Difference In Pain Scores Research Articles

Intraperitoneal and incisional ropivacaine did not improve postoperative analgesia after multimodal anaesthesia compared with saline in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Intraperitoneal administration of local anaesthetics may reduce postoperative pain after ovariohysterectomy in dogs. The aim of this prospective, randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to compare postoperative analgesia and opioid requirements after intraperitoneal and incisional administration of ropivacaine versus 0,9 % NaCl (saline). Forty-three client-owned dogs were enrolled in the study and anaesthetised using a standardized protocol that included premedication with acepromazine (0,03-0,05 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0,01 mg/kg) intramuscularly. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol titrated to effect and ketamine (1 mg/kg) intravenously and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. The analgesic regimen included carprofen (4 mg/kg) subcutaneously and morphine (0,2 mg/kg) intravenously. Depending on group assignment, each dog received either an intraperitoneal and incisional splash with ropivacaine (2 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively) (group R), or an equal volume of saline (group S). Buprenorphine (0,02 mg/kg) was administered intramuscularly once the uterus was removed. Sedation and pain were assessed 0,5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours after extubation using a sedation scale, the short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (CMPS-SF) and a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS). Postoperatively, buprenorphine (0,01 mg/kg) was administered intravenously if dogs scored 6/24 on CMPS-SF. The ordinal mixed model showed no difference in pain scores between groups. Fisher's exact test showed no significant difference in postoperative buprenorphine requirements between group S (3/22 dogs) and group R (1/21 dogs) at the doses used. In addition, lower sedation scores were associated with higher DIVAS scores. In this multimodal analgesic protocol, ropivacaine could not improve analgesia compared to saline.

Intraoperative Methadone Use in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgical Procedures

Abstract Background: Postoperative pain control is an important aspect in the recovery of patients. Recent literature suggests that the extended half-life of methadone may reduce overall opioid utilization in postoperative patients. However, there have yet to be any studies examining the efficacy of methadone as part of the protocol for enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery in patients. Objectives: To review the efficacy of perioperative methadone in reducing postoperative opioid usage and patient pain control. Design: Retrospective observational study. Settings: Tertiary academic center. Patients and Methods: Eighty-nine patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database having received methadone perioperatively from 2019 to 2021. These were compared to 89 historical controls identified from the same database and matched on procedure type, age, and American Society of Anesthesiology status. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes were postoperative opioid use and subjective pain scores. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, return of bowel function, and hospital cost. Sample Size: 89 patients receiving methadone and 89 historical control patients. Conclusions: The patients who received methadone used significantly more opioids overall compared to non-methadone patients (P = 0.015). In addition, there was no significant difference in pain scores for methadone vs non-methadone patients (P = 0.630). Furthermore, there was no difference in the length of stay and return of bowel function (P = 0.512 and P = 0.140, respectively). Moreover, opioid-naïve patients, regardless of methadone status, showed reduced average pain compared to non-naïve patients (P = 0.010 and P = 0.010, respectively). Despite support in surgical literature, we failed to find clinical benefit in including methadone as a part of the enhanced recovery pathway for patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Limitations: Retrospective design limited to minimally invasive techniques. Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The Association Between Distressed Community Index and Clinical Outcomes Following Surgical Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

Category: Ankle; Other Introduction/Purpose: Operative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures can be associated with a myriad of complications1,2. Demographics and comorbidities have been previously explored in relation to outcomes after operative management of Achilles tendon ruptures3,4. However, the relationship between socioeconomic factors and postoperative outcomes in these patients has not been explored. Distressed community index (DCI) is a score that represents a community’s level of well-being across the United States, with higher scores representing greater distress experienced in the community. Independent socioeconomic deprivation factors have been shown to be associated with suboptimal postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing certain orthopedic surgeries6–9. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any association between DCI scores and short-term complication rates and functional outcomes following ruptured Achilles tendon repair. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical repair of ruptured Achilles tendon between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Patients’ residence zip codes were obtained and matched to corresponding DCI scores (0-100) based on data provided by the Economic Innovation Group for the same time period (2015-2019). Scores were divided into quintiles. Patient age, race, ethnicity, alcohol and smoking history, need for assistance with activities of daily living, ambulation status unrelated to injury, and access to transportation were also noted. Complications such as re-rupture, superficial or deep infection, wound complications, and deep vein thrombosis within 1-year since date of surgery were noted. Preoperative Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and Visual Analogy Pain scales were compared to postoperative scores at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the statistical significance of differences in the rate of complications and FAAM-VAS scores between quintiles. Results: Patients in the 2nd DCI quintile experienced the highest rate (9.25%) of total complications while patients in the 5th quintile experienced the lowest rate (3.33%). Difference in complication rates across DCI quintiles was not statistically significant (p=0.925). Out of the 17 patients who experienced complications, 12 (70.6%) patients belonged to the 1st and 2nd quintile while 2 patients (11.7%) belonged to the 4th and 5th quintiles. The differences in FAAM and VAS pain scores were not significantly different at preoperative and at 1-year and 2-year postoperative time points across quintiles. However, patients in the 5th and 4th quintiles experienced the greatest improvement in FAAM Overall scores at 1-year and 2-year postoperative time points, respectively. Conclusion: Patients living in more distressed communities did not experience greater postoperative complication rates or report lower patient-reported outcomes up to 2 years following operative repair of Achilles tendon rupture.

An Open Label, Multi-center, Controlled, Retrospective Study of a Biodegradable Synthetic Graft for Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Patients Suffering from Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability

Category: Ankle; Sports Introduction/Purpose: Ankle sprains represent one of the most common injuries among both athletes and the general public (1). While most sprains resolve with conservative therapy, failure resulting in ligament laxity may necessitate surgical intervention due to pain and instability from injury to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), the weakest ligament in the lateral ligamentous complex (2). Surgical repair of ATFL has relatively high success rates, however post-procedure chronic instability and pain remain a clinical challenge, with re-operation rates reported as high as 14% (3). The Artelon® FlexBand® matrix is a biocompatible, synthetic matrix designed to reinforce soft tissue repair during tendon/ligament reconstructive procedures. The goal of this study is to compare the outcomes of ATFL reconstructive surgery with and without this synthetic graft augmentation. Methods: This multi-center, IRB approved study used a combination of retrospective medical chart review and prospective procedure satisfaction phone surveys in patients that had undergone ATFL repair (isolated and non-isolated) with or without synthetic graft augmentation. These results represent an interim data analysis of an ongoing clinical study. A total of 234 patients, (82 Control and 152 FlexBand augmented) diagnosed with chronic lateral ankle instability that had failed conservative therapy, and required surgical intervention to repair the lateral ligament complex were enrolled across four different research centers. Patient demographics, physician assessment of healing progression, safety, complications necessitating a return to OR, and post-op rehabilitation schedule were analyzed. Two study sites used Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain pre-surgically and at 2, 6, and 12 week follow-up visits. Phone survey questionnaires were given to patients that reached at least 1yr post-op to assess long-term patient satisfaction and function. Results: Average patient age was 42yrs in both groups and average follow-up time was 19.2mo (FlexBand) and 28.4mo (Control). There was no statistical difference in baseline VAS pain scores between groups. Augmented patients demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores at 2-,6-, and 12-week follow-up visits (p < 0.001, p< 0.0001and p< 0.0001, respectively) compared to controls (Fig 1). In addition, a significant acceleration in return to FWB status in augmented group compared to control patients was observed (9.04 ± 0.38wks, N=101 vs. 11.82 ± 1.67wks, N=45; p = 0.027). Both groups demonstrated equivalent AE safety profiles and complications were similar across groups with 3.7% (3/82) of control and 3.9% (6/152) augmented patients requiring a return to OR, however, no AEs or complication events were related to the Flexband Device. Conclusion: Our data shows a significant reduction in VAS pain scores in patients who underwent the modified Brostrom procedure with augmentation at all follow up time points. In addition, synthetic graft augmentation may lead to earlier return to function due to the significantly lower time to achieve FWB status. Further investigation on the potential clinical benefits of ATFL augmentation with Artelon Flexband is ongoing through a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Overall, long-term (>1yr) patient satisfaction was equivalent across groups and a trend toward potential earlier recovery times were better for the augmented group than the control group.

Intradiscal Glucocorticoid Injection in Discogenic Back Pain and Influence on Modic Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of RCTs

BACKGROUND: The benefit of intradiscal glucocorticoid injection (IGI) for discogenic low back pain (LBP) remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to systematically assess and meta-analyze the efficacy of IGI compared with these control groups. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed screening PubMed and Embase through May 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IGI to control groups in adult patients with discogenic lumbar back pain were included. A random effects model was used to pool mean differences of pain intensity (visual analaog scale [VAS] 0-100), and physical function assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Subgroup analyses were stratified by Modic magnetic resonance imaging findings. RESULTS: Seven studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 626 patients. The short-term (< 3 months) follow-up showed a significant pooled mean difference in both pain intensity (-20.1; 95% CI, -25.5 to -14.7) and physical function (-9.9; 95% CI, -16.1 to -3.6). In the intermediate -term follow-up (3 to < 6 months), only physical function remained significantly better in the glucocorticoid group (-13.1; 95% CI, -22.3 to -3.9). There was no clinically meaningful or significant difference in pain scores and physical function at the long-term (>= 6 months) follow-up. A subgroup analysis did not demonstrate an effect of Modic (type I) changes on the efficacy of IGI. LIMITATIONS: A limited number of studies was available and consequently publication bias could not be evaluated using a funnel plot. Statistical heterogeneity was detected among the included studies. CONCLUSION: We conclude that IGI reduces discogenic LBP intensity and improves physical function effectively at short-term follow-up, and continues to improve physical function at intermediate-term. However, 6 months posttreatment, outcomes are similar in comparison to the control groups. The type of Modic change does not appear to be related with the response to IGI. KEY WORDS: Low back pain, lumbar back pain, intradiscal glucocorticoid injection, modic changes, meta-analysis

Evaluating the effect of acupuncture on symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) among individuals with diabetic neuropathy: A single-blind, randomized trial study.

This study aimed to investigate the impact of acupuncture on Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) symptoms among individuals with diabetic neuropathy. In a single-blind, randomized trial conducted between 2019 and 2020, 60 patients diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy were enrolled. These participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group received real acupuncture alongside routine treatment once a week for seven sessions, each lasting 20min. Meanwhile, the control group received sham acupuncture as an adjunct to their routine treatment, following the same schedule. To evaluate treatment efficacy, the study assessed primary outcomes, such as pain intensity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included evaluating fatigue severity and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) side effects, measured using the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) and a standard questionnaire after each session. No statistically significant differences in pain and fatigue scores were observed between the two groups throughout all visits, even after adjusting for baseline characteristics, age, sex, type of diabetes, discopathy, and carpal tunnel syndrome parameters (P > 0.05). The findings did not provide strong evidence supporting a significant effect of real acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture on pain and fatigue values (P = 0.267 and 0.634, respectively). However, the 95% confidence interval for pain scores (-0.35, 1.28) was inconclusive, encompassing effect sizes favoring sham acupuncture. Findings suggest that using acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy alongside routine treatment may not lead to a significant reduction in the symptoms of peripheral neuropathy and fatigue severity among individuals with diabetic neuropathy. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01314-1.

Combined Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Intrapelvic Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block Is Associated With Decreased Opioid Consumption After Hip Arthroscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Ambulatory hip arthroscopies are associated with moderate-to-severe pain often requiring opioid analgesia. Novel motor-sparing blocks, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, have shown efficacy in hip surgery. We sought to investigate the analgesic benefits of these novel blocks in terms of opioid-sparing and discharge efficiency. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching of 224 patients who underwent ambulatory elective unilateral hip arthroscopy. One group received a combined PENG and LFCN block (PENG/LFCN, n = 86), while a second group received only a PENG block (n = 26). A control group (n = 112) received no blocks. The primary outcome was postanesthesia care unit (PACU) mean opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were maximum numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, intravenous rescue analgesia, and PACU readiness-for-discharge times. The PENG/LFCN-block group required significantly less opioids than the control group in the PACU (25.98 ± 13.04 vs 14.58 ± 5.77, respectively) and were discharged earlier 2.72 ± 1.16 vs 4.42 ± 1.63 hours, respectively). The combined PENG/LFCN group also used less intravenous rescue opioids than the control group (0.47 ± 1.18 vs 1.44 ± 2.1 mg, respectively) and showed a significant difference in the highest NRS pain scores than the control group (6.01 ± 2.38 vs 6.77 ± 2.1 respectively). The PENG block alone group did not show a significant difference in opioid reduction (21.95 ± 15.83 vs 27.72 ± 15.01, respectively). This retrospective study found that in patients who underwent ambulatory elective unilateral hip arthroscopy, a combined PENG and LFCN block was associated with expedited PACU discharge and a clinically significant reduction in postoperative opioid use. Further study is warranted.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block VS. Local Wound Infiltration for Elective Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy in Children: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BackgroundThe efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local anesthetic wound infiltration (LWI) in pediatric laparoscopic surgery is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to prospectively analyze this in minimally invasive cholecystectomy. We hypothesized that TAP block would be superior to LWI in terms of pain control and post-operative complications. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial between 2017 and 2022 after obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. After randomization, patients received a standard amount of ropivacaine via either 1) ultrasound-guided TAP block after general anesthesia induction or 2) local injection at port insertion by the operating surgeon. We collected data including operative time, pain scores, and medication usage post-operatively. We used descriptive statistics to report all endpoints and compared data with t-tests and Fisher's exact tests. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsWe enrolled 85 patients (43 LWI, 42 TAP). Mean [standard deviation] age and body mass index (BMI) in the LWI and TAP groups were 14.8 [1.9] and 14.7 [2] years and 29.9 [7.2] and 27.4 [8.2] kilogram/meter2 (kg/m2) respectively. We did not find any significant differences in postoperative opioid use, pain scores, and gastrointestinal symptoms. TAP patients had significantly longer time between anesthesia-start and procedure-start (p < 0.001), although total time under anesthesia was not significantly different (p = 0.540). ConclusionThere are no significant differences between equal administration of local anesthetic by TAP block and surgeon administered LWI during minimally invasive cholecystectomy. Type of StudyRandomized clinical trial. Level of EvidenceLevel II.

Evaluation of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block in Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective, Randomized, Feasibility Study.

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures, and patients complain of severe pain in the postoperative period. The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) works as an anteriorly applied lumbar plexus block and is frequently used in hip surgeries. In this study, we evaluated the effect of SIFIB in patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia. This study is a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded feasibility study conducted in a tertiary hospital. Eighty-six patients with ASA I-III were initially enrolled, and after exclusions, 80 patients were randomized into two equal groups (SIFIB and control groups). The standard multimodal analgesia was applied to the control group, while SIFIB was additionally applied to the block group. The study measured the morphine requirement in PCA and pain intensity using Numeric Rating Scores between the two groups. the 24-h cumulative morphine consumption was lower in Group SIFIB. Although there was a decrease in NRS at rest scores in the SIFIB group during some time periods, pain was moderate, and no differences in pain scores were recorded during exercise in all patients. In patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia, a single shot of SIFIB results in a significant reduction in the amount of morphine consumed in hours. This effect was most likely related to a decrease in pain at rest in the SIFIF group.

Effects of Hot Pack Therapy on Post-Colonoscopy Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

BackgroundPost-colonoscopy pain (PCP) is a negative condition that causes physical and psychological distress to patients and may lead to noncompliance with treatment and follow-up. The most common hypothesis for the cause of PCP is the inflation of the lumen with air to examine the mucosa. There are no previous studies that have examined the effects of thermal therapy in patients with PCP. AimsIn this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of the Hot Pack (HP) method in patients with PCP. DesignRandomized, controlled, prospective study. MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups of HP and control. In the HP group, hot packs of 40-45°C, kept in a hydrocollator heating unit for 30-35 minutes and wrapped in towels, were applied to the umbilical and hypogastric region of patients in the supine position for 30 minutes. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to measure the pain after colonoscopy. Visual analog scores at 1, 6, and 24 hours were recorded and compared in both groups. ResultsThere was a significant difference in the presence and severity of pain between the two groups at 1 and 6 hours after colonoscopy (p < .001 and p = .004, respectively). There was no significant difference in pain scores at 24 hours between two groups. ConclusionsThis study showed that the application of HP to patients after colonoscopy is effective in reducing pain in the early period.

Effects of Virtual Reality Exercises on Chronic Low Back Pain: Quasi-Experimental Study.

Low back pain is a common health problem globally. Based on the duration of pain, it is classified as acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain. Different treatment strategies are available to reduce chronic low back pain. Virtual reality (VR) is a novel approach in back pain rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare the effects of VR games on chronic low back pain. This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 40 patients with chronic low back pain. The data were collected using a nonprobability, convenient sampling technique. Patients visiting the Department of Physiotherapy, Government Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, were recruited and equally divided into 4 groups. Group A received the Reflex Ridge game; group B received the Body Ball game; group C combined the 2 games without back-strengthening exercises; and group D combined the 2 games with back-strengthening exercises. The participants received 8 treatment sessions, with 3 sessions/wk. The outcomes were pre- and posttest measurements of pain intensity, low back disability, and lumbar range of motion. The repeated measurement ANOVA was used for inter- and intragroup comparison, with significance at P≤.05. The study comprised a sample of 40 patients with low back pain; 12 (40%) were female and 28 (60%) were male, with a mean age of 37.85 (SD 12.15) years. The pre- and posttest mean pain scores were 7.60 (SD 1.84) and 4.20 (SD 1.62) in group A, 6.60 (SD 1.776) and 5.90 (SD 1.73) in group B, 6.90 (SD 1.73) and 5.40 (SD 1.07) in group C, and 7.10 (SD 1.53) and 3.60 (SD 0.97) in group D, respectively. The mean pain score differences of group D (combining the Reflex Ridge and Body Ball games with back-strengthening exercises) compared to groups A, B, and C were -.60 (P=.76), -2.30 (P<.001), and -1.80 (P=.03), respectively. Regarding the range of motion, the forward lumbar flexion mean differences of group D compared to groups A, B, and C were 3.80 (P=.21), 4.80 (P=.07), and 7.40 (P<.001), respectively. Similarly, the right lateral lumbar flexion mean differences of group D compared to groups A, B, and C were 2.80 (P=.04), 5.20 (P<.001), and 4.80 (P<.001), respectively. The left lateral lumbar flexion mean differences of group D compared to groups A, B, and C were 2.80 (P<.001), 4.80 (P=.02), and 2.20 (P<.001). respectively, showing significant pre- and posttreatment effects. VR exercises had statistically significant effects on improving pain, low back disability, and range of motion in all groups, but the combination of Reflex Ridge and Body Ball games with back-strengthening exercises had dominant effects compared to the other groups. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial IRCT20200330046895N1; https://en.irct.ir/trial/46916.

Prednisone Decreases Opioid Use in Adults Undergoing Benign Oropharyngeal Surgery.

This study sought to analyze the efficacy and safety of postoperative prednisone to reduce reliance on opioids in adult benign oropharyngeal surgery. Prospective cohort study. Single tertiary-care facility. Patients undergoing tonsillectomy (T), tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A), and/or modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) from December 2020 to January 2023 received the standard of care postoperative management. A prednisone taper was dependent on surgeon preference. Cohorts were based on the prescription of postoperative steroids. Patients completed a survey to assess opioid usage, pain scores, and steroid compliance. Seventy-two patients were included. The nonsteroid cohort (N = 29) received an average of 467 ± 94.1 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and the steroid cohort (N = 43) received an average of 285 ± 128 MME (P < 0.001). The nonsteroid cohort consumed 1.62 times more opioids than the steroid cohort (P < 0.002). There were no significant differences in complication or refill rates between treatment groups. There were no significant differences in pain scores on the day of surgery or postoperative days1, 5, or 10 (P = 0.34, P = 0.66, P = 0.62, and P = 0.22, respectively). Patients undergoing T&A (p = 0.019) or who had current psychiatric medication use (P < 0.006) consumed significantly more opioids. Patients who received a total opioid prescription of >300 MME(40 5-mL doses of 5 mg/5 mL liquid oxycodone) consumed 2.27 times more postoperative opioids than patients with opioid prescriptions ≤300 MME (P < 0.001). Patients who did not receive steroids consumed 1.62 times more postoperative opioids compared to those who completed a steroid taper. Corticosteroid use was not associated with changes in pain scores, refill rates, or complication rates and may be considered in a multimodal approach to pain management in adults undergoing benign oropharyngeal surgery, although further study is warranted.

The Tailored Opioid Reduction Strategy (TORS): A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Opioid Prescription Following Hysterectomy

ObjectiveTo evaluate a tailored opioid reduction strategy (TORS) in minimizing opioid prescriptions for patients undergoing hysterectomy. MethodsThis quality improvement initiative was developed by multiple stakeholders at an academic hospital in a Canadian urban centre. The intervention consisted of a three-pronged approach: (1) patient and provider education, (2) perioperative multimodal analgesia, and (3) a targeted opioid reduction strategy. All eligible patients were asked to fill pre- and postoperative questionnaires. Analysis of outcomes pre- and post-TORS implementation as well as intervention compliance was performed. ResultsFrom September 2020 to April 2021, 133 patients who underwent hysterectomy were included in the study, 69 in the pre-intervention group and 64 in the post-intervention group. Of 133 hysterectomies, 78 (58.6%) were performed laparoscopically, 16 (12%) open, 14 (10.5%) vaginally, and 25 (18.8%) robotically. The rate of discharge opioid prescriptions was significantly reduced in the post-intervention group compared with the pre-intervention group (37/64, 58% versus 62/69, 90%, respectively, P < 0.001), as well as the amount of opioid prescribed in oral morphine equivalents (OME) (mean 47 mg pre-intervention, 28 mg post-intervention, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction or postoperative pain scores between groups. Overall, compliance with 2 or more components of TORS intervention was seen in 64/64 (100%) cases. ConclusionTORS implementation was successful in reducing the rate of discharge opioid prescriptions and the total amount of opiates prescribed in patients undergoing hysterectomy with no decrease in patient satisfaction or change in postoperative pain scores. We believe it can be applied more broadly across different surgical patient populations to prevent opioid abuse.

The Efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block in the Management of Postoperative Pain After Costal Cartilage Harvest for Craniofacial Reconstruction Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Autologous costal cartilage harvest is a common procedure in craniofacial reconstruction due to its stability, dependability, and diversity. However, such a procedure is associated with severe donor-site pain postoperatively. Therefore, we aim through this study to compare the efficacy of intercostal nerve block in the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing costal cartilage harvest for craniofacial reconstruction. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The study systematically reviewed MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases without time-limitation. As a result of reviewing the literature, 33 articles were screened by full-text resulting in 14 articles which met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. However, only four high-quality RCT articles were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). The findings of this study suggest that there is no significant difference in pain scores between ICNB and control groups at 12, 24, and 48h postoperatively, both at rest and with coughing. Therefore, both techniques are considered safe and effective. Our results show evidence of favorable outcome of preventive donor-site analgesia with ICNB for harvesting autologous costal cartilage in multiple studies. However, the overall outcomes were insignificant between the two arms. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) levels following erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in posterior lumbar decompression: a randomized, controlled trial

PurposeNeutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are the inflammatory biomarkers of the stress response. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization by comparing NLR, PLR, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and functional recovery between sham block and ESPB.MethodsThis was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral hospital. Sixty patients were randomized into two equal groups, each receiving either a sham block or ESPB. The primary outcome was the NLR and PLR 12 h and 24 h after lumbar posterior decompression and stabilization. The secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption and pain score 24 h postoperatively. Also, functional recovery determined by getting out of bed, verticalization, and walking by the balcony were reviewed as secondary outcomes.ResultsSignificant differences existed between the sham block and ESPB group in NLR (29.08 ± 12.29 vs. 16.97 ± 10.38; p < 0.0001) and PLR (556.77 ± 110.32 vs. 346.43 ± 117.34; p < 0.0001) 12 h after surgery. Also, there was a significant difference in NLR (p = 0.0466) and PLR (p < 0.0001) 24 h after surgery. In addition, there was a substantial difference in pain score, total opioid consumption, and functional recovery.ConclusionESPB performance during spinal surgery lowers NRL and PLR ratios 12 h and 24 h after surgery. In addition, ESPB provides better analgesia and improves functional recovery compared to sham block following posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization.

Efficacy of amobile phone application for the improvement of oral hygiene of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment : Arandomized controlled clinical trial.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of amobile phone application (app) to improve oral hygiene of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted with atotal of 60patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment in two groups: intervention and control (n = 30 each). Apreviously designed mobile app (Labkhand) was used by patients in the intervention group. Orthodontic plaque index (OPI) and modified gingival index (MGI) were recorded in the two groups at baseline (first session or T0), and after 1 (T1) and 3 (T2) months. The number of debonded/broken brackets was also recorded, and pain score of the patients was assessed at nine time points. Data were analyzed using the χ2 test, paired t‑test, and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA; α = 0.05). The two groups demonstrated no significant difference in OPI and MGI at T0 (P > 0.05). OPI and MGI at T1 and T2 were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of patients with broken brackets in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P = 0.017). The two groups reported no significant difference in pain score (P > 0.05). The Labkhand mobile app successfully improved oral hygiene indices of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, and decreased the frequency of broken brackets after 1 and 3months of use.

Patient experience of pain during vaginal pessary removal and insertion: a service evaluation study.

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem affecting women, but there is currently a lack of research focusing on patient experience of pessary changes. This study was aimed at capturing the patient perspective of pessary changes and formally assessing pain during pessary removal and insertion. A service evaluation request was granted by South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust. Patients undergoing pessary change (ring, shelf, or Gellhorn) in gynaecology outpatient clinics over a 6-month period were asked to rate their pain scores on a ten-point numerical pain-rating scale. Other associated data were collected. Out of 213 women, 58.2% reported that pessary removal was more painful than insertion, 30.5% reported equal pain, and 10.8% reported that insertion was more painful than removal. Pain scores were significantly higher for removal (mean 4.37, median 4, IQR 4-7) than for insertion (mean 2.66, median 2, IQR 2-4, p <0.001). Ring pessaries were significantly less painful to both remove and insert than shelf and Gellhorn pessaries. Smaller pessaries were more painful to both remove and insert. There was no significant difference in pain scores reported by those with or without diagnosed vulval conditions. Pessary removal causes most women moderate pain, which should be communicated to patients beforehand. Ring pessaries are significantly less painful to change than other pessary types. Clinicians should consider pain as a factor in their decision-making surrounding pessary choice and when counselling patients. Future research should focus on ways to reduce pain during pessary removal.

Prospective Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Between Primary Repair and Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is associated with postoperative pain and necessitates using perioperative nerve blocks and multimodal analgesic plans. To assess postoperative pain and daily opioid use after ACL repair versus ACLR and to assess whether ACL repair could be performed successfully without using long-acting nerve blocks. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. All eligible patients who underwent ACL surgery between 2019 and 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were treated with primary repair if proximal tears with sufficient tissue quality were present; otherwise, they underwent single-bundle ACLR with either hamstring tendon or quadriceps tendon autograft. The patients were divided into 3 groups: ACLR with adductor canal nerve block (up to 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 2 mg dexamethasone), primary repair with nerve block, and primary repair without nerve block. Pain visual analog scale and number of opioids used were recorded during the first 14 postoperative days (PODs). Furthermore, patients completed the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) survey, and range of motion was assessed. Group differences were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. Seventy-eight patients were included: 30 (39%) underwent ACLR, 19 (24%) ACL repair with nerve block, and 29 (37%) ACL repair without nerve block. Overall, the ACL repair group used significantly fewer opioids than the ACLR group on POD 1 (1 vs 3, P = .027) and POD 2 (1 vs 3, P = .014) while also using fewer opioids in total (3 vs 8, P = .038). This difference was even more marked when only analyzing those patients who received postoperative nerve blocks (1 vs 8, P = .029). Repair patients had significantly higher QoR-15 scores throughout the first postoperative week, and they had greater range of motion (all P < .05). There were no significant differences in pain scores, opioid usage, or QoR-15 scores between patients who underwent repair with versus without nerve block. The ACL repair group experienced less postoperative pain during the first 2 weeks after surgery and used significantly fewer opioids than the ACLR group. Furthermore, they had improved knee function and higher recovery quality than patients who underwent ACLR during the initial postoperative period. Postoperative nerve blocks may not be necessary after ACL repair.

Erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The 2018 guidelines for enhanced recovery in thoracic surgery recommend paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative pain management. However, recent studies demonstrate that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) achieves similar postoperative pain control with reduced block-related complications. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ESPB versus PVB for pain management after thoracic surgery. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched through December 2022 (PROSPERO registration - CRD42023395593). Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, resting at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and at movement at 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or block-related complications in the first 48 hours. Ten randomized control trials enrolling a total of 624 total patients were included. There were no significant differences in pain scores, resting or at movement, at any time points except reduced resting pain scores at 12 hours with PVB (mean difference [MD]) 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.88). Opioid consumption demonstrated no significant differences at 24 hours; PVB reduced opioid consumption at 48 hours (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.89). There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea or vomiting. ESPB exhibited a nonsignificant trend toward reduced cumulative block-related complications (risk difference [RD] 0.05, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.00). Compared with PVB, ESPB is safe and demonstrates no clinically significant differences in pain management after thoracic surgery.

Efficacy, Safety, and Pain Level of Subcutaneous Catheter Use for Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in Children With Cancer: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy, safety, and pain level of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration via a subcutaneous catheter compared with direct injection in children with cancer. Method: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial of standard G-CSF administration versus subcutaneous catheter administration. Children 2-15 years of age who were beginning G-CSF after their first chemotherapy cycle and anticipated to receive G-CSF following the next three cycles of chemotherapy were eligible. Efficacy, safety, and pain were as outcomes of the study. Results: Twenty-nine children with cancer (median age 12 years) were enrolled in the study (16 children in the subcutaneous catheter group and 13 children in the direct injection group). During Cycle 2, the median number of days to reach absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/mm3 was greater among those in the subcutaneous catheter group (12 vs. 10; p = .02). In Cycle 3, however, the subcutaneous catheter group received fewer doses of G-CSF (8 vs. 12; p = .004). No complications related to subcutaneous catheter use were observed. No differences in the visual analog scale pain score were observed between groups in Cycles 1 to 3; however, in Cycle 4, children in the subcutaneous catheter group had lower median pain scores than those in the direct subcutaneous injection group (Mdn = 0, [IQR] = 0-2 vs. Mdn = 1, IQR = 0-6; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Results demonstrated administering G-CSF via a subcutaneous catheter enables ANC to recover with no pain or complications associated with its use. Thus, oncology teams may consider this administration method to be used in children with cancer.