Dilated Aortic Annulus Research Articles

External Scaffold for Strengthening the Pulmonary Autograft in the Ross Procedure.

Despite offering several potential benefits over standard prosthetic aortic valve replacement, the use of the pulmonary autograft has been limited to date due to concerns over the risk of pulmonary autograft expansion and the need for reintervention. Several techniques using materials with biomimetic potential have been developed to reduce this complication. The incidence, risk factors, and pathophysiology of pulmonary autograft dilatation are discussed in this article. This seminar will provide an overview of the techniques of external pulmonary autograft support and their advantages and limitations. It also considers future directions for further investigation and future clinical applications of external pulmonary autograft support. Dilatation of the autograft is more likely to occur in patients with aortic regurgitation and a dilated aortic annulus. External scaffolding may prevent autograft stretching and expansion in these specific cases. However, from a biomimetic point of view, any permanent scaffold potentially restricts the movement of the autograft root. This reduces some of the benefits associated with the use of autologous tissue, which is the priority of the Ross procedure. To address this issue, several bioresorbable matrices could be used to support the root during its initial adaptive phase. Control of blood pressure with aggressive therapy is the first line to avoid this problem in the first year after pulmonary autograft implantation, together with support of the annular and sinotubular junction in some selected cases. This is the best way to maintain stable autograft root dimensions while preserving root dynamics. However, to determine the efficacy of this combined external support and best medical management, it is important to perform regular imaging and clinical follow-up.

Technical considerations and sizing of external annuloplasty in the Ross procedure.

Pure aortic regurgitation and dilation of aortic annulus are the most significant risk factors for the failure of pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure. Aortic annuloplasty has a positive effect on the durability of the autograft. Previously, we described a technique for external annuloplasty with dedicated CORONEO ring. In the present manuscript, we suggest the sizing of annuloplasty based on the diameter of pulmonary autograft annulus.

Ross procedure and aortic valve repair: long-term echocardiographic outcomes, quality of life and physical activity of different aortic valve surgery procedures

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background To compare long-term outcomes of aortic valve repair (AVr) and pulmonary autograft replacement (Ross procedure) in terms of echocardiographic parameters, quality of life (QoL), physical activity (PA). Methods In 2005-19, 129 patients (median age 22 [13, 33 IQR], 75% males) underwent aortic surgery in our Department: 40 were Ross (22 years [19, 51 IQR]), 67 AVr (17 years [1, 50 IQR]) and 22 aortic valve replacements (52 years [30, 80 IQR]). We focused on Ross and AVr. Retrospectively, relevant data were collected from medical records and phone re-calls. Physical activity (spontaneous and active) and QoL were assessed utilizing the IPAQ and SF-36 questionnaires. All patients underwent echocardiography pre/post-surgery and the follow-up lasted 12 ± 4 years. Results At the baseline, Ross patients had more aortic stenosis than insufficiency (P = 0.045). At the follow-up, Ross procedures presented more right-ventricle and aortic annulus dilatation (P = 0.002 and P = 0.030, respectively), but higher left-ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS: 18 ± 3.2 % vs. 16 ± 3.3, P = 0.0027). Conversely, AVr experienced more re-do operations (Log-rank P = 0.005). Ross reported better QoL (SF-36: 0.8 ± 0.07 vs. 19 ± 0.4, P-0.045) and were also more active in daily PA (IPAQ ≥ 2500 Mets: 63.8% vs. 6%; P = 0.006). Ross patients practiced more sports activities than AVr (P = 0.011). Conclusions In a relatively small cohort of young and adults post aortic surgery patients, Ross procedures had better prognosis in terms of re-do operations; presented better ventricular function, as assessed by LV GLS. Ross patients had better long-term QoL and showed more spontaneous PA and involvement in sports activity.

Aortic annulus and the importance of annuloplasty.

Dystrophic aortic insufficiency accounts for the majority of Western cases of aortic insufficiency and can be divided into the three phenotypes of isolated aortic insufficiency, dilated aortic root, and dilated ascending aorta. Each of these phenotypes is associated with a dilated annulus and/or sinotubular junction. Recent international guidelines recommend reimplantation or remodeling with aortic annuloplasty for valve-sparing root replacement, as well as consideration of aortic valve repair in cases of aortic insufficiency. A dilated aortic annulus is a major risk factor for failure of aortic valve repair procedures, indicating the need to address the annulus at the time of aortic valve or root repair. Calibrated annuloplasty should be performed at sub- and supravalular levels in order to restore the ratio of the sinotubular junction and annulus and be adapted according to the phenotype of the root and ascending aorta. Standardization of aortic valve repair techniques with use of a calibrated annuloplasty will improve dissemination of techniques and rate of aortic valve repair. Current medical evidence shows that aortic valve repair is safe, produces better quality of life, and reduces valve-related mortality compared to prosthetic valve replacement.

Ascending aorta and aortic root replacement (with or without valve sparing) in early childhood: surgical strategies and long-term outcomes.

Aortic root and ascending aorta replacements (AARs) are rarely required in the paediatric population. We report here a series of AAR performed in young children using different surgical techniques. Between 1995 and 2017, 32 children under the age of 10 years (median age 5.4 years) underwent AAR procedures at our institution. Twenty-two (69%) had a connective tissue disease (infantile Marfan syndrome or Loeys-Dietz syndrome). We performed 11 AAR using a composite graft with a mechanical prosthesis and 21 valve-sparing procedures (10 Yacoub operations and 11 David operations). Median follow-up for operative survivors was 7.7 years (interquartile range 4.2-12.8 years). The cardiac-related early mortality rate was 6%. Patient survival was 91% at both 1 and 10 years. Eleven survivors (38%), all with a status of post-valve-sparing procedure, required an aortic root reintervention with an aortic valve replacement after a median interval of 4.2 years. Interestingly, only patients with infantile Marfan syndrome tended to be associated with risk of reoperation. Aortic root and AARs are safe in young children whatever the surgical procedure. Aortic valve-sparing procedures show good long-term results except in children with infantile Marfan syndrome whose ineluctable aortic annulus dilatation or aortic valve regurgitation requires reintervention after a short period.

Rationale for aortic annuloplasty to standardise aortic valve repair.

Available evidence shows that aortic valve repair reduces valve-related mortality and improves quality of life compared to prosthetic aortic valve replacement. One of the most important predictors of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair failure is the absence of treating a dilated aortic annulus greater than 25-28 mm. Competency of the aortic valve depends on multiple factors including the diameter of the annulus, sinotubular junction, valve cusps and commissures. Dystrophic aortic insufficiency (AI) is the commonest cause of AI in the Western world and is characterised by dilatation of the aortic annulus (≥25 mm), sinuses and/or sinotubular junction (≥30 mm). Depending on whether the sinuses of Valsalva and/or tubular ascending aorta are dilated, three phenotypes can be identified: dilated aortic root, dilated ascending aorta and isolated AI. All three phenotypes are associated with a dilated aortic annulus. Aortic annuloplasty reduces the dilated aortic annulus and improves the surface of coaptation, as in the case of mitral valve repair. In treating AI, it is also important to restore the physiological sinotubular junction/annulus ratio, which can be carried out with remodeling root repair + subvalvular annuloplasty (for dilated aortic root), tubular ascending aorta replacement + subvalvular annuloplasty (for dilated ascending aorta) and double sub- and supra-valvular annuloplasty (for isolated AI). Aortic annuloplasty is now considered an essential component of aortic valve repair and valve-sparing root surgery.

Comparison of Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty for aortic valve repair-a porcine study.

A subvalvular annuloplasty is often used for aortic valve repair in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation with aortic annulus dilatation. Our aim was to characterize and compare annulus geometry and dynamics of the Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty and compare it with the native aortic annulus under standardized conditions. We randomized 29 pigs of 80 kg into a Dacron ring group, a suture annuloplasty group and a native control group. The assessment was performed using sonomicrometry crystals for evaluation of dynamic geometry, and pressure measurements and echocardiography to evaluate valve performance. Aortic annulus area (AAA) was significantly reduced in the Dacron and Suture group compared with the Native group. Expansibility was similar and within normal physiologic limits in all three groups (Native: 12%±7%; Dacron: 11%±3%; Suture: 10%±4%). The largest segmental expansion was observed at the right coronary sinus (RC) in the Native and Dacron group but in the Suture group there was no significant difference between segments. The aortic annulus was primarily oval in systole and became more circular in diastole in the Native and Dacron group, however, in the Suture group, the sphericity remained relatively unchanged throughout the cardiac cycle. This study is the first to describe and compare detailed segmental geometry of the Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty in a standardized porcine model. The two annuloplasties effectively downsized the aortic annulus, while expansibility was maintained. Each annuloplasty had its own geometrical characteristics, but the Dacron ring was more similar to the native aortic annulus than the suture annuloplasty. This study suggests that the Dacron ring offers a more physiological and standardized support by mimicking the geometry and dynamics of the native aortic annulus and thus is a preferable choice over the suture annuloplasty for valve-sparing aortic root procedures.

External suture annuloplasty for mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation due to an isolated type Ic lesion.

Whether mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation should be corrected surgically during other cardiovascular surgeries remains controversial. We evaluated the effectiveness of external suture annuloplasty in such cases. Among 95 patients undergoing aortic valve repair between December 2013 and March 2018, five patients with mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation due to aortic annulus dilatation (type Ic lesion) underwent surgery for mitral regurgitation and/or thoracic aortic aneurysm. Aortic valves were repaired with external suture annuloplasty alone with a mean Hegar dilator size of 20.4 ± 0.8 (20.0-22.0)mm at the same time and were followed up echocardiographically. There were no cases of mortality or major morbidity. Intraoperative direct measurement revealed ventriculoaortic junction size of 25.0 ± 0.8 (24.0-27.0)mm. The average cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were 139 ± 46 (76-205)min and 105 ± 38 (58-172)min, respectively. Postoperative transthoracic echocardiogram during hospitalization showed trivial aortic regurgitation in all cases, with average ventriculoaortic junction size, aortic valve area, and peak and mean transvalvular gradient of 19.1 ± 0.7 (18.0-20.3)mm, 2.24 ± 0.48 (1.60-3.00)cm2, 6.4 ± 1.9 (4.0-9.2)mmHg, and 3.5 ± 1.1 (2.1-5.2)mmHg, respectively. Ventriculoaortic junction size was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). There have been no changes in ventriculoaortic junction size (P = 0.32) or other echocardiographic findings for 24 ± 6 (17-36)months after surgery. Although concomitant with other cardiac surgeries, mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation could be repaired without clinically relevant additional surgical duration. External suture annuloplasty is a useful, safe, and secure treatment choice for type Ic lesion-induced aortic regurgitation.

Clinical Outcomes Following the Ross Procedure in Adults: A 25-Year Longitudinal Study

BackgroundVery few reports of long-term outcomes of patients who underwent the Ross procedure have been published. ObjectivesThe authors reviewed their 25-year experience with the Ross procedure with the aim of defining very–long-term survival and factors associated with Ross-related failure. MethodsBetween January 1990 and December 2014, the Ross procedure was performed in 310 adults (mean age 40.8 years) at a single institution. All patients were prospectively added to a dedicated cardiac surgery registry. Complete post-operative clinical examination and history were obtained, and transthoracic echocardiography was performed according to a standardized protocol. There was no loss to follow-up. Median follow-up was 15.1 years and up to 25 years. ResultsBicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed in 227 patients (73.2%), and the most common indication for surgery was aortic stenosis (n = 225 [72.6%]). Freedom from any Ross-related reintervention was 92.9% and 70.1% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. Independent risk factors for pulmonary autograft degeneration were pre-operative large aortic annulus (hazard ratio: 1.1; p = 0.01), pre-operative aortic insufficiency (hazard ratio: 2.7; p = 0.002), and concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta (hazard ratio: 7.7; p = 0.0003). There were 4 hospital deaths (1.3%), and overall survival at 10 and 20 years was 94.1% and 83.6%, respectively. Long-term survival was not significantly different in patients who required Ross-related reintervention (log-rank p = 0.70). However, compared with the general population, survival was significantly lower in patients following the Ross procedure when matched on age and sex (p < 0.0001). ConclusionsThe Ross procedure was associated with excellent long-term valvular outcomes and survival, regardless of the need for reintervention. Adults presenting with aortic insufficiency or a dilated aortic annulus or ascending aorta were at greater risk for reintervention. Unlike previous reports, long-term survival was lower in Ross patients compared with matched subjects.

Long-term results of external aortic ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair.

An untreated dilated aortic annulus is a major risk factor for failure of aortic valve-sparing operations or repair of either bicuspid or tricuspid valve. Aortic annuloplasty efficiently reduces the annulus and increases the coaptation height, thus protecting the repair. This study analyses long-term results of 232 consecutive patients operated on with a standardized and physiological approach to aortic valve repair according to each phenotype of the dystrophic ascending aorta. Subvalvular aortic annuloplasty was systematically added using an external aortic ring to reduce annulus diameter when ≥25 mm. Data were collected into the multicentric international AVIATOR registry (AorticValve repair InternATiOnal Registry): 149 patients with root aneurysm underwent remodelling with an external ring; 21 patients with tubular aortic aneurysm underwent supracoronary grafts with an external open ring and 62 patients with isolated aortic insufficiency (AI) underwent double sub- and/or supravalvular external open ring annuloplasty. Preoperative AI ≥ Grade III was present in 58.6% (133), and the valve was bicuspid in 37.9% (88). Cusp repair was performed in 75.4% (175) patients. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 1.4% (3). The mean follow-up was 40.1 ± 37.8 months (0-145.5). The actuarial survival rate at 7 years was 89.9%. The rate of freedom from reoperation at 7 years was similar among each phenotype, being 90.5% for root aneurysms, 100% for tubular aortic aneurysms and 97.5% for isolated AI with no difference between the bicuspid and tricuspid valve. The rates of freedom from AI ≥ Grade 2 and from AI ≥ Grade 3 at 7 years were, respectively, 76.0 and 93.1% for root aneurysms, 92.9 and 100% for tubular aortic aneurysms and 57.3 and 82.2% for isolated AI. Eye balling repair achieved suboptimal valve competency when compared with systematic cusp effective height assessment, which tended to improve the rate freedom from reoperation, respectively, from 85.8 ± 5.5% to 98.9 ± 1.1% and the rate of freedom from AI ≥ Grade 3 from 89.8 ± 4.9% to 100%. For isolated AI, an additional sinotubular junction ring (double sub- and supravalvular annuloplasty) tended to reduce recurrent AI when compared with single subvalvular annuloplasty. External aortic ring annuloplasty provides a reproducible technique for aortic valve repair with satisfactory long-term results for each ascending aorta phenotype with bicuspid or tricuspid valve. Longer follow-up is ongoing with the AVIATOR registry.

Results of the Ross procedure in adults: a single-centre experience of 741 operations.

Although the Ross procedure provides excellent long-term survival and a high quality of life, only a limited number of centres perform it as an alternative to the standard aortic valve replacement in adults. In the present study, we evaluated our 16-year results of using the Ross procedure in adult patients. Between 1998 and 2014, 741 adult patients underwent the Ross procedure. The mean patient age was 47.4 ± 12.8 years (range, 18-67 years). The total root replacement technique was used in all patients. Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction was performed with pulmonary allograft in 175 (23.6%) patients, with different types of xenografts in 561 (75.7%) and with polytetrafluoroethylene conduits in 5 (0.7%) patients. The early mortality rate was 3.0%. The mean follow-up duration was 5.8 ± 2.2 years. The survival rate at 10 years was 90.7% and was comparable with survival of an age- and sex-matched general population. The rate of freedom from autograft reoperations was 94.1 and 88.3% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The aortic annulus dilatation was the only independent predictor of autograft failure. The 10-year freedom rates from reoperations for allograft, diepoxide- and glutaraldehyde-treated pericardial xenografts as well as porcine aortic root grafts were 100, 94.4, 82.7 and 80.6%, respectively. The use of xenografts and young patient age were associated with increased risk of RVOT conduit failure. The Ross operation provides long-term survival rates that are comparable with an age- and gender-matched general population. The dilated aortic annulus is a risk factor for late autograft valve insufficiency. A cryopreserved pulmonary homograft is the best option for RVOT reconstruction. Diepoxide-treated pericardial xenografts can be an alternative to allografts in elderly patients when an allograft is not available.

Early results of extra-aortic annuloplasty ring implantation on aortic annular dimensions

ObjectivesDilatation of the aortic annulus is a cause of recurrent aortic regurgitation following the Ross or Yacoub procedures. Use of an extra-aortic annuloplasty ring is a potentially useful adjunct procedure. The aim of this study was to analyze the early effectiveness and mid-term stability of this surgical approach. MethodsFrom 2011 to 2015, 50 patients (mean age, 43 ± 14 years) underwent adjunct extra-aortic annuloplasty ring implantation (n = 39 Dacron rings and n = 11 ExAo rings [CORONEO Inc, Montreal, Canada]). Median ring size was 28 mm (range, 27-32 mm). All patients had aortic regurgitation or a dilated aortic annulus. Concomitant surgical procedure was a valve-sparing remodeling procedure (n = 32) or a Ross procedure (n = 18). Baseline and follow-up echocardiographic systolic and diastolic aortic annular dimensions were prospectively collected. Longitudinal analyses were performed using mixed-effect models. Median follow-up was 12 months (98% complete). ResultsUse of an extra-aortic annuloplasty ring resulted in a significant decrease in both systolic (27.9 ± 0.5 mm preoperatively vs 23.6 ± 0.3 mm at discharge, P < .001) and diastolic (24.8 ± 0.4 mm preoperatively vs 20.3 ± 0.3 mm at discharge, P < .001) dimensions. Mean systolic and diastolic dimensions remained statistically unchanged up to 2 years postoperatively, compared with their predischarge values. Systolic expansion of the annulus was conserved early after surgery (16% systolic expansion) and preserved up to 2 years after ring implantation. ConclusionsUse of an extra-aortic annuloplasty ring is effective at reducing annular diameters. This remains stable at mid-term follow-up, with preservation of aortic annular dynamics. Longer-term studies are required to determine the continued stability and impact on long-term clinical outcomes.

New Insights Into Unicuspid Aortic Valve Disease in Adults: Not Just a Subtype of Bicuspid Aortic Valves

BackgroundThe clinical presentation, echocardiographic features, and patterns of aortic dilatation in unicuspid aortic valves (UAVs) are not well defined. MethodsFrom 2011 to 2015, all data from adult patients with confirmed UAVs (n = 42) who underwent aortic valve surgery were reviewed. ResultsThe mean age of the study population was 33.9 ± 1.7 years; 33 were male (78%). Mixed aortic valve disease (stenosis and regurgitation) was the most common mode of presentation (n = 25; 59%). Preoperative diagnosis of UAV was made in only 6 patients (14%). Preoperative transesophageal echocardiography in the operating room increased the diagnosis to 69% of the patients. The peak and mean aortic gradients were 80 ± 29 mm Hg and 50 ± 20 mm Hg, respectively. The aortic valve area was 1.1 ± 0.4 cm2. Overall, 21% of patients (n = 9) had aortic dilatation (> 45 mm): 6 patients (14%) had isolated ascending aortic dilatation, 1 patient (2%) had isolated aortic root dilatation, and 2 patients (5%) had combined aortic root and ascending aortic dilatation. In contrast, 71% of patients (n = 30) had a dilated aortic annulus (> 25 mm). Mean aortic diameters measured using transesophageal echocardiography were: aortic annulus: 25.8 ± 3.4 mm; sinus of Valsalva: 32.1 ± 5 mm, sinotubular junction: 28.1 ± 5 mm, and ascending aorta: 36.2 ± 5 mm. The valve was repaired using a bicuspidization technique in 8 patients (19%) and replaced using a Ross procedure in 34 patients (81%). ConclusionsUAVs remain significantly underdiagnosed in young adults with aortic valve disease. UAVs are associated with a distinct pattern of aortic dilatation, which is mainly present at the level of the aortic annulus. In a small proportion of patients, the valve can be surgically repaired.

Aortic events after isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve root phenotype: echocardiographic follow-up study.

Various forms of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy exist, and the optimal treatment for the different subgroups is insufficiently defined. We aimed to analyse the risk of adverse aortic events after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for BAV insufficiency and concomitant mild-to-moderate dilatation of the aortic root (i.e. BAV root phenotype). A total of 56 consecutive patients (mean age 47 ± 11 years, 95% men) with BAV insufficiency and a root diameter of 40-50 mm underwent AVR surgery from 1995 to 2008. All patients, as identified from our institutional BAV database, had a dilated aortic annulus (i.e. defined as valve prosthesis size ≥27 mm) without aortic stenosis (i.e. mean gradient ≤20 mmHg). Patients who underwent concomitant aortic surgery were excluded. Follow-up (622 patient-years) including echocardiography data was available for all patients. Aortic events were defined as the need for proximal aortic surgery, the occurrence of aortic dissection/rupture, echocardiographic evidence of increasing aortic root diameter/occurrence of late paravalvular leakage or sudden death during follow-up. Actuarial survival was 90% at 10 years and 78% at 15 years. Adverse aortic events occurred in 19 (34%) study patients. Redo aortic surgery was performed in 6 patients (11%), 2 of which were for aortic dissection. Four patients (7%) suffered sudden cardiac death. Moreover, follow-up echocardiography revealed a significant, progressive enlargement of the aortic root diameter in 7 (13%) patients and occurrence of late de novo paravalvular leakage in 2 (3%) patients. The resultant freedom from aortic events was 81% at 10 years and 51% at 15 years. Patients with a BAV root phenotype are at significant risk of aortic events after isolated AVR. Simultaneous root/ascending aortic surgery should be strongly considered in such patients.

Invited Commentary

Invited Commentary

Surgical Anatomy of the Aortic Annulus: Landmarks for External Annuloplasty in Aortic Valve Repair

Although reduction of a dilated aortic annulus is becoming an essential parameter for durablevalve repair, anatomical descriptions of the annulus and surgical landmarks of the subvalvular planefor an external aortic annuloplasty remain to be defined. Twenty hearts with normal anatomy with tricuspid aortic valves were studied. Annulus diameter, cusp geometric height, and interleaflet triangles heightswere measured. The aortic root was dissected externally down to the subvalvular plane as to perform an external aortic annuloplasty or reimplantation procedure proximal anastomosis. Tissue thickness and dissection heights relative to the annulus were measured at each cusp nadir and at the middle of each interleaflet triangle. The mean annulus diameter, cusp geometric height, and interleaflet triangle heights were, respectively, 24.9 ± 0.2 mm, 19.7 ± 0.3 mm, and 20.1 ± 0.5 mm. External dissection of the aortic root reached thesubvalvular plane below the nadir of left coronary cusp (-2.7 ± 0.4 mm), noncoronary (NC) cusp (-3.1 ± 0.3 mm), and the base of left-NC interleaflet triangle (-2.1 ± 0.4 mm). External dissection remained above the nadir of the right coronary cusp (+1.4 ± 0.4 mm), base of left-right interleaflet triangle (+2.4 ± 0.6 mm), and right-NC interleaflet triangle (+3.4 ± 0.3 mm). Mean tissue thickness between the inner and external side of the subvalvular plane was 2.5 ± 0.1 mm. External dissection of the aortic annulus allows subvalvular placement of an external aortic ring below the left and NC cusps and below or within 3 mm of the right cusp nadir in 80% of cases. An external aortic annuloplasty would induce at least a 5-mm reduction of annulus diameter, corresponding to tissue thickness. Precise anatomical landmarks are important to standardize aortic valve annuloplasty.

Aortic Valve Annuloplasty: New Single Suture Technique

Reconstruction strategies for aortic valve insufficiency in the presence of aortic annulus dilatation are usually surgically challenging. We demonstrate a simple, modified Taylor technique of downsizing and stabilization of the aortic annulus using a single internal base suture. Since April 2011, 22 consecutive patients have undergone safe aortic valve annuloplasty. No reoperations for aortic valve insufficiency and no deaths occurred.

Behcet's disease and cardiovascular involvement: our experience of asymptomatic Behcet's patients.

SummaryBehcet’s syndrome is a systemic inflammatory disease associated with vasculitis, and arterial, venous and cardiac disorders. Thirty-eight Behcet’s disease patients were examined prospectively with echocardiography, ultrasonography and computed tomography, and coagulation parameters were determined. Deep venous insufficiency was found in 16 patients, venous thrombosis in seven, one patient had iliac artery stenosis, three had carotid arterial intimal proliferation, two patients had aortic annulus dilatation, six had aortic valve insufficiency, and three had mitral valve insufficiency. None had coagulation defects. To decrease morbidity and mortality rates, a multidisciplinary approach is important for early diagnosis of cardiovascular involvement in Behcet’s disease.

Current Readings: Aortic Valve–Sparing Operations

It has been more than 2 decades since aortic valve-sparing operations were introduced to preserve the aortic valve in patients with aortic root aneurysm. Remodeling of the aortic root is physiologically superior to reimplantation of the aortic valve, mostly because it preserves the aortic annulus movement during the cardiac cycle. However, several comparative studies have shown that reimplantation of the aortic valve has provided more stable aortic valve function than remodeling of the aortic root. This difference in outcomes is largely because of patients׳ selection. Remodeling of the aortic root has been associated with high failure rates in patients with aneurysms associated with genetic syndromes and bicuspid aortic valves with dilated aortic annulus, but it has provided excellent long-term results in older patients with aortic root aneurysms secondary to ascending aortic aneurysms and normal aortic annulus. Thus, both techniques are useful in preserving the aortic valve. With either technique, restoration of normal aortic annulus and cusp geometry is the single most important technical aspect of these operations. In addition to having a competent valve with no or trivial aortic insufficiency at the end of the operation, there must be no cusp prolapse and the coaptation level of the cusps has to be well above the level of the nadir of the aortic annulus.

Repair of Dilated Aortic Root and Sinotubular Junction Using a Stabilizer Ring

Aortic root aneurysm and dissection are potentially life-threatening conditions that involve a structural weakness of the aortic wall. Management of aortic root aneurysm (with or without aortic insufficiency) has recently been the subject of much scholarly discussion which resulted in some modifications. The current trend is a valve-sparing root repair or replacement as well as preserving or restoring the diameter of the aortic annulus and sinutubular junction. This manuscript reviews the etiology and diagnosis of aortic root aneurysm or dilated aortic annulus as well as a novel treatment approach. A newly patented apparatus that restores and repairs the aortic annulus and sinotubular junction is reviewed.