Difference In 30-day Mortality Research Articles

A comparative study of femoral artery and combined femoral and axillary artery cannulation in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients

ObjectiveVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a critical support technique for cardiac surgery patients. This study compares the outcomes of femoral artery cannulation vs. combined femoral and axillary artery cannulation in post-cardiotomy VA-ECMO patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients post-cardiac surgery under VA-ECMO support using different cannulation strategies. Specifically, the focus was on the impact of femoral artery (FA) cannulation vs. combined femoral artery and axillary artery (FA+AA) cannulation on patient outcomes.MethodsThrough a retrospective analysis, we compared 51 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery and received VA-ECMO support based on the cannulation strategy employed—FA cannulation in 27 cases vs. FA+AA cannulation in 24 cases.ResultsThe FA+AA group showed significant advantages over the FA group in terms of the incidence of chronic renal failure (CRF) (37.50% vs. 14.81%, p = 0.045), preoperative blood filtration requirement (37.50% vs. 11.11%, p = 0.016), decreased platelet count (82.67 ± 44.95 vs. 147.33 ± 108.79, p = 0.014), and elevated creatinine (Cr) levels (151.80 ± 60.73 vs. 110.26 ± 57.99, p = 0.041), although the two groups had similar 30-day mortality rates (FA group 40.74%, FA+AA group 33.33%). These findings underscore that a combined approach may offer more effective hemodynamic support and better clinical outcomes when selecting an ECMO cannulation strategy.ConclusionDespite the FA+AA group patients presenting with more preoperative risk factors, this group has exhibited lower rates of complications and faster recovery during ECMO treatment. While there has been no significant difference in 30-day mortality rates between the two cannulation strategies, the FA+AA approach may be more effective in reducing complications and improving limb ischemia. These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies and meticulous monitoring in managing post-cardiac surgery ECMO patients.

Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets in ICU patients with COVID-19 – A secondary Bayesian analysis of the HOT-COVID trial

BackgroundIn the Handling Oxygenation Targets in COVID-19 (HOT-COVID) trial, a partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) target of 60 mmHg compared to 90 mmHg resulted in more days alive without life support at 90 days in adult ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and hypoxemia. The trial was stopped after enrolling 726 of 780 planned patients due to slow recruitment. Here, we present the preplanned Bayesian analysis of the HOT-COVID trial. Research QuestionWhat are the probabilities of any and of clinically relevant benefits from a PaO2 target of 60 mmHg versus 90 mmHg in adult ICU patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia, and is there heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) according to selected baseline characteristics? Study Designand Methods We analyzed days alive without life support and 90-day mortality in the HOT-COVID intention-to-treat population (n=697) using Bayesian general linear models to assess probabilities for benefit or harm, including clinically relevant benefits defined as >1 day alive without life support and >2 percentage points lower 90-day mortality. HTE was evaluated based on baseline SOFA scores, PaO2:FiO2, norepinephrine doses, and lactate concentrations. ResultsThe mean difference in days alive without life support was 5.7 days (95% credible interval (CrI): 0.2 to 11.2), with a 95.2% probability of clinically relevant benefit and a 98.0% probability of any benefit from the lower PaO2 target. The risk difference in 90-day mortality was -4.6 percentage points (95% CrI: -11.8 to 2.6), with a 76.5% probability of a clinically relevant benefit from the lower target. HTE analyses revealed potential interaction with baseline norepinephrine dose and lactate concentrations for both outcomes. InterpretationIn ICU patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia, we found high probability for a clinically relevant benefit of targeting a PaO2 of 60 mmHg vs. 90 mmHg on number of days alive without life support.

Outcomes after open and endovascular treatment for mesenteric artery embolism patients: a retrospective inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis.

This study aims to evaluate outcomes in patients with mesenteric artery embolism (MAE) who received primary endovascular therapy (EVT) or laparotomy, and investigate risk factors for 30-day mortality. A retrospective analysis of 94 MAE patients who underwent two different treatment strategies was undertaken. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to balance the confounding effects of baseline clinical data. Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the outcomes according to type of treatment regimens before and after IPTW. Univariate and multivariable analysis were conducted to determine the risk factors for 30-day mortality. Twenty-eight MAE patients received primary EVT, and 66 Open Surgery (OS). Logistic regression analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the EVT and OS group in 30-day mortality rate before (odds ratio [OR] 0.477, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.170 to 1.340, P = 0.160), and after IPTW (OR 0.647, 95% CI 0.210 to 1.993, P = 0.449). After IPTW, it revealed that the rates of second-look surgery (OR 36.727, 95% CI 5.407 to 249.458, P < 0.001) and hospital stay [> 30 days] (OR 0.006, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.363, P = 0.014) were different in the two groups. D-dimer (> 4mg/L) and procalcitonin (> 0.5 ng/mL) were the independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in MAE patients postoperatively (P < 0.05). In this retrospective study, MAE patients who performed primary EVT had no obvious difference in 30-day mortality rate compared to those who received OS; but it was conducive to reducing prolonged hospital stays. An increase in procalcitonin level and higher D-dimer were associated with short-term poor prognosis in patients with MAE.

CORRECTION OF TRAUMA-INDUCED COAGULOPATHY BY GOAL DIRECTED THERAPY: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE ITACTIC TRIAL.

Trauma hemorrhage induces a coagulopathy with a high associated mortality rate. The Implementing Treatment Algorithms for the Correction of Trauma Induced Coagulopathy (ITACTIC) randomized trial tested two goal-directed treatment algorithms for coagulation management, one guided by conventional coagulation tests and one by viscoelastic hemostatic assays (viscoelastic). The lack of a difference in 28-day mortality led us to hypothesize that coagulopathic patients received insufficient treatment to correct coagulopathy. During ITACTIC, two sites were co-enrolling patients into an ongoing prospective observational study, which included serial blood sampling at the same intervals as in ITACTIC. The subgroup in both studies had conventional and viscoelastic test results for each patient available for analysis. A goal-directed treatment was defined as one triggered by an ITACTIC algorithm. Coagulopathy was defined as ROTEM EXTEM A5 <40mm. The primary outcome was correction of coagulopathy by the 12th unit of red blood cell transfusion during resuscitation. Full viscoelastic and conventional coagulation test results were available for 133 patients. 71% were coagulopathic on admission, and 16% developed a coagulopathy during resuscitation. ITACTIC VHA group patients were more likely to receive goal-directed treatment than the standard group (76% vs 47%, OR 3.73, 95%CI:1.64-8.49, p=0.002). However, only 54% of patients received goal-directed treatment, and only 20% corrected their coagulopathy (vs 0% with empiric treatment alone, not significant). Median time to first goal-directed treatment was 68(53-88) minutes for viscoelastic and 110(77-123) minutes for standard, p=0.005. In ITACTIC, many bleeding trauma patients did not receive an indicated goal-direct treatment. Interventions arrived late during resuscitation and were only partially effective at correcting coagulopathy.

Relationship between enteral nutrition timing and 28-day mortality in critically ill stroke patients in the MIMIC-IV database.

The ideal timing for commencing enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill stroke patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains a subject of debate, with ongoing controversy regarding the impact of early EN (EEN) initiation. In this study, we investigated the association between the timing of EN initiation and 28-day mortality using data from the MIMIC-IV database. This study employed a retrospective cohort design using the MIMIC-IV database to identify stroke patients who received EN during their hospital stay. The main focus of this investigation was to examine 28-day mortality among these patients following hospital admission. Various demographic, clinical, laboratory, and intervention variables were considered as covariates. The Cox regression analysis was employed to assess the correlation between the timing of EN initiation and 28-day mortality, and restricted cubic splines (RCS) analysis was used to test for non-linear correlation. Patients were then stratified into two cohorts depending on the timing of EN initiation: within 2 days (n = 564) and beyond 2 days (n = 433). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the difference in 28-day mortality between the groups. A total of 997 participants were included in this study, with 318 (31.9%) dying within 28 days. We observed that the timing of EN initiation correlated with 28-day mortality, but this correlation was not significant after adjusting for covariates (crude HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-1, p = 0.044; adjusted HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.9-1.02, p = 0.178). The RCS analysis showed that the correlation was not non-linear. Notably, in the multivariate regression models, early EN initiation was associated with a higher mortality rate compared to late EN initiation [odds ratio (OR) = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.06-1.67, p = 0.012]. After adjusting for various confounding factors in the multivariate Cox regression models, we identified that patients in the early EN group had a 28% higher risk of mortality than those in the reference group (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1-1.61, p = 0.048). These associations remained consistent across various patient characteristics, as revealed through stratified analyses. Early commencement of EN in critically ill stroke patients may be linked to a higher risk of 28-day mortality, highlighting the need for further investigation and a more nuanced consideration of the optimal timing for commencing EN in this patient population.

The efficacy, safety and effectiveness of hyperoncotic albumin solutions in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intravenous fluid therapy is a ubiquitous intervention for the management of patients with sepsis, however excessive cumulative fluid balance has been shown to result in worse outcomes. Hyperoncotic albumin is presented in low volumes, is an effective resuscitation fluid and may have effects beyond plasma volume expansion alone. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and effectiveness of hyperoncotic albumin solutions in the management of sepsis. We searched four databases and two trial registries for controlled clinical trials of hyperoncotic albumin for management of sepsis. Review outcomes were mortality, need for renal replacement therapy, cumulative-fluid balance, and need for organ support. We used methods guided by the Cochrane Handbook for reviews of clinical interventions. Studies were assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. We performed pairwise meta-analysis where possible. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. We included six trials; four (2772 patients) were meta-analysed. Most studies had moderate or high risk of bias. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality for septic patients receiving hyperoncotic albumin compared to other intravenous fluids (OR 0.95, [95% CI: 0.8-1.12]); in patients with septic shock (2013 patients) there was a significant reduction (OR 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68-0.98]). There was no significant difference in safety outcomes. Hyperoncotic albumin was associated with variable reduction in early cumulative fluid balance and faster resolution of shock. There is no good-quality evidence to support the use of hyperoncotic albumin in patients with sepsis, but it may reduce short-term mortality in the sub-groups with septic shock. It appears safe in terms of need for renal replacement therapy and is associated with reduced early cumulative fluid balance and faster resolution of shock. Larger, better quality randomised controlled trials in patients with septic shock may enhance the certainty of these findings. PROSPERO ref: CRD42021150674.

Paxlovid reduces the 28-day mortality of patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

PurposeIn this study, we aim to explore the efficacy of paxlovid on reducing mortality of COVID-19 patients in clinical setting, especially whether paxlovid modifies the risk of death in these severe and critical patients.MethodsOur retrospective cohort study was conducted on the medical records of patients, consecutively admitted for COVID-19 to five hospitals in Chongqing, China from Dec 8, 2022 to Jan 20, 2023. Based on whether patients received paxlovid during their hospitalization, patients were grouped as paxlovid group and non-paxlovid group. We used 1:1 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) in our study to adjust for confounding factors and differences between groups. Statistical analysis were performed by SPSS 23.0. The differences in 28-day mortality between these two groups and its influencing factors were the main results we focused on.ResultsThere were 1018 patients included in our study cohort. With 1:1 ratio PSM, each of the paxlovid group and non-paxlovid group included 237 patients. The results showed that patients using paxlovid have a lower 28-day mortality in overall population either before PSM (OR 0.594, 95% CI 0.385–0.917, p = 0.019) or after PSM (OR 0.458, 95% CI 0.272–0.774, p = 0.003) with multivariable adjusted logistic regression models. Meanwhile, in severe subgroup, it showed similar findings.With paxlovid treatment, it showed a significantly lower 28-day mortality in severe subgroup both before PSM (28% vs.41%, p = 0.008) and after PSM (19% vs.32%, p = 0.007).ConclusionPaxlovid can significantly reduce the risk of 28-day mortality in overall population and severe subgroup patients.This study distinguished the severe subgroup patients with COVID-19 who benefit more from paxlovid treatment.

Association between intra-arterial catheterization and mortality of acute heart failure patients without shock in ICU: A retrospective study

BackgroundAcute heart failure necessitates intensive care, and arterial catheterization is a commonly performed invasive procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to investigate the association between arterial catheterization and outcomes in acute heart failure patients without shock. MethodsWe utilized MIMIC-IV database records for acute heart failure patients at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019. Employing doubly robust estimation, we examined the relationship between arterial catheterization and outcomes, including 28-day, 90-day, in-hospital mortality, and ICU-free days within 28 days. ResultsOf 6936 patients identified, 2078 met inclusion criteria; 347 underwent arterial catheterization during their ICU stay. We observed no significant difference in 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.31–1.21, P = 0.155), though catheterization was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.41, 95 % CI: 0.14–0.65, P = 0.02). No significant effects were observed on 90-day mortality or ICU-free days within 28 days. ConclusionOur findings suggest that arterial catheterization is not associated with 28- and 90-day mortality rates in acute heart failure patients without shock but is linked to lower in-hospital mortality. Additional research and consensus are required to determine the appropriate utilization of arterial catheterization in patients.

Effect of Fu Zheng Jie Du Formula on outcomes in patients with severe pneumonia receiving prone ventilation: a retrospective cohort study.

The effect of combining prone ventilation with traditional Chinese medicine on severe pneumonia remains unclear. To evaluate the effect of Fu Zheng Jie Du Formula (FZJDF) combined with prone ventilation on clinical outcomes in patients with severe pneumonia. This single-center retrospective cohort study included 188 severe pneumonia patients admitted to the ICU from January 2022 to December 2023. Patients were divided into an FZJD group (receiving FZJDF for 7 days plus prone ventilation) and a non-FZJD group (prone ventilation only). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio after treatment. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, PaCO2, lactic acid levels, APACHE II score, SOFA score, Chinese Medicine Score, inflammatory markers, and time to symptom resolution. After PSM, 32 patients were included in each group. Compared to the non-FZJD group, the FZJD group showed significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratios, lower PaCO2, and lower lactic acid levels after treatment (p < 0.05 for all). The FZJD group also had significantly lower APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, Chinese Medicine Scores, and levels of WBC, PCT, hs-CRP, and IL-6 (p < 0.05 for all). Time to symptom resolution, including duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, time to fever resolution, time to cough resolution, and time to resolution of pulmonary rales, was significantly shorter in the FZJD group (p < 0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the two groups. FZJDF as an adjuvant therapy to prone ventilation can improve oxygenation and other clinical outcomes in severe pneumonia patients. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Diverging Trends in Survival and Functional Outcome between Males and Females after Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Compared to ischemic stroke, sex differences in patient outcomes following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are underreported. We aimed to determine sex differences in mortality and functional outcomes in a large, unselected Swedish cohort. In this observational study, data on 22,789 patients with spontaneous ICH registered in the Swedish Stroke Register between 2012 and 2019 were used to compare sex differences in 90-day mortality and functional outcome using multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses, adjusting for relevant confounders. Multiple imputation was used to impute missing data. The crude 90-day mortality rate was 36.7% in females (3,820/10,405) and 31.7% in males (3,929/12,384) (female hazard ratio [HR] 1.20 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.25). In multivariable analysis, the HR for 90-day mortality following ICH in females was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94). Age was an important driving factor for the effect of sex on mortality. After adjustment for age, vascular risk factors, and stroke severity, the 90-day functional outcome in pre-stroke independent patients was worse in females compared to males (odds ratio: 1.27 95% CI: 1.16-1.40). In this large observational study, despite lower 90-day mortality, the female sex was independently associated with a worse functional outcome compared to males after ICH, even after adjusting for significant covariates. These diverging trends have not been previously reported for ICH. Given the observational design, our findings should be interpreted with caution, thus further external validation is warranted.

Molecular Phenotyping of Patients with Sepsis and Kidney Injury and Differential Response to Fluid Resuscitation.

Previous work has identified two AKI sub-phenotypes (SP1 and SP2) characterized by differences in inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Here we identify these sub-phenotypes using biospecimens collected in the emergency department and test for differential response to restrictive versus liberal fluid strategy in sepsis-induced hypotension in the CLOVERS trial. We applied a previously validated 3-biomarker model using plasma angiopietin-1 and 2, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 to classify sub-phenotypes in patients with kidney dysfunction (AKI or end-stage kidney disease [ESKD]). We also compared a de novo latent class analysis (LCA) to the 3-biomarker based sub-phenotypes. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to test for differences in outcomes and sub-phenotype by treatment interaction. Among 1289 patients, 846 had kidney dysfunction on enrollment and the 3-variable prediction model identified 605 as SP1 and 241 as SP2. The optimal LCA model identified two sub-phenotypes with high correlation with the 3-biomarker model (Cohen's Kappa 0.8). The risk of 28 and 90-day mortality was greater in SP2 relative to SP1 independent of AKI stage and SOFA scores. Patients with SP2, characterized by more severe endothelial injury and inflammation, had a reduction in 28-day mortality with a restrictive fluid strategy versus a liberal fluid strategy (26% vs 41%), while patients with SP1 had no difference in 28-day mortality (10% vs 11%) (p-value-for-interaction = 0.03). Sub-phenotypes can be identified in the emergency department that respond differently to fluid strategy in sepsis. Identification of these sub-phenotypes could inform a precision-guided therapeutic approach for patients with sepsis-induced hypotension and kidney injury.

Ulinastatin shortens the length of ICU stay in critical patients with organ failure: A 7-year real-world study.

Ulinastatin has been applied in a series of diseases associated with inflammation but its clinical effects remain somewhat elusive. We aimed to investigate the potential effects of ulinastatin on organ failure patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). This is a single-center retrospective study on organ failure patients from 2013 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to using ulinastatin or not during hospitalization. Propensity score matching was applied to reduce bias. The outcomes of interest were 28-day all-cause mortality, length of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation duration. Of the 841 patients who fulfilled the entry criteria, 247 received ulinastatin. A propensity-matched cohort of 608 patients was created. No significant differences in 28-day mortality between the two groups. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) was identified as the independent risk factor associated with mortality. In the subgroup with SOFA ≤ 10, patients received ulinastatin experienced significantly shorter time in ICU (10.0 d [interquartile range, IQR: 7.0∼20.0] vs 15.0 d [IQR: 7.0∼25.0]; p = .004) and on mechanical ventilation (222 h [IQR:114∼349] vs 251 h [IQR: 123∼499]; P = .01), but the 28-day mortality revealed no obvious difference (10.5% vs 9.4%; p = .74). Ulinastatin was beneficial in treating patients in ICU with organ failure, mainly by reducing the length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation.

Volume control strategy and patient survival in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial with secondary analysis

Optimal strategy for volume control and the clinical implication of achieved volume control are unknown in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the survival according to conventional or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-guided volume control strategy in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CRRT. We also compared patient survival according to achieved volume accumulation rate ([cumulative fluid balance during 3 days × 100]/fluid overload measured by BIA at enrollment) as a post-hoc analysis. We randomly assigned patients to conventional volume control strategy (n = 39) or to BIA-guided volume control strategy (n = 34). There were no differences in 28-day mortality (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.63–2.23) or 90-day mortality (HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.57–1.75) between conventional and BIA-guided volume control group. In the secondary analysis, achieved volume accumulation rate was significantly associated with patient survival. Compared with the achieved volume accumulation rate of ≤ − 50%, the HRs (95% CIs) for the risk of 90-day mortality were 1.21 (0.29–5.01), 0.55 (0.12–2.48), and 7.18 (1.58–32.51) in that of − 50–0%, 1–50%, and > 50%, respectively. Hence, BIA-guided volume control in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CRRT did not improve patient outcomes. In the secondary analysis, achieved volume accumulation rate was associated with patient survival.

Continuous vs Intermittent β-Lactam Antibiotic Infusions in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis

Whether β-lactam antibiotics administered by continuous compared with intermittent infusion reduces the risk of death in patients with sepsis is uncertain. To evaluate whether continuous vs intermittent infusion of a β-lactam antibiotic (piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) results in decreased all-cause mortality at 90 days in critically ill patients with sepsis. An international, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in 104 intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia, Belgium, France, Malaysia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Recruitment occurred from March 26, 2018, to January 11, 2023, with follow-up completed on April 12, 2023. Participants were critically ill adults (≥18 years) treated with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for sepsis. Eligible patients were randomized to receive an equivalent 24-hour dose of a β-lactam antibiotic by either continuous (n = 3498) or intermittent (n = 3533) infusion for a clinician-determined duration of treatment or until ICU discharge, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure up to 14 days after randomization; new acquisition, colonization, or infection with a multiresistant organism or Clostridioides difficile infection up to 14 days after randomization; ICU mortality; and in-hospital mortality. Among 7202 randomized participants, 7031 (mean [SD] age, 59 [16] years; 2423 women [35%]) met consent requirements for inclusion in the primary analysis (97.6%). Within 90 days, 864 of 3474 patients (24.9%) assigned to receive continuous infusion had died compared with 939 of 3507 (26.8%) assigned intermittent infusion (absolute difference, -1.9% [95% CI, -4.9% to 1.1%]; odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.01]; P = .08). Clinical cure was higher in the continuous vs intermittent infusion group (1930/3467 [55.7%] and 1744/3491 [50.0%], respectively; absolute difference, 5.7% [95% CI, 2.4% to 9.1%]). Other secondary outcomes were not statistically different. The observed difference in 90-day mortality between continuous vs intermittent infusions of β-lactam antibiotics did not meet statistical significance in the primary analysis. However, the confidence interval around the effect estimate includes the possibility of both no important effect and a clinically important benefit in the use of continuous infusions in this group of patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03213990.

Impact of immunotherapy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy on perioperative safety in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC): A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.

e16105 Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (nICT) or chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) has become the latest option for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). The safety of this treatment remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative safety profile of nICT or nICRT among patients diagnosed with LA-ESCC. Methods: LA-ESCCpatients who underwent esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant immunotherapy combining treatments (nIComT) at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were included. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance demographic and oncologic characteristics between the two groups. The primary endpoint was postoperative complications, which were assessed by the Esophageal Cancer Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) criteria and the Clavien-Dindo criteria. Results: 1477 patients were screened, and a total of 873 patients were eligible for this study.Through PSM based on age, gender, body mass index, and clinical TNM stage, 118 pairs of patients were evenly allocated to the surgery-alone and nIComT groups. Compared to the surgery-alone group, the nIComT group showed slightly higher complication rates (66.1% vs 77.1%, P= 0.061). Grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ cardiovascular system complications appeared to be more common in the nIComT group than the surgery-alone group (57.6% vs 37.3%, P= 0.002). The cardiovascular system complications mainly included hypotension with sinus tachycardia (53.4% vs 34.7%, P= 0.004) which requires continuous pumping of vasopressor medications including dopamine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine during the perioperative period. It is noteworthy that patients in the nIComT group exhibited a higher incidence of perioperative diuretic and cardiotonic therapy due to congestive heart failure compared to the surgery-alone group (11.0% vs 5.1%, P= 0.094), although this disparity did not attain statistical significance. The nIComT group exhibited a notable increase in the percentage of patients requiring perioperative blood transfusion (35.6% vs 16.9%, P= 0.001), as well as an extended operation duration (277 ± 66 vs 246 ± 62 mins, P&lt; 0.001), when compared to the surgery-alone group. Additionally, there was also a trend towards a higher proportion of patients in the nIComT group requiring intraoperative blood transfusion due to excessive blood loss (7.6% vs 2.5%, P= 0.075). The surgery-alone group ( n= 1) and the nIComT group ( n= 3) showed no significant differences in 30-day mortality rates ( P= 0.614). Conclusions: Our findings revealed a heightened incidence of cardiovascular complications among patients received nIComT, underscoring the significance of perioperative circulatory interventions. Further prospective studies are needed for validation.

Ionized hypocalcemia as a prognostic factor of early mortality in traumatic brain injury

ABSTRACT Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common neurological condition. It can affect mental, physical, and cognitive functions and is a common cause of mortality. Electrolytes imbalance is common in those patients. Effective therapy of electrolytes abnormalities improves neurological outcome and reduces mortality. Therefore, we studied the predictive significance of ionized hypocalcemia for early mortality in TBI patients. Patients and method This observational study in the intensive care units of the Ain Shams University hospitals was done on sixty adult patients with TBI of both sexes, divided into two groups: group A (ionized hypocalcemic patients), and group B (normocalcemic patients). On admission, medical history, physical examination including neurological evaluation, and appropriate investigations were performed. Ionized calcium was measured at the start of the 28-day study and then every five days after that. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for demographic data, brain injury type, or the number of intubated patients (p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference for diffuse axonal damage, subdural hemorrhage, cerebral edema, GCS, and mean blood pressure (p < 0.001). Serum ionized calcium in group A was significantly lower than in group B on the day of admission and day five (p < 0.001). On the day of admission, there was a significant difference in serum sodium (p < 0.05). In both groups, there was a significant difference in the ICU stay as regards survivors (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality between the two groups (p = 0.001). Conclusion In TBI patients, ionized hypocalcemia on admission and on day five, hypernatremia and disturbed conscious level are strongly linked to greater fatality rates.

Cortisol Levels During First Admission Day Are Associated With Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Critically Ill Patients.

To explore the correlation between cortisol levels during first admission day and clinical outcomes. Although most patients exhibit a surge in cortisol levels in response to stress, some suffer from critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI). Literature remains inconclusive as to which of these patients are at greater risk of poor outcomes. A retrospective study. A surgical ICU (SICU) in a tertiary medical center. Critically ill patients admitted to the SICU who were not treated with steroids. Levels of cortisol taken within 24 hours of admission (day 1 [D1] cortisol) in 1412 eligible patients were collected and analyzed. Results were categorized into four groups: low (0-10 µg/dL), normal (10-25 µg/dL), high (25-50 µg/dL), and very high (above 50 µg/dL) cortisol levels. Primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were the need for organ support (use of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation [MV]), ICU length of stay (LOS), and duration of MV. The majority of patients (63%) had high or very high D1 cortisol levels, whereas 7.6% had low levels and thus could be diagnosed with CIRCI. There were statistically significant differences in 90-day mortality between the four groups and very high levels were found to be an independent risk factor for mortality, primarily in patients with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) less than or equal to 3 or SOFA greater than or equal to 7. Higher cortisol levels were associated with all secondary endpoints. CIRCI was associated with favorable outcomes. In critically ill surgical patients D1 cortisol levels above 50 mcg/dL were associated with mortality, need for organ support, longer ICU LOS, and duration of MV, whereas low levels correlated with good clinical outcomes even though untreated. D1 cortisol level greater than 50 mcg/dL can help discriminate nonsurvivors from survivors when SOFA less than or equal to 3 or SOFA greater than or equal to 7.

CO2 gap changes compared with cardiac output changes in response to intravenous volume expansion and/or vasopressor therapy in septic shock.

The difference in partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) between mixed or central venous blood and arterial blood, known as the ∆PCO2 or CO2 gap, has demonstrated a strong relationship with cardiac index during septic shock resuscitation. Early monitoring of the ∆PCO2 can help assess the cardiac output (CO) adequacy for tissue perfusion. To investigate the value of ∆PCO2 changes in early septic shock management compared with CO. This observational prospective study included 76 patients diagnosed with septic shock admitted to Cairo University Hospital's Critical Care Department between December 2020 and March 2022. Patients were categorised by initial resuscitation response, initial ∆PCO2 and 28-day mortality. The primary outcome was the relationship between the ∆PCO2 and CO changes before and after initial resuscitation, with secondary outcomes including ICU length of stay (LOS) and 28-day mortality. Peri-resuscitation ∆PCO2 changes predicted a ≥15% change in the cardiac index (CI) (area under the curve (AUC) 0.727; 95% CI 0.614 - 0.840) with 66.7% sensitivity and 62.8% specificity. The optimal ∆PCO2 change cut-off value was <-1.85, corresponding to a <-22% threshold for a 15% cardiac index increase. The PCO2 gap ratio (gap/gap ratio of T1- PCO2 gap to T0 -PCO2 gap) also predicted a ≥15% change in cardiac index (AUC 745; 95% CI 0.634 - 0.855) with 63.6% sensitivity and 79.1% specificity. The optimal CO2 gap/gap ratio cut-off value was <0.71. A significant difference in 28-day mortality was noted based on the gap/gap ratio. Peri-resuscitation ∆PCO2 and the gap/gap ratio are useful non-invasive bedside markers for predicting changes in CO and preload responsiveness. The current study provides an insight to the PCO2 gap changes during and after early resuscitation of septic shock patients, which correlate to cardiac output changes and might also serve as a fluid responsiveness indicator.

Efficacy of different doses of corticosteroids in treating severe COVID-19 pneumonia

BackgroundTo investigate the efficacy of different doses of corticosteroids in treating severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia.MethodsBetween May 01, 2023, and June 20, 2023, 48 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were treated at the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of Jinan Fourth People's Hospital. The observation group (21 patients) received standard care and high-dose corticosteroids, (high-dose group). The control group (27 patients) received standard care and low-dose corticosteroids (low-dose group). We collected baseline data and recorded inflammatory marker levels after 3 days of treatment, body temperature recovery time, length of stay, and 28-day all-cause mortality. The results of outpatient follow-up were recorded after 1 month.ResultsThere were no significant differences in 28-day mortality and length of stay. The number of days it took for body temperature to return to normal in the high-dose group was less than in the low-dose group. The high-dose group had significantly more reduced inflammatory factors (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6). A total of 20 discharged patients were given 8–16 mg of methylprednisolone, depending on chest computed tomography (CT) and clinical symptoms after 1 month; in all discharged patients using oral corticosteroids, CT features improved.ConclusionHigh-dose corticosteroids had a significantly positive effect on the reduction of inflammatory factors and shortening body temperature recovery time. In the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia, early administration of high-dose, short-course corticosteroids should be implemented.

Autologous cell salvage in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduces post-operative complications: a retrospective weighted-matching analysis.

Blood transfusion plays a crucial role in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The choice between autologouscell saver (CS) and allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) has been a continuous debate in the medical community, especially within cardiac surgery. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) surgery in patients receiving blood solely via cell salvage compared to those receiving ABT or a combination of ABT and CS perioperatively. A total of 414 patients who underwent isolated OPCAB surgery at our cardiovascular clinic were analyzed. Among them, 250 patients (60.4%) received blood via CS alone, while 164 patients (39.6%) received either ABT or a mix of ABT and CS. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) matching technique ensured balance in baseline covariates. We found no significant differences in 30-day mortality rates between the CS and ABT groups. The CS group displayed significantly lower rates of overall complications, encompassing stroke, acute kidney injury, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary complications. Rates of sepsis, readmission, gastrointestinal complications, heparin-induced thrombosis, and deep venous thrombosis were comparable between the two groups. However, in contrast to the ABT group,the CS group exhibited significantly shorter median lengths of hospital stay (LOHS), ICU stay, andventilation time, along with higher rates of discharge to homerather than acute care facilities. Our data suggest that autologous blood transfusion via CS results in fewer perioperative complications and faster recovery following OPCAB procedures as compared to ABT.