Direct FXa Inhibitors Research Articles

Monitoring the efficiency of reversal on anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants using point-of-care viscoelastic testing

Bleeding events in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) can be life-threatening even at therapeutic DOAC plasma concentrations, as anticoagulation impairs hemostasis and should therefore be identified immediately after hospital admission. The anticoagulatory effects of DOAC are typically not measurable in standard coagulation tests, such as PT or aPTT. Specific calibrated anti-FXa-tests allow specific drug monitoring, but they are too time-consuming for critical bleeding events and are commonly not available for 24 h/7 days in routine care. However, recent advances in point-of-care (POC) viscoelastic testing (VET) have shown a promising approach for rapid and quantitative detection of DOAC plasma concentrations using the Russell viper venom factor V activator (RVV for FXa-inhibitors) test or the ecarin clotting time (thrombin inhibitors). In acute bleeding situations, direct FXa inhibitors can be reversed by specific antidote andexanet alfa or hemostasis can be improved by prothrombin complex factor concentrates (PCCs). After reversal, confirmation of reversal efficacy is often requested, but no routine assays are currently available. Thus, the emergency management of bleeding DOAC patients is usually “blinded” with regard to reversal efficacy. POC VET laboratory assays might therefore also be helpful for measuring DOAC effects after reversal. We present a case series demonstrating the usefulness of RVV-clotting time post-DOAC reversal with andexanet alfa.

Impact of elevated direct factor Xa inhibitor plasma levels on perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery.

Data on the perioperative bleeding risk associated with elevated plasma levels of direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) are limited. This study examines perioperative red blood cell (RBC) loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor reversal. This retrospective analysis includes data from 32 patients who underwent urgent noncardiac surgery between 2018 and 2022. This study aims to analyze perioperative RBC loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor antidote-based reversal or unspecific treatment with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). All patients were managed using a watch-and-wait strategy. The last determination of FXa inhibitor plasma concentration prior to surgery showed a median of 245 mcg/L (IQR 144-345), with a median time interval of 3.8 h (IQR 2.4-7.2) before incision. Median RBC loss during surgery was 49 mL (IQR 0-253), 189 mL (IQR 104-217) until POD1 and 254 mL (IQR 58-265) until POD3. Only one patient required intraoperative treatment with 4-factor-PCC and none required reversal with andexanet alfa. Linear regression models found no significant influence of FXa inhibitor plasma levels on intraoperative RBC loss. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher RBC loss until postoperative Day 1 compared with apixaban. No thromboembolic events were observed. Despite markedly elevated plasma concentrations of residual direct FXa inhibitors, perioperative RBC loss was limited in patients undergoing urgent noncardiac surgery. The intraoperative watch-and-wait strategy with selective intraoperative FXa inhibitor reversal or treatment only when required appears to be an appropriate approach.

Minimally modified human blood coagulation factor X to bypass direct factor Xa inhibitors

BackgroundDirect oral factor (F)Xa inhibitors are widely used as alternatives to conventional vitamin K antagonists in managing venous thromboembolism and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately, bleeding-related adverse events remain a major concern in clinical practice. In case of bleeding or emergency surgery, rapid-onset reversal agents may be required to counteract the anticoagulant activity. ObjectivesThe ability of FXa variants to bypass the direct oral FXa inhibitors was assessed. MethodsHuman FXa variants were generated through substitution of phenylalanine 174 (F174) for either alanine, isoleucine, or serine. FXa variants were stably expressed in HEK293 cells and purified to homogeneity using ion-exchange chromatography. ResultsF174-substituted human FX variants demonstrated efficacy in restoring thrombin generation in plasma containing direct FXa inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban). Their ability to bypass the anticoagulant effects stems from a significantly reduced sensitivity for the direct FXa inhibitors due to a decrease in binding affinity determined using molecular dynamics simulations and free energy computation. Furthermore, F174 modification resulted in a partial loss of inhibition by tissue factor pathway inhibitor, enhancing the procoagulant effect of F174-substituted FX. Consequently, the F174A- and F174S-substituted FX variants effectively counteracted the effects of 2 widely used anticoagulants, apixaban and rivaroxaban, in plasma of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism patients. ConclusionThese human FX variants have the potential to serve as a rescue reversal strategy to overcome the effect of direct FXa inhibitors in case of life-threatening bleeding events or emergency surgical interventions.

Tumor-associated thrombosis

The evidence available today from randomized controlled trials shows that for many patients with CAT, direct FXa-inhibitors are a safer and potentially more effective therapy than long-term treatment with Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), which has been the gold standard. Oral therapy should be used with caution, particularly in the case of gastrointestinal or urothelial tumors, especially if the tumor is still in situ. Even with LMWH there is an increased risk of bleeding. Although no randomized studies are available yet, for selected stable patients, a dose reduction for secondary prophylaxis after 6 months can represent an alternative with a relatively low risk of bleeding - an individual benefit-risk assessment is essential. Incidental VTE are anticoagulated according to the guidelines according to the standard. A less intensive AK may be justifiable in individual cases.

Factor Xa cleaves SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to block viral entry and infection

Serine proteases (SP), including furin, trypsin, and TMPRSS2 cleave the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, enabling the virus to enter cells. Here, we show that factor (F) Xa, an SP involved in blood coagulation, is upregulated in COVID-19 patients. In contrast to other SPs, FXa exerts antiviral activity. Mechanistically, FXa cleaves S protein, preventing its binding to ACE2, and thus blocking viral entry and infection. However, FXa is less effective against variants carrying the D614G mutation common in all pandemic variants. The anticoagulant rivaroxaban, a direct FXa inhibitor, inhibits FXa-mediated S protein cleavage and facilitates viral entry, whereas the indirect FXa inhibitor fondaparinux does not. In the lethal SARS-CoV-2 K18-hACE2 model, FXa prolongs survival yet its combination with rivaroxaban but not fondaparinux abrogates that protection. These results identify both a previously unknown function for FXa and an associated antiviral host defense mechanism against SARS-CoV-2 and suggest caution in considering direct FXa inhibitors for preventing or treating thrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients.

Direct Oral FXa Inhibitors Binding to Human Serum Albumin: Spectroscopic, Calorimetric, and Computational Studies.

Direct FXa inhibitors are an important class of bioactive molecules (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban) applied for thromboprophylaxis in diverse cardiovascular pathologies. The interaction of active compounds with human serum albumin (HSA), the most abundant protein in blood plasma, is a key research area and provides crucial information about drugs' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties. This research focuses on the study of the interactions between HSA and four commercially available direct oral FXa inhibitors, applying methodologies including steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and molecular dynamics. The HSA complexation of FXa inhibitors was found to occur via static quenching, and the complex formation in the ground states affects the fluorescence of HSA, with a moderate binding constant of 104 M-1. However, the ITC studies reported significantly different binding constants (103 M-1) compared with the results obtained through spectrophotometric methods. The suspected binding mode is supported by molecular dynamics simulations, where the predominant interactions were hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions (mainly π-π stacking interactions between the phenyl ring of FXa inhibitors and the indole moiety of Trp214). Finally, the possible implications of the obtained results regarding pathologies such as hypoalbuminemia are briefly discussed.

Effect of low-dose rivaroxaban with low-dose aspirin vs low-dose aspirin on platelet and oxidative biomarkers: a randomized study in diabetes patients with stable peripheral or coronary artery disease

Abstract Background Rivaroxaban (Riva), a direct FXa inhibitor, at 2.5 mg twice-daily (bid) combined with low-dose aspirin (ASA, 100 mg once daily-od) reduced major vascular events vs. ASA alone in subjects with stable coronary artery (CAD) or symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). Whether this benefit is due to the anticoagulant effect or additional FXa-mediated effects through the platelet and endothelial cell thrombin receptors is unknown. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by high platelet activation and oxidative stress that may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk. Purpose We investigated the effects of Riva (2.5 mg bid) + ASA (100 mg od) vs. ASA (100 mg od) alone on platelet and oxidative biomarkers in subjects with T2DM and stable vascular disease (stable CAD, symptomatic PAD and/or significant carotid stenosis). Methods In this randomized, open-label, cross-over trial, patients were randomized to continue ASA for 4 weeks and then add Riva for 4 weeks, or add Riva in the first 4 weeks and then continue with ASA alone for 4 weeks. Primary endpoints were: in vivo platelet activation and lipid peroxidation, assessed by the urinary excretion of 11-dehydro-TXB2 (TXM) and 8-iso-PGF2alpha (ISOP), respectively. Secondary endpoints included: routine coagulation tests, D-dimer, thrombin generation, serum TXB2, and Riva plasma concentrations. Results Seventy-6 subjects (10 females) were recruited: age 68±7 years (mean±SD); BMI 27.1±3.5 kg/m2; fasting glucose 129±31 mg/dL; HbA1c 6.8±0.9%; serum creatinine 1±0.25 mg/dL; LDL-cholesterol 77±31 mg/dL. Two patients dropped out: one for benign, self-limiting hematuria, one for unwillingness to continue, 8 subjects are completing the study leaving 66 who completed the 8-week randomized treatment and showed no sequence effect. Urinary TXM and ISOP were significantly reduced by Riva+ASA vs. ASA alone: TXM was 260 [195–398] vs. 335 [225–441] pg/mg creatinine and ISOP 722 [601–991] vs. 827 [648–1350] pg/mg creatinine (median [IQR]) on Riva+ASA vs. ASA alone, respectively (p<0.001 for paired samples). Riva plasma concentrations were 48±1.9 ng/ml at peak and 21±1.4 ng/ml at trough. The velocity of thrombin formation significantly decreased with Riva+ASA vs. ASA alone (velocity index, 46±3% vs. 83±3%; peak-height, 66±2% vs. 83±1%, respectively). aPTT levels were slightly but significantly prolonged by Riva vs. ASA alone (44±1 vs. 39±1 sec). Serum TXB2, D-dimer, von Willebrand factor, PT, fibrinogen and endogenous thrombin potential values were similar between treatments. Conclusions In ASA-treated subjects with T2DM and stable vascular disease, the addition of very low-dose Riva restrained incompletely-suppressed lipid peroxidation and platelet activation and modified the kinetics of thrombin formation. These changes may contribute to the beneficial effects of the Riva+ASA combination. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Investigator-initiated study funded by Bayer AG

Evaluation of newly-developed modified diluted prothrombin time reagent in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with direct oral anticoagulants: A comparative study with conventional reagents.

A single assay to assess the effect of the direct FXa inhibitor is needed clinically because prothrombin (PT) assay is not yet sensitive enough for accurate evaluation. We developed modified diluted prothrombin time (mdPT) assay showing a high reactivity to direct FXa inhibitors based on prothrombin time (PT) reagent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reactivity of mdPT to direct FXa inhibitors comparing to that of commercial PT reagents and diluted prothrombin time (dPT). The correlation and slopes of mdPT against the drug concentrations by anti-Xa assay were compared to those of the four commercial reagents of PT or dPT in 275, 257, and 243 clinical samples collected from non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients who are prescribed apixaban, edoxaban or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention, respectively. The correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) of mdPT against apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban was 0.818 (0.775-0.854), 0.914 (0.892-0.932), and 0.814 (0.766-0.852), respectively. The slope (95% confidence interval) of mdPT for apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban was 0.0068 (0.0063-0.0075), 0.0076 (0.0072-0.0080), and 0.0072 (0.0065-0.0078), respectively, which were higher than that of four commercial PT and dPT reagents, ranging within 0.0006-0.0023, 0.0017-0.0038, and 0.0016-0.0057 (all, p < 0.001), respectively. Compared with other PT and dPT reagents, mdPT reagent showed sharper slope to all direct FXa inhibitors, and higher correlation to apixaban and comparable correlation to edoxaban and rivaroxaban. This new reagent is expected to be a coagulation screening assay having a consistently high response to any types of direct FXa inhibitors.

Modified thromboelastometric tests provide improved sensitivity and specificity to direct oral anticoagulants compared to standard thromboelastometric tests in-vitro

BackgroundThe detection of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is still challenging but important in emergency patients. We recently demonstrated that modified thromboelastometry can detect rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Data on the detection rates of modified compared to standard thromboelastometric tests of apixaban and edoxaban, are missing. The aim of this in-vitro dose-effect-study was to add data on these DOACs and to evaluate thromboelastometric tests in-vitro using data of both studies.MethodsThe study was approved by the Ludwig-Maximilians-University ethics committee (No 17-525-2). Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals. Blood samples of healthy volunteers and samples of 10 volunteers for each DOAC were used. Blood samples were spiked with six different concentrations of edoxaban and apixaban (0ng/ml; 31.25ng/ml; 62.5ng/ml; 125ng/ml; 250 ng/ml; 500ng/ml). Modified tests (low-tissue-factor test TFTEM and ecarin-based test ECATEM) as well as standard tests (e.g. FIBTEM) analyzing extrinsic pathway of coagulation were used. Receiver operating characteristics analyzes were performed as well as regression analyzes.ResultsTFTEM CT correlated well with anti-Xa levels of apixaban and edoxaban (apixaban: r2 = 0.8064 p < 0.0001; edoxaban: r2 = 0.8603; p < 0.0001). The detection of direct FXa inhibitors (> 30 ng/mL) was successful with FIBTEM CT with a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 90%, respectively. As expected, ECATEM CT was not prolonged by direct FXa-inhibitors due to its specificity for direct thrombin inhibitors. Again, TFTEM CT provided the highest sensitivity and specificity for the detection of direct FXa inhibitors with 96% and 95%, respectively. ECATEM test showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the detection of dabigatran.ConclusionsOur study presents modified thromboelastometric tests with improved detection of even low DOAC concentrations > 30 ng/mL, including apixaban in-vitro. The study thus complements the previously published data on dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Validation studies must confirm the results due to the explanatory design of this study.

Direct (New) Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs): Drawbacks, Bleeding and Reversal

Direct (new) Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as a contemporary and promising option in the treatment of thromboses and VTE, while protecting the coagulation cascade against untoward bleeding events. They are used in the management and prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and other thrombotic diseases. The most prominent complication of these agents is bleeding. These agents have similar or lower rates of major intracranial hemorrhages, while they had a higher risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding when compared to warfarin. This manuscript is aimed to revise and update the literature findings to outline the side effects of DOACs in various clinical scenarios. A narrative review of currently published studies was performed. Online database searches were performed for clinical trials published before July 2021, on the efficacy and adverse effects attributed to the anticoagulant treatment, especially DOACs. A literature search via electronic databases was carried out, beginning with the usage of the agents in the Western Languages papers. The search terms initially included direct (new) oral anticoagulants, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, idarucizumab, andexanet, prothrombin complex concentrates, and fresh frozen plasma. Papers were examined for methodological soundness before being included. Severe bleeding episodes require aggressive interventions for successful management. Therefore, bleeding should be evaluated in special regard to the location and rate of hemorrhage, and total volume of blood loss. Patient's age, weight and organ dysfunctions (e.g., kidney/liver failure or chronic respiratory diseases) directly affect the clinical course of overdose. Management recommendations for hemorrhage associated with DOAC use vary, depending on the class of the culprit agent (direct thrombin inhibitor vs. FXa inhibitor), the clinical status of the patient (mild/ moderate vs. severe/life-threatening), and capabilities of the institution. Specific reversal agents (i.e., idarucizumab and andexanet alfa) can be used if available, while prothrombin complex concentrates, fresh frozen plasma and/ or tranexamic acid can also be employed as nonspecific replacement agents in the management of DOAC-related bleeding diathesis.

An Update of the Efficacy and Comparative Characteristics of Direct (New) Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs).

Direct (New-generation) Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as effective agents which are used in place of vitamin-K antagonists in treatment and prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), atrial fibrillation and other thrombotic diseases. Among them, the FIIa- direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and FXa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) are the most broadly used. Anticoagulant dosing may differ under special considerations. The patients' physiological reserves, organ functional status and failures should be taken into account in clinical decision-making processes. The advantages and drawbacks of each specific agent should be weighed with special regard to metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, along with the efficiency of the agents in different indications. This article aims to review the most recent literature to highlight the usage and efficacy of the agents in different clinical conditions.

Do non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants increase the risk of myocardial infarction?

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), compared with warfarin, have a favorable risk-benefit profile. However, in the RE-LY study in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the number of patients with MI was higher in the dabigatran group as compared to the warfarin group. Many meta-analyses showed that dabigatran treatment led to an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI). Large real-world data (RWD) did not confirm an increase in the risk of MI during dabigatran treatment. In our meta-analysis we excluded RWD, and each of the four drugs was evaluated in two key-phase III randomized controlled trials: in patients with AF and patients with AF and chronic coronary syndrome or acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary interventions. In each study, warfarin was the comparator for NOACs. In this homogeneous group of patients, dabigatran, in direct comparison with warfarin, significantly increased the risk of MI by about 30%. Moreover, the risk of MI was also significantly higher than the opposite effect of activated factor (F) X inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) vs. warfarin. In our network meta-analysis, considering individual NOACs in recommended doses, we found an increased risk of MI compared to warfarin only in patients treated with dabigatran 150 mg twice a day and, in particular, 110 mg twice a day. In this review we present evidence supporting our opinion that in patients with AF and coronary stenting, the choice of NOACs (direct FXa vs. thrombin inhibitors) is equally as important as choosing the optimal antiplatelet therapy (single or dual antiplatelet therapy).

Comparison of the sensitivity of commercial aPTT tests in measurement of the pharmacodynamic response of milvexian, a novel FXIa inhibitor

Abstract Introduction The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assay is a test routinely used to evaluate abnormalities or deficiencies in coagulation factors of the intrinsic and common pathways. The composition of the surface activator and phospholipids in the aPTT reagent is known to influence the response of heparin and direct FXa or thrombin inhibitors. Milvexian (formerly referred to as BMS-986177/JNJ-70033093) is an investigational small-molecule Factor XIa (FXIa) inhibitor being studied for the prevention and treatment of major thrombotic conditions. Clinical pharmacology evaluation of milvexian includes aPTT as the primary pharmacodynamic assay, thus underscoring the need for a sensitive reagent to evaluate its anticoagulant activity. Purpose This study evaluated the sensitivity of six commercially available aPTT reagents in plasma from individual donors spiked with milvexian, at concentrations spanning the anticipated clinically relevant exposures. Methods Platelet-poor plasma (PPP) prepared from citrated whole blood collected from consenting, healthy adult volunteers (n=12) was spiked with vehicle (DMSO, 0.5% v/v) or 0.1–10 μM milvexian. The aPTT was measured using six commercially available aPTT reagent kits which included silica; kaolin, or ellagic acid as the contact activator, in combination with natural or synthetic phospholipids. The coagulation automated analysers used for testing were matched to the kit's manufacturer recommendations. All reagents and respective normal or abnormal controls were prepared as instructed by the manufacturer. Results Milvexian exhibited dose-dependent prolongation of aPTT with all reagents tested. Assays performed with aPTT reagents containing kaolin or ellagic acid demonstrated the highest sensitivity, as measured by the concentration that achieved a 2-fold aPTT prolongation (EC2x), and showed the widest dynamic range of response. Coefficient of variability of aPTT measurements in plasma from 12 individual donors was between 5.6–7.9% for Dade® Actin® FS, and 7.1–8% for STA®-C.K. Prest® 5. Conclusions Prolongation of aPTT in PPP spiked with milvexian exhibited a dose-dependent relationship, with statistically significant differences observed among reagents at milvexian concentrations above 0.3 μM. The highest sensitivity measured by changes in the ratio to baseline was obtained with aPTT reagents containing an activator/procoagulant phospholipid combination of ellagic acid + purified soy phosphatides or kaolin + cephalin, which performed similarly. Identification of the reagents with the best combination of sensitivity, precision, and dynamic range may help guide the selection of reagent for assessing milvexian activity. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Janssen Research &amp; Development, LLC

Activated Factor X Signaling Pathway via Protease-Activated Receptor 2 Is a Novel Therapeutic Target for Preventing Atrial Fibrillation.

Activated factor X (FXa), which contributes to chronic inflammation via protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2), might play an important role in atrial fibrillation (AF) arrhythmogenesis. This study aimed to assess whether PAR2 signaling contributes to AF arrhythmogenesis and whether rivaroxaban ameliorates atrial inflammation and prevents AF. In Study 1, PAR2 deficient (PAR2-/-) and wild-type mice were infused with angiotensin II (Ang II) or a vehicle via an osmotic minipump for 2 weeks. In Study 2, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) were treated with rivaroxaban, warfarin, or vehicle for 2 weeks after 8 h of right atrial rapid pacing. The AF inducibility and atrial remodeling in both studies were examined. Ang II-treated PAR2-/- mice had a lower incidence of AF and less mRNA expression of collagen1 and collagen3 in the atrium compared to wild-type mice treated with Ang II. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced AF inducibility compared with warfarin or vehicle. In SHRs treated with a vehicle, rapid atrial pacing promoted gene expression of inflammatory and fibrosis-related biomarkers in the atrium. Rivaroxaban, but not warfarin, significantly reduced expression levels of these genes. The FXa-PAR2 signaling pathway might contribute to AF arrhythmogenesis associated with atrial inflammation. A direct FXa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, could prevent atrial inflammation and reduce AF inducibility, probably by inhibiting the pro-inflammatory activation.

Factor Xa inhibitors: critical considerations for clinical development and testing

The selection of factor (F) X and its activated protease FXa for targeted inhibition to prevent and treat thrombotic conditions is based on an understanding of coagulation biochemistry, sequential steps that occur on tissue factor bearing cells and the interface of coagulation proteins, platelets, mononuclear cells and the nuclear constituents of inflammatory cells. The goal for developing direct oral FXa inhibitors was to achieve rapid, selective, predictable, safe and effective anticoagulation across a broad group of patients expected to derive benefit. The history and development in patient care are exemplars of knowledge, translation and collaboration between the public and private sectors.

Different DOACs Control Inflammation in Cardiac Ischemia-Reperfusion Differently.

While thrombin is the key protease in thrombus formation, other coagulation proteases, such as fXa (factor Xa) or aPC (activated protein C), independently modulate intracellular signaling via partially distinct receptors. To study the differential effects of fXa or fIIa (factor IIa) inhibition on gene expression and inflammation in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Mice were treated with a direct fIIa inhibitor (fIIai) or direct fXa inhibitor (fXai) at doses that induced comparable anticoagulant effects ex vivo and in vivo (tail-bleeding assay and FeCl3-induced thrombosis). Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury was induced via left anterior descending ligation. We determined infarct size and in vivo aPC generation, analyzed gene expression by RNA sequencing, and performed immunoblotting and ELISA. The signaling-only 3K3A-aPC variant and inhibitory antibodies that blocked all or only the anticoagulant function of aPC were used to determine the role of aPC. Doses of fIIai and fXai that induced comparable anticoagulant effects resulted in a comparable reduction in infarct size. However, unbiased gene expression analyses revealed marked differences, including pathways related to sterile inflammation and inflammasome regulation. fXai but not fIIai inhibited sterile inflammation by reducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL [interleukin]-1β, IL-6, and TNFα [tumor necrosis factor alpha]), as well as NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa B) and inflammasome activation. This anti-inflammatory effect was associated with reduced myocardial fibrosis 28 days post-myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Mechanistically, in vivo aPC generation was higher with fXai than with fIIai. Inhibition of the anticoagulant and signaling properties of aPC abolished the anti-inflammatory effect associated with fXai, while inhibiting only the anticoagulant function of aPC had no effect. Combining 3K3A-aPC with fIIai reduced the inflammatory response, mimicking the fXai-associated effect. We showed that specific inhibition of coagulation via direct oral anticoagulants had differential effects on gene expression and inflammation, despite comparable anticoagulant effects and infarct sizes. Targeting individual coagulation proteases induces specific cellular responses unrelated to their anticoagulant effect.

Rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients

ABSTRACT Introduction Anticoagulant therapy is in use for both prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolic disorders. Delivering safe and effective anticoagulation in the pediatric population is challenging, since the available standard therapy with parenteral UFH and LMWH is troublesome for most pediatric patients, and VKAs require frequent INR monitoring due to the unpredictable pharmacokinetics and numerous food and drug interactions. Rivaroxaban, a direct FXa inhibitor, offers the convenience of oral administration and predictable pharmacokinetics across a wide range of patients. Its safety and efficacy have been previously established in various adult indications. Areas covered This review outlines pharmacologic and clinical aspects regarding rivaroxaban treatment in adults and children, and provides a broad appraisal of the The EINSTEIN-Jr program which evaluated the safety and efficacy of body-weight adjusted pediatric rivaroxaban regimens for the treatment of VTE in children. A review of the literature using the keywords rivaroxaban and pediatric venous thromboembolism was conducted within the National Center for Biotechnology (NCBI) and EMBASE databases. Expert opinion Rivaroxaban represents an appealing therapeutic alternative for VTE in children. Further research should explore additional indications for rivaroxaban in the pediatric population beyond that of VTE.

Apixaban Downregulates Endothelial Inflammatory and Prothrombotic Phenotype in an In Vitro Model of Endothelial Dysfunction in Uremia.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) associates with inflammatory and prothrombotic phenotypes, resulting in higher cardiovascular risk. Factor Xa displays functions beyond coagulation, exhibiting proinflammatory effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a direct FXa inhibitor protects from the endothelial dysfunction (ED) caused by uremia. Macro (HUVEC) and microvascular (HMEC) endothelial cells (ECs) were exposed to serum from uremic patients or healthy donors, in absence and presence of apixaban (60 ng/ml). We evaluated changes in surface VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, intracellular eNOS, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and von Willebrand Factor (VWF) production by immunofluorescence, reactivity of the extracellular matrix (ECM) towards platelets, and intracellular signaling. ECs exposed to uremic serum triggered dysregulation of all the parameters. Presence of apixaban resulted in decreased expression of VCAM-1 (178 ± 14 to 89 ± 2% on HMEC and 324 ± 71 to 142 ± 25% on HUVEC) and ICAM-1 (388 ± 60 to 111 ± 10% on HMEC and 148 ± 9% to 90 ± 7% on HUVEC); increased eNOS (72 ± 8% to 95 ± 10% on HMEC); normalization of ROS levels (173 ± 21 to 114 ± 13% on HMEC and 165 ± 14 to 127 ± 7% on HUVEC); lower production of VWF (168 ± 14 to 92 ± 4% on HMEC and 151 ± 22 to 99 ± 11% on HUVEC); and decreased platelet adhesion onto ECM (134 ± 22 to 93 ± 23% on HMEC and 161 ± 14 to 117 ± 7% on HUVEC). Apixaban inhibited p38MAPK and p42/44 activation in HUVEC (139 ± 15 to 48 ± 15% and 411 ± 66 to 177 ± 57%, respectively) (p < 0.05 vs control for all parameters). Anti-FXa strategies, such as apixaban, prevented ED caused by the uremic milieu, exhibiting anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and modulating the reactivity of the ECM.

Chromogenic anti-FXa assay calibrated with low molecular weight heparin in patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban: possibilities and limitations.

IntroductionClinical application of rivaroxaban and apixaban does not require therapeutic monitoring. Commercial anti-activated factor X (anti-FXa) inhibition methods for all anti-FXa drugs are based on the same principle, so there are attempts to evaluate potential clinical application of heparin-calibrated anti-FXa assay as an alternative method for direct FXa inhibitors. We aimed to evaluate relationship between anti-FXa methods calibrated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and with drug specific calibrators, and to determine whether commercial LMWH anti-FXa assay can be used to exclude the presence of clinically relevant concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban.Materials and methodsLow molecular weight heparin calibrated reagent (Siemens Healthineers, Marburg, Germany) was used for anti-FXa activity measurement. Innovance heparin (Siemens Healthineers, Marburg, Germany) calibrated with rivaroxaban and apixaban calibrators (Hyphen BioMed, Neuville-sur-Oise, France) was used for quantitative determination of FXa inhibitors.ResultsAnalysis showed good agreement between LMWH calibrated and rivaroxaban calibrated activity (κ = 0.76) and very good agreement with apixaban calibrated anti-Xa activity (κ = 0.82), respectively. Low molecular weight heparin anti-FXa activity cut-off values of 0.05 IU/mL and 0.1 IU/mL are suitable for excluding the presence of clinically relevant concentrations (< 30 ng/mL) of rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Concentrations above 300 ng/mL exceeded upper measurement range for LMWH anti-FXa assay and cannot be determined by this method.ConclusionLow molecular weight heparin anti-FXa assay can be used in emergency clinical conditions for ruling out the presence of clinically relevant concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban. However, use of LMWH anti-FXa assay is not appropriate for their quantitative determination as an interchangeable method.

Differential effects of direct factor IIa and factor Xa inhibitors in protein C-deficient plasma detected using thrombin generation and viscoelastometry assays.

Protein C (PC) deficiency results in dysregulated thrombin generation and increases thrombosis risk. In order to investigate the potential effects of anticoagulant drugs in PC deficiency, we evaluated the pharmacodynamic effect of selective direct factor (F) IIa inhibitors (dabigatran and argatroban), selective direct FXa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and an indirect FXa/FIIa inhibitor (enoxaparin) in commercial PC-deficient plasma using thrombin generation and viscoelastometry assays modified to reflect PC anticoagulant activity. Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak thrombin concentration (PTC) were increased in PC-deficient plasma but this corrected completely with PC concentrate. Inhibition of FIIa and FXa with the selective inhibitors also corrected the increased ETP and PTC but required high drug concentrations. There was sustained low-level thrombin generation in PC-deficient plasma with FXa inhibitors but not with FIIa inhibitors. Adding PC concentrate to PC-deficient plasma anticoagulated with dabigatran had little additional effect on ETP or PTC. In contrast, addition of even small quantities of PC concentrate to PC-deficient plasma anticoagulated with rivaroxaban further diminished ETP, primarily by abolishing sustained thrombin generation. In the viscoelastometry assay, the coagulation time was shortened and α-angle increased in PC-deficient plasma. These abnormalities reversed with both dabigatran and rivaroxaban. The selective direct FXa and FIIa inhibitors at high concentrations both counteracted the abnormal thrombin generation and clot formation observed in PC-deficient plasma, but with qualitative differences in their effects.