Inotrope therapy can be utilized as palliation for patients with end stage heart failure who are not candidates for durable devices or transplant. We aim to compare survival and outcomes between patients with and without defibrillators who received palliative inotropes. We retrospectively analyzed 220 patients with American Heart Association Stage D heart failure discharged on palliative inotropes after January 1, 2010. Patients who underwent durable device support or transplant were excluded. Those with a permanent pacemaker (PPM), bi-ventricular pacemaker (BiV-P), or no device were assigned to the Pacer/None group. Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), BiV-defibrillator (BiV-D), or LifeVest (Zoll, Chelmsford, MA) were assigned to the Defibrillator group. Primary outcome was 2-year survival. Secondary outcomes were clinic visits and hospitalizations, complications such as infection or arrhythmia, and number of treated tachyarrhythmia episodes. Of 220 patients, 54 were in the Pacer/None group and 168 were in the Defibrillator group. We found no difference in age or gender. In both groups, more patients were placed on milrinone compared to dobutamine, but no difference in days on therapy was seen. Patients in the Defibrillator group were more likely to have hypertension. Patients in the Pacer/None group were more likely to have pulmonary hypertension (see Figure). We found no significant difference in our primary outcome of survival at 2-years post-discharge with 25.8% in the Pacer/None group compared to 26.3% in the Defibrillator group (see Kaplan-Meyer curve). No difference was found in PICC line infections and arrhythmias, number of hospitalizations, and clinic visits within 2-years. No difference was seen in the number of treated arrhythmic episodes within in the Defibrillator group. Those who expired or entered hospice, however, were found to have more treated episodes than those who survived to 2-years. Patients undergoing evaluation for defibrillator implantation are required to meet guidelines on indications and expected survival. As patients with palliative inotropes are living longer, consideration for protection against arrhythmic events is fundamental. Further studies with larger populations are needed to understand the utility of defibrillators in this population. Inotrope therapy can be utilized as palliation for patients with end stage heart failure who are not candidates for durable devices or transplant. We aim to compare survival and outcomes between patients with and without defibrillators who received palliative inotropes. We retrospectively analyzed 220 patients with American Heart Association Stage D heart failure discharged on palliative inotropes after January 1, 2010. Patients who underwent durable device support or transplant were excluded. Those with a permanent pacemaker (PPM), bi-ventricular pacemaker (BiV-P), or no device were assigned to the Pacer/None group. Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), BiV-defibrillator (BiV-D), or LifeVest (Zoll, Chelmsford, MA) were assigned to the Defibrillator group. Primary outcome was 2-year survival. Secondary outcomes were clinic visits and hospitalizations, complications such as infection or arrhythmia, and number of treated tachyarrhythmia episodes. Of 220 patients, 54 were in the Pacer/None group and 168 were in the Defibrillator group. We found no difference in age or gender. In both groups, more patients were placed on milrinone compared to dobutamine, but no difference in days on therapy was seen. Patients in the Defibrillator group were more likely to have hypertension. Patients in the Pacer/None group were more likely to have pulmonary hypertension (see Figure). We found no significant difference in our primary outcome of survival at 2-years post-discharge with 25.8% in the Pacer/None group compared to 26.3% in the Defibrillator group (see Kaplan-Meyer curve). No difference was found in PICC line infections and arrhythmias, number of hospitalizations, and clinic visits within 2-years. No difference was seen in the number of treated arrhythmic episodes within in the Defibrillator group. Those who expired or entered hospice, however, were found to have more treated episodes than those who survived to 2-years. Patients undergoing evaluation for defibrillator implantation are required to meet guidelines on indications and expected survival. As patients with palliative inotropes are living longer, consideration for protection against arrhythmic events is fundamental. Further studies with larger populations are needed to understand the utility of defibrillators in this population.