Diamondback moth (DBM, Plutella xylostella) is the most significant pest of cruciferous vegetables as they rapidly develop high-level resistance to many insecticides. Monitoring DBM susceptibility and target-site mutation frequency is essential for pest control. In this study, 10 insecticides were tested on 11 field populations. Frequencies of target-site mutations (including para, ace1, Rdl1, RyR1, and nAChRα6 genes) were estimated by pyrosequencing. Insecticides registered after 2007 for DBM control in Taiwan, i.e., spinetoram, chlorantraniliprole, chlorfenapyr, metaflumizone, and flubendiamide, showed >80% mortality toward several populations; Bacillus thurigiensis, emamectin benzoate, and chlorfluazuron showed medium to low efficacy in all populations; and tolfenpyrad and mevinphos were highly ineffective. Susceptibility to insecticides varied substantially among populations: eight out of nine populations were highly susceptible to spinetoram, but only one was susceptible to flubendiamide. Target-site mutations related to organophosphates, pyrethroids, fipronil, and diamides were detected in all populations, but there were few spinosad and spinetoram mutations. Our three-year field study demonstrated rapid efficacy loss for all insecticides tested, particularly for more toxic insecticides. Skipped-generation selection of a field DBM strain to emamectin benzoate, metaflumizone, chlorantraniliprole, and flubendiamide revealed that mortality rates dropped from 60 to 80% to <10% after 6 generations. Next-generation sequencing was performed to identify possible target gene mutations. A resistance management program that considers the instability of resistance to some chemicals and pertinent data on resistance mechanisms should be established. Identifying compounds to overcome high-frequency field DBM point mutations could be beneficial for pest control.
Read full abstract