Neighborhood Disadvantage Research Articles

The Relationship Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Markers of Chronic Pain Risk: Findings From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP)

Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to health inequities, including chronic pain. Yet, research examining socioeconomic disadvantage and pain risk in Native Americans (NAs) is scant. This exploratory analysis assessed relationships between socioeconomic position (SEP), ethnicity, and neighborhood disadvantage on pronociceptive processes in 272 healthy, chronic pain-free NAs (n = 139) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs, n = 133) from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP). Neighborhood disadvantage was quantified using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Regression models tested whether ADI predicted pain-promoting outcomes (ie, peripheral fiber functionality, pain sensitivity, pain and nociceptive amplification, and endogenous pain inhibition) above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. The Ethnicity × ADI interaction was also tested. Of the 11 outcomes tested, 9 were not statistically significant. Of the significant findings, neighborhood disadvantage predicted impaired inhibition of the nociceptive flexion reflex above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. Additionally, ethnicity moderated the relationship between ADI and warm detection threshold; disadvantage was associated with higher thresholds for NAs, but not for NHWs. Together, the results suggest neighborhood disadvantage is associated with reduced C-fiber function and impaired spinal inhibition, thus pointing to a role of neighborhood disadvantage in the relationship between the environment and pain inequities. PerspectiveThis study assessed neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and pronociceptive processes in chronic pain-free Native Americans (NAs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Irrespective of ethnicity, greater neighborhood disadvantage predicted less descending inhibition of spinal nociception. Neighborhood disadvantage was associated with a marker of C-fiber impairment (higher warm detection threshold) in NAs only.

Socioeconomic disparities based on shooting intent in pediatric firearm injury.

Pediatric firearm injury is often associated with socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Most studies only include fatal injuries and do not differentiate by shooting intent. We hypothesized that differences in neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage would be observed among shooting intents of fatal and nonfatal cases. A linked integrated database of pediatric fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries was developed from trauma center and medical examiner records in Harris County, Texas (2018-2020). Geospatial analysis was utilized to map victim residence locations, stratified by shooting intent. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a composite measure of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage at the census tract level was linked to shooting intent. Differences in high ADI (more deprived) versus low ADI among the shooting intents were assessed. Unadjusted and adjusted regression models assessed differences in ADI scores across shooting intent, adjusted models controlled for age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Of 324 pediatric firearm injuries, 28% were fatal; 77% were classified as interpersonal violence, 15% unintentional, and 8% self-harm. Differences were noted among shooting intent across the ADI quartiles; with increases in ADI score, the odds of interpersonal violence injuries compared with self-harm injuries significantly increased by 5%; however, when adjusting for individual-level variables of age, gender, and race and ethnicity, no significant differences in ADI were noted. Our results suggest that children living in disadvantaged neighborhoods are more likely to be affected by interpersonal firearm violence compared with self-harm; however, when differences in race/ethnicity are considered, the differences attributable to neighborhood-level disadvantage disappeared. Resources should be dedicated to improving structural aspects of neighborhood disadvantage, which disproportionately impact racial/ethnic minoritized populations. Furthermore, firearm self-harm injuries occurred among children living in the less disadvantaged neighborhoods. Understanding the associations among individual and neighborhood-level factors are important for developing streamlined injury prevention interventions by shooting intent. Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Early Adversity and Socioeconomic Factors in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: A Case-Control Study.

Psychosocial adversity and stress, known to predispose adults to neurodegenerative and inflammatory immune disorders, are widespread among children who experience socioeconomic disadvantage, and the associated neurotoxicity and proinflammatory profile may predispose these children to multiple sclerosis (MS). We sought to determine associations of socioeconomic disadvantage and psychosocial adversity with odds of pediatric-onset MS (POMS), age at POMS onset, and POMS disease activity. This case-control study used data collected across 17 sites in the United States by the Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors for Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study. Cases (n = 381) were youth aged 3-21 years diagnosed with POMS or a clinically isolated demyelinating syndrome indicating high risk of MS. Frequency-matched controls (n = 611) aged 3-21 years were recruited from the same institutions. Prenatal and postnatal adversity and postnatal socioeconomic factors were assessed using retrospective questionnaires and zip code data. The primary outcome was MS diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were age at onset, relapse rate, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Predictors were maternal education, maternal prenatal stress events, child separation from caregivers during infancy and childhood, parental death during childhood, and childhood neighborhood disadvantage. MS cases (64% female, mean age 15.4 years, SD 2.8) were demographically similar to controls (60% female, mean age 14.9 years, SD 3.9). Cases were less likely to have a mother with a bachelor's degree or higher (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.80, p = 0.009) and were more likely to experience childhood neighborhood disadvantage (OR 1.04 for each additional point on the neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage score, 95% CI 1.00-1.07; p = 0.025). There were no associations of the socioeconomic variables with age at onset, relapse rate, or EDSS, or of prenatal or postnatal adverse events with risk of POMS, age at onset, relapse rate, or EDSS. Low socioeconomic status at the neighborhood level may increase the risk of POMS while high parental education may be protective against POMS. Although we did not find associations of other evaluated prenatal or postnatal adversities with POMS, future research should explore such associations further by assessing a broader range of stressful childhood experiences.

Changes in neighborhood disadvantage over the course of 22 years among community-living older persons.

Among older persons, neighborhood disadvantage is a granular and increasingly used social determinant of health and functional well-being. The frequency of transitions into or out of a disadvantaged neighborhood over time is not known. These transitions may occur when a person moves from one location to another or when the Neighborhood Atlas, the data source for the area deprivation index (ADI) that is used to identify disadvantaged neighborhoods at the census-block level, is updated. From a prospective longitudinal study of community-living persons, aged 70 years or older in South Central Connecticut, neighborhood disadvantage was ascertained every 18 months for 22 years (from March 1998 to March 2020). ADI scores higher than the 80th state percentile were used to distinguish neighborhoods that were disadvantaged (81-100) from those that were not (1-80). At baseline, 205 (29.3%) of the 699 participants were living in a disadvantaged neighborhood. Changes in neighborhood disadvantage during 14 consecutive 18-month intervals were relatively uncommon, ranging from 1.5% to 11.8%. Nearly 80% of participants had no change in neighborhood disadvantage and less than 4% had more than one change over a median follow-up of more than 9 years. Overall, the rate of transitions into or out of neighborhood disadvantage was only 2.7 per 100 person-years. These transitions were most common when the Neighborhood Atlas was updated (2013, 2015, 2018, and 2020). Comparable results were observed when decile changes in ADI scores during the 18-month intervals were evaluated. In longitudinal studies of older persons with extended follow-up, it may not be necessary to update information on disadvantaged neighborhoods in circumstances when it is possible, and the degree of misclassification of neighborhood disadvantage should be relatively low in circumstances when updated information cannot be obtained.

‘I’ve just heard that there are people who feel like they need to exercise’: a photo-elicitation study of values and priorities influencing physical activity in a socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhood in Uppsala, Sweden

ObjectivePeople living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Sweden engage less in physical activity compared with the general population, contributing to an elevated risk of cardiometabolic diseases. To inform targeted and...

Effects of Air Pollution on Respiratory Events and Pain Crises among Children with Sickle Cell Disease in New York City.

The disease burden of sickle cell disease (SCD) is highest among U.S. Black and Hispanic populations, who are often disproportionately represented in communities with poor air quality. There is limited data on the effects of air pollution exposure and social environmental factors on health outcomes in children with SCD. The objective of our study was to examine the associations between air pollution exposure and acute respiratory and vaso-occlusive pain crises (VOCs), and further study the associations stratifying by asthma status and neighborhood disadvantages. We conducted a retrospective study collecting data on outpatient sick and ED visits, and hospital admissions for respiratory events (i.e., respiratory tract infections, asthma exacerbation, acute chest syndrome), and hospitalizations for VOCs among children with SCD in a tertiary care center in New York City (NYC) from 2015-2018. Modeled data from the NYC Community Air Survey data using home addresses estimated street-level, annual-average exposure to air pollution (i.e., black carbon (BC), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)). The area deprivation index (ADI): continuous national ranking percentile (1-100) was used, representing a composite index for neighborhood-level social disadvantage. We further dichotomized study participants at the upper tertile (high vs. low ADI). Multivariable Poisson regression in generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to estimate relative risks (RR), after adjusting for potential covariates. A total of 114 children with SCD were included in this study and had between 1-4 annual repeated measures of annual average air pollutants over a total of 425 visits. Overall, there were no significant associations between air pollution levels and acute respiratory and VOCs among children with SCD and when stratified by asthma status. We found significant interactions between air pollution levels and the continuous ADI variable on respiratory outpatient and frequent respiratory outpatient/ED visits (p<0.1). When stratified by high ADI, increased exposure to PM2.5 was significantly associated with more frequent respiratory outpatient/ED visits among children residing in higher ADI neighborhoods (RR (95% CI)= 1.13 (1.01, 1.27), p<0.05), but not among those in lower ADI neighborhoods. Increased exposure to NO2 was associated with more outpatient respiratory events for children in high ADI neighborhoods (RR (95%CI= 2.74 (1.24, 6.08), p<0.05), compared with low ADI neighborhoods. Air pollution exposures increased respiratory complications among children with SCD living in deprived neighborhoods.

The Relationships Among Neighborhood Disadvantage, Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Diagnoses, and Race/Ethnicity in a U.S. Urban Location.

Childhood health disparities by race have been found. Neighborhood disadvantage, which may result from racism, may impact outcomes. The aim of the study is to describe the distribution of mental health (MH) and developmental disabilities (DD) diagnosis across Child Opportunity Index (COI) levels by race/ethnicity. A cross-sectional study using 2022 outpatient visit data for children < 18years living in the Louisville Metropolitan Area (n = 115,738) was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the association between diagnoses and COI levels, controlling for sex and age. Almost 18,000 children (15.5%) had a MH or DD (7,905 [6.8%]) diagnosis. In each COI level, the prevalence of MH diagnosis was lower for non-Hispanic (N-H) Black than for N-H White children. In adjusted analyses, there were no significant associations between diagnoses and COI for non-White children for MH or DD diagnoses. The odds of receiving a MH [OR: 1.74 (95% CI: 1.62, 1.87)] and DD [OR: 1.69 (95% CI: 1.51, 1.88)] diagnosis were higher among N-H White children living in Very Low compared to Very High COI areas. Current findings suggest that COI does not explain disparities in diagnosis for non-White children. More research is needed to identify potential multi-level drivers such as other forms of racism. Identifying programs, policies, and interventions to reduce childhood poverty and link children and families to affordable, family-centered, quality community mental and physical health resources is needed to ensure that families can build trusting relationships with the providers while minimizing stigma.

“The unwavering bond”: examining the sense of place in Harare’s informal urban neighbourhoods

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the sense of place in Hopley and Hatcliffe Extension, the largest informal neighbourhoods in Harare, Zimbabwe. The study draws from insights gained through focus group discussions with selected participants from these two communities. Contrary to conventional beliefs, we contend that residents of these neighbourhoods, despite enduring significant deprivation, exhibit a profound emotional connection to their neighbourhoods. These emotional ties stem from a collective sense of solidarity forged through shared experiences of socio-spatial exclusion. Our empirical findings challenge the prevailing assumptions about the sense of place in marginalised neighbourhoods, where such areas are typically perceived as having a diminished sense of place. This study contributes to the scholarly discourse on sense of place in disadvantaged neighbourhoods – a relatively understudied subject, particularly in Global South cities. These findings hold significant implications for urban planning policies on a global scale, especially those directed at informal settlements.

Individual socioeconomic status, neighborhood disadvantage, and cognitive aging: A longitudinal analysis of the CLSA.

There are likely many contributors to variation in the rate of cognitive decline in middle and late adulthood, including individual and neighborhood socio-economic factors. This study examines whether individual socio-economic factors, namely income and wealth, correlate with cognitive decline, in part, through neighborhood-level social and material disadvantage. Using the three waves of data collection from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), this study included 51,338 participants between the age of 45 and 85 years at baseline (51% female). Individual socio-economic status (SES) was assessed by annual household income and by the current value of savings and investments. Neighborhood disadvantage was measured by area-based material and social deprivation indices. Cognition was measured at each wave using verbal fluency, mental alternations, and delayed word recall. Latent change score models, incorporating direct and indirect pathways, were constructed to estimate the indirect effect of individual SES on cognitive change through area-level disadvantage. Multi-group models were constructed on the basis of age-group (45-64 years; 65-74 years; or 75+ years) to allow for varying estimates across age. Among 45-64-year-olds, income and wealth had indirect effects on initial cognitive level and on rate of cognitive decline through material disadvantage (standardized indirect effects = 0.01, p < 0.001), but only wealth had an indirect effect through social disadvantage (p = 0.019). Among 65-74-year-olds, income and wealth had indirect effects on initial cognitive level (p < 0.01) but not on rate of cognitive decline (p > 0.05), and among 75+ year-olds, no indirect effects were observed (p > 0.05). Wealth and income had direct effects, independent of neighborhood disadvantage, on cognition in all age groups (p < 0.05). Among middle-aged adults, greater individual SES may mitigate cognitive decline, in part, by allowing individuals to live in more materially and socially advantaged neighborhoods.

Benchmarking commercial healthcare claims data.

Commercial healthcare claims datasets represent a sample of the US population that is biased along socioeconomic/demographic lines; depending on the target population of interest, results derived from these datasets may not generalize. Rigorous comparisons of claims-derived results to ground-truth data that quantify this bias are lacking. (1) To quantify the extent and variation of the bias associated with commercial healthcare claims data with respect to different target populations; (2) To evaluate how socioeconomic/demographic factors may explain the magnitude of the bias. This is a retrospective observational study. Healthcare claims data come from the Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database; reference data for comparison come from the State Inpatient Databases (SID) and the US Census. We considered three target populations, aged 18-64 years: (1) all Americans; (2) Americans with health insurance; (3) Americans with commercial health insurance. We analyzed inpatient discharge records of patients aged 18-64 years, occurring between 01/01/2019 to 12/31/2019 in five states: California, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. We estimated rates of the 250 most common inpatient procedures, using claims data and using reference data for each target population, and we compared the two estimates. The average rate of inpatient discharges per 100 person-years was 5.39 in the claims data (95% CI: [5.37, 5.40]) and 7.003 (95% CI: [7.002, 7.004]) in the reference data for all Americans, corresponding to a 23.1% underestimate from claims. We found large variation in the extent of relative bias across inpatient procedures, including 22.8% of procedures that were underestimated by more than a factor of 2. There was a significant relationship between socioeconomic/demographic factors and the magnitude of bias: procedures that disproportionately occur in disadvantaged neighborhoods were more underestimated in claims data (R 2 51.6%, p < 0.001). When the target population was restricted to commercially insured Americans, the bias decreased substantially (3.2% of procedures were biased by more than factor of 2), but some variation across procedures remained. Naïve use of healthcare claims data to derive estimates for the underlying US population can be severely biased. The extent of bias is at least partially explained by neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors.

Association between Heat Vulnerability Index and Stroke Severity.

Socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods are particularly vulnerable to heat-related illnesses. We aim to investigate the association between the heat vulnerability index (HVI), an established neighborhood-level metric of heat-related mortality risk, and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) severity. We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive AIS admissions to a comprehensive stroke center between 2012 and 2021. Stroke severity was defined upon admission based on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics were extracted from electronic health records. HVI status was assigned using residential ZIP codes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Of 3429 AIS admissions, 1123 (32.8%) were from high-HVI (scores 4-5) neighborhoods and 868 (25.3%) had severe stroke (NIHSS score ≥ 10). In the multivariable regression model with stepwise selection, a high HVI was independently associated with severe stroke (adjusted odds ratio: 1.40 [95% confidence interval 1.16-1.69]). The association between a high HVI and severe stroke underscores the importance of targeting policy interventions to mitigate heat-related illness in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and 30-Day Outcomes for Common Cardiovascular Conditions.

Understanding the relationship between neighborhood environment and cardiovascular outcomes is important to achieve health equity and implement effective quality strategies. We conducted a population-based cohort study to determine the association of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and 30-day mortality and readmission rate for patients admitted with common cardiovascular conditions. We examined claims data from fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years between 2017 and 2019 admitted for heart failure, valvular heart disease, ischemic heart disease, or cardiac arrhythmias. The primary exposure was the Area Deprivation Index; outcomes were 30-day all-cause death and unplanned readmission. More than 2 million admissions were included. After sequential adjustment for patient characteristics (demographics, dual eligibility, comorbidities), area health care resources (primary care clinicians, specialists, and hospital beds per capita), and admitting hospital characteristics (ownership, size, teaching status), there was a dose-dependent association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and 30-day mortality rate for all conditions. In the fully adjusted model for death, estimated effect sizes of residence in the most disadvantaged versus least disadvantaged neighborhoods ranged from adjusted odds ratio 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22-1.36) for the heart failure group to adjusted odds ratio 1.63 (95% CI, 1.36-1.95) for the valvular heart disease group. Neighborhood deprivation was associated with increased adjusted 30-day readmission rates, with estimated effect sizes from adjusted odds ratio 1.09 (95% CI, 1.05-1.14) for heart failure to adjusted odds ratio 1.19 (95% CI, 1.13-1.26) for arrhythmia. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with 30-day mortality rate and readmission for patients admitted with common cardiovascular conditions independent of individual demographics, socioeconomic status, medical risk, care access, or admitting hospital characteristics.

Higher neighborhood disadvantage is associated with weaker interactions among cardiometabolic drivers

BackgroundAdiposity, dysglycemia, and hypertension are metabolic drivers that have causal interactions with each other. However, the effect of neighborhood-level disadvantage on the intensity of interactions among these metabolic drivers has not been studied. The objective of this study is to determine whether the strength of the interplay between these drivers is affected by neighborhood-level disadvantage. MethodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed patients presenting to a multidisciplinary preventive cardiology center in New York City, from March 2017 to February 2021. Patients’ home addresses were mapped to the Area Deprivation Index to determine neighborhood disadvantage. The outcomes of interest were correlation coefficients (range from −1 to +1) among the various stages (0 - normal, 1 - risk, 2 - predisease, 3 - disease, and 4 - complications) of abnormal adiposity, dysglycemia, and hypertension at presentation, stratified by neighborhood disadvantage. ResultsThe cohort consisted of 963 patients (age, median [IQR] 63.8 [49.7–72.5] years; 624 [65.1 %] female). The correlation among the various stages of adiposity, dysglycemia, and hypertension was weaker with increasing neighborhood disadvantage (P for trend <0.001). Specifically, the correlation describing adiposity, dysglycemia, and hypertension interaction was weaker in the high neighborhood disadvantage group compared to the intermediate neighborhood disadvantage group (median [IQR]: 0.34 [0.27, 0.44] vs. median [IQR]: 0.39 [0.34, 0.45]; P < 0.001) and compared to the low neighborhood disadvantage group (median [IQR]: 0.34 [0.27, 0.44] vs. median [IQR]: 0.54 [0.52, 0.57]; P < 0.001), as well as weaker in the intermediate neighborhood disadvantage group compared to the low neighborhood disadvantage group (median [IQR]: 0.39 [0.34, 0.45] vs. 0.54 median [IQR]: 0.54 [0.52, 0.57]; P < 0.001). ConclusionsInteractions among the various stages of abnormal adiposity, dysglycemia, and hypertension with each other are weaker with increasing neighborhood disadvantage. Factors related to neighborhood-level disadvantage, other than abnormal adiposity, might play a crucial role in the development of dysglycemia and hypertension.

Carjacking and homicide in Minneapolis after the police killing of George Floyd: Evidence from an interrupted time series analysis

There is abundant research showing the disproportionate impacts of violence on health in disadvantaged neighborhoods, making an understanding of recent violent crime trends essential for promoting health equity. Carjackings have been of particular interest in the media, although little research has been undertaken on this violent crime. We use interrupted time series models to examine the impact of the police killing of George Floyd on the spatiotemporal patterns of carjacking in Minneapolis in relation to neighborhood disadvantage. To provide grounding, we compare our results to the well-studied patterns of homicides. Results indicate that carjackings both increased and dispersed spatially after the murder of George Floyd and subsequent social unrest, more so than homicides. Socially disadvantaged neighborhoods experienced the greatest absolute increase while more advantaged neighborhoods saw a greater relative increase. The challenge ahead is to identify policy responses that will effectively curb such violence without resorting to harsh and inequitable policing and sentencing practices.

Neighborhood disadvantage and breast cancer incidence among women living in the United States

Neighborhood disadvantage and breast cancer incidence among women living in the United States

Preoperative Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter and Risk of Postoperative Complications: A Single Center Observational Cohort Bayesian Analysis.

While exposure to fine particulate matter air pollution (PM 2.5 ) is known to cause adverse health effects, its impact on postoperative outcomes in US adults remains understudied. Perioperative exposure to PM 2.5 may induce inflammation that insidiously interacts with the systemic inflammatory response after surgery, leading to higher postoperative complications. We conducted a single center, retrospective cohort study using data from 64,313 surgical patients living along Utah's Wasatch Front and undergoing elective surgical procedures at a single academic medical center from 2016-2018. Patients' addresses were geocoded and linked to daily Census-tract level PM 2.5 estimates preoperatively. We hypothesized that elevated PM 2.5 concentrations in the seven days prior to surgery would be associated with an increase in a bundle of major postoperative complications. A hierarchical Bayesians regression model was fit adjusting for age, sex, season, neighborhood disadvantage, and the Elixhauser index of comorbidities. Postoperative complications increased in a dose-dependent manner with higher concentrations of PM 2.5 exposure, with a relative increase of 7% in the odds of complications for every 10ug/m3 increase in the highest single-day 24-hr PM 2.5 exposure during the 7 days prior to surgery. The association persisted after controlling for comorbidities and potential confounders; our inferences were robust to modeling choices and sensitivity analysis. In this large Utah cohort, exposure to elevated PM 2.5 concentrations in the week before surgery was associated with increased postoperative complications in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting a potential impact of air pollution on surgical outcomes. These findings merit replication in larger datasets to identify populations at risk and to define the interaction and impact of different pollutants. PM 2.5 exposure is a potential perioperative risk factor and, given the unmitigated air pollution in urban areas, a global health concern.

Neighborhood Disadvantage and Prostate Tumor Aggressiveness among African American and European American Men.

Studies have identified associations between neighborhood disadvantage (ND), which is more likely to affect African American (AA) individuals, and aggressive prostate cancer. Thus, ND may contribute to prostate cancer disparities. However, it is unknown what ND components drive aggressive disease and whether associations vary by race. We evaluated associations between aggressive prostate cancer and four ND metrics-Area Deprivation Index (ADI), validated Bayesian Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI), racial isolation (RI) index, and historical redlining, and whether these factors interacted with race, among men with prostate cancer treated at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (2004-2021). We included 1,458 men (698 European American and 760 AA). AA men were more likely to experience ND. In adjusted models, the ADI, RI, and redlining were significantly associated with aggressive versus nonaggressive prostate cancer overall [ADI, OR for one SD increase = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.30; RI, OR = 1.27, CI, 1.07-1.51; redlining, OR = 1.77; CI, 1.23-2.56] and among AA men. The NDI was associated with aggressive prostate cancer among AA men (OR = 1.32, 95% credible interval: 1.13-1.57); percent in poverty received the largest importance weight. The ADI (P heterogeneity = 0.002) and NDI (exceedance probability heterogeneity = 98.1%) significantly interacted with race, such that associations were significantly stronger for AA men. We identified novel significant positive associations for racial segregation and historical redlining with aggressive prostate cancer and significant interactions between ND indices and race. Findings inform specific ND components that are associated with aggressive prostate cancer and suggest the ND effect is stronger for AA men, which has implications for interventions to reduce disparities.

The TBI Model Systems Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage Index (TBIMS-NSDI): Development and Comparison to Individual Socioeconomic Characteristics.

To create a census-based composite neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation index (NSDI) from geocoded residential addresses and to quantify how NSDI aligns with individual-level socioeconomic factors among people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Community. People enrolled in the TBI Model Systems National Database (TBIMS NDB). Secondary analysis of a longitudinal cohort study. The TBIMS-NSDI was calculated at the census tract level for the United States population based on a principal components analysis of eight census tract-level variables from the American Community Survey. Individual socioeconomic characteristics from the TBIMS NDB were personal household income, education (years), and unemployment status. Neighborhood:Individual NSDI residuals represent the difference between predicted neighborhood disadvantage based on individual socioeconomic characteristics versus observed neighborhood disadvantage based on the TBIMS-NSDI. A single principal component was found to encompass the eight socioeconomic neighborhood-level variables. It was normally distributed across follow-up years 2, 5, and 10 post-injury in the TBIMS NDB. In all years, the TBIMS-NDSI was significantly associated with individual-level measures of household income and education but not unemployment status. Males, persons of Black and Hispanic background, Medicaid recipients, persons with TBI caused by violence, and those living in urban areas, as well as in the Northeast or Southern regions of the United States, were more likely to have greater neighborhood disadvantage than predicted based on their individual socioeconomic characteristics. The TBIMS-NSDI provides a neighborhood-level indicator of socioeconomic disadvantage, an important social determinant of outcomes from TBI. The Neighborhood:Individual NSDI residual adds another dimension to the TBIMS-NSDI by summarizing how a person's socioeconomic status aligns with their neighborhood socioeconomics. Future studies should evaluate how both measures affect TBI recovery and life quality. Research studying neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage may improve our understanding of how systemic adversity influences outcomes after TBI.

Neighborhood disadvantage, race, and clinical outcomes in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Background: Little is known about the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) outcomes. Objective: The objective is to determine the impact of neighborhood disadvantage on time from symptom onset to diagnosis and annualized relapse rate (ARR). Methods: Neighborhood disadvantage were captured with the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated measure of neighborhood-level disadvantage. Negative binomial regression models assessed the impact of ADI on diagnostic delay (⩾3 months between symptom onset and diagnosis) and ARR. Results: A total of 158 NMOSD patients were identified, a majority of whom were White (56.3%) and female (89.9%) with a mean age of 46 years at diagnosis. The ADI did not significantly affect odds of diagnostic delay (odds ratio (OR) = 0.99, p = 0.26). In univariable models, the ADI was not significantly associated with ARR (OR = 1.004, p = 0.29), but non-White race (OR = 1.541, p = 0.02) and time on immunosuppressive therapies (ISTs; OR = 0.994, p = 0.03) were. White patients used IST for an average of 81% of the follow-up period, compared to an average of 65% for non-White patients (p < 0.01). Conclusion: No significant relationship between neighborhood-level disadvantage and diagnostic delay or ARR in NMOSD patients was observed. Non-White patients had a higher ARR, which may be related to less IST use.

Anxiety disorders in the elderly: the effect of child maltreatment

Introduction: Anxiety disorders in the elderly, when analyzed in light of the effects of childhood maltreatment, are notable not only for the high prevalence of these disorders in this age group, but also for the growing evidence that traumatic childhood experiences may play a significant role in its late development. Objective: To evaluate the influence of the occurrence and characteristics of child abuse and the clinical manifestation of anxiety disorders in the elderly. Methodology: This is a cross-sectional study, carried out with elderly people from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods in Porto Alegre, Brazil (n = 274), who responded to the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0 (MINI). more. Results: The development of anxiety disorder in the elderly was associated with several factors, reflecting a complex interaction between past experiences and present conditions. Among these factors, it was possible to deduce that the presence of child abuse, psychiatric comorbidities, disadvantaged financial conditions and low levels of education stood out. Conclusion: It is concluded that these findings support the hypothesis that child maltreatment is associated with anxiety disorders in the elderly and with specific levels of financial and educational conditions. Although they suggest that improving maladaptive social conditions in childhood could prevent anxiety disorders in the elderly.