The association of advanced or complete heart block with acute myocardial infarction was reviewed as a basis for understanding the special problems related to the complicating heart block and for evaluating artificial cardiac pacemaker therapy in this disease. In addition to studies reported in the literature, 28 personal cases of advanced heart block with acute myocardial infarction were analyzed. The average reported incidence of second degree heart block was 5 percent and of complete heart block 3 percent of cases of acute myocardial infarction; but in patients who were continuously monitored, a higher incidence was noted-fiz., 10 percent for second degree block and 8 percent for complete heart block Since the atrioventricular node and bundle are supplied by the right coronary artery in 90 percent of persons, advanced heart block occurs chiefly with acute diaphragmatic infarction. When advanced heart block occurs with anterior myocardial infarction, there is usually severe narrowing or old occlusion of the right coronary artery as well as a fresh occlusion of the left coronary artery. There is usually extensive septal infarction causing bilateral branch block. The fatality rate is much higher in cases of advanced heart block with anterior than with diaphragmatic myocardial infarction. In patients who recover, chiefly those with diaphragmatic infarcts, the heart block usually disappears, indicating that the heart block was due to reversible ischemia of the artrioventricular node. In fatal cases of advanced heart block with diaphragmatic infarction, there is evidence of severe left coronary narrowing or occlusion as well as occlusion of the right coronary artery. The fatality rate is determined not only by the complicating heart block, as such, but also by the location of the infarct, the type of the idioventricular QRS complex in complete heart block, and especially by other associated complications such as shock and heart failure. The prognosis is more favorable with diaphragmatic than with anterior myocardial infarction, with a narrow, “supraventricular type” of QRS complex than with a wide, “aberrant” idioventricular QRS complex, and in the absence of serious complications. Reports of fatalities in various series of cases with and without any particular therapy must be analyzed with proper regard for these prognostic factors. In our series of 28 cases, there were only two deaths among nine patients with diaphragmatic infarction and narrow QRS complexes, five deaths among seven patients with diaphragmatic infarction and wide QRS complexes and seven deaths among eight patients with advanced or complete heart block and acute anterior myocardial infarction. In four patients with advanced heart block and subendocardial infarction, there were no deaths. The insertion of a temporary transvenous cardiac pacemaker has been advocated for the treatment of heart block complicating acute myocardial infarction in the belief that (1) heart block is responsible for a higher mortality than would otherwise occur in similar cases without heart block and (2) that pacemaker insertion during the acute phase of heart block reduces this excess mortality. Although these beliefs seem valid, reported data are inadequate to conclude that increased mortality is due to the heart block per se, and not to other serious complications which themselves are associated with a high fatality rate. Actually, the fatality rate has been high in reported series of cases in which pacemakers were inserted, but the poor results were undoubtedly due in large measure to the poor condition of many of the patients. Failure to classify cases in terms of other factors besides heart block which might influence prognosis impairs any conclusion as to the value of pacemakers in heart block with myocardial infarction and as to the precise indications for their use. Nevertheless, continued application of this form of therapy, with careful analysis in terms of the various known prognostic factors, appears justified.