Differences In Cardiovascular Disease Research Articles

Gender‐specific features of plasmatic and circulating cell alterations as risk factors in cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the Western countries. Several epidemiological studies have hypothesized a gender disparity in the pathogenesis and progression of CVD. For instance, women develop CVD when they are about 10 years older than men and, typically, after menopause. However, considering that women are often excluded from research studies, sex differences in CVD remains a frontier for discovery. Very important is thus the identification of risk factors allowing us to diagnose or predict cardiovascular events taking into account gender disparities. In this review, we will examine some of the major challenges in the discovery and validation of cardiovascular biomarkers in a gender perspective. In particular, we will consider classical (hypertension, smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemia, physical inactivity) and novel (inflammation markers, markers of endothelial dysfunction, markers of coronary disease) risk factors reporting gender differences. The aim of this review was to provide an overview on current knowledge on sex-associated cardiovascular determinants with the aim to improve CVD diagnostic and prognostic clinical courses and to develop new and gender-biased prevention strategies.

P46 Ethnic differences in pace of growth between birth and 5 years: results from the millennium cohort study

ObjectiveSize at birth and accelerated postnatal growth are linked to obesity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adulthood. CVD is more common in Black African and South Asian origin populations in...

Atherosclerosis and sex hormones: current concepts

CVD (cardiovascular disease) is the leading cause of death for women. Considerable progress has been made in both our understanding of the complexities governing menopausal hormone therapy and our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying hormone and hormone receptor function. Understanding the interplay of atherosclerosis and sex steroid hormones and their cognate receptors at the level of the vessel wall has important ramifications for clinical practice. In the present review, we discuss the epidemiology of CVD in men and women, the clinical impact of sex hormones on CVD, and summarize our current understanding of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis with a focus on gender differences in CVD, its clinical presentation and course, and pathobiology. The critical animal and human data that pertain to the role of oestrogens, androgens and progestins on the vessel wall is also reviewed, with particular attention to the actions of sex hormones on each of the three key cell types involved in atherogenesis: the endothelium, smooth muscle cells and macrophages. Where relevant, the systemic (metabolic) effects of sex hormones that influence atherogenesis, such as those involving vascular reactivity, inflammation and lipoprotein metabolism, are discussed. In addition, four key current concepts in the field are explored: (i) total hormone exposure time and coronary heart disease risk; (ii) the importance of tissue specificity of sex steroid hormones, critical timing and the stage of atherosclerosis in hormone action; (iii) biomarkers for atherosclerosis with regard to hormone therapy; and (iv) the complex role of sex steroids in inflammation. Future studies in this field will contribute to guiding clinical treatment recommendations for women and help define research priorities.

Lipoprotein Subfraction Cholesterol Distribution Is Proatherogenic in Women With Type 1 Diabetes and Insulin Resistance

OBJECTIVEIndividuals with type 1 diabetes have a less atherogenic fasting lipid profile than those without diabetes but paradoxically have increased rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We investigated differences in lipoprotein subfraction cholesterol distribution and insulin resistance between subjects with and without type 1 diabetes to better understand the etiology of increased CVD risk.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSFast protein liquid chromatography was used to fractionate lipoprotein cholesterol distribution in a substudy of the Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes (CACTI) study (n = 82, age 46 ± 8 years, 52% female, 49% with type 1 diabetes for 23 ± 8 years). Insulin resistance was assessed by a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.RESULTSAmong men, those with type 1 diabetes had less VLDL and more HDL cholesterol than control subjects (P < 0.05), but among women, those with diabetes had a shift in cholesterol to denser LDL, despite more statin use. Among control subjects, men had more cholesterol distributed as VLDL and LDL but less as HDL than women; however, among those with type 1 diabetes, there was no sex difference. Within sex and diabetes strata, a more atherogenic cholesterol distribution by insulin resistance was seen in men with and without diabetes, but only in women with type 1 diabetes.CONCLUSIONSThe expected sex-based less atherogenic lipoprotein cholesterol distribution was not seen in women with type 1 diabetes. Moreover, insulin resistance was associated with a more atherogenic lipoprotein cholesterol distribution in all men and in women with type 1 diabetes. This lipoprotein cholesterol distribution may contribute to sex-based differences in CVD in type 1 diabetes.

Obesity, Nutrition, and Physical Activity in Blacks and Whites: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease

Rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD), obesity, and obesity-related CVD risk factors such as hypertension are higher in blacks than whites in the United States. Obesity, poor nutrition, and physical inactivity as well as psychosocial and environmental factors may contribute to ethnic differences in CVD. Survey data from the United States show that black populations consume fewer vegetables and CVD-protective micronutrients such as calcium, potassium, and magnesium than whites. Black populations are also less physically active. Physiologic factors may also contribute to ethnic differences in CVD. Blacks are more insulin resistant than whites, predisposing them to type 2 diabetes and CVD, and healthy black adults have higher levels of inflammatory markers, potentially increasing their risk for CVD. Although obesity does not appear to have a differential impact on CVD risk factors by race, the higher obesity prevalence of blacks combined with their higher-risk diet, lack of exercise, and psychosocial stress places this population at significant excess risk for CVD.

What We Know and Do Not Know about Sex and Cardiac Disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the single leading cause of death in both men and women. A large proportion of the population with CVD will die with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF). It is becoming increasingly recognized that sex differences exist in the etiology, development, and outcome of CHF. For example, compared to male counterparts, women that present with CHF are typically older and have systolic cardiac function that is not impaired. Despite a growing body of literature addressing the underlying mechanisms of sex dimorphisms in cardiac disease, there remain significant inconsistencies reported in these studies. Given that the development of CHF results from the complex integration of genetic and nongenetic cues, it is not surprising that the elucidation and subsequent identification of molecular mechanisms remains unclear. In this review, key aspects of sex differences in CVD and CHF will be highlighted with an emphasis on some of the unanswered questions regarding these differences. The contention is presented that it becomes critical to reference cellular mechanisms within the context of each sex to better understand these sex dimorphisms.

Free fatty acids are associated with pulse pressure in women, but not men, with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Pulse pressure, a measure of arterial stiffness, is elevated in T1D and associated with CVD. Free fatty acids (FFAs), elevated in women and abdominal adiposity, are also elevated in T1D and CVD. We thus examined the association of fasting FFAs with pulse pressure and coronary artery calcification (CAC, a marker of coronary atherosclerotic burden) in an adult population (n = 150) of childhood-onset T1D and whether any such associations varied by abdominal adiposity and sex. Mean age and diabetes duration were 42 and 33 years, respectively, when CAC, visceral abdominal adiposity (VAT), and subcutaneous abdominal adiposity (SAT) were determined by electron beam tomography. Free fatty acids were determined by in vitro colorimetry. Pulse pressure was calculated as systolic blood pressure minus diastolic blood pressure. Free fatty acids were log transformed before analyses, and all analyses were controlled for serum albumin. Free fatty acids were associated with pulse pressure in women (r = 0.24, P = .04), but not in men (r = 0.07, P = .55). An interaction for the prediction of pulse pressure was noted between FFAs and both VAT (P = .03) and SAT (P = .008) in women, but only a marginal interaction with SAT (P = .09) and no interaction for VAT (P = .40) with FFAs were observed in men. In multivariable linear regression analysis allowing for serum albumin, age, height, heart rate, albumin excretion rate, hemoglobin A1c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertension medication use, FFAs, SAT, and the interaction between FFAs and SAT, the interaction between FFAs and SAT remained associated with pulse pressure in women (FFAs, P = .04; interaction term, P = .03), but not men (FFAs, P = .32; interaction term, P = .32). FFAs showed no association with log-transformed CAC. Although FFAs were not associated with CAC in either sex, they were associated with pulse pressure in women and their effect appeared to vary by abdominal adiposity, particularly SAT. This finding might help explain the loss of the sex difference in CVD in T1D.

On oxidative status and cardiovascular risk in women: Keeping pink at heart

Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) has always been perceived as a pathology regarding essentially males, incidence and death from cardiovascular events dramatically increase after menopause in women. Obviously, while many aspects of CVD are similar in both sexes, it is now clear that there are significant differences as well. Exploration of these gender-related differences in CVD might provide a basis for the development of new strategies in the management of patients with CVD from a gender point of view. In particular, a growing amount of data suggested the possible major role of oxidative stress in female patients and the possibility to integrate this new biomarker in future study evaluating CVD risk in women.

C-reactive protein, established risk factors and social inequalities in cardiovascular disease – the significance of absolute versus relative measures of disease

BackgroundThe widespread use of relative scales in socioepidemiological studies has recently been criticized. The criticism is based mainly on the fact that the importance of different risk factors in explaining social inequalities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) varies, depending on which scale is used to measure social inequalities. The present study examines the importance of established risk factors, as opposed to low-grade inflammation, in explaining socioeconomic differences in the incidence of CVD, using both relative and absolute scales.MethodsWe obtained information on socioeconomic position (SEP), established risk factors (smoking, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia), and low-grade inflammation as measured by high-sensitive (hs) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, in 4,268 Swedish men and women who participated in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS). Data on first cardiovascular events, i.e., stroke or coronary event (CE), was collected from regional and national registers. Social inequalities were measured in relative terms, i.e., as ratios between incidence rates in groups with lower and higher SEP, and also in absolute terms, i.e., as the absolute difference in incidence rates in groups with lower and higher SEP.ResultsThose with low SEP had a higher risk of future CVD. Adjustment for risk factors resulted in a rather small reduction in the relative socioeconomic gradient, namely 8% for CRP (≥ 3 mg/L) and 21% for established risk factors taken together. However, there was a reduction of 18% in the absolute socioeconomic gradient when looking at subjects with CRP-levels < 3 mg/L, and of 69% when looking at a low-risk population with no smoking, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia.ConclusionC-reactive protein and established risk factors all contribute to socioeconomic differences in CVD. However, conclusions on the importance of "modern" risk factors (here, CRP), as opposed to established risk factors, in the association between SEP and CVD depend on the scale on which social inequalities are measured. The one-sided use of the relative scale, without including a background of absolute levels of disease, and of what causes disease, can consequently prevent efforts to reduce established risk factors by giving priority to research and preventive programs looking in new directions.

Androgen therapy and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in Western society today. There is a striking gender difference in CVD with men predisposed to earlier onset and more severe disease. Following the recent reevaluation and ongoing debate regarding the estrogen protection hypothesis, and given that androgen use and abuse is increasing in our society, the alternate view that androgens may promote CVD in men is assuming increasing importance. Whether androgens adversely affect CVD in either men or women remains a contentious issue within both the cardiovascular and endocrinological fraternities. This review draws from basic science, animal and clinical studies to outline our current understanding regarding androgen effects on atherosclerosis, the major CVD, and asks where future directions of atherosclerosis-related androgen research may lie.

Gender differences in the metabolic syndrome and their role for cardiovascular disease

Women live longer than men and develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) at an older age. The metabolic syndrome represents a major risk factor for the development of CVD, and gender differences in this syndrome may contribute to gender differences in CVD. In recent years, the metabolic syndrome has been more prevalent in men than in women. Prevalence is increasing and this increase has been steeper in women, particularly in young women, during the last decade. The contributions of the different components of the metabolic syndrome differ between genders and in different countries. In a recent survey in Germany, 40% of the adult population had been diagnosed with disturbed glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes. Undiagnosed diabetes was more frequent in men than in women, and risk factors for undiagnosed diabetes differed between the sexes. Worldwide, in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose was observed more frequently in men, whereas impaired glucose tolerance occurred relatively more often in women. Lipid accumulation patterns differ between women and men. Premenopausal women more frequently develop peripheral obesity with subcutaneous fat accumulation, whereas men and postmenopausal women are more prone to central or android obesity. In particular, android obesity is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and the development of type 2 diabetes. Visceral adipocytes differ from peripheral adipocytes in their lipolytic activity and their response to insulin, adrenergic and angiotensin stimulation and sex hormones. Visceral fat is a major source of circulating free fatty acids and cytokines, which are directly delivered via the portal vein to the liver inducing insulin resistance and an atherogenic lipid profile. Inflammation increases cardiovascular risk particularly in women. A relatively greater increase in cardiovascular risk by the appearance of diabetes in women has been reported in many studies.Thus, the presently available data suggest that the pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome and its contribution to the relative risk of cardiovascular events and heart failure show gender differences, which might be of potential relevance for prevention, diagnostics, and therapy of the syndrome.

Cardiovascular Disease Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

There is an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and morbidity in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus compared with the general population as shown by epidemiologic studies measuring cardiovascular endpoints, as well as by autopsy, angiographic, and coronary calcification studies. Most of the excess CVD risk associated with type 1 diabetes is concentrated in the subset of approximately 35% of patients who develop diabetic nephropathy (after 20 years of diabetes duration), who also typically have dyslipidemias, elevated blood pressure, and hyperglycemia, factors contributing to CVD. For reasons that remain speculative, the relative risks from CVD are higher in women than in men with type 1 diabetes compared with the general population, which effectively eliminates the gender differences in CVD. As in the general population and in patients with type 2 diabetes, education and lifestyle changes, interventions to reduce hyperglycemia, blood pressure, micro-albuminuria, lipid control, and the use of aspirin are important management areas in order to reduce the increased risk of CVD. Whether management with aspirin and statins should be started in type 1 diabetic patients at a younger age or at a lower risk score than in the general population is still under investigation. There is a need for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of vascular complications in type 1 diabetes, more specific risk engines in type 1 diabetes, and accurate estimations of the absolute and relative risk for CVD in order to improve management of CVD in these high-risk patients.

Tuberculous lymphadenitis in the Nigerian African.

<h3>Objectives</h3> Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is of increasing concern among breast cancer survivors. However, evidence on ethnic differences in CVD among women with breast cancer is sparse. We assessed ethnic differences in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer in the Netherlands. <h3>Methods</h3> A nationwide register-based cohort study comprising all women with a first admission for breast cancer (n=127 714) between 1996 and 2010 in the Netherlands was conducted. Differences in CVD admission, CVD mortality and overall CVD event, which comprised a CVD admission and/or CVD mortality, between the largest ethnic minority groups (Surinamese, Moroccan, Turkish, Antillean and Indonesian) and the Dutch general population (henceforth, Dutch) were investigated using Cox proportional hazard models. <h3>Results</h3> The incidence of cardiovascular outcomes varied by the ethnic group. The incidence of an overall cardiovascular event was significantly higher for women with breast cancer from Suriname (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.29 to 1.64) and Turkey (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.51), compared with Dutch women with breast cancer. In contrast, Indonesian women with breast cancer had a significantly lower risk (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96) of a cardiovascular event compared with Dutch women with breast cancer. The risk of a cardiovascular event did not differ between Moroccan and Dutch women with breast cancer, whereas for Antillean women the risk was not significantly higher. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our findings suggest that Surinamese and Turkish women with breast cancer are disadvantaged in terms of cardiovascular outcomes compared with Dutch women with breast cancer. More work is needed to unravel the potential factors contributing to these differences.