Auditory frequency difference limens at 2.0 kHz were measured monaurally in three humans and three Old World monkeys: one Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata), one vervet (Cercopithecus aethiops), and one De Brazza monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus). A go, no‐go, repetitive‐standard discrimination procedure was employed with positive reinforcement. In addition to species differences, we examined the effects of presence versus absence of feedback after missed stimuli, changes in sensation level (35 vs 45 dB), and presenting frequency increments versus decrements. Results showed that human ΔFs (4–11 Hz) were superior to those of monkeys (25–99 Hz), and all subjects performed better with feedback after misses. In addition, while the best human thresholds tended to occur with frequency increments at higher sensation levels, the best monkey thresholds tended to occur with frequency decrements at lower sensation levels. Of the three monkeys, the Japanese macaque exhibited performance qualitatively and quantitatively...
Read full abstract