Difficulty Of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Research Articles

A novel entire traction method with clip-anchored nylon ring facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early gastric cancer.

A 48-year-old woman with a high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the gastric antrum was referred for ESD treatment.The difficulty of ESD is to expose the submucosa,especially in difficult sites and lesions with severe fibrosis.Adequate submucosal exposure is the most critical technology to reduce complications and improving efficiency.Here we report a novel entire traction method to facilitate safe and efficient ESD.

Assessment of predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japanese multicenter retrospective study.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is performed for the treatment of lesions with varied backgrounds and factors. However, the predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD remain unknown in patients with varied lesions. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD for ESCC using a retrospective cohort. This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in 10 hospitals in Japan. Consecutive patients who underwent esophageal ESD between January 2013 and December 2019 were enrolled. Lesions of subepithelial tumors, adenocarcinoma, and adenoma were excluded. Difficult lesions were defined as ESD requiring a long procedure time (≥120 min), perforation development, piecemeal resection, or discontinued ESD. In the present study, the clinical factors were assessed to identify the technical difficulty of ESD using univariate and multivariate analyses. Among 1708 lesions treated with esophageal ESD, eight subepithelial tumors, 44 adenocarcinomas, and two adenomas were excluded. Finally, 1505 patients with 1654 lesions were analyzed, and 217 patients with 217 lesions (13.1%) were classified as patients with difficult lesions. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD were as follows: tumors with varices, tumors with diverticulum, antiplatelet use (discontinued), circumference of tumor (≥1/2), preoperative tumor size ≥30 mm, trainee, and nonhigh-volume center. This multicenter retrospective study identified the predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD for ESCC with varied backgrounds and factors.

Use of unique endoscope holder and scissor-style knife reduces difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

The stability of the endoscope tip is very important in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Especially in the case of a scissors-type incision device, it is important to be able to insert and remove the device while maintaining the field of view. This study examined gastric ESD using an endoscope holder, the Endo KEYper (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) ([Fig. 1], [Fig. 2]), and a scissors-type incision device, the SB Knife (SB-Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan).

How to Perform a High-Quality Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

How to Perform a High-Quality Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

The risk scoring system for assessing the technical difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection in cases of remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) after distal gastrectomy (DG) is considered technically challenging due to the narrow working space, and severe fibrosis and staples from the previous surgery. Technical difficulties of ESD for RGC after DG have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for assessing the technical difficulty of ESD for RGC after DG in a large multicenter cohort. We investigated patients who underwent ESD for RGC after DG in 10 institutions between April 2008 and March 2018. A difficult case was defined as ESD lasting ≥ 120min, involving piecemeal resection, or the occurrence of perforation during the procedure. A risk-scoring system for the technical difficulty of the procedure was developed based on multiple logistic regression analyses, and its performance was internally validated using bootstrapping. A total of 197 consecutive patients with 201 lesions were analyzed. There were 90 and 111 difficult and non-difficult cases, respectively. The scoring model consisted of four independent risk factors and points of risk scores were assigned for each as follows: tumor size > 20mm: 2 points; anastomosis site: 2 points; suture line: 1 point; and non-expert endoscopist: 2 points. The C-statistics of the scoring system for technical difficulty was 0.72. We developed a validated risk-scoring model for predicting the technical difficulty of ESD for RGC after DG that can contribute to its safer and more reliable performance.

Factors associated with technical difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer that met the expanded indication criteria: post hoc analysis of a multi-institutional prospective confirmatory trial (JCOG0607)

There are few reports on the technical difficulty of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD for early gastric cancer (EGC) using the data from the multicenter non-randomized confirmatory trial of expanded indication criteria of ESD (JCOG0607). The major inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) histologically proven intestinal-type adenocarcinoma; (2) cT1aN0M0; (3) lesion without finding of ulcer (UL-negative) with > 2cm in size, or UL-positive with ≤ 3cm; (4) age 20-75years. The difficult case was defined as ESD taking ≥ 120min, piecemeal resection, and/or developing perforation during procedure. Between June 2007 and October 2010, 470 patients were enrolled from 29 institutions. Median procedure time was 79 (range 14-462) min, and it was ≥ 120min in 127 patients. Twelve patients developed perforation during ESD, and the procedure time was ≥ 120min in 9 of them. Therefore, 130 patients (27.7%) were identified as difficult cases. Multivariable analysis showed that UL-negative with > 5cm (vs. UL-negative with ≤ 3cm, odds ratio, 24.993; 95% CI 6.130-101.897, p < 0.0001) had the largest odds ratio and followed by UL-negative with 3-5cm upper or middle portion of stomach and age ≤ 60years were significantly associated with difficulty. UL-negative lesion with > 3cm, upper or middle portion of stomach and age ≤ 60years were independent factors associated with technical difficulty of ESD for EGC. Trial registered number was UMIN000000737.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a grasping-type scissors for early colorectal epithelial neoplasms: a large single-center experience.

Background and aimsThe Clutch Cutter (CC) can grasp, pull, coagulate, and incise targeted tissue with the use of electrosurgical current. It was developed as a biopsy technique to reduce the technical difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with knives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD using the CC (ESD-CC) for early colorectal epithelial neoplasms (ECENs).MethodsIn this prospective study, we enrolled 437 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of ECEN between January 2009 and January 2018. They all satisfied the Japanese colorectal cancer treatment guidelines for ESD; namely, confirmation by preliminary endoscopy, EUS, and endoscopic biopsy. The CC was used for all steps of ESD (mucosal incision, submucosal dissection, and hemostatic treatment); therapeutic efficacy and safety were assessed.ResultsThe en bloc resection rate was 99.3% (434/437), and the R0 resection rate was 87.0% (380/437). The mean operating time was 88.3 minutes. Perforation occurred in 10 cases (2.3%) and was managed with conservative medical treatment. Post-ESD-CC bleeding occurred in 10 cases (2.3%) and was successfully treated by endoscopic hemostatic treatment.ConclusionsESD-CC is a technically efficient, safe, and easy method for resecting ECEN.

Which part of a porcine stomach is suitable as an animal training model for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?

Training using an animal model is generally recommended before performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in humans. This study aimed to clarify the suitability of an isolated porcine stomach as an animal training model for gastric ESD. Study 1: six experienced endoscopists performed ESDs of six simulated lesions located in six locations in an isolated porcine stomach (1, lower third [L]/ greater curvature [Gre]; 2, L/ anterior wall [Ant]; 3, L/ posterior wall [Post]; 4, upper third [U]/ Gre; 5, U/Ant; 6, U/Post). The procedure times (s/cm(2)) were compared among the different lesion locations. A questionnaire (scored 1 - 5) completed by the endoscopists was used to assess the difference in the difficulty compared to the human stomach of the three steps of the ESD procedure (injection, incision and dissection). Study 2: the thicknesses of the mucosal layers were histologically evaluated among the six locations in three porcine and two human stomachs. Study 1: the procedure speed was significantly slower at L/Gre and U/Gre in the porcine stomachs (P = 0.0004). The questionnaire responses revealed a tendency toward similarity between the lower regions of the human and porcine stomachs at L/Ant, L/Post, U/Ant and U/Post during the dissection step (P = 0.056). In contrast, the injection and incision steps at L/Gre in the porcine stomach were shown to differ in difficultly level (both P = 0.0006). Study 2: the mucosal layers in the porcine stomachs were significantly thicker than those in the human stomachs in the lower areas, especially L/Gre. The difficulty of ESD and the histological features of the porcine stomachs were coincident with those of the human stomachs at L/Ant, L/Post, U/Ant and U/Post. These parts of the porcine stomach may be suitable as animal training models for gastric ESD.

INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN PROCEDURE TIME OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR GASTRIC CANCER WITH FIBROTIC CHANGE

Factors correlating with the technical difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) are still unclear. EGC coexisting with fibrosis inside lesions has been a common therapeutic indication for ESD. The aim of this study was to clarify the most important factor related to difficult ESD for EGC. Fifty-six patients (49 male and seven female, median age 66 years) who received ESD at a single institute for EGC with fibrosis in the resected lesion were selected. Various clinicopathological factors, including the histological findings of fibrotic changes within the cancer area in the resected specimen, were evaluated statistically for correlation with ESD procedure time. Univariate linear regression analysis with logarithmic ESD procedure time revealed the upper-third portion of lesion in the stomach (P = 0.02), histological classification of dense fibrosis (ulcer/ulcer scar-III/IV) within EGC (P < 0.001), and presence of peptic ulcer other than EGC (P = 0.04). Areas of the resected specimen (P < 0.001) and fibrosis (P < 0.001) were significant factors related to prolonged operation times. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the upper-third portion of lesion (P = 0.007), ulcer/ulcer scar-III/IV findings (P = 0.006), and area of resected specimen (P = 0.006) were significant independent factors influencing ESD procedure time. Histological findings of fibrotic changes coexisting with EGC are closely related to technical difficulty in ESD as well as the location of tumors. Preoperative precise evaluation of fibrotic changes within EGC may be helpful to predict a technical difficulty in ESD.

T1424: Does Obesity Have an Adverse Impact on the Short-Term Outcomes and the Technical Difficulty of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for the Patients With Early Gastric Cancer?

Obesity has been generally associated with increased surgical risk. But there has not been reported whether obesity have an adverse impact of the short-term complications and technical difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether obesity is associated with a greater technical difficulty and short-term complications of ESD for early gastric cancer (EGC).