REVIEWS fines them in terms ofclass. In the French Lancelot cycles, E. Jane Burns argues, clothing also "supersedes anatomy as the prime indicator ofgen der identity" (p. 113); but the very play with costume in courtly ro mances also exposes the fragility offixed gender categories. Burns's essay also applies contemporary gender theory to a historically situated and perceptive close reading of medieval texts. If the collection can be said to have a flagship essay, it would likely be its opening piece, Dyan Elliott's "Pollution, Illusion and Masculine Disarray: Nocturnal Emissions and the Sexuality of the Clergy." Ar guing that nocturnal emissions, which were connected with menstrua tion, gave medieval ascetics a "sensitive gauge for clocking the relative success or failure of disciplinary efforts to gain mastery over the body," Elliott tracks the discourse from patristic texts through Gerson. This highly readable and skillful work of original historical scholarship ends in the fascinating observation that the obsession with pollution in late medieval clerical manuals mirrors the concomitant emphasis on eucha ristic ritual. Both articulate a similar "masculine disarray," Elliott spec ulates, that can be read in the overdetermined status of forms of "man handling," where the "unalloyed masculine ascendency" ofclerical ritual in late medieval culture bespeaks anxieties about the very fixity of gender. Constructing Medieval Sexuality is an excellent essay collection with much that will be useful to students, both undergraduate and graduate. It should be essential reading for medieval scholars from all disciplines interested in queer theory and gender studies. SARAH STANBURY College of the Holy Cross MARY RHINELANDER MCCARL, ed. The Plowman's Tale: The c. 1532 and 1606 Editions ofa Spurious Canterbury Tale. Renaissance Imagination Series. New York: Garland Publishing, 1997. Pp. 318. $72.00. This combined edition of two early printed editions of The Plowman's Tale gives readers a chance to reconsider this tale in a Renaissance con text, while somewhat slighting its more than 200-year role as a Canter bury Tale. I particularly enjoyed reading the 1606 edition, which differs 367 STUDIES IN THE AGE OF CHAUCER from the 1533 edition principally in that the later recension has exten sive explanatory notes and glosses by Antony Wotton, a Puritan clergy man. The earlier edition, inexplicably dated 1533 in McCarl's text and 1532 in the tide, has its own notes in Latin, most of which quote the Latin Vulgate. Both sets of side notes are printed in McCarl's edition at the bottom ofthe page ofthe text; the proximity ofthe side notes to the text is the most exciting thing about the volume. This edition grew out ofMcCarl's research on sixteenth-century printed books, and it exists in the underexplored territory of the influence of the Middle Ages on the Renaissance, and how the Renaissance shaped our view of the Middle Ages. Part ofthe series The Renaissance Imagination: Important Literary and Theatrical Texts from the Late Middle Ages through the Seventeenth Century, edited by Stephen Orgel, the edition presumably aims to help make such connections. This edition is only available in expensive cloth, so it is clearly not intended for teaching, and in any case there is a serviceable teaching edition in James M. Dean's Six Ecclesiastical Satires put out by the Con sortium for the Teaching of the Middle Ages (TEAMS). I therefore as sume that this edition is intended for scholars of both the Renaissance and the Middle Ages who would like easy access to a sixteenth- and a seventeenth-century version of the poem. The extensive introduction and glossary often seem aimed more at students than at scholars, but that may be due to McCarl's varied audiences. For example, most medi eval scholars probably will not need her interesting introductory infor mation about Lollardry, but perhaps some Renaissance scholars would find it useful. McCarl chooses to edit two different texts of the poem without regu larizing spelling or collating texts. She does not mention any emenda tions, but also does not explain her editing choices. There are some ben efits to such diplomatic editions, but I wonder what the benefits are for publication of The Plowman'.r Tale and why these two recensions are chosen. Each...