Direct-to-consumer Research Articles

Websites Selling Direct-to-Consumer Anti-Mullerian Hormone Tests

The recent provision of direct-to-consumer (DTC) Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) testing in several countries has been contentious, particularly due to concerns about judicious testing and informed consent. To describe and analyze information on websites that sell DTC AMH tests. Qualitative study including content analysis of text information from websites in multiple countries that sell AMH tests DTC. The top 50 search results from 4 different internet search strings were captured and reviewed for eligibility. Data were extracted in March 2022 and analyzed from April 2022 to July 2023. Themes and categories were derived from the website content using a conventional inductive approach, with a particular focus on information content, quality and accuracy, as well as the tone and language used. Twenty-seven websites across 7 different countries formed the sample for analysis. Information varied considerably across websites and was organized into 6 overarching categories: (1) whether a test description was included (25 websites [93%]); (2) statements about what the test can do, which included indicating ovarian reserve (26 websites [96%]) and indicating likelihood of conceiving (20 websites [74%]); (3) statements about the usefulness of the test result, which included enabling women to adjust their reproductive timeline (11 websites [41%]) and determining whether egg freezing was a viable option (8 websites [30%]); (4) blood collection method (ie, through a laboratory or an at-home sample); (5) promotion tactics, such as stating the convenience of testing (24 websites [89%]) and using language promoting empowerment and control (7 websites [26%]); and (6) statements about limitations of the test, which included polycystic ovary syndrome falsely inflating AMH levels (13 websites [48%]) and that it cannot accurately predict chances of conceiving (9 websites [33%]). In this qualitative study including content analysis, most websites selling DTC AMH tests included false and misleading claims which might lead consumers to purchase an AMH test in the belief that it can reliably predict fertility potential and age of menopause. Depending on the test result, this may in turn lead to misplaced anxiety or reassurance about one's fertility and modifications to subsequent conception or contraceptive plans and behavior.

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive Review.

Emerged in the early 2000s, direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing has helped consumers access and understand their genetic information without the involvement of a healthcare provider. Unlike traditional clinical-based testing, in which a healthcare provider is responsible for ordering, testing, interpreting, and communicating the results, DTC testing provides valuable insights directly to individuals about their genetic information. It empowers consumers and their families to be proactive about their health and lifestyle. The online testing format has become increasingly popular due to its accessibility and affordability. However, it raises concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the results, data security and how to ensure privacy for consumers and regulators. A hybrid model combining elements from both DTC and clinical-based genetic testing has surfaced in the market recently. In the US, current health-related DTC genetic tests are not recognized for diagnostic purposes; instead, these tests are intended to provide genetic information that is associated with certain conditions, which may encourage consumers to take the opportunity to discuss the results and their implications with a healthcare provider. This DTC genetic testing review focuses on the fundamental concepts, applications, benefits, limitations, risks, and consumer concerns, as well as the state of the DTC framework compared with the clinical-based and hybrid models. Additionally, the regulatory oversight, data protection, and healthcare professional perspective on DTC genetic testing in the US will be discussed, including current policies and regulations.

The Racial and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Men Using Mail-in Semen Testing Kits in the United States

To describe the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of men using mail-in semen testing kits for their fertility care in the United States over 3 years. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of men who used mail-in semen analyses from a single direct-to-consumer (DTC) fertility platform between 2020 and 2022. Age, race/ethnicity, place of residence, and education level of men using mail-in semen analysis kits was collected from user questionnaires. Zip code level socioeconomic status was estimated using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). These characteristics were compared to the overall population of the United States. 4,342 men used mail-in semen analyses from a single DTC fertility company between 2020 and 2022 and completed the questionnaire. The median age of this cohort was 36 (IQR: 32,40) years. The group consisted of predominantly white men (72%), with 7.9% Asian and only 5.1% Black, 3.2% Hispanic, 0.4% Indian American, 0.1% pacific islander, 5.8% mixed race, and 2.8% other groups. 45.8% of the group had completed college, 22% had a master's degree, and 9% had a doctoral degree. The mean ADI was 83.47 (SD 21.44) compared to the average ADI of 100 for the general US population (p<0.005). DTC mail-in semen analyses have the potential to improve access to affordable fertility care. Racial and ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic classes are underrepresented for men seeking DTC fertility testing as they are for men presenting for in-office fertility care. Additional studies are needed to determine the factors responsible for these discrepancies.

Retrospective Cohort Study on the Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Screening in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Among cancer predisposition genes, most direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests evaluate three Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) founder mutations in BRCA1/2, which represent a small proportion of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PLPV) in cancer predisposing genes. In this study, we investigate PLPV in BRCA1/2 and other cancer predisposition genes that are missed by testing only AJ founder BRCA1/2 mutations. Individuals were referred to genetic testing for personal diagnoses of breast and/or ovarian cancer (clinical cohort) or were self-referred (nonindication-based cohort). There were 348,692 participants in the clinical cohort and 7,636 participants in the nonindication-based cohort. Both cohorts were analyzed for BRCA1/2 AJ founder mutations. Full sequence analysis was done for PLPV in BRCA1/2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK2 (truncating variants), EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2/6, NF1, PMS2, RAD51C/D, and 22 other genes. BRCA1/2 AJ founder mutations accounted for 10.8% and 29.7% of BRCA1/2 PLPV in the clinical and nonindication-based cohorts, respectively. AJ founder mutations accounted for 89.9% of BRCA1/2 PLPV in those of full AJ descent, but only 69.6% of those of partial AJ descent. In total, 0.5% of all individuals had a BRCA1/2 AJ founder variant, while 7.7% had PLPV in a high-risk breast/ovarian cancer gene. For non-AJ individuals, limiting evaluation to the AJ founder BRCA1/2 mutations missed >90% of mutations in actionable cancer risk genes. Secondary analysis revealed a false-positive rate of 69% for PLPV outside of non-AJ BRCA 1/2 founder mutations. DTC genetic testing misses >90% of BRCA1/2 PLPV in individuals of non-AJ ancestry and about 10% of BRCA1/2 PLPV among AJ individuals. There is a high false-positivity rate for non-AJ BRCA 1/2 PLPV with DTC genetic testing.

Characteristics of direct-to-consumer platforms offering erectile dysfunction treatment.

Due to the sensitivity and potential embarrassment of discussing erectile dysfunction (ED) in person, men are seeking treatment online. We sought to compare offerings of direct-to-consumer (DTC) platforms for ED treatment with respect to consultation, pricing, services, and privacy policy. Google was queried to identify DTC platforms offering ED treatment with the keywords: "telehealth erectile dysfunction," "telemedicine erectile dysfunction," and "online erectile dysfunction." Inclusion criteria were as follows: serving a majority of U.S. states, existing online only, providing both the consultation and prescription for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and delivering the prescription to the patient. Fifteen DTC platforms met criteria. Ten provided free consultations; 4 bundled the consultation fee with the first month of the prescription, with 1 of these functioning as a subscription service. Fourteen (93%) relied on online intake forms and 10 (67%) advertised review by the prescriber within 2 business days. Only 4 (27%) platforms explicitly advertised physician-only consults. Direct contact with the prescriber would only occur if needed or if required by state law at 8 (53%) platforms. Purchasing sildenafil and tadalafil was advertised on all platforms. Minimum prices of sildenafil ranged from $0.50 to $35/pill (mean $5.16/pill, median $2.65/pill); tadalafil ranged from $0.50 to $9.80/pill (mean $4.70/pill, median $3.21/pill). In addition to ED therapy, 13 (86%) platforms offered treatment for other men's health issues. All platforms included a website privacy policy, but only 10 (67%) mentioned Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance, with 2 of these claiming to not be covered entities. Although DTC platforms are transparent with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor medication and subscription pricing information, few offer direct contact with a physician to further discuss issues related to ED after completion of the online intake form. For comprehensive evaluation of ED in Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant settings, in-person or telemedicine visits should be arranged with men's physicians.

Understanding and preventing the advertisement and sale of illicit drugs to young people through social media: A multidisciplinary scoping review.

The sale of illicit drugs online has expanded to mainstream social media apps. These platforms provide access to a wide audience, especially children and adolescents. Research is in its infancy and scattered due to the multidisciplinary aspects of the phenomena. We present a multidisciplinary systematic scoping review on the advertisement and sale of illicit drugs to young people. Peer-reviewed studies written in English, Spanish and French were searched for the period 2015 to 2022. We extracted data on users, drugs studied, rate of posts, terminology used and study methodology. A total of 56 peer-reviewed papers were included. The analysis of these highlights the variety of drugs advertised and platforms used to do so. Various methodological designs were considered. Approaches to detecting illicit content were the focus of many studies as algorithms move from detecting drug-related keywords to drug selling behaviour. We found that on average, for the studies reviewed, 13 in 100 social media posts advertise illicit drugs. However, popular platforms used by adolescents are rarely studied. Promotional content is increasing in sophistication to appeal to young people, shifting towards healthy, glamourous and seemingly legal depictions of drugs. Greater inter-disciplinary collaboration between computational and qualitative approaches are needed to comprehensively study the sale and advertisement of illegal drugs on social media across different platforms. This requires coordinated action from researchers, policy makers and service providers.

The epistemic harms of direct-to-consumer genetic tests.

In this paper, I provide an epistemic evaluation of the harms that result from the widespread marketing of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests. While genetic tests are a valuable accessory diagnostic tool when ordered by a medical practitioner, there are different implications when they are sold directly to consumers. I aim to show that there are both epistemic and non-epistemic harms associated with the widespread commoditization of DTC genetic tests. I argue that the epistemic harms produced by DTC genetic tests have been disregarded in discussions on the topic. Drawing on the notion of contributory epistemic injustices, I highlight two pertinent epistemic harms: (1) a failure to uptake an individual's articulations about their identity and (2) the presiding reductionist framework dismisses useful hermeneutical resources. I then propose ways to mitigate these harms.

Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Medicines

Personalized or precision medicine has been used to describe the right drug to the right person at the right dose at the right time. One important aspect of personalized medicines is the genetic makeup of the individual. Pharmacogenetics investigates the role of individual genes in drug disposition. The use of pharmacogenetics will increase drug efficacy with minimum side effects. Several tables have been published by the FDA that list the pharmacogenetic associations with certain drugs. These tables suggest that certain subgroups of patients with certain genetic variants are likely to have “altered drug metabolism, and in certain cases, differential therapeutic effects, including differences in risks of adverse events” (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/precision-medicine/table-pharmacogenetic-associations#about).These tables include: Section 1: Pharmacogenetic associations for which the data support therapeutic management recommendations such as celecoxib and CYP2C9 polymorphisms. Section 2: Pharmacogenetic associations for which the data indicate a potential impact on safety or response such as codeine in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers will result in a lower concentration of the active form morphine. Section 3: Pharmacogenetic associations for which the data demonstrate a potential impact on pharmacokinetic properties only. In this list, the implications of the genotypes have not been well established for example atorvastatin and SLCO1B1 phenotypes may result in a higher systemic concentration of the drug. In the US pharmacogenetic tests are available as direct-to-consumer (DTC) tests. With DTC tests, individuals can send in a saliva sample and get results directly at their homes (Drelles et al 2021). Although the evidence on the effects of such tests and pharmacogenetic counseling is available and mounting in many clinical practices all around the world but is still to be implemented in the clinical practice in Jordan.&#x0D;

The evolving direct‐to‐consumer retail model: A review and research agenda

AbstractThe substantial growth of e‐commerce sales, driven by digital advancements, has enticed brands to sell direct‐to‐consumers (DTC) online. Despite the growth of the DTC online retail model in practice, academic literature remains fragmented. This systematic review is timely as it meets the need for a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of DTC over two decades of research to 2023. A SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol combined with a Theory–Context–Methods (TCM) approach examines the extant literature through a marketing lens. An analysis of 81 articles reveals a need for consumer behavior theories to underpin research on the DTC retail model. We conclude the review by identifying areas for further development, such as the need for research on the technology‐driven balance of power between brands, retailers, and consumers. Contextually, the authors highlight research opportunities on SME brands' internationalization and the DTC online luxury experience. Methodological directions include empirical qualitative studies and experiments on the emerging topics of technology‐enabled retail services and the experiential e‐commerce impact on customer experience. These future research undertakings will help us to better understand the DTC retail model.

Critical Test of the Beneficial Consequences of Lifting the Ban on Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Prescription Drugs in Italy: Experimental Exposure and Questionnaire Study

Background There are only two countries in the world (the United States and New Zealand) that allow the pharmaceutical branch to advertise prescription medication directly to consumers. There is pressure on governments to allow direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) for prescription drugs elsewhere too. One argument the industry uses frequently is the claim that exposure to DCTA, through various methods and occasions, is supposed to improve customers’ knowledge of a disease and treatment. This argument has been part of the health care community’s wider discussion of whether DTCA of prescription drugs benefits the population’s general interest or is only an attempt to increase the sales of the pharmaceutical branch. Belief in true learning by DTCA is rooted in concepts of empowered consumers and their autonomous and empowered decision-making. Objective In this study, we tested the hypotheses that contact with DTCA increases recipients’ literacy/knowledge, especially regarding the side effects of treatment (hypothesis 1), and empowerment (hypothesis 2). We further hypothesized that DTCA exposure would not increase depression knowledge (ie, about treatments, symptoms, and prevalence) (hypothesis 3). Methods A snowball sample of 180 participants was randomly split into three experimental groups receiving (1) a traditional information sheet, (2) a DTCA video clip for an antidepressant prescription drug, or (3) both. The video was original material from the United States translated into Italian for the experiment. Dependent variables were measures of depression knowledge (regarding treatments, symptoms and prevalence, and antidepressant side effects), depression literacy, and empowerment. Results None of the experimental groups differed significantly from the others in the empowerment measure (hypothesis 2 not confirmed). Partial confirmation of hypothesis 1 was obtained. Lower values on the depression literacy scale were obtained when participants had been given the video compared to the sheet condition. However, the general depression knowledge and its subscale on side effects reached higher scores when participants were exposed to the DTCA, alone or in combination with the information sheet. Finally, participants showed lower scores on knowledge about treatment and symptoms or prevalence after watching the video compared to the sheet condition (hypothesis 3 confirmed). Symptoms and prevalence knowledge increased only when the video was presented in combination with the sheet. Conclusions There is no evidence for an increase in empowerment following DTCA exposure. An increase in knowledge of the side effects of the medication was observed in the group exposed to the DTCA video. This was the only result that confirmed the hypothesis of the beneficial effect of DTCA videos on knowledge. Written information proved to be the most suitable way to convey knowledge on treatments and symptoms prevalence. Our findings support the necessity of studying health literacy and patient empowerment together and the consequences of such an increase in knowledge in terms of help-seeking behavior.

Is exposure to pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising for heart disease and diabetes associated with physical activity and dietary behavior?

ContextScholars have suggested that direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs may discourage or encourage changes in lifestyle to improve health. The current paper informs this debate by examining associations between estimated exposure to DTCA for drugs focused on heart disease/cholesterol and diabetes and self-reported exercise and consumption of a variety of unhealthy foods (candy, sugary drinks, alcohol, and fast food). MethodsWe estimated exposure to DTCA by combining data from Kantar Media Intelligence (Kantar) on televised pharmaceutical DTCA airings in the U.S. from January 2003 to August 2016 (n = 7,696,851 airings) with thirteen years of data from the Simmons National Consumer Survey (Simmons), a mailed survey on television viewing patterns. We estimated associations between exposure to advertising (both overall and for advertisements with specific content) and self-reported physical activity and dietary behavior using Simmons data from January 2004 to December 2016 (n = 288,483 respondents from n = 157,621 unique households in the U.S.). Our analysis controls for many potential confounders including respondent demographics, temporal trends, and program placement to account for purposeful ad targeting to higher-risk adults. FindingsHigher estimated exposure to DTCA for heart disease and diabetes drugs were not consistently associated with meaningful differences in the frequency of engaging in regular physical activity. Greater estimated exposure to DTCA for both diseases were, linked to small but consistently higher volume of consumption of candy, sugar-sweetened beverages, alcohol, and fast food. Specific DTCA message content about diet and exercise explained very little of the observed association between overall DTCA exposure volume and study outcomes. ConclusionsMany Americans were regularly exposed to pharmaceutical DTCA for heart disease and diabetes from 2003 to 2016. Widespread exposure to such DTCA is associated with higher levels (though small in magnitude) of consuming alcohol, fast food, candy, and sugar-sweetened beverages.

Assessing the general public's view of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing and their interpretation of DTC website disclaimer messages.

The general public continues to show increased interest and uptake of Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) genetic testing. We conducted an online survey (N = 405) to assess genetics knowledge, interest, and outcome expectancy of DTC genetic testing before and after exposure to a sample DTC disclaimer message. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the relationship between previous genetic knowledge, attitudes and self-reported systematic processing of a sample DTC disclaimer message, outcome expectancies, and interest to pursue DTC genetic testing. Increased genetic knowledge and more positive attitudes towards DTC genetic testing were associated with increased self-reported systematic processing of the DTC disclaimer message. Further, self-reported systematic processing of the DTC disclaimer message was associated with greater interest in pursuing DTC genetic testing but did not predict outcome expectancies. As DTC genetic testing continues to gain in popularity and usage, additional research is imperative to better understand participants' motivations and processing of the DTC disclaimer messages to improve the user experience.

A social and ethical framework for providing health information obtained from combining genetics and fitness tracking data

In this paper we explore a new technological intersection in the “big data revolution”: the integration of two forms of data, genetic data and fitness tracking data. For example, a small number of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing companies have recently begun offering customers the ability to link their fitness tracking data with their genetic profile to get personalized diet and exercise recommendations. In this paper we put forward four ethical considerations that should inform potential uses of this health information. Those considerations are: the heightened risks to privacy resulting from combining sensitive data sets; the poor quality of health information that is possible at present in the realm of precision DTC genomics; the limited usefulness of the recommendations; and finally, the cultural assumptions about health and personal responsibility that are embedded within fitness genetic testing and fitness tracking. To conclude, we offer some guidance on how the benefits and risks of returning this type of health information can be weighed.

Assessment of Patient Risk Profiles by a Male Sexual Health Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Platform: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) online prescription platforms (OPP) for sexual health represent a potential paradigm shift in the diagnosis and treatment for sexual dysfunctions in the way men seek care. Knowledge of patients' risk profile using these platforms is limited. To assess risk profiles of patients reaching out to health care professionals through their DTC. Anonymized data originally collected between February 2021 to May 2022 by a DTC platform in the men's health care space were retrospectively analyzed. Data included the content of patient requests through a communication function, as well as the corresponding responses by the attending physician on staff. Each request was then assessed by two independent urologists and categorized by the level of the risk profile as well as the need to refer the patient to further medical evaluation. Of 585 patient requests, 531 (90.8%) were classified as low risk. In the high-risk group, 32 patients were recommended to schedule an urgent appointment at a specialist. Only three patients (0.5%) were advised to seek emergency care. The overall referral rate for both risk groups was 52.3%. The requests of 279 patients (47.7%) were assessed as digitally treatable. Almost all patients who were digitally treatable were low risk. Side effects accounted for only 9.6% of all requests in the low-risk group, compared with 46.3% in the high-risk group. Overall, low-risk levels in the requests of patients using a DTC platform were reported, with almost half of them suitable to be solved digitally, whereas the other half required referral to an in-person specialist.

Which visual elements on packaging affect perceived credibility? A case study of in vitro diagnostic kits

With increasing public health awareness and the unprecedented global health crisis, consumers' demand for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) reagents is gradually increasing. However, consumer mistrust remains a significant barrier to purchasing and using IVD products. Pharmaceutical companies and governments prioritizing direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing have recognized the impact of visual packaging elements on consumer perception. Thus, we researched whether visual packaging elements systematically influence consumers' perceived credibility of IVD products' credence attributes, namely, their ability to protect personal and public health. Combining previous related studies, this study was conducted experimentally with rapid diagnostic test (RDT) kits, assuming that the visual elements (i.e., typeface, color, pattern, and information) of packaging can influence consumers' perceived credibility of RDT kits and explored which elements are more credible. Questionnaires were randomly selected and assigned to 216 participants. The results indicated that all four elements influenced the participants’ perceived credibility. Specifically, a sans serif typeface, realistic pattern, chromatic color, and more information made the participants feel more credible. Our research results fill a gap in the consumer perception of over-the-counter (OTC) pharmaceutical products by providing new insights into dissecting consumer perceptions. This offers a novel design strategy for online and offline marketing and promotional efforts by different companies and governmental organizations.

New Trends of Omnichannel Operation in Retail Trade in the Visegrad Countries

Abstract In the Visegrad countries, online sales increased generally by double-digit growth in the last 5 years. The research examines how the changing processes affected by the pandemic and consequently the macroeconomic environments and the distributors were confined because of the restrictions and lockdown of borders. It is observed that many traders moved toward the direct-to-consumer (DTC) strategy, so one of the research questions is how consumers could use the Internet for satysfing their needs. The pandemic has accelerated the changes in the value chains, and distribution channels, so the paper analyses how companies transformed their commercial models to omnichannel form. One of the other research questions is to determine the strength of the relationship between e-commerce’s gaining ground and the pandemic restriction in Visegrad countries. The role of innovation in the commercial branch, which have resulted in a more effective way, particularly disruptive technologies is stressed.

Economics of a health system's direct-to-consumer telemedicine for its employees.

To compare the mean per-episode unit cost for a direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine service for medical center employees (OnDemand) with that of in-person care and to estimate whether the offered service increased the use of care. Propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of adult employees and dependents of a large academic health system between July 7, 2017, and December 31, 2019. To estimate differences in per-episode unit costs within 7 days, we compared costs between OnDemand encounters and conventional in-person encounters (primary care, urgent care, and emergency department) for any similar condition using a generalized linear model. We used interrupted time series analyses limited to the top 10 clinical conditions managed by OnDemand to estimate the effect of OnDemand's availability on the trends for overall employee per-month encounters. A total of 10,826 encounters among 7793 beneficiaries were included (mean [SD] age, 38.5 [10.9] years; 81.6% were women). The mean (SE) 7-day per-episode cost among employees and beneficiaries was lower for OnDemand encounters at $379.76 ($19.83) relative to non-OnDemand encounters at $493.49 ($25.53), a mean per-episode savings of $113.73 (95% CI, $50.36-$177.10; P < .001). After the introduction of OnDemand, among employees with encounters for the top 10 clinical conditions managed by OnDemand, the trend for encounter rates per 100 employees per month increased marginally (0.03; 95% CI, 0.00-0.05; P = .03). These results suggest that DTC telemedicine staffed by an academic health system and offered directly to employees reduced the per-episode unit costs and only marginally increased utilization, suggesting lower cost overall.

Are commercial genetic injury tests premature?

Several direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing companies have emerged that claim to be able to test for susceptibility for musculoskeletal injuries. Although there are several publications on the emergence of this industry, none have critically evaluated the evidence for the use of genetic polymorphisms in commercial tests. The aim of this review was to identify, where possible, the polymorphisms and to evaluate the current scientific evidence for their inclusion. The most common polymorphisms included COL1A1 rs1800012, COL5A1 rs12722, and GDF5 rs143383. The current evidence suggests that it is premature or even not viable to include these three polymorphisms as markers of injury risk. A unique set of injury-specific polymorphisms, which do not include COL1A1, COL5A1, or GDF5, identified from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is used by one company in their tests for 13 sports injuries. However, of the 39 reviewed polymorphisms, 22 effective alleles are rare and absent in African, American, and/or Asian populations. Even when informative in all populations, the sensitivity of many of the genetic markers was low and/or has not been independently validated in follow-up studies. The current evidence suggests it is premature to include any of the reviewed polymorphisms identified by GWAS or candidate gene approaches in commercial genetic tests. The association of MMP7 rs1937810 with Achilles tendon injuries, and SAP30BP rs820218 and GLCCI1 rs4725069 with rotator cuff injuries does warrant further investigation. Based on current evidence, it remains premature to market any commercial genetic test to determine susceptibility to musculoskeletal injuries.

The Pandora's box of transparency opened by direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

With the increasing use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, several cases of fertility fraud have been uncovered throughout the world. A review of newspaper articles and specialized literature was made to analyze the issue of fertility fraud. The most famous cases, some of which are narrated in this article, became a scandal because they were committed by the doctors who treated the patients in question as a routine procedure in their medical practice. Some have been widely exposed in documentaries on streaming platforms, thereby raising awareness about a grave problem. The discussion focuses on the ambiguous regulation on the anonymity of donors, which has been one of the elements of the deception committed against the families using these services. Anonymity nowadays collides with the fascinating Pandora's box of transparency in genetic information that has been opened by DTC genetic testing.

Corporate Crime In The Pharmaceutical Industry: Why We Must Be Concerned

The impact of corporate crime is wide and varies. This study intends to highlight on this, from the perspective of the pharmaceutical industry. This study is conducted by using a semi-structured interview question. Information is also collected from books, journals, reports, websites etc. The objective of this study is to determine the impacts of corporate crime in the pharmaceutical industry and provides some suggestion to overcome the issues. Corporate crime in the pharmaceutical industry is an issue of concern because of its impact, especially on public safety and health, as it may lead to serious cases of permanent disability and fatality. Additionally, it can lead to other serious issues including the diversion of prescription medicine for non-medical or illicit use. It may also hamper the nation with the issue of drug problems which will consequently, affect the family institution as well as the society at large. The health system may also be affected due to the unsafe use of medicinal products and unethical practices among health professionals and personnel. Consumers or patients may also be exposed to untruthful and inaccurate drug advertisements and information. The crime has a negative impact on the pharmaceutical company itself and may tarnish the country’s name and reputation. To overcome and stop corporate crime, requires cooperation and commitment from various entity. Holistic actions and approaches need to be taken to dealt with the issue immediately so it does not get worse.