Discharge Order Set Research Articles

Guided ordering: Clinician interactions with complex order-sets

BackgroundElectronic order-sets increasingly ask clinicians to answer questions or follow algorithms. Cooperation with such requests has not been studied. SettingInternal Medicine service of an academic medical center. ObjectiveWe studied the accuracy of clinician responses to questions embedded in electronic admission and discharge order-sets. Embedded questions asked whether any of three “core” diagnoses was present; a response was required to submit orders. Endorsement of any diagnosis made available best-practice ordering screens for that diagnosis. DesignThree reviewers examined 180 electronic records (8% of discharges), drawn equally (for each core diagnosis) from possible combinations of Yes/No responses on admission and discharge. In addition to noting responses, we identified whether the core diagnosis was coded, determined from notes whether the admitting clinician believed that diagnosis present, and sought clinical evidence of disease on admission. We also surveyed participating clinicians anonymously about practices in answering embedded questions. MeasurementsWe measured occurrence of six admission and five discharge scenarios relating medical record evidence of disease to clinician responses about its presence. ResultsThe commonest discordant pattern between response and evidence was a negative response to disease presence on admission despite both early clinical evidence and documentation.Survey of study clinicians found that 75% endorsed some intentional inaccuracy; the commonest reason given was that questions were sometimes irrelevant to the clinical situation at the point asked. ConclusionThrough faults in order-set design, limitations of software, and/or because of an inherent tendency to resist directed behavior, clinicians may often ignore questions embedded in order-sets.

Systematizing Inpatient Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation 2010

Despite recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, evidence suggests cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and use following indicated cardiac events is low. Referral strategies such as systematic referral have been advocated to improve CR use. The objective of this policy position is to synthesize evidence and make recommendations on strategies to increase patient enrollment in CR. A systematic review of 6 databases from inception to January 2009 was conducted. Only primary, published, English-language studies were included. A meta-analysis was undertaken to synthesize the enrollment rates by referral strategy. In all, 14 studies met inclusion criteria. Referral strategies were categorized as systematic on the basis of use of systematic discharge order sets, as liaison on the basis of discussions with allied health care providers, or as other on the basis of patient letters. Overall, there were 7 positive studies, 5 without comparison groups, and 2 studies that reported null findings. The combined effect sizes of the meta-analysis were as follows: 73% (95% CI, 39%-92%) for the patient letters ("other"), 66% (95% CI, 54%-77%) for the combined systematic and liaison strategy, 45% (95% CI, 33%-57%) for the systematic strategy alone, and 44% (95% CI, 35%-53%) for the liaison strategy alone. In conclusion, the results suggest that innovative referral strategies increase CR use. Although patient letters look promising, evidence for this strategy is sparse and inconsistent at present. Therefore we suggest that inpatient units adopt systematic referral strategies, including a discussion at the bedside, for eligible patient groups in order to increase CR enrollment and participation. This approach should be considered best practice for further investigation.

Systematizing Inpatient Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation 2010: Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Joint Position Paper: Endorsed by the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario

Despite recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, evidence suggests cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and use following indicated cardiac events is low. Referral strategies such as systematic referral have been advocated to improve CR use. The objective of this policy position is to synthesize evidence and make recommendations on strategies to increase patient enrollment in CR. A systematic review of 6 databases from inception to January 2009 was conducted. Only primary, published, English-language studies were included. A meta-analysis was undertaken to synthesize the enrollment rates by referral strategy. In all, 14 studies met inclusion criteria. Referral strategies were categorized as systematic on the basis of use of systematic discharge order sets, as liaison on the basis of discussions with allied health care providers, or as other on the basis of patient letters. Overall, there were 7 positive studies, 5 without comparison groups, and 2 studies that reported null findings. The combined effect sizes of the meta-analysis were as follows: 73% (95% CI, 39%-92%) for the patient letters (“other”), 66% (95% CI, 54%-77%) for the combined systematic and liaison strategy, 45% (95% CI, 33%-57%) for the systematic strategy alone, and 44% (95% CI, 35%-53%) for the liaison strategy alone. In conclusion, the results suggest that innovative referral strategies increase CR use. Although patient letters look promising, evidence for this strategy is sparse and inconsistent at present. Therefore we suggest that inpatient units adopt systematic referral strategies, including a discussion at the bedside, for eligible patient groups in order to increase CR enrollment and participation. This approach should be considered best practice for further investigation.

Effects of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on referral and enrollment rates

Despite recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, evidence suggests that utilization of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following indicated cardiac events is low. Referral strategies, such as automatic referral, have been advocated to improve CR utilization. In this Review, we evaluate the effects of referral strategies on rates of CR referral and enrollment. Referral strategies are categorized as 'automatic' (the use of electronic health records or systematic discharge order sets), as 'liaison' (discussions with allied health-care providers), or as 'other' (for example, the use of motivational letter to patients). The highest rates of CR referral have been achieved in studies implementing automatic referral orders, whereas the highest rates of CR enrollment have resulted from a combination of automatic and liaison methods. Overall, innovative referral strategies significantly increase CR utilization. While further investigation is needed, institutions should evaluate their CR referral practice in light of these findings.

DEVELOPMENT OF A CLINICAL PATHWAY FOR NEAR-TERM AND CONVALESCING PREMATURE INFANTS IN A LEVEL II NURSERY

A subcategory of premature infants, those born near term at 34 to 36 and 6/7 weeks gestation, may represent a previously unrecognized at-risk neonatal population. Evidence-based practice guidelines, crafted specifically for this population, are needed to effectively manage their care. In an effort to meet the needs of the near-term infant (NTI) population, and concurrently address the needs of the convalescing premature infants reverse transported to a Level II nursery setting, a multidisciplinary team of clinicians designed tools to provide a more consistent approach to care for and discharge these infants. This article describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of an evidence-based multidisciplinary clinical pathway specific to the needs of the NTI, including care plans, a standardized physician admission and discharge order set, evidence-based interventions, parent education, and recommendations for follow-up after hospital discharge that were developed for use in a Level II nursery. The use of the premature and near-term infant pathway has now been expanded to NTIs cared for in the newborn nursery, thereby ensuring safe, consistent, quality care for this population, regardless of their setting.