Use Of Direct-acting Oral Anticoagulants Research Articles

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin among Nursing Home Residents with Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ObjectiveResidents of nursing homes are usually excluded from clinical trials, including trials to assess treatments for common conditions such as nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We aimed to quantify the real-world comparative safety and effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin among nursing home residents with NVAF. DesignRetrospective cohort study using 100% national Minimum Data Set and linked Medicare claims from January 2011 through December 2018. Setting and ParticipantsLong-term care nursing home residents aged ≥66 years enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare. We included individuals diagnosed with NVAF newly initiating oral anticoagulants. MethodsWe identified exposure to DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban) vs warfarin. Outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, pneumonia (negative control outcome), and all-cause death. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting competing risk regression models for clinical outcomes and Cox proportional hazards regression for all-cause death. ResultsOf 38,983 individuals newly initiating anticoagulants, 19,366 (49.7%) initiated DOACs and 19,617 (50.3%) initiated warfarin. In the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, compared with warfarin, there was no statistically significant association between DOAC use and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism [4.5 vs 4.7 events per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84–1.05] or major bleeding (12.6 vs 12.4 events per 100 person-years; aHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96–1.10). DOACs use was associated with a modest but statistically significant lower risk of all-cause death (48.1 vs 49.0 events per 100 person-years; IPTW analysis aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91–0.98). Conclusions and ImplicationsAmong nursing home residents with NVAF, DOACs and warfarin were associated with a similar risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. However, the use of DOACs was associated with a slightly reduced risk of all-cause mortality.

Use of direct-acting anticoagulants (DOACs) delays surgery and is associated with increased mortality in hip fracture patients

PurposeTreatment with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing among hip-fracture patients, with accompanying safety concerns regarding spinal anesthesia (SA). The aim of this study was to investigate if DOAC use is associated with increased waiting time before surgery, increased mortality, or other adverse events.MethodsRegistry data on surgically treated hip-fracture cases at a single hospital between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed. Multivariable regression analyses were performed with DOAC-status and choice of anesthesia as exposures, and waiting time, length of stay, transfusion, and mortality as outcomes.Results2885 cases were included, 467 patients (16%) were using DOACs. DOAC users were older (86.3 vs. 82.2 years, p < 0.001), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.1 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001) and had longer median time to surgery than non-DOAC cases (36 h vs 17 h, p < 0.001). General anesthesia (GA) was used in 19.3% of DOAC patients and in 3.0% of non-DOAC patients. DOAC-patients had an increased risk of one-month mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 1.6 (1.1–2.3)) and one-year mortality (AOR 1.4 (1.1–1.8)). There were no differences in risk of blood transfusion. Patients on DOAC operated under GA had a lower risk of one-year mortality (AOR 0.5 (0.3–0.9)), but a similar one-month mortality to DOAC-patients operated under SA.ConclusionDOAC users had a longer waiting time to surgery, indicating postponement of surgery due to concerns of the safety of SA. The clinical practice should be changed to allow earlier surgery for DOAC patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Saudi Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly heightens stroke risk, which can be mitigated through anticoagulation therapy. Although warfarin was traditionally employed for this purpose, the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is on the rise. This retrospective study, which spanned from June 2016 to January 2018, focused on adult patients diagnosed with AF. Their treatments, either via warfarin or DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran), were evaluated. Data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 21; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus warfarin in preventing thromboembolic complications among Saudi patients with AF. A total of 396 patients with AF, averaging 66 ± 14 years of age, were part of the study. Among them, there were slightly more female patients (205 or 51.8%). The majority of patients (223 or 56.3%) were treated with a DOAC, while the rest (173 or 43.7%) received warfarin. Furthermore, 93 patients (23.5%) were taking anti-platelet drugs. Statistically, the rate of ischemic stroke was significantly higher among patients treated with DOACs than with warfarin (p=0.005), but bleeding rates were similar in both groups. Specifically, the DOACs apixaban and rivaroxaban showed a significant association with the occurrence of stroke when compared to warfarin (p=0.012 and p=007, respectively). Overall, both DOACs and warfarin presented similar results regarding hemorrhagic complications when treating AF patients. However, the DOACs apixaban and rivaroxaban displayed higher risks of ischemic stroke compared to warfarin.

Use of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation.

There are limited data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation with significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR), which can lead to hepatic dysfunction and intestinal malabsorption. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs and warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation with significant (moderate to severe) TR. A total of 1215 patients with significant TR and atrial fibrillation who were treated with warfarin (N=491) or DOACs (N=724) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke, systemic embolic events, and hospitalization for major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage, hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding, all-cause mortality, and a composite outcome. The median follow-up duration was 2.4 years. In the inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted cohort, DOACs and warfarin had a similar risk for ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.67-1.36]; P=0.79) and major bleeding (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.57-1.06]; P=0.11). For the secondary outcomes, relative to warfarin, DOACs had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and the composite outcome, and a comparable risk for gastrointestinal bleeding and all-cause mortality. In the subgroup analysis, the effects of DOACs on ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events were comparable to the effects ofwarfarin, even in patients with inferior vena cava plethora (increased right atrial pressure) or severe TR. In this study, relative to warfarin, DOACs demonstrated comparable efficacy for ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events and major bleeding, with a lower intracranial hemorrhage risk in patients with significant TR and atrial fibrillation, indicating their effectiveness and safety.

Stroke and Bleeding Risks of Endocardial Ablation for Ventricular Arrhythmias

BackgroundRisks of radiofrequency catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias include emboli and bleeding complications but data on antithrombotic regimens are limited and guidelines do not specify a systematic approach. ObjectivesThis study sought to assess embolic and bleeding complications in relation to pre-periprocedure and post-periprocedure antithrombotic regimens. MethodsProspective assessment for complications was performed for 663 endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures in 616 consecutive patients (median age 64 years [Q1-Q3: 54-73 years], 70.3% men, 71.6% with cardiomyopathy, 44.5% with sustained ventricular tachycardia). ResultsThere were 2 strokes (0.3%; 95% CI: 0.0%-0.8%), 1 transient ischemic attack (0.15%), and 2 pulmonary emboli (0.3%). There were 39 bleeding complications (5.9%) including 11 pericardial effusions (1.7%), and 28 related to vascular access (4.2%). Consistent with the prevalence of coronary artery disease (47.5%), atrial fibrillation (30.0%), and prior stroke (10.6%), preprocedure, 464 patients (70.0%) were taking antithrombotic agents including 220 (33.2%) taking aspirin alone (ASA), and 163 (24.6%) taking warfarin or a direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Preprocedure non-ASA antiplatelet use (OR: 2.846; P = 0.011) and DOAC use (OR: 2.585; P = 0.032) were associated with risk of bleeding complications. Following ablation, 49.8% of patients were treated with ASA 325 mg/d and 30.3% received DOACs or warfarin. New DOAC or warfarin administration was initiated in only 6.6% of patients. Overall, 39.7% of patients continued the same preprocedure antithrombotic regimen. ConclusionsStroke is a rare complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia using ASA 325 mg/d as a minimal postprocedure regimen with more potent regimens for selected patients.

Real life results of direct-acting oral anticoagulants recommended-dose in obese vs normal-weight patients with venous thromboembolism

BackgroundThere is scarce evidence on the effectiveness and safety of recommended-dose direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Material and methodsWe used the data in the RIETE registry to compare the rates of VTE recurrences and major bleeding during long-term therapy with DOACs at recommended doses in patients with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (obese) vs. those with BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 (normal weight). We performed regression models with competing risks for death. ResultsFrom January 2013 through October 2022, 2885 obese patients and 2676 with normal weight in RIETE received rivaroxaban (n = 3020), apixaban (n = 1754), edoxaban (n = 636) or dabigatran (n = 151). Median age was 63 years and 52 % were female. At baseline, obese patients were more likely to have diabetes (18.6 % vs. 8.4 %), hypertension (51.9 % vs. 31.4 %) or pulmonary embolism (67.7 % vs. 61 %), and less likely to have renal insufficiency (5.3 % vs. 16 %) or anaemia (21.8 % vs. 28 %%). During anticoagulation (median, 147 vs. 101 days), the obese had a similar rate of VTE recurrences (1.71 vs. 2.14 events per 100 patients-years; hazard ratio (HR): 0.81; 95 % CI: 0.49–1.34) or major bleeding (1.45 vs. 1.76 per 100 patients-years; HR: 0.91; 95 % CI: 0.52–1.59) than those with normal weight. These findings persisted after multivariable analysis (recurrent VTE, HR: 0.80; 95 % CI: 0.48–1.32; major bleeding, HR: 1.11; 95 % CI: 0.60–2.07). ConclusionThe use of DOACs at recommended doses in obese patients with VTE was associated with similar rates of VTE recurrences or major bleeding than in patients with normal weight.

Evidence of the association between increased use of direct oral anticoagulants and a reduction in the rate of atrial fibrillation-related stroke and major bleeding at the population level (2012–2019)

BackgroundThe introduction of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has shown to decrease atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke and bleeding rates in clinical studies, but there is no certain evidence about their effects at the population level. Our aim was to assess changes in AF-related stroke and major bleeding rates between 2012 and 2019 in Andalusia (Spain), and the association between DOACs use and events rates at the population level. MethodsAll patients with an AF diagnosis from 2012 to 2019 were identified using the Andalusian Health Population Base, that provides clinical information on all Andalusian people. Annual ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding rates, and used antithrombotic treatments were determined. Marginal hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for each treatment. ResultsA total of 95,085 patients with an AF diagnosis were identified. Mean age was 76.1±10.2 years (49.7% women). An increase in the use of DOACs was observed throughout the study period in both males and females (p<0.001). The annual rate of ischemic stroke decreased by one third, while that of hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding decreased 2–3-fold from 2012 to 2019. Marginal HR was lower than 0.50 for DOACs compared to VKA for all ischemic or hemorrhagic events. ConclusionsIn this contemporary population-based study using clinical and administrative databases in Andalusia, a significant reduction in the incidence of AF-related ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding was observed between 2012 and 2019. The increased use of DOACs seems to be associated with this reduction.

Real-world evidence that among atrial fibrillation patients warfarin is associated with reduced nonelective admissions compared with those on DOACs.

Randomized trials show inconsistent estimates on risks of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in bleeding and mortality for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Trials are confounded by additional DOAC adherence support, while warfarin has a low time in therapeutic range. Few real-world studies compared emergency hospitalization risk between DOAC and warfarin users in AF. This study aimed to determine emergency hospitalization risk for AF patients on DOACs or warfarin in real-world settings. A tapered-matched real-world cohort extracted data from 412 English general practices' primary care records linked with emergency department (ED) and hospitalization data from the ECLIPSE database. AF patients with new DOAC or warfarin prescriptions were included. The primary outcome was all-cause ED attendance; the secondary outcomes were ED re-attendance, nonelective hospitalization, and rehospitalization within 12 months. Weighted Cox regression estimated relative risk difference. 39 201 DOAC patients were matched with 13 145 warfarin patients. DOAC patients had a 25% higher likelihood of attending ED (odds ratio 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.55). DOAC use also associated with higher ED re-attendance, nonelective hospitalization, and rehospitalization within 12 months: 1.41 (95% CI 1.00-1.98), 1.26 (1.00-1.57), and 1.54 (1.01-2.34), respectively, with p-values < .05. DOACs for AF thromboprophylaxis are associated with the increased risk of ED attendance, recurrent hospitalization, and numerical rise in ED re-attendance and first nonelective hospitalization compared to warfarin. However, these real-world data cannot establish if this difference results from medication adherence, lack of regular warfarin clinic monitoring, unmeasured confounders, or fundamental agent efficacy disparities.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Cancer Patients-A Review.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important aspect in cancer patients. There are various pharmacological methods used for thrombotic event treatment. DOACs (direct-acting oral anticoagulants) are gaining popularity among both physicians and researchers and are slowly starting to replace VKAs (vitamin K antagonists), thus becoming a substitute or alternative option for LMWHs (low-molecular-weight heparins). In this article, we present DOACs' main therapeutic advantages and disadvantages in patients with cancer. The only major concern with using DOACs is the higher risk of bleeding; however, there are discrepancies in this matter. There are still some types of cancer for which DOACs are not recommended. Specific cancer types may influence the efficacy of DOAC therapy. Additionally, race and ethnicity may affect therapy in cancer patients with DOACs. A sizeable number of clinical trials are focused on comparing DOACs with other anticoagulants. The current guidelines of different scientific associations are not unanimous in their DOAC assessments. There is still a need for more evidence of DOACs' potential advantages over other methods of anticoagulation in cancer patients to facilitate their position in this recommendation. This literature review presents the current state of knowledge about the use of DOACs in patients with neoplastic growth.

Bleeding related to oral anticoagulants: Trends in US emergency department visits, 2016-2020

BackgroundClinical trials suggest lower rates of major bleeding with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) than with warfarin, but anticoagulant-related bleeding remains one of the most common outpatient adverse drug events. MethodsWe estimated the number of emergency department (ED) visits and subsequent hospitalizations for oral anticoagulant-related bleeding in 2016–2020 based on active surveillance in a nationally representative, size-stratified probability sample of 60 U.S. hospitals. We estimated rates of ED visits using a nationally-projected retail prescription dispensing database. ResultsBased on 19,557 cases, oral anticoagulant-related bleeding resulted in an estimated 1,270,259 (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 644,686-1,895,832) ED visits for the five years 2016–2020, of which 47.8 % (95 % CI, 40.6 %–55.0 %) resulted in hospitalization. Oral anticoagulant-related bleeding resulted in an estimated 230,163 (95% CI, 109,598-350,728) ED visits in 2016 and 301,433 (95% CI, 138,363-464,503) in 2020. During 2016–2020, ED visits for DOAC-related bleeding increased by an average of 27.9 % (95 % CI, 24.0 %–32.0 %; p < .001) per year, while ED visits for warfarin-related bleeding decreased by an average of 8.8 % (95 % CI, −10.7 % to −7.0 %; p = .001) per year. The estimated rate of bleeding visits per 100 patients dispensed oral anticoagulants at least once in 2016–2020 was highest for patients aged ≥ 80 years (13.1; 95 % CI, 6.2–20.0) and lowest for those aged <45 years (4.0; 95 % CI, 2.6–5.5); it was 5.9 visits per 100 patients dispensed DOACs [95 % CI, 2.5–9.2] and 13.0 visits per 100 patients dispensed warfarin [95 % CI, 7.4–18.7]. ConclusionsAlthough the rates of ED visits for anticoagulant-related bleeding may be lower for DOACs than for warfarin, persistently large numbers of patients requiring ED visits for anticoagulant-related bleeding despite increased use of DOACs and declining use of warfarin suggest that efforts to improve appropriate prescribing and monitoring of anticoagulants remain important.

Use of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Liver Disease

HomeCirculationVol. 147, No. 10Use of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Liver Disease No AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextAboutView Full TextView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toNo AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextUse of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Liver Disease Theresa J. Hydes, PhD, Gregory Y.H. Lip, MD and Deirdre A. Lane, PhD Theresa J. HydesTheresa J. Hydes Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK (T.J.H., G.Y.H.L., D.A.L.). Liverpool University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, UK (T.J.H.). Search for more papers by this author , Gregory Y.H. LipGregory Y.H. Lip https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7566-1626 Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK (T.J.H., G.Y.H.L., D.A.L.). Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (G.Y.H.L., D.A.L.). Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark (G.Y.H.L., D.A.L.). Search for more papers by this author and Deirdre A. LaneDeirdre A. Lane Correspondence to: Deirdre A. Lane, PhD, Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK L7 8TX. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-9378 Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK (T.J.H., G.Y.H.L., D.A.L.). Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (G.Y.H.L., D.A.L.). Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark (G.Y.H.L., D.A.L.). Search for more papers by this author Originally published6 Mar 2023https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063195Circulation. 2023;147:795–797This article is a commentary on the followingComparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Liver Disease: A Nationwide Cohort StudyFootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.For Disclosures, see page 797.Circulation is available at www.ahajournals.org/journal/circCorrespondence to: Deirdre A. Lane, PhD, Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK L7 8TX. Email [email protected]net

Outcomes with direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with a history of bariatric surgery: a retrospective cohort study

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Patients who undergo bariatric surgery have major physiologic changes in their gastrointestinal tract, which can theoretically alter drug absorption and pharmacokinetics. This is especially concerning for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, as small changes in absorption can have significant effects on safety and efficacy. One class of interest is direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), for which there is a paucity of data in this population. <h3>Objective</h3> To characterize the use of DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) in patients with a history of bariatric surgery and incidence of clotting and bleeding events. <h3>Setting</h3> Public healthcare system/university hospital, United States. <h3>Methods</h3> This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who were prescribed a DOAC for the prophylaxis or treatment of venous thromboembolism or for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in atrial fibrillation between January 2011 and December 2018. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 191 patients with a history of bariatric surgery were included. Clotting events occurred in 11 of 191 patients (5.8%) receiving DOAC therapy, with a calculated clotting rate of 3.9 clots per 100 person-years. Bleeding events occurred in 42 of 191 patients (22%) receiving a DOAC, with a calculated bleeding rate of 17.1 bleeds per 100 person-years. The use of rivaroxaban versus apixaban was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of bleeding in patients with a history of bariatric surgery. <h3>Conclusion</h3> In this retrospective cohort of bariatric surgery patients receiving DOACs, we found clotting rates consistent with expected rates and bleeding rates above expected rates based on historical data. We also found an increased risk of bleeding in rivaroxaban users compared with apixaban users. Careful evaluation of bleeding risks in bariatric surgery patients is encouraged.

Abstract TP162: Age, Weight, And Prior Stroke Predicts Ischemic Stroke Despite Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant Use In Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin are standard of care for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke (IS) in persons with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, despite adequate anticoagulation (AC), patients may still experience recurrent IS. We aimed to study the characteristics of patients who developed IS despite therapeutic AC, specifically with DOACs. Methods: Between 2012 and 2021, patients admitted at our hospital with IS despite adequate AC for AF were enrolled. Clinical variables collected included National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and modified Rankin Score (mRS) at admission. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients taking DOACs and warfarin. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of IS in patients using DOACs. Results: A total of 595 patients were included. Of these, 291 patients (48.9%) were on DOACs with a mean age of 75.21 and 43.9% were female. The median CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and NIHSS score in the DOAC group was 4 and 6, respectively. Compared to those on Warfarin, patients on DOACs were younger (75.21 vs. 78.99 p &lt; 0.001), more likely to be men (55.3% vs. 45.2% p = 0.01) and had higher rates of prior TIA/IS (37.5% vs. 29.3% p = 0.04). Both groups had similar rates of hemorrhagic transformation, but more patients in the DOAC group were on antiplatelet agents concomitantly (21% vs. 6.9% p &lt; 0.001). The most prescribed DOAC was apixaban (66.3%) and cardioembolism was the most common stroke etiology (63.6%), followed by cryptogenic, which was significantly higher in the DOAC group (18.2% vs. 8.3% p = 0.02). Notably, DOAC failure in preventing IS was associated with younger age, overweight/obesity, and prior TIA/IS (Table) . Conclusions: IS despite the use of DOACs is more likely to occur in younger people with prior TIA/IS and obesity. Focusing on preventative strategies and risk factor control for competing mechanisms in this subgroup may help prevent IS recurrence.

Providing Evidence for Dogma: Risk of Epistaxis After COVID-19 Nasal-Screening Swab.

There is anecdotal evidence SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) RT-PCR screening nasal swabs confer an elevated epistaxis risk. We aimed to assess the association between epistaxis and exposure to a COVID nasal swab. A matched pairs design was used. The study was performed in a single, integrated health care system. All patients who received a single COVID nasal swab at our institution between April 2020 and March 2021 were included. McNemar's test was used to compare rates of epistaxis between the 7 days following the index COVID swab (hazard period), and the 7 days preceding the index COVID swab (control period). Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for epistaxis. A total of 827,987 participants were included, with 1047 epistaxis encounters. The prevalence of epistaxis during the hazard and control periods were 0.08% and 0.04%, respectively. Swab exposure was associated with 1.92-fold odds of epistaxis during the hazard period (95% confidence interval [1.73, 2.12]). Older age, Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) (compared to white), male sex, hypertension, prior facial trauma, and warfarin or direct-acting oral anticoagulant use were also associated with significantly increased odds of epistaxis (p ≦ 0.01). COVID nasal swabs are associated with increased odds of epistaxis. Physicians should counsel patients, particularly those at the highest risk, including ahistory of prior facial trauma, anticoagulants/antiplatelets, or hypertension.

Just DOAC: Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in pediatrics.

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current literature for direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in pediatric patients and summarize ongoing trials. In treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients, evidence supports use of both dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran has been shown to be noninferior to standard of care (SOC) in terms of efficacy, with similar bleeding rates. Similarly, treatment with rivaroxaban in children with acute VTE resulted in a low recurrence risk and reduced thrombotic burden, without increased risk of bleeding, compared to SOC. Treatment of pediatric cerebral venous thrombosis as well as central venous catheter-related VTE with rivaroxaban appeared to be both safe and efficacious and similar to that with SOC. Dabigatran also has a favorable safety profile for prevention of VTE, and rivaroxaban has a favorable safety profile for VTE prevention in children with congenital heart disease. Many studies with several different DOACs are ongoing to evaluate both safety and efficacy in unique patient populations, as well as VTE prevention. The literature regarding pediatric VTE treatment and prophylaxis is growing, but the need for evidence-based pediatric guidelines remains. Additional long-term, postauthorization studies are warranted to further elucidate safety and efficacy in clinical scenarios excluded in clinical trials. Additional data on safety, efficacy, and dosing strategies for reversal agents are also necessary, especially as the use of DOACs becomes more common in the pediatric population.

Biomechanics and early sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BackgroundSac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is regarded as a marker of successful response to treatment. Several factors influence sac behavior after EVAR, yet little is known about the value of preoperative biomechanics. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in aortic biomechanics between patients with and without sac regression. MethodsPatients treated with standard EVAR for infrarenal AAA at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2009 and 2012 with one preoperative and a minimum of two postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans were considered for inclusion in this single-center retrospective cohort study. Biomechanical indices such as AAA wall stress and wall stress-strength ratio as well as intraluminal thrombus (ILT) thickness and stress were measured preoperatively in A4ClinicRE (VASCOPS GmbH). AAA diameter and volume were analyzed on preoperative, 30-day, and 1-year CTAs. Patients were dichotomized based on sac regression, defined as a ≥5 mm decrease in maximal AAA diameter between the first two postoperative CTA scans. Multivariable logistic regression was used for analysis of factors associated with early sac regression. ResultsOf the 101 patients treated during the inclusion period, 64 were included. Thirty-nine (61%) demonstrated sac regression and 25 (39%) had a stable sac or sac increase. The mean patients age (73 years vs 76 years), male sex (85% vs 96%), and median AAA diameter (58 mm vs 58.5 mm) did not differ between patients with and without sac regression. Although no difference in preoperative biomechanics was seen between the groups, multivariable logistic regression revealed that a larger AAA diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.51; P = .009) and smoking (OR, 22.1; 95% CI, 2.78-174; P = .003) were positively associated with sac regression. In contrast, the lumen diameter (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .023), ILT thickness (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97; P = .013), aspirin or direct-acting oral anticoagulant use (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.61; P = .012), and mean ILT stress (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.87; P = .024) showed a negative association. Patients with sac regression had fewer reinterventions (log-rank P = .010) and lower mortality (log-rank P = .012) at the 5-year follow-up. ConclusionsThis study, characterizing preoperative biomechanics in patients with and without sac regression, demonstrated a negative association between mean ILT stress and ILT thickness with a change in sac diameter after EVAR. Given that the ILT is a highly dynamic entity, further studies focusing on the role of the thrombus are needed. Furthermore, patients presenting with early sac regression had improved outcomes after EVAR.

Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants associated with improved survival and bypass graft patency compared with warfarin after infrageniculate bypass

ObjectiveNo consensus has yet been reached regarding the optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimen for patients after lower extremity bypass. Usually, patients who have undergone below-the-knee bypass will begin oral anticoagulation therapy. Historically, the bypass has been with prosthetic conduits and the anticoagulation therapy has been warfarin. However, the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been increasing owing to their relative ease of dosing. The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether a difference exists in the postoperative outcomes for patients who have undergone infrageniculate bypass stratified by the use of on DOACs vs warfarin. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal bypass database was queried for all patients who had undergone infrageniculate bypass, been anticoagulation naive at baseline, and been discharged with anticoagulation therapy. A survival analysis was performed for patients for ≤2 years postoperatively to determine whether discharge with warfarin vs DOACs was associated with differences in overall mortality, loss of primary patency, risk of amputation, and risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to control for differences in the baseline demographic factors between the two groups. ResultsDuring the study period (2007-2020) 57,887 patients had undergone infrageniculate bypass. Of these patients, 2786 had been anticoagulation naive and discharged with either warfarin (n = 1889) or DOACs (n = 897). Discharge with a DOAC was associated with a lower risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.83; P = .001), loss of primary patency (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.87; P < .001), risk of amputation (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86; P = .001), and risk of MALE (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97; P = .017). ConclusionsAnticoagulation-naive patients who had undergone infrageniculate bypass had had higher rates of overall survival, bypass patency, amputation-free survival, and freedom from MALE when discharged with a DOAC than with warfarin.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Among Adults With Cancer and Atrial Fibrillation.

While clinical guidelines recommend direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) over warfarin to treat isolated nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, guidelines are silent regarding nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treatment among individuals with cancer, reflecting the paucity of evidence in this setting. We quantified relative risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding (primary outcomes), and all-cause and cardiovascular death (secondary outcomes) among older individuals with cancer and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation comparing DOACs and warfarin. This retrospective cohort study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry and linked US Medicare data from 2010 through 2016, and included individuals diagnosed with cancer and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who newly initiated DOAC or warfarin. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to control confounding. We used competing risk regression for primary outcomes and cardiovascular death, and Cox proportional hazard regression for all-cause death. Among 7675 individuals included in the cohort, 4244 (55.3%) received DOACs and 3431 (44.7%) warfarin. In the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, there was no statistically significant difference among DOAC and warfarin users in the risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (1.24 versus 1.19 events per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 1.41 [95% CI, 0.92-2.14]), major bleeding (3.08 versus 4.49 events per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.90 [95% CI, 0.70-1.17]), and cardiovascular death (1.88 versus 3.14 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.82 [95% CI, 0.59-0.1.13]). DOAC users had significantly lower risk of all-cause death (7.09 versus 13.3 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.81 [95% CI, 0.69-0.94]) compared to warfarin users. Older adults with cancer and atrial fibrillation exposed to DOACs had similar risks of stroke and systemic embolism and major bleeding as those exposed to warfarin. Relative to warfarin, DOAC use was associated with a similar risk of cardiovascular death and a lower risk of all-cause death.

Evidence-Based Recommendations: Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction.

One of the potential complications of acute myocardial infarction is left ventricular thrombus (LVT). The incidence of LVT following acute myocardial infarction has decreased dramatically with early invasive reperfusion techniques or fibrinolysis. However, the risk of LVT formation remains significant and is associated with an increased risk of systemic embolism, stroke, cardiovascular events, and even death. Current guidelines indicate that dual antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation therapy for at least 3 months can reduce the risk of these events. While vitamin K antagonist is the preferred oral anticoagulant, there is growing evidence to support the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in LVT management. Cardiac magnetic resonance has shown the highest diagnostic accuracy for LVT assessment, followed by echocardiography with contrast agents. This article serves as a general review of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of LVT.

Incidence of Osteoporosis in Primary Care Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Different Oral Anticoagulants.

Studies investigating the association between the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) and osteoporosis are limited. We aimed to determine the risk of osteoporosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and receiving different OACs. We performed a population-based cohort study using a nationwide primary care dataset, MedicineInsight. Patients aged between 18 and 111 years with AF and newly recorded OAC prescriptions between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017 were included and followed until 31 December 2018. We applied propensity score matching to control for patients' baseline characteristic differences before calculating adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for a new diagnosis of osteoporosis, using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 18,454 patients (1714 prescribed dabigatran, 5871 rivaroxaban, 5248 apixaban and 5621 warfarin) were included. Of these, 39.5% were females, and the overall mean age (standard deviation [SD] was 73.2(10.3) years. Over a mean follow-up of 841 days, 1627 patients (1028 receiving direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and 599 warfarin) had a newly recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis. The weighted incidence rates (95% confidence interval; CI) per 100 person-years of treatment were 5.0 (4.7-5.2) for warfarin, 4.3 (3.8-4.8) for dabigatran, 3.6 (3.3-3.8) for rivaroxaban, and 4.4 (4.0-4.7) for apixaban. Overall, DOAC use was associated with a significantly lower risk of a new diagnosis of osteoporosis than warfarin use (aHR, 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.85; p &lt; 0.001). Use of each individual DOAC was associated with a significantly lower risk of osteoporosis compared with warfarin (aHRs, 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.82 for rivaroxaban; 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.86 for apixaban; 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.99 for dabigatran). Compared with warfarin, the use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of developing osteoporosis in patients with AF. This association remained significant when individual DOACs were compared with warfarin.