar with autogenous procedures, with a delay of 6 to 12 months. In addition, there is a possibility for acceleration of healing with the addition of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid between 1 and 3 months postsurgery. We have insufficient data so far to determine if the re-rupture rate will decline compared with reported outcomes. Conclusion: The 3-incision technique with allograft quadriceps tendon for ACL reconstruction is a reproducible surgical technique that avoids harvest from the patient's own body. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Concomitant Anatomic PCL and FCL Reconstructions With Partial Lateral Meniscectomy

Background: Fibular collateral ligament (FCL) injuries commonly present in a multiligament knee injury pattern. These injuries are associated with significant instability leading to altered tibiofemoral biomechanics and therefore require surgical intervention. Similarly, grade 3 posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries may disrupt normal tibiofemoral and patellofemoral biomechanics and increase the risk of secondary osteoarthritis. Therefore, concomitant reconstruction of the FCL and PCL should be performed to decrease knee laxity and optimize functional outcomes. Indications: Early operative treatment is indicated for patients with combined grade 3 FCL injuries and complete PCL tears. Contraindications to this procedure include patients who have significant osteoarthritis, open knee dislocations, or medical comorbidities making them unfit for surgery. Technique Description: The fundamental idea behind this technique is a stepwise treatment starting with open aspects of the procedure and followed by arthroscopic work. The technique is initiated with a lateral approach, common peroneal neurolysis, fibular and femoral FCL reconstruction tunnel preparation, and a gracilis or semitendinosus tendon autograft harvest. After that, focus shifts to intra-articular work such as associated meniscal assessment and treatment, PCL femoral and tibial tunnel preparation, graft passage, and PCL femoral tunnel fixation. Final graft fixation order is as follows: anterolateral bundle of PCL, posteromedial bundle of PCL, and finally FCL. Results: Multiple studies have reported that an anatomic FCL reconstruction in the setting of multiligament injury results in improved patient outcomes. In a prospective study of 20 patients, LaPrade et al reported −0.4 mm difference in side-to-side lateral compartment gapping and significant postoperative improvement of symptom and functional scores at a minimum 2 year postoperative follow-up after anatomic reconstruction of the FCL. Similarly, Moulton et al reported significant improvement in the average Western Ontario and Lysholm scores at 2.7 years follow-up. LaPrade et al also reported significant improvement in function and objective outcome scores at 3 years’ follow-up from anatomic double-bundle PCL reconstruction. Discussion: Anatomic FCL and PCL reconstructions successfully restore near native knee objective stability and provide superior clinical outcomes when compared to nonanatomic-based FCL reconstructions that continue to be performed. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.