Difference In Tensile Bond Strength Research Articles

Optimum Concentration and Application Time of 1, 6-hexanediol as a Dentin Primer

The optimum concentration and application time for an experimental dentin primer composed of an aqueous solution of 1,6-hexanediol were determined by measuring the wall-to-wall polymerization contraction gap width of a commercial light-activated resin composite in a cylindrical dentin cavity prepared in an extracted human molar. Contraction gap formation was completely prevented only when the dentin cavity wall was primed with 45 wt% 1,6-hexanediol for 60 s. There were no significant differences in tensile bond strength among primers composed of 20.0-57.5 wt% 1,6-hexanediol. These results suggest that the optimum concentration and application time are 45 wt% and 60 s, respectively.

The effect of bead attachment systems on casting patterns and resultant tensile bond strength of composite resin veneer cast restorations

This study compared the difference in tensile bond strength between the composite resin veneer and the cast Ni-Cr disk when different bead adhesives were used to make the laboratory patterns. Visio-Gem, cyanoacrylate, and shellac were the adhesives tested. Fifty-six composite resin bonded Ni-Cr disks were prepared and tested to tensile failure with the Kemper-Kilian device. All tested samples showed a complex failure pattern. The results showed that the mean tensile bond strength of the cyanoacrylate group was significantly higher than the other two groups. No significant difference in the mean tensile bond strength was observed between the Visio-Gem and shellac groups. The higher tensile bond strength in the cyanoacrylate group is thought to be attributed to the low rheological property of the adhesive that allowed greater exposure of the bead for retention. Using different adhesives in the fabrication of composite resin veneered-castings may affect the bond strength in the composite resin-metal interface.