The lack of reliable and continuous measurements of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height poses a significant problem for accurate weather forecasting and examining the intricate dynamics between the ABL and the free troposphere (FT). To address this crucial scientific problem, the present study investigates the ABL height from various simultaneous observations of multi-remote sensing instruments Micropulse lidar (MPL), Ceilometer (CL), Wind profiler radar (WPR) and Radiosonde (RS) and four different PBL schemes (Asymmetrical Convective Model version 2 (ACM2), Yonsei University (YSU), Mellor-Yamada Nakanishi and Nino level 2.5 (MYNN2), and Bougeault–Lacarrere (BouLac) during different sky and surface conditions. The diurnal variation of ABL heights between observation and model differs by ∼230 m. The ACM2 and MYNN2 show better performance (R > 0.85) of ABL height than other numerical schemes. The ABL height from different observations such as CL, WPR, MPL, RS and simulated ACM2 and MYNN2 is about 1098 ± 196 m, 1303 ± 217 m, 1461 ± 391 m, and 1716 ± 639 m, 1808 ± 407 m, and 1585 ± 393 m respectively, during the radiosonde launching time (∼11:00–12:00 IST). The difference in mean ABL height is observed due to their different measurement techniques and tracer identity between observation and model simulations. The study underscores a consistent and abrupt reduction in ABL height between observations (<480 m), model simulations (∼700 m), and re-analysis data sets (∼550 m) during wet-surface conditions, highlighting the model's ability to replicate consistent ABL behaviour in different surface conditions. While in cloudy conditions, the WRF-model underestimates ∼50–200 m than the observed ABL. This discrepancy is mainly observed due to the underestimation of sensible heat flux and downward shortwave radiation in model simulations. Due to the distinct ABL growth rate difference between the model (∼100–200 m/h) and observations (∼105–130 m/h), the time of attaining peak ABL height differs by one hour among them during different sky conditions. This is attributed to the large deviation in surface temperature, the incoming solar radiation, and the sensible heat fluxes.
Read full abstract