The global climate issue has become increasingly severe, and relying solely on a single entity for governance is insufficient to achieve ideal outcomes. Various international organizations are on the rise, and diversification and decentralization have become inevitable results in the evolution of international climate governance mechanisms. Social dialogue, as a mechanism involving multiple stakeholders, information sharing, and collaborative decision-making, can effectively address the collective action dilemma in climate governance. Therefore, this paper explores and analyzes the evolution of international climate mechanisms and the impact of diversified governance models through the lens of social dialogue. From this perspective, multiple stakeholders enhance democratic participation in international climate governance, which, to some extent, increases governance motivation. However, it also inevitably leads to a fragmented and decentralized global climate governance mechanism, characterized by a lack of international leadership and low governance efficiency. To address this issue and advance the climate governance process, it is necessary to acknowledge that a diversified governance mechanism has become a established fact, and subsequently, to establish a collaborative mechanism among multiple stakeholders, facilitating multi-faceted and multi-level dialogues to promote active and orderly participation from all parties, rather than pursuing a singular centralized leadership governance mechanism.
Read full abstract