Different Stages Of Transcription Research Articles

Nonspecific interactions in transcription regulation and organization of transcriptional condensates

Eukaryotic cells are characterized by a high degree of compartmentalization of their internal contents, which ensures precise and controlled regulation of intracellular processes. During many processes, including different stages of transcription, dynamic membrane-free compartments called biomolecular condensates are formed. Transcription condensates contain various transcription factors and RNA polymerase and are formed by high and low specificity interactions between protein factors, DNA and nearby RNA. This review discusses recent data demonstrating the important role of nonspecific multivalent protein-protein and RNA-protein interactions in the organization and regulation of transcription.

Nonspecific Interactions in Transcription Regulation and Organization of Transcriptional Condensates.

Eukaryotic cells are characterized by a high degree of compartmentalization of their internal contents, which ensures precise and controlled regulation of intracellular processes. During many processes, including different stages of transcription, dynamic membraneless compartments termed biomolecular condensates are formed. Transcription condensates contain various transcription factors and RNA polymerase and are formed by high- and low-specificity interactions between the proteins, DNA, and nearby RNA. This review discusses recent data demonstrating important role of nonspecific multivalent protein-protein and RNA-protein interactions in organization and regulation of transcription.

Mechanisms and Functions of the RNA Polymerase II General Transcription Machinery during the Transcription Cycle.

Central to the development and survival of all organisms is the regulation of gene expression, which begins with the process of transcription catalyzed by RNA polymerases. During transcription of protein-coding genes, the general transcription factors (GTFs) work alongside RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to assemble the preinitiation complex at the transcription start site, open the promoter DNA, initiate synthesis of the nascent messenger RNA, transition to productive elongation, and ultimately terminate transcription. Through these different stages of transcription, Pol II is dynamically phosphorylated at the C-terminal tail of its largest subunit, serving as a control mechanism for Pol II elongation and a signaling/binding platform for co-transcriptional factors. The large number of core protein factors participating in the fundamental steps of transcription add dense layers of regulation that contribute to the complexity of temporal and spatial control of gene expression within any given cell type. The Pol II transcription system is highly conserved across different levels of eukaryotes; however, most of the information here will focus on the human Pol II system. This review walks through various stages of transcription, from preinitiation complex assembly to termination, highlighting the functions and mechanisms of the core machinery that participates in each stage.

Distinctive interactomes of RNA polymerase II phosphorylation during different stages of transcription

During eukaryotic transcription, RNA polymerase II undergoes dynamic post-translational modifications on the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit, generating an information-rich PTM landscape that transcriptional regulators bind. The phosphorylation of Ser5 and Ser2 of CTD heptad occurs spatiotemporally with the transcriptional stages, recruiting different transcriptional regulators to Pol II. To delineate the protein interactomes at different transcriptional stages, we reconstructed phosphorylation patterns of the CTD at Ser5 and Ser2 invitro. Our results showed that distinct protein interactomes are recruited to RNA polymerase II at different stages of transcription by the phosphorylation of Ser2 and Ser5 of the CTD heptads. In particular, we characterized calcium homeostasis endoplasmic reticulum protein (CHERP) as a regulator bound by phospho-Ser2 heptad. Pol II association with CHERP recruits an accessory splicing complex whose loss results in broad changes in alternative splicing events. Our results shed light on the PTM-coded recruitment process that coordinates transcription.

PIP2-Effector Protein MPRIP Regulates RNA Polymerase II Condensation and Transcription.

The specific post-translational modifications of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the Rpb1 subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) correlate with different stages of transcription. The phosphorylation of the Ser5 residues of this domain associates with the initiation condensates, which are formed through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). The subsequent Tyr1 phosphorylation of the CTD peaks at the promoter-proximal region and is involved in the pause-release of RNAPII. By implementing super-resolution microscopy techniques, we previously reported that the nuclear Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) associates with the Ser5-phosphorylated-RNAPII complex and facilitates the RNAPII transcription. In this study, we identified Myosin Phosphatase Rho-Interacting Protein (MPRIP) as a novel regulator of the RNAPII transcription that recruits Tyr1-phosphorylated CTD (Tyr1P-CTD) to nuclear PIP2-containing structures. The depletion of MPRIP increases the number of the initiation condensates, indicating a defect in the transcription. We hypothesize that MPRIP regulates the condensation and transcription through affecting the association of the RNAPII complex with nuclear PIP2-rich structures. The identification of Tyr1P-CTD as an interactor of PIP2 and MPRIP further points to a regulatory role in RNAPII pause-release, where the susceptibility of the transcriptional complex to leave the initiation condensate depends on its association with nuclear PIP2-rich structures. Moreover, the N-terminal domain of MPRIP, which is responsible for the interaction with the Tyr1P-CTD, contains an F-actin binding region that offers an explanation of how nuclear F-actin formations can affect the RNAPII transcription and condensation. Overall, our findings shed light on the role of PIP2 in RNAPII transcription through identifying the F-actin binding protein MPRIP as a transcription regulator and a determinant of the condensation of RNAPII.

CTD Kinases’ structural elements enable them to phosphorylate specific residues in the CTD of RNA Polymerase II

The phosphorylation states of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) coordinate the process of eukaryotic transcription by recruitment of transcription regulators. The largest subunit of pol II consists of a highly disordered C-Terminal Domain (CTD). Individual residues of repetitive heptads (Consensus sequence - Tyr1-Ser2-Pro3-Thr4-Ser5-Pro6-Ser7) of the CTD are phosphorylated temporally at different stages of transcription. Intriguingly, despite similar flanking residues, phosphorylation of Ser2 and Ser5 in CTD heptads play dramatically different roles. The uncanny ability of kinases to recognize the correct serine is not well understood. In this paper, we use biochemical assays, mass spectrometry, molecular modeling, and structural analysis to understand the structural elements determining which serine of the CTD heptad is subject to phosphorylation. We identified three motifs in the activation/P+1 loops differentiating the intrinsic specificity of CTD in various CTD kinases. We characterized the enzyme specificity of the CTD kinases, CDK7 as Ser5-specific, Erk2 with dual specificity for Ser2 and Ser5, and Dyrk1a as a Ser2-specific kinase. We also show that the specificities of kinases are malleable and can be modified by incorporating mutations in their activation/P+1 loops that alter the interactions of the three motifs. Our results provide an important clue to the understanding of post-translational modification of RNA polymerase II temporally during active transcription.

RNA polymerase clamp conformational dynamics: long-lived states and modulation by crowding, cations, and nonspecific DNA binding.

The RNA polymerase (RNAP) clamp, a mobile structural element conserved in RNAP from all domains of life, has been proposed to play critical roles at different stages of transcription. In previous work, we demonstrated using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) that RNAP clamp interconvert between three short-lived conformational states (lifetimes ∼ 0.3–0.6 s), that the clamp can be locked into any one of these states by small molecules, and that the clamp stays closed during initial transcription and elongation. Here, we extend these studies to obtain a comprehensive understanding of clamp dynamics under conditions RNAP may encounter in living cells. We find that the RNAP clamp can populate long-lived conformational states (lifetimes > 1.0 s) and can switch between these long-lived states and the previously observed short-lived states. In addition, we find that clamp motions are increased in the presence of molecular crowding, are unchanged in the presence of elevated monovalent-cation concentrations, and are reduced in the presence of elevated divalent-cation concentrations. Finally, we find that RNAP bound to non-specific DNA predominantly exhibits a closed clamp conformation. Our results raise the possibility of additional regulatory checkpoints that could affect clamp dynamics and consequently could affect transcription and transcriptional regulation.

Structural Motifs for CTD Kinase Specificity on RNA Polymerase II during Eukaryotic Transcription.

The phosphorylation states of RNA polymerase II coordinate the process of eukaryotic transcription by recruitment of transcription regulators. The individual residues of the repetitive heptad of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the biggest subunit of RNA polymerase II are phosphorylated temporally at different stages of transcription. Intriguingly, despite similar flanking residues, phosphorylation of Ser2 and Ser5 in CTD heptads play dramatically different roles. The mechanism of how the kinases place phosphorylation on the correct serine is not well understood. In this paper, we use biochemical assays, mass spectrometry, molecular modeling, and structural analysis to understand the structural elements determining which serine of the CTD heptad is subject to phosphorylation. We identified three motifs in the activation/P+1 loops differentiating the intrinsic specificity of CTD in various CTD kinases. We characterized the enzyme specificity of the CTD kinases-CDK7 as Ser5-specific, Erk2 with dual specificity for Ser2 and Ser5, and Dyrk1a as a Ser2-specific kinase. We also show that the specificities of kinases are malleable and can be modified by incorporating mutations in their activation/P+1 loops that alter the interactions of the three motifs. Our results provide an important clue to the understanding of post-translational modification of RNA polymerase II temporally during active transcription.

Structural determinants for accurate dephosphorylation of RNA polymerase II by its cognate C-terminal domain (CTD) phosphatase during eukaryotic transcription

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II contains a repetitive heptad sequence (YSPTSPS) whose phosphorylation states coordinate eukaryotic transcription by recruiting protein regulators. The precise placement and removal of phosphate groups on specific residues of the CTD are critical for the fidelity and effectiveness of RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription. During transcriptional elongation, phosphoryl-Ser5 (pSer5) is gradually dephosphorylated by CTD phosphatases, whereas Ser2 phosphorylation accumulates. Using MS, X-ray crystallography, protein engineering, and immunoblotting analyses, here we investigated the structure and function of SSU72 homolog, RNA polymerase II CTD phosphatase (Ssu72, from Drosophila melanogaster), an essential CTD phosphatase that dephosphorylates pSer5 at the transition from elongation to termination, to determine the mechanism by which Ssu72 distinguishes the highly similar pSer2 and pSer5 CTDs. We found that Ssu72 dephosphorylates pSer5 effectively but only has low activities toward pSer7 and pSer2 The structural analysis revealed that Ssu72 requires that the proline residue in the substrate's SP motif is in the cis configuration, forming a tight β-turn for recognition by Ssu72. We also noted that residues flanking the SP motif, such as the bulky Tyr1 next to Ser2, prevent the formation of such configuration and enable Ssu72 to distinguish among the different SP motifs. The phosphorylation of Tyr1 further prohibited Ssu72 binding to pSer2 and thereby prevented untimely Ser2 dephosphorylation. Our results reveal critical roles for Tyr1 in differentiating the phosphorylation states of Ser2/Ser5 of CTD in RNA polymerase II that occur at different stages of transcription.

Analysis of RNA polymerase II ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation.

Transcribing RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is decorated by a plethora of post-translational modifications that mark different stages of transcription. One important modification is RNAPII ubiquitylation, which occurs in response to numerous different stimuli that cause RNAPII stalling, such as DNA damaging agents, RNAPII inhibitors, or depletion of the nucleotide pool. Stalled RNAPII triggers a so-called "last resort pathway", which involves RNAPII poly-ubiquitylation and proteasome-mediated degradation. Different approaches have been described to study RNAPII poly-ubiquitylation and degradation, each method with its own advantages and caveats. Here, we describe optimised strategies for detecting ubiquitylated RNAPII and studying its degradation, but these protocols are suitable for studying other ubiquitylated proteins as well.

Acetylation-Dependent Recruitment of the FACT Complex and Its Role in Regulating Pol II Occupancy Genome-Wide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Histone chaperones, chromatin remodelers, and histone modifying complexes play a critical role in alleviating the nucleosomal barrier for DNA-dependent processes. Here, we have examined the role of two highly conserved yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) histone chaperones, facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) and Spt6, in regulating transcription. We show that the H3 tail contributes to the recruitment of FACT to coding sequences in a manner dependent on acetylation. We found that deleting a H3 histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 or mutating lysines on the H3 tail impairs FACT recruitment at ADH1 and ARG1 genes. However, deleting the H4 tail or mutating the H4 lysines failed to dampen FACT occupancy in coding regions. Additionally, we show that FACT depletion reduces RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy genome-wide. Spt6 depletion leads to a reduction in Pol II occupancy toward the 3'-end, in a manner dependent on the gene length. Severe transcription and histone-eviction defects were also observed in a strain that was impaired for Spt6 recruitment (spt6Δ202) and depleted of FACT. Importantly, the severity of the defect strongly correlated with wild-type Pol II occupancies at these genes, indicating critical roles for Spt6 and Spt16 in promoting high-level transcription. Collectively, our results show that both FACT and Spt6 are important for transcription globally and may participate during different stages of transcription.

Different phosphoisoforms of RNA polymerase II engage the Rtt103 termination factor in a structurally analogous manner

The carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) orchestrates dynamic recruitment of specific cellular machines during different stages of transcription. Signature phosphorylation patterns of Y1S2P3T4S5P6S7 heptapeptide repeats of the CTD engage specific "readers." Whereas phospho-Ser5 and phospho-Ser2 marks are ubiquitous, phospho-Thr4 is reported to only impact specific genes. Here, we identify a role for phospho-Thr4 in transcription termination at noncoding small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) genes. Quantitative proteomics reveals an interactome of known readers as well as protein complexes that were not known to rely on Thr4 for association with Pol II. The data indicate a key role for Thr4 in engaging the machinery used for transcription elongation and termination. We focus on Rtt103, a protein that binds phospho-Ser2 and phospho-Thr4 marks and facilitates transcription termination at protein-coding genes. To elucidate how Rtt103 engages two distinct CTD modifications that are differentially enriched at noncoding genes, we relied on NMR analysis of Rtt103 in complex with phospho-Thr4- or phospho-Ser2-bearing CTD peptides. The structural data reveal that Rtt103 interacts with phospho-Thr4 in a manner analogous to its interaction with phospho-Ser2-modified CTD. The same set of hydrogen bonds involving either the oxygen on phospho-Thr4 and the hydroxyl on Ser2, or the phosphate on Ser2 and the Thr4 hydroxyl, can be formed by rotation of an arginine side chain, leaving the intermolecular interface otherwise unperturbed. This economy of design enables Rtt103 to engage Pol II at distinct sets of genes with differentially enriched CTD marks.

Subgenic Pol II interactomes identify region‐specific transcription elongation regulators

Transcription, RNA processing, and chromatin‐related factors all interact with RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to ensure proper timing and coordination of transcription and co‐transcriptional processes. Many transcription elongation regulators must function simultaneously to coordinate these processes, yet few strategies exist to explore the complement of factors regulating specific stages of transcription. To this end, we developed a strategy to purify Pol II elongation complexes from subgenic regions of a single gene, namely the 5′ and 3′ regions, using sequences in the nascent RNA. Applying this strategy to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we determined the specific set of factors that interact with Pol II at precise stages during transcription. We identify many known region‐specific factors as well as determine unappreciated associations of regulatory factors during early and late stages of transcription. These data reveal a role for the transcription termination factor, Rai1, in regulating the early stages of transcription genome‐wide and support the role of Bye1 as a negative regulator of early elongation. We also demonstrate a role for the ubiquitin ligase, Bre1, in regulating Pol II dynamics during the latter stages of transcription. These data and our approach to analyze subgenic transcription elongation complexes will shed new light on the myriad factors that regulate the different stages of transcription and coordinate co‐transcriptional processes.

Direct Analysis of Phosphorylation Sites on the Rpb1 C-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II

Dynamic interactions between RNA polymerase II and various mRNA-processing and chromatin-modifying enzymes are mediated by the changing phosphorylation pattern on the C-terminal domain (CTD) of polymerase subunit Rpb1 during different stages of transcription. Phosphorylations within the repetitive heptamer sequence (YSPTSPS) of CTD have primarily been defined using antibodies, but these do not distinguish different repeats or allow comparative quantitation. Using a CTD modified for mass spectrometry (msCTD), we show that Ser5-P and Ser2-P occur throughout the length of CTD and are far more abundant than other phosphorylation sites. msCTD extracted from cells mutated in several CTD kinases or phosphatases showed the expected changes in phosphorylation. Furthermore, msCTD associated with capping enzyme was enriched for Ser5-P while that bound to the transcription termination factor Rtt103 had higher levels of Ser2-P. These results suggest a relatively sparse and simple "CTD code."

Transcription in Archaea: in vitro transcription assays for mjRNAP.

The fully recombinant Methanocaldococcus jannaschii RNA polymerase allows for a detailed dissection of the different stages of the transcription. In the previous chapter, we discussed how to purify the different components of the M. jannaschii transcription system, the RNA polymerase subunits, and general transcription factors and how to assemble a functional M. jannaschii enzyme. Standard in vitro transcription assays can be used to examine the different stages of transcription. In this chapter, we describe how some of these assays have been optimized for M. jannaschii RNA polymerase, which transcribes at much higher temperatures than many other transcription complexes.

Organization of protein factors on the carboxy terminal domain of RNA polymerase II in yeast (941.1)

Organization of Protein Factors on the Carboxy Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II in Yeast Mohammad M. Mosaheb and Stephen M. Fuchs: Tufts University, Medford, MA, Department of Biology.The Carboxy Terminal Domain (CTD) of RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) in yeast is made up of 26 heptad repeats with the sequence YSPTSPS. The heptad repeats have different phosphorylation patterns at their 3 serines at different stages of transcription which mediate the recruitment of specific protein factors required for transcription. Our goal is to find out how the protein factors organize themselves on the 26 repeats ‐ Do the protein factors have to bind to a specific range of repeats? Or can they bind anywhere on the CTD and still be functional. For this work, we divided the CTD into 3 segments of 8 heptad repeats and subsequently created variants in which the serines in one of three segments were replaced with alanine. Measuring yeast growth on plates we have demonstrated that repeats likely have non‐redundant function. We are currently isolating RNAPII complexes to biochemically identify difference in protein factor abundance in our three mutants. We are also creating 3 new mutants heptad repeats each one with only one of the 3 serines mutated, these new mutants will be helpful to decipher which one of the 3 serines is more important in recruiting our protein factor of interest.

Characterization of a Novel RNA Polymerase Mutant That Alters DksA Activity

The auxiliary factor DksA is a global transcription regulator and, with the help of ppGpp, controls the nutritional stress response in Escherichia coli. Although the consequences of its modulation of RNA polymerase (RNAP) are becoming better explained, it is still not fully understood how the two proteins interact. We employed a series of genetic suppressor selections to find residues in RNAP that alter its sensitivity to DksA. Our approach allowed us to identify and genetically characterize in vivo three single amino acid substitutions: β' E677G, β V146F, and β G534D. We demonstrate that the mutation β' E677G affects the activity of both DksA and its homolog, TraR, but does not affect the action of other secondary interactors, such as GreA or GreB. Our mutants provide insight into how different auxiliary transcription factors interact with RNAP and contribute to our understanding of how different stages of transcription are regulated through the secondary channel of RNAP in vivo.

Regulating CTD‐Interactions by Ess1‐Dependent Prolyl Isomerization

RNA polymerase II directs the synthesis of mRNAs as well as snoRNAs and some snRNAs. The largest subunit, Rpb1, contains an unstructured C‐terminal domain (CTD) composed of multiple repeats of the heptapeptide, Y‐S‐P‐T‐S‐P‐S. These repeats are located near the RNA exit channel and are bound by a variety of protein complexes that function during different stages of transcription and co‐transcriptional RNA processing. Despite the fact that the CTD is relatively long (26 repeats in yeast, 52 in human), different co‐factor complexes are differentially recruited to the CTD during the transcription cycle. Recruitment is regulated by covalent and non‐covalent modification of residues within the CTD repeat. This regulation is referred to as the “CTD code.” Examples of important covalent modifications are phosphorylation of serines at positions 2, 5, and 7.We are studying a non‐covalent modification, the cis/trans isomerization of the peptide bond at phosphorylated Ser5‐Pro6 sites. In yeast, this is carried out by a highly‐conserved enzyme that we discovered called Ess1 (Pin1 in humans). Ess1 binds and isomerizes pSer5‐Pro6, and this has profound consequences for the proper recruitment of proteins (e.g. Nrd1, Pcf11) to the RNAP II complex. Cells that lack Ess1 activity fail to suppress cryptic transcription, and cannot efficiently terminate transcription of small ncRNAs and mRNAs, leading to cell death. Ess1‐dependent isomerization of the CTD also seems to be important for histone modification, as ess1 mutants show reduced levels of H3K4‐ trimethylation. We will discuss potential mechanisms for how Ess1 regulates RNAP II transcription and co‐transcriptional processing.

Sub1 and RPA Associate with RNA Polymerase II at Different Stages of Transcription

Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins play many roles in nucleic acid metabolism, but their importance during transcription remains unclear. Quantitative proteomic analysis of RNA polymerase II (RNApII) preinitiation complexes (PICs) identified Sub1 and the replication protein A complex (RPA), both of which bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Sub1, homolog of mammalian coactivator PC4, exhibits strong genetic interactions with factors necessary for promoter melting. Sub1 localizes near the transcription bubble in vitro and binds to promoters in vivo dependent upon PIC assembly. In contrast, RPA localizes to transcribed regions of active genes, strongly correlated with transcribing RNApII but independently of replication. RFA1 interacts genetically with transcription elongation factor genes. Interestingly, RPA levels increase at active promoters in cells carrying a Sub1 deletion or ssDNA-binding mutant, suggesting competition for a common binding site. We propose that Sub1 and RPA interact with the nontemplate strand of RNApII complexes during initiation and elongation, respectively.

The Role of Cotranscriptional Histone Methylations

The carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of the RNA polymerase II subunit Rpb1 undergoes dynamic phosphorylation, with different phosphorylation sites predominating at different stages of transcription. Our laboratory studies show how various mRNA-processing and chromatin-modifying enzymes interact with the phosphorylated CTD to efficiently produce mRNAs. The H3K36 methyltransferase Set2 interacts with CTD carrying phosphorylations characteristic of downstream elongation complexes, and the resulting cotranscriptional H3K36 methylation targets the Rpd3S histone deacetylase to downstream transcribed regions. Although positively correlated with gene activity, this pathway actually inhibits transcription elongation as well as initiation from cryptic promoters within genes. During early elongation, CTD serine 5 phosphorylation helps recruit the H3K4 methyltransferase complex containing Set1. Within 5' transcribed regions, cotranscriptional H3K4 dimethylation (H3K4me2) by Set1 recruits the deacetylase complex Set3C. Finally, H3K4 trimethylation at the most promoter-proximal nucleosomes is thought to stimulate transcription by promoting histone acetylation by complexes containing the ING/Yng PHD finger proteins. Surprisingly, the Rpd3L histone deacetylase complex, normally a transcription repressor, may also recognize H3K4me3. Together, the cotranscriptional histone methylations appear to function primarily to distinguish active promoter regions, which are marked by high levels of acetylation and nucleosome turnover, from the deacetylated, downstream transcribed regions of genes.