Accurate estimation of crop water use, which is expressed as evapotranspiration (ET) is an important task for effective irrigation and agricultural water management. Although direct field measurement of actual evapotranspiration (ETa) is the most reliable method, practical and economic limitations often make it difficult to acquire, especially in developing countries. Consequently, crop evapotranspiration (ETc) is calculated using reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and crop-specific coefficients (Kc) to support irrigation water management practices. Several ETo models have been developed to address varying environmental conditions; however, their transferability to new environments often leads to under or over estimation of ETo, which has an impact on ETc estimation. This study evaluated the accuracy of 30 ETo micrometeorological models to estimate ETc under different seasonal and micro-climatic conditions using ETa data directly measured using a smart field weighing lysimeter as a benchmark. Local Kc values were derived from field-based measurements, while statistical metrics were applied for the evaluation process. A cumulative ranking approach was used to assess the accuracy and consistency of the models across four cropping seasons. Results demonstrated the Penman–Monteith model to be the most consistent model in estimating ETc, which outperformed other models across all cropping seasons. The performance of alternative models differed significantly with seasonal conditions, indicating their susceptibility to seasonality. The findings demonstrated the Penman–Monteith model as the most reliable approach for estimating ETc, which justifies its application role as a benchmark for validating other ETo models in data-limited areas. The study emphasizes the importance of site-specific validation and calibration of ETo models to improve their accuracy, applicability, and reliability in diverse environmental conditions.
Read full abstract