Background: Understanding the differential impacts of natural versus artificial UV exposure and validating a method to evaluate tanning prevention products are crucial for advancements in dermatological research and skincare. This study aimed to develop and validate a process for inducing skin tanning using natural sunlight and artificial UV-lamps, determining the optimal UV dosages to induce controlled tanning and erythema. Methods: Six adults aged 18 to 55 were exposed to natural sunlight and a 365nm UV-lamp, with incremental exposure times and doses. Sunlight exposure was at 7600 μW/cm2 for 20, 35, and 50 minutes, while the UV-lamp provided 78, 97.5, and 117 mJ/cm² doses. Skin tan and erythema were measured using Mexameter® MX-18-probe on days 1, 3, and 7. Test products A and B were applied to evaluate their protective efficacy, with untreated sites as controls. Safety assessments included dermatological evaluations for adverse effects. Results: Sunlight exposure led to a mean erythema index (EI) increase of 40.22, 42.55-, and 47.12-units post-exposure, and mean melanin index (MI) increase of 37.78, 46.22, and 59.20 units by day 3. UV-lamp exposure resulted in less consistent increases, with maximum EI rise of 12.09 units and MI rise of 7.79 units. Test products significantly prevented tanning and erythema compared to untreated sites, with no adverse effects observed. Conclusions: Direct sunlight exposure was more effective than artificial UV-light in reliably inducing tanning and erythema, establishing it as a method for such studies. The UV-lamp doses were insufficient for consistent results. The study validated a method for evaluating anti-tanning products, confirming their efficacy and safety. These findings support further research and optimization in UV exposure techniques, standardizing a method to induce tanning using direct sunlight exposure.