In February 1807 delegation of Shawnee Indians traveled from their town of Wapakoneta, in what is now northern Ohio, to Washington where they asked President Thomas Jefferson for piece of land around their settlement to be laid off separately for their people. The headmen carefully detailed where they wished their borders-what they called our line-to run and asked Jefferson to give them a strong writing that would prove their right to territory these boundaries encompassed (see Figure 1). The Shawnees' request is puzzling, for land they asked for was located in Indian Country, beyond reach of American officials. Moreover, chiefs' desire for bounded territory goes against dominant scholarly image of Shawnees as the greatest Travellers in America. Historians typically portray Shawnees as diasporic people whose survival in colonial world depended on geographic mobility. Consequently, borders have played little role in narratives of Shawnee history, as they have more generally in Native American history. Breaking from this tradition, this essay explores how diasporic Shawnees envisioned and drew borders to create homeland for themselves in Great Lakes country between Treaty of Greenville in 1795 and Shawnee removal in 1832 and how these boundaries intertwined and clashed with lines drawn by United States to control this strategically important region. Examining Shawnee borders underlines complexity and contingency of transformation of Great Lakes country from an intercolonial borderland into bordered lands of emerging nation-states during early nineteenth century. Both diasporic Indians and Euro-Ajmerican statebuilders contributed to this development, as they adopted borders as instruments for creating order in world unsettled by displacement and violence.1Historians have traced how boundary between United States and British Canada, formally concluded in 1783, reconfigured Great Lakes region from multicultural middle ground into divided ground, as states on both sides of new line established practices to control peoples and spaces between them. Indian land played an integral part in this process. Both United States and British Empire assumed exclusive right to buy Native land on their side of border; re-selling this land to Euro-American speculators and settlers became primary way for states to gain political support, wealth, and authority on their margins. State-building, then, hinged on drawing borders, both between American and Canadian territory and between Indian and Euro-American land. As historians are increasingly realizing, Native peoples, too, used borders to define and defend their place in region, often appropriating Euro-American notions of borders and creating culturally hybrid forms of asserting land ownership. There has been less attention on how both American and Indian lines constructed nationhood and social order in Native communities. Investigating competing, but often intertwined, Shawnee and U.S. projects of bordermaking in Great Lakes country reveals that borders provided both Indians and Americans with symbolic language to articulate and argue their understandings of Native identity, nationhood, and power. In early nineteenth century several rival discourses of Indian borders developed among both Shawnees and Americans, as they debated how Native societies and their relations with republic should be organized.2The Great Lakes country has long been home to diverse and populous Native American communities whose kinship networks and ideas about human-land relations had ordered land use and territorial rights across region for millennia before European colonialism. In addition to these traditional inhabitants, by end of eighteenth century Anglo-American expansion had pushed thousands of displaced Indians from east and south, including about one thousand Shawnees, to Great Lakes region. …
Read full abstract