Differential Diagnosis Of Ovarian Masses Research Articles

OC16.02: Differential diagnosis of ovarian masses

The outcome measure was the histological classification of excised tissues as malignant or benign. Over 50 end-point variables were prospectively defined and recorded for analysis. By utilizing a multicenter approach any model developed is likely to be more generally applicable outside the context of the study population. Several new mathematical models were developed and tested. The results were also compared with results obtained with older models and with subjective assessment of experienced clinicians. This presentation will extensively cover the benefits and limitations of mathematical models.

Ovarian masses during adolescence: clinical, ultrasonographic and pathologic findings, serum tumor markers and endocrinological profile

This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the epidemiological and clinical features, laboratory findings, preoperative work-up, surgical treatment and pathologic findings in adolescents with ovarian cysts. All adolescents who were referred to our institution and had been operated on because of a diagnosed ovarian mass, from January 1997 to June 2003, were included in this study. Forty-four cases of women with an ovarian mass were retrospectively analyzed. These patients, aged between 12 and 21 years, had 47 ovarian masses (three patients had bilateral lesions), of which 49% were non-neoplastic and 51% were neoplastic. Of the neoplastic lesions, 62.5% were germ cell tumors, 20.8% were epithelial and 16.7% were sex cord–stromal tumors. Of the neoplastic tumors, 95.8% were benign while 4.2% were malignant. Procedures included 30 operative laparoscopies (68.2%) and 14 exploratory laparotomies (31.8%). Simple excision of the ovarian cyst was performed in 39 cases (88.6%). According to our study, most of the adolescents with an ovarian cyst underwent an operation because of a neoplastic lesion. The majority of ovarian tumors occurring in adolescents are non-epithelial in origin, and germ cell tumors are the most common histological type. Ultrasound examination is one of the most important diagnostic tools. Preoperative diagnostic approach of these patients should always include careful history taking, physical examination, imaging and evaluation of serum assays. Gynecologists who care for young girls must be familiar with the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses whose surgical treatment should be conservative when appropriate, so that hormonal status and future fertility are not compromised in this group of patients.

Serum tumor markers in the management of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer

CA 125 is the most reliable serum marker for ovarian carcinoma. Whereas its role in the screening of the malignancy is controversial, serum CA 125 assay is very useful for both the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses, particularly in postmenopause, and the monitoring of the response to chemotherapy and follow-up of patients with histologically proven ovarian carcinoma. Tumor-associated antigens other than CA 125, such as CA 19.9, CA 15.3 and TAG.72, firstly identified in gastro-intestinal or breast malignancies, have been detected also in tissue and serum samples from patients with ovarian carcinoma. In particular CA19.9 offers the advantage of high sensitivity for mucinous histotype, which often fails to express CA 125. Serum CA 125 correlates with the clinical course of disease better than the other antigens, and in patients with positive CA 125 assay at diagnosis the concomitant evaluation of CA 19.9 or CA 72.4 or CA 15.3 does not offer any additional benefit for monitoring ovarian carcinoma. Conversely, the serial measurements of these other antigens may represent an interesting biochemical tool for the management of patients with negative CA 125 assay. Serum αFP and βHCG are very useful in the preoperative evaluation and management of nondysgerminomatous ovarian germ cell tumors, whereas elevated serum inhibin levels can be detected in patients with granulosa cell tumors of the ovary. As for endometrial carcinoma, preoperative serum CA 125 levels correlate with stage, depth of myometrial invasion, histologic grade, cervical invasion, peritoneal cytology, lymph node status and clinical outcome. Moreover, serial CA 125 assay is a good indicator of disease activity and a useful biochemical tool for post-treatment surveillance of patients with endometrial carcinoma. SCC is the most reliable serum marker for squamous cell cervical carcinoma, and in patients with this malignancy pretreatment SCC levels are related to tumor stage, tumor size, depth of cervical invasion, lymph-vascular space involvement, lymph node status and clinical outcome. Serial SCC measurements parallel the response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy as well as the clinical course of disease after the completion of treatment. Serum CYFRA 21.1 seems to be less sensitive than serum SCC for squamous cell cervical carcinoma. Elevated CA 125 levels can be often detected in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma. The future for tumor marker research is represented by the emerging technologies of transcriptional profiling and proteomics.

Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor assay in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Preoperative serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and CA 125 levels were measured in 183 patients with ovarian masses undergoing laparotomy. Serum sIL-2R levels were higher in the 54 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer than in the 129 patients with benign ovarian diseases (p < 0.0001). Elevated serum levels of sIL-2R (> or = 71 U/ml) and CA 125 (> or = 83 U/ml) were found in 79.6 and 77.8% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, respectively. Serum sIL-2R and CA 125 positivity rates correlated with the FIGO stage (p = 0.0033 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Raised serum levels of sIL-2R and CA 125 were detected in 11.6 and 7.0% of patients with benign ovarian diseases, respectively. The combination sIL-2R or CA 125 had a sensitivity of 88.9%, and the association sIL-2R and CA 125 had a specificity of 98.4% for epithelial ovarian cancer. As for the 16 patients with this malignancy who were serially monitored during and after chemotherapy, changes in sIL-2R and CA 125 levels correlated with the clinical course of disease in 62.3 and 94.3% of 53 instances, respectively. In conclusion, the serum sIL-2R assay could represent a useful adjunctive tool for the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses, while it seems to be of limited benefit for monitoring the response to chemotherapy and follow-up of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

The concomitant determination of different tumor markers in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and benign ovarian masses: Relevance for differential diagnosis

The serum levels of CA 125 (cutoff limit, 65 U/ml), CA19.9 (cutoff, 40 U/ml), CA 15.3 (cutoff, 32 U/ml), CA72.4 (cutoff, 3.8 U/ml), and TATI (cutoff, 22 ng/ml) were preoperatively measured in 90 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and in 254 patients with benign ovarian pathology. CA125 had a sensitivity of 75.6%, a specificity of 86.6%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 83.7% for epithelial ovarian cancer; CA19.9 had a sensitivity of 35.6%, a specificity of 81.1%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 69.2%; CA15.3 had a sensitivity of 57.1%, a specificity of 93.9%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 84.6%; CA72.4 had a sensitivity of 70.7%, a specificity of 91.8%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 86.2%; and TATI had a sensitivity of 47.3%, a specificity of 95.3%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 82.9%. CA 125 was the most sensitive marker for nonmucinous tumors, while CA19.9 and CA72.4 were the antigens more frequently expressed by mucinous malignancies. The sensitivities of serum CA 125 (81.1% vs 50.0%; P = 0.01) and TATI (55.2% vs 18.8%; P = 0.02) were higher in patients above 50 years of age than in younger patients while specificities were quite similar in both age groups. The association of serum CA125 and CA19.9 had a significantly higher sensitivity (93.2% vs 81.1%; P = 0.03) and a slightly lowered specificity (78.9% vs 86.0%; P = 0.46) than CA125 assay alone in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses in patients above 50 years of age.