In a music performance, both performers and audience experience emotions (Juslin, 2000). Performers attempt to communicate nuances of a piece in their own artistic performance: [I] communicate an emotion to audience; [I] transform emotions and moods into tones (Lindstrom, Juslin, Bresin, & Williamon, 2003, p. 30). Such emotions experienced by performers (and subsequently by audience) can be represented by dimensional (e.g., arousal, valence, Schubert, 2001) or discrete (e.g., happiness, sadness, fear, anger; Dahl & Friberg, 2007; Gabrielsson & Juslin, 1996; Ohgushi & Hattori, 1996; Juslin, 1997) models of emotion (Eerola & Vuoskoski, 2011). The projection of emotions in an artistic performance, however, derives from a performer's deliberate interpretation of a piece that often goes beyond dimensions of arousal and valence or limited number of emotion words. For example, pianist Kazuko Yasukawa has described Debussy's Jardins sous la pluie (Gardens in rain) as if it expressed the melancholy of children playing in rain as well as tranquil memories of happiness (Yasukawa, 1960, p. 6, translation and emphases by present authors). A critic also expresses characteristics of a piece with rich vocabularies: James Huneker described F. Chopin's Ballade No. Four in f minor, It is in his most reflective, yet lyric mood. Lyricism is keynote of work, a passionate lyricism, with a note of self-absorption, suppressed feeling-truly Slavic, this shyness! -and a concentration that is remarkable even for Chopin (Huneker, 1918, p. 286, emphases by present authors). These multifaceted emotions underlying a music performance have been studied extensively from listener's perspectives (Asmus, 1985; Hevner, 1936; Taniguchi, 1995), but it is still unclear whether affective nuances perceived by listeners are actually concordant with those interpreted by a performer. The main goal of present study was to explore a performer-to-audience communication of affective nuances of a piece by identifying how audience would perceive complex nuances of a piano performance through its acoustical and visual recordings.In Shoda and Adachi (2012), a pianist evaluated affective nuances of structurally contrasting pieces by S. Rachmaninoff- Tableaux Op. 39-1 in c minor (Etude) and Op. 32-5 in G major (Prelude)-by means of a set of 24 adjectives (see Figure 1), which was selected from Hevner (1936)'s adjective circle. For Etude (Allegro Agitato in 4/4 time), which consists of continuously moving figurations with contrasting block chords (Glover, 2003), pianist gave high ratings (i.e., 8 or 9 on 9-point scale) for emphatic, majestic, passionate, robust, and solemn. For Prelude (Moderato in 4/4 time), structurally much simpler than Etude and characterized by smooth melodic line and its accompaniment (Glover, 2003), adjectives such as bright, dreamy, graceful, joyous, longing, tender, tranquil, and passionate were rated high. Such interpretations were given only for artistic rendition of each piece (Shoda & Adachi, 2012), indicating that ideal level of expressivity1 (i.e., artistic rendition) elicited rich impressions in pianist but neither minimal (i.e., deadpan rendition) nor excessive level of expressivity (i.e., exaggerated rendition) did so.As for audience, previous studies focused primarily on affective nuances of musical performances represented as single target adjectives (Senju & Ohgushi, 1987), and to date their perception of more complex nuances through a combination of many adjectives has rarely been studied from a viewpoint of performer-to-audience communication. Nonetheless, basic emotions (e.g., happiness, sadness, anger, fear) can be portrayed by guitarists (Gabrielsson & Juslin, 1996; Juslin, 1997), violinists (Gabrielsson & Juslin, 1996), flutists (Gabrielsson & Juslin, 1996), percussionists (Laukka & Gabrielsson, 2000), and even children (Adachi & Trehub, 1998; Yamasaki, 2006), who manipulate tempo, timing, dynamics, and articulation of a simple melody or rhythm that otherwise conveys neutral emotion (Juslin, 2001, see Figure 14. …