The first published suggestion that some shadows in radiographs of lungs might be produced by iron oxide and not by fibrosis was made by Collis in 1923, but Fawcitt (1943) quotes letters exchanged between Thurston Holland and Collis in 1919 when the possibility was discussed. In 1936 Doig and McLaughlin gave the first account of the x-ray appearances of the lungs of electric-arc welders, and suggested that these appearances might be due to iron deposits. Recently McLaughlin, Barrie, Grout and Harding (1945) have reported on the condition of the lungs of silver polishers, suggesting that these workmen have no industrial disability and that the radiographie abnormalities in their lungs are the result of iron oxide deposition without attendant fibrosis. A brief review of the literature of iron pigmentation of the lung is also given. Since this last paper was written, the lungs of two more silver polishers have been examined and found to show similar pigmentation without fibrosis. Since then the Miners' Phthisis Bureau of South Africa (1944) report investigations on a native iron-ore miner whose radiograph at the end of 1937 showed a ' generalized small mottling throughout the fields of both lungs ' ; this man died from lobar pneumonia in 1939, and his lungs were found to have heavy deposits of haematite dust but no fibrosis. The report concludes that the ' mottling observed in his radiograph was due entirely to deposits of haematite in the lung substance and not to fibrosis.' There are few papers describing the effects of iron oxide on the lungs of experimental animals, and no reports of the production of radiographie appearances corresponding with the reticulation or nodulation found in man. There is, however, general agreement that iron oxide does not produce fibrosis under the varied experimental conditions used. It is not proposed to discuss here the early histological picture, which is well described in the guinea-pig by Carleton (1927) and by Haynes (1931). Naeslung (1937, 1938) used a number of dusts, mainly derived from iron ores, in inhalation experi ments on rabbits, and found fibrosis in the lungs of only those animals which had inhaled a silica containing dust. He pictured the miliary accumu lations of iron pigment, and noted that ' a number of animals amongst which pneumoconiosis or silicosis was obvious on autopsy had shown no alterations of the lungs when x-rayed at the conclu sion of the dust exposure.' In a further experiment (Naeslund 1940), two rabbits inhaled a mixture of Fe203 and Fe205 for six months; when they were killed three months later the lungs are stated to have shown a slight general fibrotic change but no nodular fibrosis. Harrold, Meek and McCord (1940) exposed rabbits and rats to welding fumes; th y noted that early diffuse pigmentation became more nodular with time, and that ' no fibrotic c anges or other pathology of a permanent nature ascribable to metallic fumes have been observed/ They also said that ' x-ray examinations made on intact animals and on extirpated lungs yielded no positive results.' Gardner and McCrum (1942) studied x-ray films of the distended lungs of 3 cavies exposed to arc-welding fumes for 10 months and then kept in a normal atmosphere for another 3 months. No pictures were given but they stated ' to our surprise it was possible to distinguish their films from that of a normal animal's lungs. The great number of fine particles of high molecular weight cast a diffuse shadow which gave the lung fi lds a very fine grainy appearance.' They found that the response to the metallic particles in the fume was that to inert foreign particles : ' it con sisted of simple phagocytosis without demonstrable ef ect upon the dust cells and without subsequent proliferation of fixed tissues.' I agree with this statement.