BackgroundIt is unknown whether pigs can detect deficiencies in multiple amino acids (AAs) and consequently change their feed choice. ObjectivesWe investigated whether pigs compensate for a diet deficient in 3 AAs (Thr, Trp, and Val) by selecting multiple diets and whether this compensation is affected by the supplemented AA concentration. MethodsPair-housed 5-wk-old pigs (n = 96) were exposed to 1 of 4 treatments: 1) AA-adequate: offered a low-protein (LP) diet adequate in AA for growth (LP+); 2) AA-deficient: offered LP diet deficient in Thr, Trp, and Val by 20% (LP–); 3) 2-choice between LP+ and LP–; and 4) 4-choice between LP– and 3 diets supplemented with Thr, Trp, Val at +40% (n = 12 pens/treatment) from d0 to d21 (phase 1). From d21 to d28, AA concentration of supplemented diets increased to +60% (phase 2). Average daily feed intake (ADFI) and gain (ADG) were recorded. ResultsDietary treatment did not affect ADFI and ADG in phase 1 (P > 0.05). In phase 2, ADFI and ADG were higher in AA-adequate and 2-choice treatments than in AA-deficient treatment with 4-choice in between (P < 0.05). In both phases, Thr, Trp, and Val intake was lower in AA-deficient treatment than in other treatments. For the 2-choice treatment, consumption of LP– was higher than LP+ in both phases (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001). Four-choice treatment consumed more LP– and Trp-supplemented than Thr- and Val-supplemented diets in phase 1 (P < 0.001); in phase 2, consumption of the Trp-supplemented diet was the highest (P < 0.01). ConclusionsPigs can detect multiple AA deficiencies and compensate by consuming AA-supplemented diets. In a 2-choice setting, pigs proportionally decrease consumption of a supplemented diet with increased dietary AA concentration. However, when given the choice between individual AA-supplemented diets, pigs proportionally decrease consumption of a highly concentrated Val diet and increase preference for a highly concentrated Trp diet.
Read full abstract