Digoxin-specific Antibody Fragments Research Articles

Beneficial effect of digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments in oleander intoxication

Beneficial effect of digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments in oleander intoxication

Recurrent digoxin overdose and treatment with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments

A case of overdose with digoxin on three separate occasions is presented. The patient received digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments on each presentation without adverse effects. A discussion of digoxin toxicity and specific treatment follows. Immunologic aspects of therapy are emphasized.

Digoxin Assay Anomalies Due to Digoxin-Specific FAB Immunotherapy

We demonstrate that digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments, used in the treatment of severe digitalis intoxication, cause a marked interference with both fluorescence excitation transfer immunoassays and radioimmunoassays for digoxin. In addition, we describe a rapid ultrafiltration method that avoids the Fab-induced interference and affords excellent accuracy and precision. This technique will provide a useful adjunct to the clinical evaluation of patients with digoxin toxicity who are recipients of antidigoxin immunotherapy by enabling a precise determination of their serum digoxin concentrations. By separating the free and protein-bound digoxin this technique also may be useful in evaluating serum digoxin concentrations in patients with abnormal plasma protein concentrations.

Which cardiac disturbances should be treated with digoxin immune fab (ovine) antibody?

Digoxin excess can produce characteristic bradyarrhythmias, tachyarrhythmias, and hyperkalemia. The bradyarrhythmias, which consist of disturbances in conduction and block at the level of the atrioventricular and sinus nodes, are mediated by a direct and vagotonic effect. The vagotonic effect of excess digoxin may also result in a marked slowing of the sinus rate in the setting of severe toxicity. Digoxin increases automatic and triggered electrical activity in atrial muscle, His-Purkinje system, and ventricular muscle, which predisposes to tachycardias. Many of the tachyarrhythmias are relatively specific for the toxic effects of digoxin. Atrial tachycardias with variable atrioventricular block, accelerated junctional rhythms (especially in the setting of atrial fibrillation), and fascicular tachycardias are characteristic digoxin toxic rhythms. Digoxin-specific antibody fragments should be considered the treatment of choice for any digoxin toxic arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic compromise or the threat of hemodynamic compromise. Hyperkalemia, when due to acute severe digoxin toxicity, is also an appropriate indication for digoxin-specific Fab fragment therapy. When assessing the risk:benefit ratio for using digoxin-specific Fab fragment therapy, one needs to determine, in addition to the electrocardiographic manifestations and patient's hemodynamic status (1) the severity of toxicity, as indexed by the amount ingested and/or the serum digoxin concentration; (2) the expected time course for reversal of toxicity, which is usually determined by the status of renal function; (3) the need for digoxin to provide ventricular rate control or improved ventricular contractility and therapeutic alternatives to digoxin; (4) the presence of a strong allergy history; (5) the presence of such factors as increased age and severity of heart disease that may predispose to digoxin toxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Digoxin Immune Fab therapy in the management of digitalis intoxication: Safety and efficacy results of an observational surveillance study

An observational surveillance study was conducted to monitor the safety and effectiveness of treatment with Digoxin Immune Fab (Ovine) (Digibind) in patients with digitalis intoxication. Before April 1986, a relatively limited number of patients received treatment with digoxin-specific Fab fragments through a multicenter clinical trial. Beginning with commercial availability in July 1986, this study sought additional, voluntarily reported clinical data pertaining to treatment through a 3 week follow-up. The study included 717 adults who received Digoxin Immune Fab (Ovine). Most patients were greater than or equal to 70 years old and developed toxicity during maintenance dosing with digoxin. Fifty percent of patients were reported to have a complete response to treatment, 24% a partial response and 12% no response. The response for 14% of patients was not reported or reported as uncertain. Six patients (0.8%, 95% confidence interval 0.3% to 1.8%) had an allergic reaction to digoxin-specific antibody fragments. Three of the six had a history of allergy to antibiotic drugs. Twenty patients (2.8%, 95% confidence interval 1.7% to 4.3%) developed recrudescent toxicity. Risk of recrudescent toxicity increased sixfold when less than 50% of the estimated dose of antibody was administered. A total of 215 patients experienced posttreatment adverse events. The events for 163 patients (76%) were judged to result from manifestations of underlying disease and thus considered unrelated to Fab treatment. Digoxin-specific antibody fragments were generally well tolerated and clinically effective in patients judged by treating physicians to have potentially life-threatening digitalis intoxication.

Results of multicenter studies of digoxin-specific antibody fragments in managing digitalis intoxication in the pediatric population

Digitalis toxicity continues to be a problem for pediatric patients undergoing therapy with cardiac glycosides for heart failure or arrhythmias, as well as in accidental ingestions. In this article the previous use of digoxin-specific antibody Fab fragments to treat digitalis overdose or intoxication in children is reviewed. The case reports cited in the medical literature and the 57 pediatric cases gathered as a result of the multicenter clinical trial and postmarketing surveillance study reported here indicate that digoxin-specific antibody Fab fragments are effective in ameliorating signs of digitalis poisoning in children. Not only can Fab fragments rapidly eradicate potentially life-threatening arrhythmias and conduction defects, but they are also effective in treating hyperkalemia and other noncardiac manifestations of digitalis toxicity. In the small samples of patients studied to date, complications have been minimal and no allergic reactions to digoxin-specific Fab fragments have been observed. Recommendations for the management of digitalis intoxication in children are outlined.

Review of clinical experience with digoxin immune Fab (ovine)

Following the development of methods for eliciting and purifying digoxin-specific Fab fragments with high affinity and specificity for cardiac glycosides, clinical studies were undertaken as a multicenter, open-label trial to test safety and efficacy in patients with advanced and potentially life-threatening digitalis toxicity that failed to respond to conventional therapeutic measures. One-hundred fifty such patients were treated with digoxin-specific antibody fragments purified from immunoglobulin G (IgG) produced in sheep. Doses of Fab were equivalent to the amount of digoxin or digitoxin in the patient's body, as estimated from the medical history or serum concentration measurements. Of 150 patients included in this trial, detailed information is available on 148. One-hundred nineteen (80%) had resolution of all signs and symptoms of digitalis toxicity following specific Fab fragment infusions, 14 (10%) improved, and 15 (10%) showed no response. Among 14 patients with adverse events possibly or probably caused by Fab, the most common events were development of hypokalemia and exacerbation of congestive heart failure. Analysis of the available clinical data indicates that a treatment response was observed in at least 90% of patients with convincing evidence of advanced and potentially life-threatening digitalis toxicity. The data from this multicenter trial have been augmented by findings from an observational surveillance study conducted to monitor the safety and effectiveness of treatment with digoxin immune Fab (ovine) following commercial availability. In this experience, 74% of patients were judged to have a complete or partial response to treatment, and 12% no response. The response for the remaining 14% was not reported or reported as uncertain. In this clinical experience, digoxin-specific Fab was generally well tolerated and clinically effective in patients with potentially life-threatening digitalis toxicity.

Treatment of 150 cases of life-threatening digitalis intoxication with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments: Antman EM, Wenger TL, Butler VP, et al Circulation 81:1744–1752 Jun 1990

Treatment of 150 cases of life-threatening digitalis intoxication with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments: Antman EM, Wenger TL, Butler VP, et al Circulation 81:1744–1752 Jun 1990

Treatment of 150 cases of life-threatening digitalis intoxication with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments. Final report of a multicenter study.

One hundred fifty patients with potentially life-threatening digitalis toxicity were treated with digoxin-specific antibody fragments (Fab) purified from immunoglobulin G produced in sheep. The dose of Fab fragments was equal to the amount of digoxin or digitoxin in the patient's body as estimated from medical histories or determinations of serum digoxin or digitoxin concentrations. The youngest patient received Fab fragments within several hours of birth, and the oldest patient was 94 years old. Seventy-five patients (50%) were receiving long-term digitalis therapy, 15 (10%) had taken a large overdose of digitalis accidentally, and 59 (39%) had ingested an overdose of digitalis with suicidal intent. The clinical response to Fab was unspecified in two cases, leaving 148 patients who could be evaluated. One hundred nineteen patients (80%) had resolution of all signs and symptoms of digitalis toxicity, 14 (10%) improved, and 15 (10%) showed no response. After termination of the Fab infusion, the median time to initial response was 19 minutes, and 75% of the patients had some evidence of a response by 60 minutes. There were only 14 patients with adverse events considered to possibly or probably have been caused by Fab; the most common events were rapid development of hypokalemia and exacerbation of congestive heart failure. No allergic reactions were identified in response to Fab treatment. Of patients who experienced cardiac arrest as a manifestation of digitalis toxicity, 54% survived hospitalization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Near-fatal yew berry intoxication treated with external cardiac pacing and digoxin-specific FAB antibody fragments

The case of a 5-year-old girl who survived a near-fatal ingestion of yew plant leaves after treatment with CPR, transcutaneous pacing, and digoxin-specific FAB antibody fragments is presented. Multiple rhythm disturbances, including profound bradycardia, occurred. She required endotracheal intubation, external chest compressions, and application of a transcutaneous pacemaker. Paced cardiac contractions produced a dramatic improvement in her blood pressure and clinical condition. Two empiric injections of digoxin-specific FAB antibody fragments were administered, after which cardiac function and rhythm gradually improved. She was discharged in her normal state of health three days later. Yew leaves and berries contain several alkaloids that can produce fatal conduction disturbances. Transcutaneous cardiac pacemakers may be lifesaving for patients with transient cardiac toxicity from drug or toxin ingestions. In addition, cross-reactivity between digoxin-specific FAB antibodies and the alkaloids in the yew plant may exist and may have therapeutic importance, although this mechanism was unlikely to have helped our patient.

Treatment of Digoxin Intoxication in a Renal Failure Patient with Digoxin-Specific Antibody Fragments and Plasmapheresis

A patient with renal failure due to myeloma kidney and coincident digitalis intoxication due to prescribed daily digoxin administration was treated with digoxin-specific antibody fragments and plasmapheresis. Rapid response to therapy was noted, removal of digoxin-antidigoxin antibody complexes was confirmed, and prevention of delayed rebound toxicity was documented. We suggest that this is the therapy of choice in similar individuals.

Acute digoxin overdose: Use of digoxin-specific antibody fragments

An acute ingestion of 6 to 7 mg digoxin as a suicidal gesture in a 76-year-old man with chronic heart disease is presented. The patient arrived in the emergency department approximately 5 hours after ingestion with a normal serum potassium and increasing numbers of multifocal premature ventricular contractions. Digoxin-specific antibody fragments were administered. The patient developed ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation and was eventually stabilized 35 minutes after the Fab fragments were infused. A review of the pharmacology and indications for use of digoxin-immune Fab fragments is also presented.

Digitalis, Digitalis Antibodies, Digitalis-like Immunoreactive Substances, and Sodium Homeostasis: A Review

Most pharmacokinetic and biologic attributes of digitalis are age dependent. They are determined in great measure by the chemical structure of the specific cardiac glycoside being used. These effects differ in the intact normal circulation and in heart failure because of the altered autonomic nervous system and hormonal control that exist in the latter. Digitalis is effective only in the presence of myocardial dysfunction, but in a clinical setting, cardiac performance may be difficult to gauge; improved tools are needed for this purpose. The dosages of digoxin recommended for infants and children have been steadily reduced in the past decade, and there is no good evidence that more favorable risk-to-benefit ratios are achieved when higher doses are used or when higher plasma concentrations are sought. Massive digitalis toxicity is a serious, often fatal, complication in young infants, especially when the drug is given parenterally; it may be difficult to diagnose early. The only reliable deterrent for this complication is the adoption of careful safety standards whenever the drug is employed. Experience with digoxin antibodies is still scarce in children, especially in infancy, but their use generally has been associated with a favorable outcome. Endogenous substances that interfere with the digoxin radioimmunoassay (DLIS) occasionally yield clinically relevant, erroneously high, plasma digoxin concentration readings in neonates. An interesting hypothesis currently being investigated is the physiologic and pathologic role of these compounds in sodium hemostasis; they may be part of a putative endogenous NaK-ATP-ase inhibitor involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension and renal diseases.

Treatment of severe digitalis intoxication with digoxin-specific antibody fragments: a clinical review.

Treatment of severe digitalis intoxication with digoxin-specific antibody fragments: a clinical review.

The influence of digoxin-specific antibody fragments on digoxin disposition in the rat

Pentobarbitone-anaesthetized bile duct-cannulated female rats were injected intravenously with an equimolar dose of digoxin-specific sheep antibody fragments (DS-Fab) at 2 or 60 min after a dose of [ 3H]digoxin. The plasma drug levels were promptly elevated by 7-fold or 12–30-fold when the DS-Fab were given at 2 or 60 min respectively. When tissue drug concentrations were measured 2 min after a dose of DS-Fab (given 60 min after digoxin) which caused a 30-fold increase in plasma concentration, reductions could be detected if corrections were made for the presence in the tissues of high plasma concentrations of DS-Fab-bound drug. For instance, reductions in the heart, liver and small intestine were 63, 58 and 48% respectively. However, by 120 min after digoxin injection the only detectable effects on tissue drug concentration were in the kidney, where concentrations had increased 14-fold or 7-fold when the DS-Fab were given at 2 or 60 min respectively. Over the 120 min period the urinary excretion of digoxin-derived radioactivity was enhanced, and in the case where DS-Fab were given at 2 min, a 3-fold increase in urinary excretion was seen, which resulted in a net increase in the overall drug elimination. This greater urinary elimination was accompanied by a marked increase in the amount of bound drug in the urine (control and experimental values were 4 and 36% respectively). The cumulative biliary excretion of radioactivity seemed to be slightly reduced by DS-Fab administration at 2 or 60 min, although this was not statistically significant. A lack of significant drug-specific binding in the bile suggested that the liver is not involved in the elimination of hapten-DS-Fab complexes. There was tittle effect on the intestinal secretion of the drug.

Response of digoxin toxic atrial tachycardia to digoxin-specific Fab fragments

Digoxin-specific antibody fragments have been used successfully to safely treat ventricular ectopic activity, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, severe sinus bradycardia and atrioventricular block precipitated by excess digoxin. 1–3 These arrhythmias in general have been reported to respond within 30 minutes of administration of digoxin-specific Fab fragments. We describe the time course and electrocardiographic response of a patient with digoxin toxic atrial tachycardia to digoxin-specific Fab fragments.

Time course for reversal of digoxin toxicity with digoxin-specific antibody fragments

Time course for reversal of digoxin toxicity with digoxin-specific antibody fragments

Treatment of 63 severely digitalis-toxic patients with digoxin-specific antibody fragments

Sixty-three patients with life-threatening digitalis intoxication were treated with purified fragments of digoxin-specific antibodies (Fab) obtained from sheep. Twenty-eight patients developed toxicity as the result of digitalis ingestion in a suicide attempt, 5 ingested a large amount of digoxin accidentally and 30 developed toxicity in the course of treatment for underlying heart disease. The dosage of digoxin-specific Fab was calculated to be equimolar to the amount of cardiac glycoside in the patient's body. Digitalis toxicity was completely reversed in most cases, with onset of effect usually within 30 minutes of administration of Fab fragments. Unbound and, therefore, active digoxin serum concentrations decreased to undetectable levels within minutes after administration of the fragments. In all patients who had elevated serum potassium concentrations caused by massive digitalis toxicity, treatment with the Fab fragments reversed the hyperkalemia. There were no obvious adverse reactions to treatment. Potentially life-threatening digitalis intoxication can be rapidly and safely reversed by treatment with purified digoxin-specific Fab fragments.

Oleander tea: Herbal draught of death

A woman died after drinking herbal tea prepared from oleander (Nerium oleander) leaves. This case demonstrates the cross-reactivity between the cardiac glycosides in oleander and the digoxin radioimmunoassay. Digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments have not been used in oleander poisoning, but these might prove to be lifesaving. Treatment of oleander toxicity is aimed at controlling arrhythmias and hyperkalemia; inactivation of the Na-K ATPase pump, however, can make treatment difficult.

Digoxin Specific Antibody (Fab) Fragments in 34 Cases of Severe Digitalis Intoxication

34 patients aged between 2 and 80 years were treated with digoxin specific antibody (Fab) fragments for severe digitalis poisoning. In 27 cases, the glycoside was taken with suicidal intent; in 3 cases accidentally and 4 were iatrogenic. The following criteria were considered to be indications for use of Fab fragments: the appearance of life-threatening arrhythmias such as high-grade atrioventricular conduction disorders (grade 2 and 3 A-V block), multifocal ectopic beats, ventricular tachycardia, and relapsing ventricular fibrillation. Serum digoxin concentrations were between 3.4 and 29ng/ml before the start of treatment. Between 240 and 800mg of Fab were administered; the majority of patients received 480mg. Regression of arrhythmias was seen between 0.5 and 8 hours after Fab infusion. There was a rapid fall in the free digoxin in the serum to concentrations that were no longer measurable and a marked rise in bound digoxin with a simultaneous increase of excretion of bound digoxin in the urine. Fab therapy is considered to be a major advance in the treatment of severe, previously fatal, glycoside poisoning. No notable side effects or allergic reactions were observed.