Differences In Symptom Profiles Research Articles

Comparative analysis of post-procedural symptom patterns after intragastric balloon and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty

Aim: Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) offer minimally invasive approaches for obesity management, with intragastric balloon (IGB) and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) being amongst the most prominent interventions. While both are effective, their comparative impact on post-procedural gastric symptoms remains underexplored. Methods: Single-center retrospective study was designed to evaluate the incidence of post-procedure symptoms in patients undergoing IGB and ESG. Incidence and severity of gastric symptoms were assessed using visual analog scales at various time points. Weight outcomes and medication usage were also recorded. Changes at different time points (baseline, one and four months) were compared by means of Mann-Whitney U Test. Bivariate correlations were carried out through Pearson correlation. Results: Thirty patients undergoing IGB placement and 13 patients undergoing ESG were included in the analysis. ESG group showed a significant reduction in BMI at four months compared to IGB (32.2 ± 4.2 vs . 34.4 ± 5.3, P = 0.05). ESG demonstrated significantly lower rates of post-procedural gastric symptoms compared to IGB, including nausea, regurgitation, vomiting, and abdominal cramps and greater satiety (P < 0.001) in the early postoperative period. Medication usage differed between groups, with higher usage of antispasmodics and antiemetics among IGB patients during the first week (P < 0.001). Symptom severity correlated with the need for antiemetics and antispasmodics. Conclusion: This study provides insights into the management of gastric symptoms following two prominent EBMTs. While both endoscopic interventions offer viable options for obesity management, ESG emerges as a favorable choice due to its significantly lower incidence of early post-procedural gastric symptoms. Further research is warranted to refine symptom management strategies and elucidate differences in symptom profiles between IGB and ESG procedures, ultimately aiming to optimize treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction in the field of endoscopic obesity interventions.

Abstract PO5-12-11: Characterizing Symptom Alerts in Different Breast Cancer Regimens: A Remote Symptom Monitoring Study

Abstract Introduction: Remote symptom monitoring is becoming more common in the management of patients on active cancer treatments. The patterns of symptoms and subsequent alerts for specific types of treatment administered as part of standard of care remains unknown. This study aims to characterize the frequencies and types of symptom alerts among breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Methods: This secondary analysis used data from a hybrid type 2 randomized controlled trial testing the implementation of remote symptom monitoring. For our analysis, we included women with breast cancer receiving (neo)adjuvant therapy. Enrolled patients received remote symptom monitoring surveys within 30 days of treatment initiation at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from 06/2021 to 05/2023. Self-reported symptoms were recorded via weekly electronic surveys for six months. The weekly survey used the PRO-CTCAE measurement tool and patients report frequency, intensity, and interference of the following symptoms: constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, cough, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, neuropathy, pain, urinary problems. Symptom alert severity is categorized as either moderate or severe. Self-reported race and treatment regimen (within the first 60 days) were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Regimens were grouped into three categories 1) trastuzumab-containing, 2) any regimen with pembrolizumab, 3) chemotherapy without trastuzumab or pembrolizumab. Descriptive statistics were calculated using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for categorical variables. Results: A total of 108 women with breast cancer were included in our analysis. Overall, 54% were of White race, 36.1% were of Black or African American race, and 1.85% were of Asian race. The median age was 54 years (IQR 41-65). Fifty-one percent were prescribed a chemotherapy regimen, 33% trastuzumab-based regimen, and 15% pembrolizumab-based regimen. Symptom alerts were addressed supportively or escalated with nursing and treating oncologist via direct communication with patients. A total of 1438 symptom alerts were triggered with 55% of surveys generating an alert. The most reported symptom alert was pain, accounting for 30% of all alerts. Additionally, of all symptom alerts, 70% were moderate and 30% severe, with similar distributions across regimens. Patients receiving pembrolizumab regimen most often reported moderate pain compared to the other two regimens (35% vs 22% vs 23%). However, severe pain was most often reported by those receiving chemotherapy at 46%, trastuzumab-based regimen at 40%, and pembrolizumab-based regimen at 31%. Furthermore, patients on trastuzumab-based regimens reported severe diarrhea most frequently (11%) compared to 3% & 2% for the other two regimens. Discussion: Symptoms experienced during receipt of (neo)adjuvant breast cancer treatment are common, with the majority being moderate in nature. Differences in symptom profiles were observed across different treatment modalities, consistent with known side effect profiles. The higher prevalence of pain in patients receiving chemotherapy alone may be attributed to the use of growth factors in these regimens. Further exploration is warranted to investigate the use of supportive medications in managing these symptoms. Further evaluations are underway to evaluate how symptom alerts could potentially increase treatment adherence and decrease hospitalizations. Citation Format: Katia Khoury, Nicole Caston, Megan Patterson, Nancy Holmes, Jena Seward, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Nusrat Jahan, Gabrielle Rocque. Characterizing Symptom Alerts in Different Breast Cancer Regimens: A Remote Symptom Monitoring Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-12-11.

Developing tumor-specific PRO-CTCAE item sets: analysis of a cross-sectional survey in three German outpatient cancer centers

BackgroundTo include the patient perspective in the assessment of adverse events in oncology, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) was developed by the US National Cancer Institute, the so called PRO-CTCAE. The objective of this study was the development of disease-specific PRO-CTCAE item sets for patients with breast cancer (BC), multiple myeloma (MM), and prostate cancer (PC).MethodsThe cross-sectional survey was conducted at three German outpatient cancer centers. Prevalence and importance of the 78 PRO-CTCAE symptoms were assessed using a patient questionnaire. To select the most relevant PRO-CTCAE items for each tumor entity, symptoms were ranked based on patient answers.Results101 patients with BC, 107 with MM, and 66 with PC participated. The final item sets contained 21 symptoms (BC) or 19 symptoms (MM and PC), respectively. Eight symptoms (fatigue, muscle pain, insomnia, joint pain, general pain, dizziness, shortness of breath, and swelling) were represented in all three item sets. Fatigue was the symptom with the highest ranking across item sets followed by insomnia. Symptoms with the highest rankings represented in only one item set were symptoms affecting the urogenital system in the PC item set, blurred vision in the BC item set, and decreased appetite in the MM item set.ConclusionsIndividual PRO-CTCAE item sets for a German patient population were developed for the three tumor entities on the basis of patients’ differences in symptom profiles and perceptions. The quality and psychometric criteria of the newly compiled item sets should be evaluated in validation studies.

Emotional, Behavioral, and Physical Health Consequences in Caregivers of Children with Cancer: A Network Analysis Differentiation in Mothers’ and Fathers’ Reactivity

Background: Pediatric cancer presents mental and physical challenges for patients and their caregivers. However, parental distress has been understudied despite its negative impact on quality of life, disability, and somatic disorders. Parents of oncopediatric patients experience high levels of suffering with their resilience tested throughout their children’s illness. Identifying at-risk parents and offering specific treatments is crucial and urgent to prevent or alleviate negative outcomes. Methods: This study used statistical and network analyses to examine symptom patterns assessed by the Kellner Symptom Questionnaire in 16 fathers and 23 mothers at different time points: diagnosis, treatment, and discharge. Results: The results indicated significantly higher distress levels in parents of oncopediatric children compared to the control reference population. Gender-specific differences in symptom profiles were observed at each time point, and symptoms showed a gradual but non-significant decrease over time. Conclusions: The network analysis yielded valuable insights that, when applied in clinical practice, can guide the implementation of timely treatments to prevent and manage parental distress, thus addressing long-term, stress-related issues in primary caregivers of children diagnosed and treated for cancer.

Surveillance of Symptom Burden Using the Patient-Reported Outcome Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Patients With Various Types of Cancers During Chemoradiation Therapy: Real-World Study

Over 90% of patients with cancer experience 1 or more symptoms caused directly by cancer or its treatment. These symptoms negatively impact on the completion of planned treatment as well as patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It often results in serious complications and even life-threatening outcomes. Thus, it has been recommended that surveillance of symptom burden should be performed and managed during cancer treatment. However, differences in symptom profiles in various patients with cancer have not been fully elucidated for use in performing surveillance in the real world. This study aims to evaluate the burden of symptoms in patients with various types of cancers during chemotherapy or radiation therapy using the PRO-CTCAE (Patient-Reported Outcome Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and its impact on quality of life. We performed a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing outpatient-based chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both at the National Cancer Center at Goyang or at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea between December 2017 and January 2018. To evaluate cancer-specific symptom burden, we developed 10 subsets for using the PRO-CTCAE-Korean. To measure HRQoL, we used the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Participants answered questions prior to their clinic appointments on tablets. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze symptoms based on cancer type and to evaluate the association between the PRO-CTCAE items and the EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score. The mean age (SD) of the patients was 55.0 (11.9) years, and 39.94% (540/1352) were male. Overall, symptoms in the gastrointestinal category were the most dominant in all cancers. Fatigue (1034/1352, 76.48%), decreased appetite (884/1352, 65.38%), and numbness and tingling (778/1352, 57.54%) were the most frequently reported. Patients reported more local symptoms caused by a specific cancer. In terms of nonsite-specific symptoms, patients commonly reported concentration (587/1352, 43.42%), anxiety (647/1352, 47.86%), and general pain (605/1352, 44.75%). More than 50% of patients with colorectal (69/127, 54.3%), gynecologic (63/112, 56.3%), breast (252/411, 61.3%), and lung cancers (121/234, 51.7%) experienced decreased libido, whereas 67/112 (59.8%) patients with gynecologic cancer and lymphoma/myeloma reported pain during sexual intercourse. Patients with breast, gastric, and liver cancers were more likely to have the hand-foot syndrome. Worsening PRO-CTCAE scores were associated with poor HRQoL (eg, fatigue: coefficient -8.15; 95% CI -9.32 to -6.97), difficulty in achieving and maintaining erection (coefficient -8.07; 95% CI -14.52 to -1.61), poor concentration (coefficient -7.54; 95% CI -9.06 to -6.01), and dizziness (coefficient -7.24; 95% CI -8.92 to -5.55). The frequency and severity of symptoms differed by cancer types. Higher symptom burden was associated with poor HRQoL, which suggests the importance of appropriate surveillance of PRO symptoms during cancer treatment. Considering patients had comprehensive symptoms, it is necessary to include a holistic approach in the symptom monitoring and management strategies based on comprehensive patient-reported outcome measurements.

Methods for detecting probable COVID-19 cases from large-scale survey data also reveal probable sex differences in symptom profiles.

Daily symptom reporting collected via web-based symptom survey tools holds the potential to improve disease monitoring. Such screening tools might be able to not only discriminate between states of acute illness and non-illness, but also make use of additional demographic information so as to identify how illnesses may differ across groups, such as biological sex. These capabilities may play an important role in the context of future disease outbreaks. Use data collected via a daily web-based symptom survey tool to develop a Bayesian model that could differentiate between COVID-19 and other illnesses and refine this model to identify illness profiles that differ by biological sex. We used daily symptom profiles to plot symptom progressions for COVID-19, influenza (flu), and the common cold. We then built a Bayesian network to discriminate between these three illnesses based on daily symptom reports. We further separated out the COVID-19 cohort into self-reported female and male subgroups to observe any differences in symptoms relating to sex. We identified key symptoms that contributed to a COVID-19 prediction in both males and females using a logistic regression model. Although the Bayesian model performed only moderately well in identifying a COVID-19 diagnosis (71.6% true positive rate), the model showed promise in being able to differentiate between COVID-19, flu, and the common cold, as well as periods of acute illness vs. non-illness. Additionally, COVID-19 symptoms differed between the biological sexes; specifically, fever was a more important symptom in identifying subsequent COVID-19 infection among males than among females. Web-based symptom survey tools hold promise as tools to identify illness and may help with coordinated disease outbreak responses. Incorporating demographic factors such as biological sex into predictive models may elucidate important differences in symptom profiles that hold implications for disease detection.

Gender Differences in Callous Unemotional Trait Profiles in an Undergraduate Sample

ABSTRACT A wealth of research has consistently identified two distinct callous unemotional (CU) variants that differ on etiological mechanisms. While the first variant has been posited to represent a genetically predisposed difference in lower emotional arousal, the secondary variant demonstrates overlap with trauma-related symptomatology. Limited research has examined whether these CU variants differ based on child maltreatment subtypes or whether symptom profiles for CU variants differ by male-identified and female-identified participants. We aimed to replicate findings that individuals in the secondary CU group demonstrate higher PTSS. In an undergraduate sample of youth ages 18 to 24 (N = 546; 55.5% female), the present study examined whether CU variants could be identified utilizing latent profile analysis including CU trait clusters (i.e., callousness, uncaring, unemotional), anxiety, and child maltreatment subtypes. We identified unique symptom profiles by male-identified and female-identified gender. CU variant groups were differentiated based on the severity of child maltreatment experiences and anxiety symptoms. The manifestation of CU symptoms differed by variant group and by gender. Additionally, PTSS was highest in secondary CU variant groups. The findings support the conceptualization of the secondary CU variant group as a trauma-based reaction and suggest potential differences in symptom profiles by gender.

Identification of robust and interpretable brain signatures of autism and clinical symptom severity using a dynamic time-series deep neural network

IntroductionAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is among the most common and pervasive neurodevelopmental disorders. Yet, despite decades of research, the neurobiology of ASD is still poorly understood, as inconsistent findings preclude the identification of robust and interpretable neurobiological markers and predictors of clinical symptoms.ObjectivesIdentify robust and interpretable dynamic brain markers that distinguish children with ASD from typically-developing (TD) children and predict clinical symptom severity.MethodsWe leverage multiple functional brain imaging cohorts (ABIDE, Stanford; N = 1004) and exciting recent advances in explainable artificial intelligence (xAI), to develop a novel multivariate time series deep neural network model that extracts informative brain dynamics features that accurately distinguish between ASD and TD children, and predict clinical symptom severity.ResultsOur model achieved consistently high classification accuracies in cross-validation analysis of data from the ABIDE cohort. Crucially, despite the differences in symptom profiles, age, and data acquisition protocols, our model also accurately classified data from an independent Stanford cohort without additional training. xAI analyses revealed that brain features associated with the default mode network, and the human voice/face processing and communication systems, most clearly distinguished ASD from TD children in both cohorts. Furthermore, the posterior cingulate cortex emerged as robust predictor of the severity of social and communication deficits in ASD in both cohorts.ConclusionsOur findings, replicated across two independent cohorts, reveal robust and neurobiologically interpretable brain features that detect ASD and predict core phenotypic features of ASD, and have the potential to transform our understanding of the etiology and treatment of the disorder.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Sex differences in the association between symptom profiles and cognitive functioning in patients with depressive disorder

ObjectiveDepressive disorder (DD) is a heterogeneous disease with sex differences in symptom profiles and cognitive performance. However, sex differences in cognitive dysfunction associated with different symptom profiles have received little systematic study. This study aimed to explore the association between clinical symptoms and cognitive deficits in patients with DD. MethodsA cohort of 222 hospitalized patients with DD (males/females = 114/108) and 173 healthy controls (males/females = 80/93) were enrolled. Cognitive function was measured using a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Depression was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17). According to different genders, the relationship between symptom profiles and cognitive deficits was identified using partial correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. ResultsPatients with DD performed significantly worse than healthy controls in all cognitive domains investigated (all p < 0.05). Remarkably, female patients scored better than male patients on information processing speed (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analyses showed that the retardation factor score was independently associated with attention and cognitive flexibility, and the sleep disturbance factor score was independently associated with information processing speed in male patients. Furthermore, the anxiety/somatization factor score was independently associated with working memory in female patients. ConclusionIn the present study, we showed that significant sex differences in the association between symptom profiles and cognitive impairment are present in DD patients. Understanding how DD patients' clinical features and cognitive performance are linked from a sex perspective may have clinical implications for predicting and interfering with the outcome of depression.

Acute Symptoms of Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Are Highly Heterogeneous Across Individuals and Over Time.

BackgroundThe symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appear to be heterogenous, and the typical course of these symptoms is unknown. Our objectives were to characterize the common trajectories of COVID-19 symptoms and to assess how symptom course predicts other symptom changes as well as clinical deterioration.MethodsOne hundred sixty-two participants with acute COVID-19 responded to surveys up to 31 times for up to 17 days. Several statistical methods were used to characterize the temporal dynamics of these symptoms. Because 9 participants showed clinical deterioration, we explored whether these participants showed any differences in symptom profiles.ResultsTrajectories varied greatly between individuals, with many having persistently severe symptoms or developing new symptoms several days after being diagnosed. A typical trajectory was for a symptom to improve at a decremental rate, with most symptoms still persisting to some degree at the end of the reporting period. The pattern of symptoms over time suggested a fluctuating course for many patients. Participants who showed clinical deterioration were more likely to present with higher reports of severity of cough and diarrhea.ConclusionsThe course of symptoms during the initial weeks of COVID-19 is highly heterogeneous and is neither predictable nor easily characterized using typical survey methods. This has implications for clinical care and early-treatment clinical trials. Additional research is needed to determine whether the decelerating improvement pattern seen in our data is related to the phenomenon of patients reporting long-term symptoms and whether higher symptoms of diarrhea in early illness presages deterioration.

Examining which factors influence age of onset in males and females with schizophrenia

ObjectiveData from the 2010 Australian National Survey of High Impact Psychosis (SHIP) was used to examine (1) what variables influence age of onset (AOO) for males and females, and (2) whether influencing variables were different between the sexes. MethodData from 622 schizophrenia patients in the SHIP sample was used. These included early life factors, encompassing family psychiatric history, childhood development, trauma and parental loss. Factors occurring within 12 months of diagnosis were also used, including drug/alcohol abuse and premorbid work and social adjustment. Based on the recognised differences in symptom profiles and AOO between the sexes, these factors were regressed separately for males and females. ResultsStepwise linear regressions showed that a family history of psychiatric disorders was significantly associated with earlier AOO in both sexes. Other variables differed between males and females. Specifically, for females, an earlier AOO was associated with poor premorbid social adjustment and the loss of a family member in childhood. Older AOO was associated with immigrant status. For males, a younger AOO was associated with unemployment at onset, poor premorbid work adjustment, parental divorce in childhood, and lifetime cannabis use. A higher premorbid IQ was associated with an older AOO. ConclusionFamilial predisposition to psychiatric illness is related to earlier AOO of schizophrenia independent of sex. Males appear to have more individual-based predictive factors while females seem to have more community/social-based influences. Future directions for research in schizophrenia are suggested.

Dementia in People from Ethnic Minority Backgrounds: Disability, Functioning, and Pharmacotherapy at the Time of Diagnosis

ObjectivesIncreasingly, older populations in the United Kingdom and other well-resourced settings are ethnically diverse. Despite a concern that the prevalence of dementia is expected to rise, very little is known about the association of ethnicity and dementia among aging older adults. The current study aimed to compare ethnic group differences in symptom profile, functioning and pharmacotherapy at dementia diagnosis. DesignCross-sectional study of patient characteristics at the point of dementia diagnosis. Setting and ParticipantsIn total, 12,154 patients aged 65 years or older diagnosed with dementia in Southeast London between 2007 and 2015. MethodsData were extracted from the Clinical Record Interactive Search system, which provides anonymized access to the electronic health records of a large mental healthcare provider in Southeast London. Patients from ethnic minority backgrounds were compared with white British individuals on mental and physical well-being, functional scales and medications prescribed at dementia diagnosis, as well as subtype of dementia documented anywhere in the record. ResultsCompared with white British patients, Black African and Black Caribbean patients were more likely to present with psychotic symptoms and were less likely to have an antidepressant prescribed; white Irish patients had higher rates of substance/alcohol use and depressive symptoms were more prevalent in South Asian patients; all ethnic minority groups had higher odds of polypharmacy; and vascular dementia diagnoses were more common in Black and Irish ethnic minority groups. Conclusions and ImplicationsAt dementia diagnosis, there are substantial differences in noncognitive mental health symptoms and pharmacotherapy across ethnic minority groups and compared with the white British majority population. Some of these differences might reflect access/treatment inequalities or implicit unconscious bias related to ethnicity, influencing both. They need to be taken into consideration to optimize pathways into care and personalize assessment and management.

Neuroanatomical underpinnings of autism symptomatology in carriers and non-carriers of the 22q11.2 microdeletion

BackgroundA crucial step to understanding the mechanistic underpinnings of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), is to examine if the biological underpinnings of ASD in genetic high-risk conditions, like 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS), are similar to those in idiopathic illness. This study aimed to examine if ASD symptomatology in 22q11.2DS is underpinned by the same—or distinct—neural systems that mediate these symptoms in non-deletion carriers.MethodsWe examined vertex-wise estimates of cortical volume (CV), surface area (SA), and cortical thickness across 131 individuals between 6 and 25 years of age including (1) 50 individuals with 22q11.2DS, out of which n = 25 had a diagnosis of ASD, (2) 40 non-carriers of the microdeletion with a diagnosis of ASD (i.e., idiopathic ASD), and (3) 41 typically developing (TD) controls. We employed a 2-by-2 factorial design to identify neuroanatomical variability associated with the main effects of 22q11.2DS and ASD, as well as their interaction. Further, using canonical correlation analysis (CCA), we compared neuroanatomical variability associated with the complex (i.e., multivariate) clinical phenotype of ASD between 22q11.2 deletion carriers and non-carriers.ResultsThe set of brain regions associated with the main effect of 22q11.2DS was distinct from the neuroanatomical underpinnings of the main effect of ASD. Moreover, significant 22q11.2DS-by-ASD interactions were observed for CV and SA in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, precentral gyrus, and posterior cingulate cortex, suggesting that the neuroanatomy of ASD is significantly modulated by 22q11.2DS (p < 0.01). We further established that the multivariate patterns of neuroanatomical variability associated with differences in symptom profiles significantly differed between 22q11.2 deletion carriers and non-carriers.LimitationsWe employed a multicenter design to overcome single-site recruitment limitations; however, FreeSurfer-derived measures of surface anatomy have been shown to be highly reliable across scanner platforms and field strengths. Further, we controlled for gender to address the differing distribution between idiopathic ASD individuals and the other groups. Nonetheless, the gender distribution in our sample reflects that of the respective populations, adding to the generalizability of our results. Last, we included individuals with a relatively wide age range (i.e., 6–25 years).ConclusionsOur findings indicate that neuroanatomical correlates of ASD symptomatology in carriers of the 22q11.2 microdeletion diverge from those in idiopathic ASD.

Triggers and Clinical Presentations of Functional Neurological Disorders: Lessons from World War 1

Introduction: The psychological contribution to functional neurological and somatic symptom disorders is a major topic in current medical debate. Objective: For an understanding of the processes leading to functional somatic symptoms, it is paramount to explore their relationship with stress and life events and to elucidate the contribution of cultural factors. Methods: A total of 937 case records of civilian and military patients with functional somatic disorders treated in London during World War 1 were analysed. Group differences in symptom profiles and contemporaneous diagnoses were tested with χ² tests. Results: Paralyses and speech disturbances were significantly more common in soldiers (43.3 and 17.2% of cases) than in civilian male (28.1 and 6.5%) and female patients (32.4 and 7.5%), whereas female patients had the highest rates of pain (48.6%) and somatic symptoms (67%). Triggers were identified in around two-thirds of cases and included accidents, physical illness, and work stress, in addition to the combat experience of the soldier patients. The nature of the trigger influenced symptom expression, with acute (combat and noncombat) events being particularly prone to trigger loss of motor function. Symptom profiles showed a great deal of multi-morbidity and overlap, although some symptom clusters were more (motor and speech disturbance) or less common (pain and loss of energy) in soldiers than civilians. Triggering life events in civilians were similar to those reported by patients with somatic symptom disorders today, with an important role of physical factors. Patterns of multi-morbidity and symptom clusters also resembled those of modern cohorts. Conclusions: Analysis of historical records, illness trajectories, and treatments can enhance the understanding of the presentation, mechanisms, and course of functional neurological and related disorders and their consistency over time.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients With and Without Polyps Experience Different Symptom Perception and Quality of Life Burdens.

We sought to determine if chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) differentially perceived CRS symptom burden compared to patients without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) and to what extent CRS symptom severity was associated with quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported symptom control in the 2 groups. A total of 600 patients (266 CRSwNP and 334 CRSsNP) presenting with CRS were recruited. CRS symptom burden was assessed with the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). SNOT-22 nasal, sleep, ear/facial discomfort, and emotional subdomain scores were calculated. General health-related QOL was assessed with the visual analog scale of the 5-dimensional EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D VAS). Patients rated their CRS symptom control on a 5-point scale. SNOT-22 scores did not differ between CRSwNP (mean: 35.6) and CRSsNP (mean: 36.3). There were no differences in nasal, sleep, and emotional subdomains of the SNOT-22. CRSsNP had higher (P = .003) ear/facial subdomain scores than CRSwNP, while CRSwNP reported greater hyposmia (P < .001). EQ-5D VAS was significantly lower (P = .011) in CRSsNP (mean: 68.9) compared to CRSwNP (mean: 73.2). However, CRSwNP patients reported significantly less symptom control, compared to CRSsNP, in association with nasal and emotional symptoms. CRSwNP and CRSsNP have differences in symptom profile, effect on health-related QOL, and patient-perceived symptom control. CRSsNP experience significantly greater burden of ear/facial discomfort, while CRSwNP report greater hyposmia. Although CRSsNP reports lower general health-related QOL overall, CRSwNP patients had lower levels of CRS symptom control for every incremental increase in symptom burden suggesting greater sensitivity/intolerance to CRS symptoms.

Symptom profile of postpartum and non-postpartum manic episodes in bipolar I disorder: a within-subjects study

The relationship of postpartum mania to episodes of mania occurring outside the perinatal period among women with bipolar disorder remains controversial. Previous studies have used between-subjects designs to compare the clinical presentations of these episodes meaning the differences, in part, may reflect between-group differences. To overcome this we have undertaken within-subject comparisons of the symptom profile of postpartum and non-postpartum manic episodes in 50 women with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder. For each woman detailed symptom information on a postpartum episode of mania and a comparison non-postpartum manic episode was collected. The occurrence of manic, psychotic and depressive symptoms in these episodes were compared. Postpartum manic episodes had a significantly higher incidence of perplexity and excessive self-reproach. Classic manic symptoms, specifically pressured speech and increased sociability, were significantly less frequent in postpartum manic episodes. Overall there were significantly fewer manic symptoms and significantly more depressive symptoms in the postpartum episodes than in the non-postpartum episodes. The mixed presentation of postpartum manic episodes suggests childbirth may act as a pathoplastic trigger in women with bipolar disorder. The differences in symptom profiles suggests further research is warranted into whether differences in treatment response exist among women experiencing postpartum and non-postpartum manic episodes.

Symptom Profile and Clinical Course of Inpatients with Unipolar versus Bipolar Depression

Background: Although differences in symptom profiles and outcome between depressive patients with an underlying major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar depression (BD) have been reported, studies with sequential short-interval assessments in a real-life inpatient setting are scarce. Objectives: To examine potential differences in symptom profile and course of depressive symptomatology in depressive inpatients with underlying MDD and BD. Methods: A cohort of 276 consecutive inpatients with MDD (n = 224) or BD (n = 52) was followed during their hospitalization using routine outcome monitoring (ROM), which included a structured diagnostic interview at baseline (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus [MINI-Plus]) and repeated 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale every 2 weeks. MDD and BD were compared regarding their symptom profiles and time to response and remission. Furthermore, the concordance between the MINI-Plus and clinical diagnosis was analyzed. Results: Patients were on average 52 and 47 years old in the MDD and BD group, respectively, and 66 versus 64% were female. Compared to patients with BD, patients with MDD scored higher on weight loss (p = 0.02), whereas the BD group showed a higher long-term likelihood of response (hazard ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.16–3.20, p for interaction with time = 0.04). Although the same association was seen for remission, the interaction with time was not significant (p = 0.48). Efficiency between the MINI-Plus and clinical diagnosis of BD was high (0.90), suggesting that the MINI-Plus is an adequate ROM diagnostic tool. Conclusions: In routine clinical inpatient care, minor differences in the symptom profile and the course of depressive symptomatology may be helpful in distinguishing MDD and BD, particularly when using sequential ROM assessments.

Sex differences in neurodevelopmental disorders.

There continues to be more males than females diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders, which may provide clues about their cause. This review will focus on the two most common neurodevelopmental disorders - autism spectrum disorder (autism) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and explore recent research to understand recent developments in the field. Biological mechanisms including genetics, hormones and their interaction with other risk factors, such as stress and lead exposure, point to complex causal pathways for neurodevelopmental disorders. Over recent years, the research focus on sex differences in symptom profiles in autism has continued; however, a meta-analysis of existing studies indicated minimal sex differences in core autism symptoms. In ADHD, changes in the sex ratio from disparity in childhood to parity in adulthood may relate to the onset and trajectory of hyperactivity symptoms in females. Research into medical and psychiatric comorbidities, such as polycystic ovary syndrome and gender dysphoria, is also providing insights into the role of early androgen exposure as a potential causal factor for neurodevelopmental disorders. The factors, which contribute to an increased number of males with neurodevelopmental disorders in most cases are complex involving interactions between genetics, hormones and environmental factors.

Individuals with migraine have a different dry eye symptom profile than individuals without migraine

BackgroundMany individuals with migraine report symptoms of dry eye (DE). However, it is not known whether DE profiles are similar between individuals with and without migraine. To bridge this gap,...

Insights into the natural history of metachromatic leukodystrophy from interviews with caregivers

Background and methodsMetachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a rare, autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease caused by deficient activity of arylsulfatase A. Neurological involvement results in severe disability and premature death, but understanding of the natural history of the disease remains limited. In this study, 32 caregivers of patients with MLD in the USA (16 with late-infantile MLD; 16 with juvenile MLD) were interviewed about their experiences of the disease. Qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts was performed to gain insights into symptom onset, the diagnostic process and disease progression, with a focus on the differences between late-infantile and juvenile MLD.ResultsThe mean ages of patients at interview were 7.6 years and 20.7 years for individuals with late-infantile and juvenile MLD, respectively. Patients with late-infantile MLD had a mean age of 1.5 years at symptom onset and 2.6 years at diagnosis. The most common initial symptoms in this group related to problems with gross motor function (12/16 patients); 11 patients never learned to walk independently. For patients with juvenile MLD, the mean ages at symptom onset and diagnosis were 8.7 years and 11.6 years, respectively. Cognitive or social/behavioural problems were the most common first reported symptoms in this group (9/16 and 7/16 patients, respectively); these were generally followed by deterioration in motor function. The rate of functional decline was more rapid in patients with late-infantile MLD than those with juvenile MLD; the mean time from first symptom to first functional loss was 1 year versus 6.1 years, respectively. Nine patients with juvenile MLD and three with late-infantile MLD had undergone a haematopoietic stem cell transplant; outcomes following transplant were variable.ConclusionsOur data highlight clear overall differences in symptom profiles and disease progression between late-infantile and juvenile MLD, but also indicate some degree of interindividual variability within each subtype. These findings are broadly consistent with previously published descriptions of MLD and enhance our knowledge of the natural history of the disease, which ultimately should help to improve patient care and aid assessments of the effectiveness of disease-related interventions in the future.