Veterinary Radiology & UltrasoundVolume 58, Issue 2 p. 237-237 CorrigendumFree Access CORRELATION OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS MADE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, MAGNETIC RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY, AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ARTHROGRAPHY WITH GROSS ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS IN THE EQUINE METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT This article corrects the following: CORRELATION OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS MADE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, MAGNETIC RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY, AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ARTHROGRAPHY WITH GROSS ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS IN THE EQUINE METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT Erin G. Porter, Matthew D. Winter, Barbara J. Sheppard, Clifford R. Berry, Jorge A. Hernandez, Volume 57Issue 5Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound pages: 515-525 First Published online: August 1, 2016 First published: 13 March 2017 https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12462AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL In Porter et al.1 the following information was not published in Results and Discussion sections. Results section, page 520, first column: The new information should have been inserted at the end of the second paragraph. “The pixel dimensions calculated from the MRI and CT parameters used in the study are provided in Table 1. In our study, the average diagonal pixel measurement used for measuring cartilage thickness on MRI was about 0.79 mm. The average gross cartilage thickness on the third metacarpal bone was 1.03 mm and on the proximal phalanx was 1.15 mm. This indicates an error in measurement of about 77% for the third metacarpal bone and 69% for the proximal phalanx.2 Table 1. The pixel dimensions calculated from the MRI and CT parameters MRI Pulse sequence Vertical Resolution (mm) Horizontal resolution (mm) Diagonal resolution (mm) PD-FS 0.53 0.47 0.71 T1-FS 0.76 0.45 0.88 SSFP 0.67 0.45 0.81 SPGR-FS 0.58 0.47 0.75 CT arthrography 0.29 0.29 0.41 Discussion section, page 521, second column: The new information should have been inserted at the end of the first paragraph describing limitations of the study. “Some of the cartilage thickness measurements in this study were too small for the spatial resolution capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging system. The spatial resolution of the computed tomographic system was adequate to support the measurements made.” ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Manuel Arreola, PhD for his help in assessing the system resolution. We apologize for these errors. REFERENCE 1Porter EG, Winter MD, Sheppard BJ, Berry CR, Hernandez JA. Correlation of articular cartilage thickness measurements made with magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography, and computed tomographic arthrography with gross articular cartilage thickness in the equine metacarpophalangeal joint. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016; 57: 515– 525. Volume58, Issue2March/April 2017Pages 237-237 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Read full abstract