Introduction: The radiotherapy treatment aims to deliver the maximum dose to the cancerous cells while preserving the healthy tissue. Recently, modern radiotherapy techniques have been extensively developed to deliver doses just to the therapeutic volume. Therefore, the exposure of smaller therapeutic fields is necessary. Because of the importance of dosimetry techniques in such field sizes, the objective of this work is to empirically evaluate the performance capability of an ionization chamber in comparison with edge detector.Materials and Methods: At first, the performance of ionization chamber compared with edge diode detector was validated at 10×10cm2 field size. Then, the percentage depth dose (PDD), the percentage surface dose and the transverse profile doses at the 2×2cm2, 3×3cm2 and 4×4cm2 field sizes were evaluated for both dosimeters. The empirical and statistical results in a water phantom were compared with those of the edge diode detector as the reference field dosimeter using Elekta 6MV linear accelerator. Results: The empirical and statistical results of transverse profiles of the ionization chamber and the edge detector are in a good agreement for the reference field of 10×10cm2. However, a small difference between the two dosimeters could be observed in small-fields. A discrepancy of less than 1% was observed between the results of PDDs for two dosimeters in small-fields.Conclusion: Dosimetric characteristics of ioization chamber and the edge detector illustrated some differences especially in terms of transverse profiles at small-field size. This discrepancy could be related to the volume effect of the chamber which influences on the penumbra. Because of the importance of sensitive organs, utilization of a special dosimeter for the small radiotherapy fields is recommended.
Read full abstract