990 Reviews at times unnecessarily tendentious. The final part of the book addresses the difficulty of closure that nineteenth-century erotic novels share with many more modern narra? tives, although in the case ofthe former,the problem is sexual as well as narratorial. In insisting that 'people and their desires are not everywhere the same' (p. 48), Cryle is probably preaching to the converted ifhis intended readership is his fellow scholars, and indeed, this study does appear to be aimed less at the uninitiated than at a critical community that can be assumed to have read Foucault and broadly accepted his the? ories of discourse. Yet, accusations of loose interpretation and anachronistic readings levelled at other critics give the book a polemical and combative character. Crebillon's novels, for instance, are not, as some would have it, 'about sex' in the modern sense, but the closest equivalent to what, since the end of the nineteenth century, we have called 'erotic literature', with its emphasis on 'the sexual act' leading inevitably to 'orgasm '. The very term 'orgasm', we are told, had an entirely differentmeaning forthe Encyclopedistes, who defined itas a formof illness. Cryle is undoubtedly rightto draw attention to the dangers of anachronism, but such chidings are undermined by his own use ofmodern American vulgarisms ('dick', 'screw', ete.) in the English translations of quotations. More regrettably,Cryle hardly ever ventures directly into the trickyarea of literary value, despite his preoccupations with gradation, perhaps because he is reluctant , as he himself declares, to 'confuse analysis with apologetics' (p. 365). He rebukes Dworkin and other anti-porn feminists forcondemning this literature out ofhand, but himself eschews all issues of reader response, feminist or otherwise. Now and again, though, objective analysis gives way to contemptuous irony,and at such moments one cannot help feeling that, for all his claims to neutrality, Cryle is a literary purist, on a covet mission in enemy territoryto flushout the artificesand cliches oferotic narrative. London Metropolitan University John Phillips Sade: The Libertine Novels. By John Phillips. London and Sterling, VA: Pluto Press. 2001. x + 204pp. ISBN 0-7453-1598-4. Sade, ou la tentation totalitaire: etude sur I'anthropologie litteraire dans 'La Nou? velle Justine'et 'L'Histoire de Juliette'. By Svein-Eirik FauskevAg. (Les Dixhuitiemes siecles, 49) Paris: Champion. 2001. 199 pp. ISBN 2-7453-0329-5. Taken together, these books indicate the considerable range, indeed the professional division, of Sade studies. Each is of great interest, but they have no problematic in common. John Phillips's work, firstly,can be read as a kind of antidote to the tendentious , polemical uses of Sade's name and work that have abounded in the Frenchspeaking world since the time of the Romantics, some of which now circulate widely in anglophone daily culture. It might well be claimed in fact that Sade, while one of the French authors most talked about, is still one of the least read. Phillips rightly declares his suspicion of the many 'ideologically motivated' biographies of Sade, and refers to a long history of stereotypical readings (e.g. p. 23), but does not engage in lengthy refutations. Instead, he defines a relatively narrow corpus, Sade's 'four lib? ertine novels', and concentrates on reading them. This strategy is both economical and elegant: it produces a book that has introductory qualities while remaining thoroughly erudite. Phillips's primary focus is not on the cocktail of I'homme et I'oeuvre which^ in Sade's case, has often proved a rather captious potion. 'It is always the text', he says, 'rather than the life which I take as the starting point of my analysis' (p. 24). The point of an introductory study is, by generic definition, to gain new readers for Sade, and to justify the fact of reading his work. Where most authors are concerned, this is a matter of rhetorical routine: with a little ingenuity, any author can be shown to be valuable from some point of view or other. But in Sade's case the difficultyis a MLRy 98.4, 2003 991 genuinely ethical one, as Phillips knows well. 'Sade's libertine novels are ultimately worth reading5, he argues, 'because of the light they cast...
Read full abstract