Direct Anterior Approach Research Articles

Dislocation Following Anterior and Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Setting of Spinal Deformity and Stiffness: Evolving Trends Using a High-Risk Protocol at a Single Tertiary Center

BackgroundPatients who have spinal stiffness and deformity are at the highest risk for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous reports of this cohort are limited to antero-lateral and postero-lateral (PL) approaches. We investigated the dislocation rate after direct anterior (DA) and PL approach THA with a contemporary high-risk protocol to optimize stability. MethodsWe investigated patients undergoing THA who had preoperative biplanar imaging from January-December 2019. Patients were identified using radiographic criteria of spinal-stiffness (<10-degree change in sacral slope from standing to seated) and deformity (flatback deformity with >10-degree difference in pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis). There were 367 patients identified (181 DA, 186 PL). The primary outcome was dislocation rate at 2-years postoperatively. Risk-factors for dislocation were evaluated using logistic regressions (significance level of 0.05). ResultsThere were 6 (1.6%) dislocations in the entire cohort, with low dislocation rates for both DA (0.6%) and PL-THA (2.7%). We observed increased utilization of dual mobility with larger outer head bearings (>38 mm) with PL-THA (34.4 versus 5.0%, P < .01) and conversely increased utilization of 32-mm femoral-heads with DA-THA (39.4 versus 7.0%, P < .001). Surgical approach (PL) was not a significant risk-factor for dislocation (odds ratio: 5.03, P = .15). Patients who had a history of lumbar-fusion had 8-times higher odds for dislocation (OR: 8.20, P = .020). ConclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series to date evaluating DA and PL-THA in the hip-spine 2B-group. Our results demonstrate lower dislocation rate than expected with either surgical approach using a high-risk protocol.

The Anatomical Course of the Superior Gluteal Vessel Bundle with Regard to Different Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundIatrogenic vascular injury during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is rare, reported at rates of 0.05 to 0.3%, but a potentially limb-threatening and life-threatening complication. We aimed to describe safe and danger zones for the superior gluteal vessel bundle (SGV bundle) with reference to different THA approaches. MethodsThere were 27 formalin-fixed cadavers with 49 hemipelves dissected. The course and distribution of the SGV bundle were investigated with the help of anatomical landmarks like the greater trochanter, the iliac tubercle (IT), and the ischial tuberosity. ResultsWe found and exposed the SGV bundle in all 49 specimens with no sex-specific differences. No SGV bundle was encountered up to 28 mm from the greater trochanter and up to 16 mm below the IT. The zone with the highest probability of finding the vessels was 25 to 65 mm below the IT in 39 (80%) cases – defining a danger zone (in relation to the skin incision) in the proximal fourth for the direct anterior approach, in the proximal half for the antero-lateral approach, in the proximal fifth for the direct lateral approach, and almost no danger zone for the posterior approach. ConclusionsSpecial care in proximal instrument placement should be taken during THA. When extending one of the surgical approaches, manipulations in the proximal, cranial surgical window should be performed with the utmost care to avoid SGV bundle injury.

Low Risk of Fracture Using a Cementless Triple-Tapered Collared Femoral Stem With Automated Impaction in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundDirect anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with increased periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) risk. The aim of our study was to evaluate the fracture risk utilizing a triple-tapered, collared stem with automated impaction through the anterior approach. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive DAA THA procedures at a single institution performed by 4 experienced DAA THA surgeons between 2019 and 2021. We collected data on age, sex, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, and intraoperative and early postoperative PFF within 6 weeks postoperatively. Preoperative radiographs were evaluated to determine femoral neck-shaft angle and Dorr classification. We used Wilcoxon rank sum or Chi-square tests to assess differences between patients who did and did not have PFF. We also evaluated potential risk factors for PFF in unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses. In all, 24 PFFs (1.6%) occurred. There were 18 fractures (1.2%) recognized and managed intraoperatively (15 calcar, 2 greater trochanter, 1 posterior cortical). There were 6 PFFs (0.4%) identified postoperatively (5 greater trochanter, 1 diaphyseal), of which one required revision surgery. ResultsIdentified risk factors for fracture in adjusted regression models included women (odds ratio [OR] = 2.76, P = .047), preoperative coxa valga (OR = 4.54, P = .005), and coxa vara (OR = 2.85, P = .03). ConclusionsThe incidence of PFFs is low using a triple-tapered, collared cementless femoral stem with automated impaction through the DAA. Our findings agree with previous reports that have demonstrated women and preoperative valgus neck angle are risk factors for PFF.

Leg position effects on the femoral neurovascular bundle location during a direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic study

BackgroundFemoral neurovascular injury is a serious complication in a direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty. However, dynamic neurovascular bundle location changes during the approach were not examined. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the effects of leg position on the femoral neurovascular bundle location using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsThis study scanned 30 healthy volunteers (15 males and 15 females) with 3.0T MRI in a supine and 30-degree hip extension position with the left leg in a neutral rotation position and the right leg in a 45-degree external extension position. The minimum distance from the edge of the anterior acetabulum to the femoral nerve (dFN), artery, and vein were measured on axial T1-weighted images at the hip center level, as well as the angle to the horizontal line of the femoral nerve (aFN), artery (aFA), and vein from the anterior acetabulum.ResultsThe dFN in the supine position with external rotation was significantly larger than supine with neutral and extension with external rotation position (20.7, 19.5, and 19.0; p = 0.031 and 0.012, respectively). The aFA in supine with external rotation was significantly larger than in other postures (52.4°, 34.2°, and 36.2°, p < 0.001, respectively). The aFV in supine with external rotation was significantly larger than in supine with a neutral position (52.3° versus 47.7°, p = 0.037). The aFN in supine and external rotation was significantly larger than other postures (54.6, 38.2, and 33.0, p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsThis radiographic study revealed that the leg position affected the neurovascular bundle location. These movements can be the risk of direct neurovascular injury or traction.

Open reduction and internal fixation of irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture with femoral Neck System: a preliminary study

BackgroundMost displaced femoral neck fractures can achieve satisfactory anatomical reduction by closed reduction, but there are still some that cannot reset satisfactorily after closed reduction, and open reduction are required. Such fractures that cannot be repositioned successfully by closed reduction are called irreducible displaced femoral neck fractures in this study. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of direct anterior incision with the Femoral Neck System in the treatment of irreducible displaced femoral fractures.MethodsA total of 16 young and middle-aged patients with irreducible displaced femoral neck fractures involving Garden type III and IV were treated using Femoral Neck System fixation by open reduction through Direct Anterior Approach between January 2020 to September 2021. Functional outcomes and postoperative complications were assessed during follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Hip Harris score. The postoperative reduction was evaluated by the Garden Index. Observe postoperative complications.ResultsAll patients were followed up with a mean follow-up time of 21.1(12–30) months, and according to radiological results, all patients achieved fracture healing, with a mean healing time of 4.25 months. All 16 patients received grade Garden I and II reductions, and there was no significant difference in the anteroposterior Garden reduction index between the first day after surgery (166.13 ± 5.61) and the 12th month after surgery(164.94 ± 4.49) (P>0.05) and no significant difference in lateral Garden index between the first day after surgery(171.06 ± 4.46) and the 12th month after surgery(169.38 ± 3.98) (P<0.05). According to the Hip Harris score scale, 13 patients received excellent and 3 patients received good. The postoperative Hip Harris Score(17.19 ± 4.8) was significantly higher than the preoperative score(92.19 ± 3.4), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). No or mild femoral neck shortness occurred in 12 (75%) patients, moderate shortening occurred in 3 (18.75%) patients, and severe shortening occurred in 1 (6.25%) patient. None of the patients experienced femoral head necrosis, fracture nonunion, or incision infection. One patient developed deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity.ConclusionsThe Direct Anterior Approach combined with Femoral Neck System is an excellent treatment for irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture and achieved good functional outcomes and anatomical reduction with low complications.

The “Inside-Out” Anterior Osteotomy of the Proximal Femur via the Direct Anterior Approach in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

Osteotomy techniques used for wide exposure during femoral component revision include the extended trochanteric osteotomy and its modifications. We describe an anterior proximal femur osteotomy technique starting from the inside of the femoral canal at the bone-implant interface and heading outward. The technique is used in conjunction with the extended direct anterior approach and allows direct access to and visualization of the anterior, medial, and lateral bone-implant interfaces. This technique is most useful for the removal of collared, fully hydroxyapatite-coated double-tapered femoral stems, in which bone-implant interfaces need to be accessed for removal of a well-osseointegrated hip arthroplasty implant.

Comparison of early complications for primary total hip arthroplasty using modified direct anterior approach and lateral approach.

Total hip arthroplasty is a surgical procedure with reliable results, regardless of the approach used. The anterior approach has advantages by respecting muscle insertions, reflected in the lower number of complications and shorter recovery time compared to other approaches. The goal of the study was to assess the progression of 150 total hip arthroplasty procedures in the first 90 postoperative days. 75 patients underwent a modified direct anterior approach (MDAA) using a minimally invasive technique with a special table, and 75 patients underwent a direct lateral approach (DLA). An observational retrospective study was conducted, including 150 arthroplasties, performed by the same surgeon, using two surgical approaches. 75 cases with direct lateral approach (DLA) and 75 cases with modified direct anterior approach (MDAA), between January 2007 and December 2020. Baseline characteristics, surgical variables, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. At 90 days, both groups presented a similar percentage of minor complications (32% vs. 42%), however, there was a higher number of major complications due to DLA (40% vs. 12% p < 0.0001) overall, where motor neurological complications have a higher incidence (14 [18.6%]). No differences were found in terms of the Harris functional scale. MDAA is a safe and reliable technique with satisfactory results. It presents predictable early complications, such as other approaches. Although it allows a faster recovery, at 90 days, the evolution and satisfaction are similar between both approaches with excellent and good outcomes in > 90% of cases.

First 100 total hip arthroplasties performed by a young surgeon using the direct anterior approach: learning curve and complications.

Most of the reported discussions about the learning curve for the direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been by experienced surgeons. The study's aim was to describe the learning curve, short-term outcomes, complications, and adaptations to the DAA used in the first 100 THA cases experienced by a young surgeon who had received DAA training for trauma surgeries. This retrospective study summarizes the first 100 consecutive cases experienced by a young surgeon who performed the unilateral DAA for THA between 2019 and 2021. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed to evaluate the learning curve on the basis of operative time and overall complications. The demographics data, short-term outcomes, and complications of the first 50 and second 50 cases were compared. The CUSUM curve declined after 49 and 55 cases, measured by operative time and overall complications, respectively. The median operative time (104 vs. 80min) and intraoperative fluoroscopic time (38 vs. 12s) increased significantly in the first 50 cases compared with the times in the second 50 cases. Complications tended to occur in the first 50 cases (12% vs. 6%), and the overall rate was 9%. Major complications all occurred in the first 50 cases, with a rate of 4%. Only one case, which involved a complicated periprosthetic fracture around the stem that extended to the tip, required the intervention of a senior surgeon. Even after receiving training on the DAA for trauma surgeries, the young surgeon experienced a steep learning curve and more complications in the first 50 cases. The DAA for THA is a technically demanding procedure and may require guidance from an experienced surgeon to manage unexpected complications.

Outcomes of direct anterior approach for uncemented total hip replacement in medial femoral neck fractures: a retrospective comparative study on the first 100 consecutive patients

BackgroundWith the aging of the population, the incidence of medial femoral neck fractures is likely to increase, and along them the need for total hip replacement. The present study aimed to analyze whether the use of the direct anterior hip approach, compared with posterolateral approach in medial proximal femur fracture patients, results in any advantage in terms of complications rate and functional recovery.MethodsA total of 162 patients were included in the study, and divided by approach: 100 performed with direct anterior approach (group A) and 62 with posterolateral approach (group B). The two populations were overlapping in age (75 vs 74 years; p = 0.13), sex (58F 42M vs 46F 16M; p = 0.12) and BMI (24 vs 24; p = 0.77).ResultsGroup A showed a higher ASA score compared to group B (3 vs 2; p = 0.04). Similar hospital stays (7 vs 7 days; p = 0.55) and complication rates (6% vs 8%; p = 0.61) were observed among groups, the most frequent being periprosthetic fractures, and need for allogeneic blood transfusion (20% vs 13%; p = 0.25). Patients in group A (96 vs 85 min; p = 0.10) showed a slightly, longer surgical time and a faster postoperative functional recovery witnessed by the ability to climb stairs at hospital discharge (37% vs 21%; p = 0.041).ConclusionThe use of the direct anterior hip approach was effective in the management of frail patients with medial femoral neck fractures managed by total hip arthroplasty, allowing faster functional recovery in the elderly population.

Free Hip Arthroplasty Templating Software - Does it Work?

Preoperative planning is important for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA) and has been historically performed using acetate templates. Digital software templating has been adopted for evaluating implant size, position, and alignment. Commercial software can be expensive, but free programs exist. Detroit Bone Setter (detroitbonesetter.com, Detroit, MI) is a freely available templating program, but hasn't been validated. Our study reports this program's accuracy for templating THA. Sixty-five patients undergoing THA between 2017 and 2022 at 2 hospitals were included. All cases were templated by the senior author or orthopaedic trauma fellow prospectively or retrospectively in a blinded fashion. Direct anterior or posterior approaches were used based on attending surgeon's preference. A student's t-test was used to compare means of templated vs actual implant sizes of femoral and acetabular components. There was no significant difference between implanted (mean [M]= 6.4, standard deviation [SD]= 2.0) and templated femoral component sizes (M= 5.7, SD= 2.1). There was a significant difference between implanted (M= 57.0, SD= 3.9) and templated acetabular component sizes (M= 53.4, SD= 3.0). Bland-Altman testing demonstrated femoral components with positive measurement bias of 0.62, indicating slight overestimation of implant size. Acetabular component size was overestimated with positive measurement bias of 3.6 mm. Detroit Bone Setter is advantageous as it is freely available and supports most major company implants. It accurately templated femoral component size but consistently overestimated acetabular component size by 3.6 mm. Further studies are needed prior to recommending its routine use for templating THA when other validated methods exist. It could be used with caution when no other methods are available.

Trauma

The October 2023 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: Intramedullary nailing versus sliding hip screw in trochanteric fracture management: the INSITE randomized clinical trial; Five-year outcomes for patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia; Direct anterior versus anterolateral approach in hip joint hemiarthroplasty; Proximal humerus fractures: treat them all nonoperatively?; Tranexamic acid administration by prehospital personnel; Locked plating versus nailing for proximal tibia fractures: a multicentre randomized controlled trial; A retrospective review of the rate of septic knee arthritis after retrograde femoral nailing for traumatic femoral fractures at a single academic institution.

Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty utilizing a fluoroscopy-guided system resulted in improved intra-operative efficiency relative to a computerized tomography-based platform.

Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a computerized-tomography (CT) based workflow increases surgical time relative to traditional manual technique. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the intra-operative efficiencies of two robotic THA systems: a fluoroscopy-based platform (FL-RTHA) and a contemporary, CT-based (CT-RTHA) platform. A review of 107 consecutive FL-RTHA and 159 CT-RTHA primary, direct anterior approach (DAA) THA procedures was conducted. All cases were performed by one of two surgeons operating at the same institution, for a pre-operative diagnosis of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Primary outcome variables included averages and consistencies (variances) for surgical times and operating room (OR) times. A secondary outcome was to quantify the duration of robot-active phases in the FL-RTHA workflow. The FL-RTHA cohort experienced shorter surgical times (38.71min ± 7.00 vs. 75.33min ± 11.38; p < 0.001) and OR times (101.35min ± 12.22 vs. 156.74min ± 17.79; p < 0.001) compared to the CT-RTHA cohort. Surgical times and OR times were both more consistent in the FL-RTHA cohort compared to the CT-RTHA cohort (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent DAA THA with the assistance of a fluoroscopy-based robotic system experienced shorter and more consistent surgical times and OR times compared to patients who underwent similar DAA THA procedures with a contemporary, CT-based robotic platform.

Perioperative periprosthetic femur fracture associated with direct anterior total hip arthroplasty using metaphyseal fit and fill stem

IntroductionThis study aims to identify radiographic and clinical risk factors of perioperative periprosthetic femur fracture associated with the direct anterior approach (DAA) using a metaphyseal fit and fill stem. We hypothesize stem malalignment with this femoral implant places increased stress on the medial calcar region, which leads to an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture.MethodsWe compared patients with periprosthetic femur fractures following DAA total hip arthroplasty (THA) utilizing the Echo Bi-Metric Microplasty Stem (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) to a cohort of patients who did not sustain a periprosthetic fracture from five orthopedic surgeons over four years. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for stem alignment, neck cut level, Dorr classification, and the presence of radiographic pannus. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed. Demographic and categorical variables were also analyzed.ResultsFourteen hips sustained femur fractures, including nine Vancouver B2 and five AG fractures. Valgus stem malalignment, proud stems, extended offset, and patients with enlarged radiographic pannus reached statistical significance for increased fracture risk. Low femoral neck cut showed a trend toward statistical significance.ConclusionPatients undergoing DAA THA using a metaphyseal fit and fill stem may be at increased risk of perioperative periprosthetic fracture when the femoral stem sits proudly in valgus malalignment with extended offset and when an enlarged pannus is seen radiographically. This study identifies a specific pattern in the Vancouver B2 fracture cohort with regard to injury mechanism, time of injury, and fracture pattern, which may be attributed to coronal malalignment of the implant.

The Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Approach on Short-Term Postoperative and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Background While multiple studies have compared outcomes between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral (PL) total hip arthroplasty (THA), the debate over the optimal approach remains. Proponents of the DAA suggest that its muscle-sparing properties and unrestricted rehabilitation facilitate a more rapid return to function. The majority of studies demonstrate that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are similar between approaches beyond the one-year timeframe, but results are mixed when evaluating earlier time points. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and PROs between DAA and PL THAs at six weeks postoperatively. Methods A retrospective review of 749 primary THAs (151 PL, 598 DAA) from March 2020 to November 2022 was performed. All surgeries were performed by one of the five board-certified and fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. All patients completed Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) questionnaires preoperatively and at six weeks postoperatively. A univariate comparison of clinical outcomes (length of stay (LOS), home discharge rate, 90-day ED returns, and readmissions) and six-week PROMIS-PF scores between approaches was performed. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of the approach on outcomes after adjusting for baseline differences between groups. Results Patients undergoing DAA THA experienced significantly shorter average LOS (0.71 vs. 1.36 days, p<0.001), higher rates of home discharge (99.0 vs. 92.1%, p<0.001), and lower rates of 90-day readmissions (0.7 vs. 6.0%, p<0.001) than those undergoing the PL approach. At six weeks postoperatively, DAA patients achieved higher average PROMIS-PF scores (42.2 vs. 39.9, p=0.001). After adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index and baseline physical function, the DAA was significantly associated with shorter LOS (β=-0.52, p<0.001), increased odds of home discharge (OR=5.70, p=0.001), reduced risk of 90-day readmission (OR=0.14, p=0.001), and higher PROMIS-PF scores at six weeks postoperatively (β=1.37, p=0.045). Conclusion In comparison to patients undergoing PL THA, those treated using the DAA experienced improved clinical and PROs over the six-week postoperative period. While both approaches resulted in satisfactory outcomes, these results support the assertion that DAA THA may result in more rapid recovery and return to function.

The influence of direct anterior approach and postero-lateral approach on wound complications after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

To date, we have reviewed the synthesis literature critically through four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Eight relevant studies were examined after compliance with the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, as well as documentation quality evaluation. This report covered all randomised, controlled studies of total hip arthroplasty (THA) comparing the direct anterior approach (DAA) with the postero-lateral approach (PLA). The main result was surgical site infection rate. The secondary results were duration of the operation, length of the incision and VAS score after surgery. The results of the meta-analyses of wound infections in the present trial did not show any statistically significant difference in DAA versus PLA (between DAA and PLA) (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 0.5 to 4.04, p = 0.51). Compared with PLA, DAA had shorter surgical incision (WMD = -3.2, 95%CI: -4.00 to -2.41; p < 0.001) and longer operative times(WMD = 14. 67, 95%CI: 9.24 to 20.09; p < 0.001). Postoperative VAS scores were markedly lower in DAA compared with PLA within 6 weeks of surgery (p < 0.05), with low heterogeneities(I2 = 0). We found that DAA did not differ significantly from PLA in terms of the risk of wound infection for THA and that the surgical incisions was shorter and less postoperative pain after surgery, even though DAA surgery takes longer.

Surgical approach and dislocation risk following hemiarthroplasty in geriatric femoral neck fracture patients with and without cognitive impairment - Does cognitive impairment influence dislocation risk?

Determine if there is an association between surgical approach and dislocation risk in patients with cognitive impairment compared to those without cognitive impairment treated with hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Retrospective. Large, multicenter health system. 1,481 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. 828 hips met inclusion criteria; 290 (35.0%) were cognitively impaired and 538 (65.0%) were cognitively intact. Hemiarthroplasty. Prosthetic hip dislocation. The overall dislocation rate was 2.1% (17/828), 3.4% (10/290) in the cognitively impaired group, and 1.3% (7/538) in the cognitively intact group with a median time to dislocation of 20.5 days (range 2-326 days), 24.5 days (range 3-326 days) and 19.0 days (range 2-36 days), respectively. In the entire cohort, there were no dislocations (0/58) with the direct anterior approach (DA); 1.1% (6/553) and 5.1% (11/217) dislocated with the modified Hardinge (MH) and posterior approaches (PA), respectively. In the cognitively impaired group, there were no dislocations with the DA (0/19); 1.5% (3/202) and 10.1% (7/69) dislocated with the MH and PA, respectively. In the cognitively intact group, there were no dislocations (0/39) with the DA; 0.85% (3/351) and 2.7% (4/148) dislocated with the MH and PA, respectively.There were statistically significant associations between surgical approach and dislocation in the entire cohort and the cognitively impaired group when comparing the MH and PA groups. This was not observed in the cognitively intact group. Patients who dislocated had 3.2 times (95% CI 1.2, 8.7) (p = 0.0226) the hazard of death compared to patients who did not dislocate. Dislocation effectively increased the risk of death by 221% (HR 3.2 95% CI 1.2, 8.7) (p = 0.0226). In this patient population, the PA has a higher dislocation rate than other approaches and has an especially high rate of dislocation when the patients were cognitively impaired. The authors of this study suggest careful consideration of surgical approach when treating these injuries.

Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty With Gluteus Medius Repair: A Novel Technique

Introduction: Proper function of the gluteus medius muscle is crucial to performance and outcomes following total hip arthroplasty. Gluteus medius tears are reported in up to 20% of patients undergoing hip replacements. The combination of increasing notoriety for the direct anterior approach and the potential for improved patient outcomes necessitates a technique to address gluteus medius tears in conjunction with total hip arthroplasty. Therefore, we present the following novel technique for transtendinous gluteus medius repair in conjunction with a direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Technique: The patient is placed supine with the operative leg in slight external rotation. An incision is made to the fascia overlying the tensor fascia latae. Blunt dissection is performed to the tensor fascia latae-sartorius interval. The deep rectus fascia is split, identifying the anterior capsule. Arthroplasty is then performed in the usual manner. Once the arthroplasty is completed, the hip capsule is closed, and the gluteus medius is exposed through an anterolateral approach. Once found, the tear is classified. A split in line with the tendon fibers is made in the mid aspect of the tear. Once visualized, the greater trochanter is decorticated, and suture anchors are placed. Sutures are passed and tied sequentially from distal to proximal. Expected Outcomes: Gluteus medius repair patients experience excellent outcomes, with multiple studies showing decreased pain and restoration in the strength of the abductor complex. In the setting of total hip arthroplasty, most patients display adequate abductor strength and no Trendelenburg gait at 5 years postoperative.

Comparative evaluation of the clinical efffcacy and safety of surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty

Background Advanced coxarthrosis is a leading cause of disability in patients. Total arthroplasty is regarded as the "gold standard" for the treatment of hip pathologies that are not amenable to conservative treatment. Arthroplasty introduced into clinical practice has significantly improved functional status of patients. The data are largely contradictory and indicate certain difficulties and risks at the stages of treatment and rehabilitation of patients after surgery. The shortcomings can be overcome by improving the treatment methods for the cohort of patients based on the results of large-scale comparative studies exploring the effectiveness of different approaches to all stages of treatment of arthroplastic patients.The objective was to search for the most justified and promising surgical approaches in terms of clinical efficacy and safety of total hip arthroplasty (THA).Material and methods The search for publications was produced using the databases of Scopus, PubMed and the electronic scientific library eLIBRARY in Russian and English languages using the keywords: total hip arthroplasty, minimally invasive approach, anterolateral approach in THA, direct lateral approach in THA, posterior approach in THA, comparative assessment of approaches in hip arthroplasty, advanced replacement techniques, incidence of postoperative complications in THA, direct anterior approach in THA.Results and discussion A number of studies have shown that interventions using direct anterior access (DAA) are characterized by less blood loss, less frequent blood transfusions, less operating time and shorter hospital stay. There was a more rapid recovery of the hip function during early postoperative period with less need for opioid analgesics with DAA. Complication rate was higher with DAA than in the comparison group, which directly correlated with the learning curve.Conclusion DAA was shown to be an advanced approach that resulted in enhanced clinical efficacy and safety of surgical treatment in the majority of patients with coxarthrosis with sufficient experience of the surgeon. The method can be considered as low-traumatic. Unlike other approaches, DAA was accompanied by less injury to intact tissues; smaller skin incision; less blood loss; precipitated postoperative rehabilitation; less severity of postoperative pain and less need for opioid analgesia. However, DAA is inferior to classical approaches in primarily complicated hip pathologies.

Total hip arthroplasty; indications, historical overview, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes

Introduction and purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has revolutionized the treatment of various hip pathologies. This method of treatment leads to significant pain relief, improved function, and enhanced quality of life for patients worldwide. The following article provides an extensive overview of THA; covering indications, historical overview, surgical techniques, complications, as well as outcomes. Material and method The authors had analyzed both PubMed, as well as Google Scholar databases using the following key words: ‘THA’; ‘total hip replacement’; ‘total hip arthroplasty’; ‘hip’; ‘direct anterior approach’; ‘direct lateral approach’; ‘posterior approach’; ‘THA outcomes’. Conclusion THA is considered to be one of the most clinically successful and cost-effective medical procedures, which were developed during the last century. What is worth mentioning, the world’s highest-impact academic journal, The Lancet, called THA ‘the operation of the century’ in the year 2007. The historical perspective of total hip arthroplasty reveals the remarkable journey of medical pioneers who paved the way for modern techniques and materials. From the early days of simple hemiarthroplasty to the development of innovative prosthetic components and minimally invasive approaches, the field has undergone substantial progress, resulting in improved patient outcomes and longevity of the implants. Despite these advancements, the review highlights several challenges and complications associated with total hip arthroplasty. Through continued investment in research, and collaboration among orthopedic surgeons, engineers, and researchers, addressing these challenges can lead to further improvements and enhanced patient experiences.

Total Hip Arthroplasty by Direct Anterior Approach (Hueter)

Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is a successful treatment in orthopedics. The direct anterior approach, through the Hueter interval, avoids dissection of muscle attachments to the bone and causes less disruption of the soft tissues around the hip. Purpose: To show the results of primary total hip arthroplasties, performed by direct anterior approach. Methods: Descriptive-prospective study, case series type, with patients operated on for hip osteoarthritis, who underwent primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach between September 2019 and March 2021 and one-year follow-up. Results: Predominance of the female sex in a ratio of 2 to 1, age groups between 45 and 60 years with no difference in the location of the operated hip. Low body mass index and low anesthetic risk. Surgical time greater than two hours, with little surgical bleeding, the placement of the acetabular and femoral component was adequate and allowed walking in less than three postoperative days with such hospitalization time. Incidence of low and infrequent complications, resolved with adequate treatment. The pain went from a mean of 9 in the preoperative period to a 2 in the postoperative period, the "Harris hip score" varied from a mean of 60 (bad) to one of 87 (good close to excellent). Conclusions: The use of the direct anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasties offers very satisfactory results valued as good.