Diagnosis Of Porphyria Research Articles

Analisis Perbandingan Certainty Factor dan Dempster Shafer Dalam Diagnosis Penyakit Porfiria Menggunakan Metode Perbandingan Eksponensial

Porphyria refers to a group of genetic disorders that affect the metabolism of porphyrins in the body. Porphyrin itself is a molecule that plays a role in the synthesis of hemoglobin, which functions as a carrier of oxygen in the blood. Disturbances in porphyrin metabolism can lead to the accumulation of porphyrins or their precursors, which in turn can produce a variety of symptoms. Porphyria comes in many forms, including acute porphyria and skin porphyria, each with its own unique symptoms. Nervous system and skin problems are common in porphyria patients, and if not treated properly, their health condition can deteriorate. A unique approach is needed to provide answers to this problem because it is still challenging to develop practical ways to address the problems experienced by patients. Certainty Factor and Dempster Shafer methods are two techniques that are widely used in the field of disease diagnosis today, where expert systems are often applied. But building expert systems in multiple disciplines is difficult due to uncertainty. Therefore, it is important to research and distinguish the many ways that these systems can be built. The exponential comparison approach is one of the most straightforward comparison techniques and helps minimize bias in the analysis process. To identify candidiasis in humans, this study attempted to apply, evaluate, and compare the two methodologies, as well as compare the results with the exponential comparison method. Comparative findings suggest that the Dempster Shafer technique provides a more precise diagnosis of porphyria

Phase 1/2, first-in-child study of sonodynamic therapy (SDT) using low intensity focused ultrasound and 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) for patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

TPS10070 Background: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a devastating pediatric brain tumor with poor prognosis. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) with ALA is a non-invasive strategy that sensitizes target tissues with a non-toxic chemical agent followed by exposure to low intensity MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS). Preclinical studies have shown that ALA is preferentially taken up by glioma cells and metabolized to protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). SDT activates protoporphyrin IX and induces tumor cell death via photodynamic effect (lipoperoxidation, apoptosis). Suheiro et al and Wu et al demonstrated that SDT killed tumors via apoptosis and lipoperoxidation in rodent glioma models with minimal damage to surrounding normal brain.1,2 ALA SDT was well-tolerated in an ongoing first-in-human trial in adults with recurrent high-grade gliomas and demonstrated biomarker evidence of the photodynamic effect3. Methods: A Phase 1/2, multicenter, open label study (NCT05123534) is enrolling patients at Children’s National Hospital. The study employs the Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) algorithm to evaluate safety and tolerability of treatment with SDT in newly diagnosed DIPG subjects to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of MRgFUS energy in combination with ALA. The study will evaluate 3 ALA doses and 3 acoustic energy doses. ALA is administered IV six to nine hours prior to MRgFUS with the Exablate type-2 device. The first cohort, B1C1, evaluates the lowest drug-device dose combination and if no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is encountered after 3 patients, ascending dose-escalation will proceed to the second cohort, B2C1, treated with lowest dose of ALA with the second level of MRgFUS energy. Again, if no DLT is experienced, the next cohort will receive a higher dose combination. The initial patient in each cohort is treated in 2 sessions 21 to 28 days apart, each covering one-half of the pons. Subsequent patients are treated in 1 session to the whole pons. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SDT in DIPG subjects. Secondary outcomes include preliminary efficacy assessments, pharmacokinetics of ALA and PpIX, mechanical performance of the Exablate Type-2 device, and radiographic evidence of tumor physiological changes associated with SDT. All patients at least 5 years of age with newly diagnosed, radiographically typical DIPG between 4-24 weeks after completion of standard radiotherapy are eligible for the trial. Patients with evidence of disease progression, diagnosis of porphyria, or prior or concurrent therapy with any other anticancer or investigational intervention will be excluded. Cohort 1 has been completed without DLT.

Porphyria: a case report

BackgroundPrompt diagnosis of metabolic disorders in a resource-limited country like Nepal is daunting. Acute intermittent porphyria is a rare but common hepatic porphyria mostly seen in females of the reproductive age group. As its incidence is quite uncommon, conjectures about porphyria diagnosis are often duped into a diagnostic conundrum.Case presentationHere we unravel a case of a 15-year-old Hindu Nepalese girl distraught by the myriad of symptoms in the setting of severe abdominal pain accompanied by constipation and limb pain as the chief complaints. She presented with acute severe hypertension with marked persistent hyponatremia (up to 109 mEq/L). Despite conservative management of hypertension and electrolytes, unresolved electrolyte imbalance led us to the speculation of disturbance in the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Due to her exacerbating neurovisceral status, she also required intensive care during the disease course. After thorough investigations and exemption of presumed provisional diagnoses, based on sustained symptomatic presentation, the clinical suspicion was driven towards a diagnosis of porphyria-related disorders. Positive Watson-Schwartz test substantiated the diagnosis of acute intermittent porphyria. Her symptoms gradually abated after the consumption of high carbohydrate diets.ConclusionThis case highlights the baffling amalgamation of symptoms that simulate common diseases of concern yet are buried in the realm of porphyric disorders. Porphyria can be diagnosed using simple screening tools and timely treatment can diminish serious consequences.

Development and validation of diagnostic algorithms for the laboratory diagnosis of porphyrias.

Porphyrias are rare metabolic disorders of the haem synthesis. They can present with acute neurovisceral attacks, cutaneous symptoms, or a combination of both. As they present with a wide variety of clinical symptoms, diagnosis is often delayed and correct interpretation of porphyria-related tests remains a challenge for many physicians. We developed and validated two algorithms for the laboratory diagnosis of porphyrias based on presenting symptoms. Based on a literature search and clinical/laboratory expertise, we developed algorithms for acute and cutaneous porphyrias. We validated these algorithms using all porphyria related laboratory test requests between January 1st 2000 and September 30th 2020 in UZ Leuven. In addition, we also evaluated our algorithm using samples from the European porphyria network (EPNET) external quality assessment scheme (2010-2021). Sensitivity of the algorithm for acute porphyria was 100.0% [74.9%-100.0%] (13 acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) and 1 variegate porphyria [VP]) with a specificity of 98.5% [91.0%-100.0%] (65 patients). Sensitivity of the algorithm for cutaneous porphyria was 100% [95.1%-100.0%] (7 VP, 59 porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT), 23 erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP), 2 X-linked erythropoietic protoporphyria [XLEPP]) with a specificity of 93.9% [82.9%-98.5%]. There were no diagnostic samples of other types of porphyria. The algorithms correctly identified 18 of the 19 EPNET porphyria cases. One of the two hereditary coproporphyria cases was missed. The algorithms for acute and cutaneous porphyria showed high sensitivity and specificity and can be used to aid the clinician in correctly interpreting the laboratory findings of porphyria-related tests.

Therapy Follows Diagnosis: Old and New Approaches for the Treatment of Acute Porphyrias, What We Know and What We Should Know.

Heme, iron protoporphyrin IX, is one of life’s most central molecules. Hence, availability of the enzymatic machinery necessary for its synthesis is crucial for every cell. Consequently, inborn errors of porphyrin metabolism that compromise normal synthesis, namely the family of porphyrias, undermine normal cellular metabolism given that heme has functions in catalytic centers, signal transduction and functional regulation and its synthesis is fully integrated into the center of intermediary metabolism. Very often, diagnosis of porphyrias is difficult and therefore delayed. Therapy can be as complicated. Over the last 50 years, several strategies have been developed: because of its integration with other parts of intermediary metabolism, the infusion of glucose (glucose effect) was one of the first attempts to counterbalance the dysregulation of porphyrin synthesis in porphyrias. Since heme synthesis is impaired, infusional replacement of heme was the next important therapeutic step. Recently, siRNA technology has been introduced in order to downregulate 5-ALA-synthase 1, which contributes to the patho-physiology of these diseases. Moreover, other novel therapies using enzyme protein replacement, mRNA techniques or proteostasis regulators are being developed.

Neuropsychiatric Manifestation of Acute Intermittent Porphyria: A Case Report

Acute intermittent porphyria is a rare hereditary metabolic disorder with heme biosynthesis. Because of the wide and non-specific symptomatology of porphyria, diagnosis of porphyria is often missed or usually misdiagnosed as polyneuropathy or encephalopathy, or psychiatric disease. This case report is a reminder to physicians regarding porphyric neuropathy and psychiatric involvement associated with porphyria.

Acute Intermittent Porphyria as a Rare Challenging Neuro-Metabolic Disease; a Case Report.

Porphyria is a challenging metabolic disease due to its heterogeneous presentation symptoms and its difficult diagnosis. Many affected individuals can complain of recurrent neuro-visceral attacks per year, some of which may be persistent and life-threatening, which is confusing if there is no established diagnosis. Although the motor manifestations, autonomic changes and seizure are highly suggestive, the diagnosis is often overlooked and needs confirmatory genetic testing. To the best of our knowledge, the acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) reported in this case, involving severe electrolyte disturbances and rapid severe weakness is a challenging neuro-metabolic case and is extremely rare worldwide. Here, we reported a case of AIP in a young girl who presented to the emergency department of Al-Araby international Hospital, Monufia, Egypt with severe abdominal pain, constipation, and headache which had started 10 days ago. It seems that the diagnosis of porphyria should be considered particularly in those patients with abdominal complaints associated with electrolyte disturbances, seizures, and severe progressive neuropathy.

Laboratory Diagnosis of Porphyria.

Porphyrias are a group of diseases that are clinically and genetically heterogeneous and originate mostly from inherited dysfunctions of specific enzymes involved in heme biosynthesis. Such dysfunctions result in the excessive production and excretion of the intermediates of the heme biosynthesis pathway in the blood, urine, or feces, and these intermediates are responsible for specific clinical presentations. Porphyrias continue to be underdiagnosed, although laboratory diagnosis based on the measurement of metabolites could be utilized to support clinical suspicion in all symptomatic patients. Moreover, the measurement of enzymatic activities along with a molecular analysis may confirm the diagnosis and are, therefore, crucial for identifying pre-symptomatic carriers. The present review provides an overview of the laboratory assays used most commonly for establishing the diagnosis of porphyria. This would assist the clinicians in prescribing appropriate diagnostic testing and interpreting the testing results.

Porphyrien

Porphyrien werden durch Enzymdefekte der Hämbiosynthese hervorgerufen und anhand spezifischer biochemischer Muster von Porphyrinen und deren Vorläufern in Urin, Stuhl und Blut diagnostiziert. Das jeweilige Muster der akkumulierten Porphyrine, Vorläufer und Derivate ist verbunden mit der klinischen Ausprägung, die abdominale, neurologische, psychiatrische, endokrine, kardiovaskuläre Symptome, Leberschaden und/oder Lichtempfindlichkeit der Haut umfassen kann. Klinisch werden akute und nichtakute Porphyrien unterschieden. Bei symptomatischen (klinisch aktiven), akuten hepatischen Porphyrien – hierzu gehören akute intermittierende Porphyrie, Porphyria variegata, hereditäre Koproporphyrie und Doss-Porphyrie – kommt es aufgrund einer Regulationsstörung zur Kumulation der Porphyrinvorläufer 5‑Aminolävulinsäure und Porphobilinogen. Bei den nichtakuten Formen – u. a. Porphyria cutanea tarda, erythropoetische und X‑chromosomale Protoporphyrie sowie kongenitale erythropoetische Porphyrie – führen akkumulierte Porphyrine zu Lichtempfindlichkeit (Fotodermatose) und mitunter auch zu schweren Leberschäden. Zur Therapie der Porphyrien stehen sowohl bewährte und sichere als auch innovative Optionen zur Verfügung.

Greater disease burden of variegate porphyria than hereditary coproporphyria: An Israeli nationwide study of neurocutaneous porphyrias

Hereditary coproporphyria (HCP) and variegate porphyria (VP) are referred to as neurocutaneous porphyrias (NCP). Data concerning their systemic presentation are limited and no direct attempt of comparison of the two has ever been made. Our aim was to describe the type and frequency of systemic manifestations of NCPs in Israeli patients. A cross-sectional survey was conducted. The study population included all patients with NCP diagnosed at the Israeli National Service for Biochemical Diagnoses of Porphyrias (INSP) between 1988 and 2019. Of the 83 patients with NCP who were alive in 2019, 61 (73%) completed the survey, 40 with VP and 21 with HCP. Systemic symptoms were reported by 63% of the VP group and 62% of the HCP group (p = .96); corresponding rates of cutaneous symptoms were 58% and 5% (p < .001). We found no association between the occurrence of systemic and cutaneous symptoms. Among patients with systemic involvement, abdominal pain was the predominant systemic symptom, found in 64% of the VP group and 69% of the HCP group; Analysis of symptom frequency showed that in 68% of the VP group, systemic symptoms (either abdominal, musculoskeletal or neuropsychiatric) occurred on a daily/weekly basis, whereas the HCP group experienced less than one symptom per week (p < .001). This nationwide study depicts a significantly heavier disease burden in VP patients compared to HCP owing to its more frequent neurovisceral and cutaneous manifestations.

Healthcare Utilization and Cost Burden of Porphyria in Commercially Insured Adults in the United States.

ObjectivesThe healthcare burden associated with porphyria remains unevaluated despite the associated increased risks of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the healthcare utilization and cost burdens of porphyria in the United States (US) using real-world claims data.MethodsWe performed a case–control analysis of adults in the Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims database (2010–2015). Using propensity scores, 2788 porphyria cases were matched 1:1 to porphyria-free controls with chronic liver disease. Total and service-specific parameters were quantified for the 12 months before porphyria diagnosis versus the 12 months after diagnosis and over the 12 months following a randomly selected date for controls. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and McNemar tests were used to examine incremental differences in burden between cases and controls. Adjusted multivariable generalized linear regression models were used to compare healthcare burdens for cases versus controls.ResultsRelative to the 12 months before porphyria diagnosis, the following 12 months had more claims per patient (35.94 vs 39.67; p < 0.0001) and increased per-patient healthcare costs (US$21,308 vs US$27,270; p < 0.0001). Porphyria cases incurred US$7839 more in total unadjusted costs compared with controls in the 12 months after index date. Compared with controls, cases also had more claims (39.67 vs 34.81), primarily due to inpatient admissions (1.80 vs 0.78) and outpatient visits (21.41 vs 17.98). Cases also had higher healthcare costs for inpatient admissions (US$8882 vs US$4674) and outpatient visits (US$12,378 vs US$9801).ConclusionPorphyria is associated with significant healthcare costs and utilization burdens driven by increased inpatient admissions, outpatient visits, and pharmaceutical claims.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-020-00229-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The clinical importance of early acute hepatic porphyria diagnosis: a national cohort.

Acute hepatic porphyria (AHP) attacks begin with abdominal pain and can progress to severe life-threatening conditions. Early diagnosis and treatment may prevent these complications. We investigated the difference between the severity of porphyria attacks before and after porphyria diagnosis. A retrospective study including AHP patients hospitalized for an acute attack in Israel during a 15-year period. Diagnosis of an attack was based on typical clinical symptoms accompanied by at least one documented elevated urinary porphobilinogen above fourfold of normal values. The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, severe hyponatremia, seizures, and psychiatric symptoms. 42 attacks in 9 patients were included. Most attacks occurred in women (78.6%) and in acute intermittent porphyria patients (76.2%). The mean age of attack was 26.5 (± 6.3) years. Attacks following porphyria diagnosis had a lower prevalence of ICU admission (3.3% versus 75.0%, p < 0.001), seizures (0% versus 50.0%, p < 0.001), psychiatric symptoms (23.3% versus 66.7%, p = 0.01), severe hyponatremia (16.7% versus 83.3%, p < 0.001), and median length of hospital stay (5 versus 11.0days, p < 0.001). These results remained significant after simple univariate logistic regression for ICU admission [odds ratio (OR) 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00-0.12], prolonged hospital stay (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.41), seizures or neurological symptoms (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.30), and severe hyponatremia (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.20). Previously diagnosed AHP patients have a significantly milder attack course as compared to previously undiagnosed patients. Family screening following sentinel cases might prevent severe AHP attacks.

EXPLORE: A Prospective, Multinational, Natural History Study of Patients with Acute Hepatic Porphyria with Recurrent Attacks.

Background and AimsAcute hepatic porphyria comprises a group of rare genetic diseases caused by mutations in genes involved in heme biosynthesis. Patients can experience acute neurovisceral attacks, debilitating chronic symptoms, and long‐term complications. There is a lack of multinational, prospective data characterizing the disease and current treatment practices in severely affected patients.Approach and ResultsEXPLORE is a prospective, multinational, natural history study characterizing disease activity and clinical management in patients with acute hepatic porphyria who experience recurrent attacks. Eligible patients had a confirmed acute hepatic porphyria diagnosis and had experienced ≥3 attacks in the prior 12 months or were receiving prophylactic treatment. A total of 112 patients were enrolled and followed for at least 6 months. In the 12 months before the study, patients reported a median (range) of 6 (0‐52) acute attacks, with 52 (46%) patients receiving hemin prophylaxis. Chronic symptoms were reported by 73 (65%) patients, with 52 (46%) patients experiencing these daily. During the study, 98 (88%) patients experienced a total of 483 attacks, 77% of which required treatment at a health care facility and/or hemin administration (median [range] annualized attack rate 2.0 [0.0‐37.0]). Elevated levels of hepatic δ‐aminolevulinic acid synthase 1 messenger ribonucleic acid levels, δ‐aminolevulinic acid, and porphobilinogen compared with the upper limit of normal in healthy individuals were observed at baseline and increased further during attacks. Patients had impaired quality of life and increased health care utilization.ConclusionsPatients experienced attacks often requiring treatment in a health care facility and/or with hemin, as well as chronic symptoms that adversely influenced day‐to‐day functioning. In this patient group, the high disease burden and diminished quality of life highlight the need for novel therapies.

Epidemiology of cutaneous porphyria in Israel: a nationwide cohort study.

From a dermatologist's perspective, there are four major types of cutaneous porphyrias (CPs): porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT), erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP), variegate porphyria (VP) and hereditary coproporphyria (HCP). Scarce data are available regarding the epidemiology of CPs. To describe the epidemiology of CPs in Israel, including distribution, incidence and prevalence rates of major types. This retrospective study includes all patients who were diagnosed with CPs between the years 1988-2018. It is based on data from Israel's National Service for the Biochemical Diagnoses of Porphyrias, and Israeli patients' nationwide electronic medical charts. Incidence and prevalence rates were calculated. Of 173 patients with CPs diagnosed during a 30-year period, 65 (38%) had VP, 62 (36%) had PCT, 31 (18%) had HCP and 15 (9%) had EPP; with incidence rates of 0.29, 0.30, 0.17, 0.07, and prevalence rates of 6.3, 4.8, 2.9, 1.6, respectively, per million population. Characteristics of patients with PCT differed from those with other CPs with regard to lack of family history, older mean age at diagnosis [51 vs. 36 (VP), 35 (HCP) and 25 (EPP) years] and male predominance (81% vs. similar distribution). All patients with PCT were diagnosed at adulthood, while 20%, 19% and 15% of patients with VP, HCP and EPP, respectively, were diagnosed during childhood or adolescence. Variegate porphyria and PCT were found to be the most prevalent in Israel; however, CPs might be underdiagnosed, thus dermatologists' awareness of these rare disorders is highly important.

A next-generation-sequencing panel for mutational analysis of dominant acute hepatic porphyrias

Molecular diagnosis of autosomal dominant acute hepatic porphyrias (AHPs) plays an important role in the management of these disorders. To introduce next generation sequencing (NGS) to the porphyria diagnosis, we designed a panel that contained four genes, ALAS1, HMBS, CPOX and PPOX for mutational analysis of acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), hereditary coproporphyria (HCP) and variegate porphyria (VP). To validate the AHP panel, 30 samples with known pathogenic variants as determined by Sanger sequencing, were analyzed using the Ion PGM™. Among them, nine have so far not been reported. The pathogenic variants were identified and annotated manually in IGV by three individuals who were blinded to the Sanger results. The AHP panel consists of 95 amplicons that covers 92% of the coding region of the four genes. Of the 95 amplicons, 93 had an average read-depth of >500 reads. In 29 of the 30 tested samples, pathogenic variants were correctly identified and annotated. The number of reads from the mutated alleles were approximately 50% of the total. The annotation of a 22-bp duplication with NGS differed from that of Sanger by one nucleotide. NGS showed an advantage in allelic discrimination over Sanger sequencing and was also able to detect a known somatic variant in the HMBS gene. The AHP panel will be applied in the initial diagnosis of new patients. Any sequence variations with a frequency of ≥10% will be confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The cost-effectiveness of a NGS approach for AHP in a diagnostic laboratory needs to be further assessed.

The Patient Odyssey to Confirmed Acute Hepatic Porphyria Diagnosis: Neurological Symptoms and Use of Drugs Known to Provoke Porphyria Attacks Prior to Diagnosis (P3.9-070)

The Patient Odyssey to Confirmed Acute Hepatic Porphyria Diagnosis: Neurological Symptoms and Use of Drugs Known to Provoke Porphyria Attacks Prior to Diagnosis (P3.9-070)

Porphyria: A Rare, Complicated, and Misdiagnosed Disease.

Diagnosis of porphyria is often difficult due to the range of symptoms, which are common in many other disorders, hence frequently leading to misdiagnosis. Attacks can be triggered through sunlight and contact with diverse substances, including medications. Signs are severe, appear quickly, and tend to last from days to weeks, affecting the skin, mentation, the digestive, cardiovascular, nervous, and muscular system. Neuropathy signifies a severe and potentially life-threatening attack. Porphyria is mainly an inherited disorder, but can be acquired, and emerges in adults and children. The exact rates of porphyria are unknown and vary around the world. Diagnosis, clinical presentation, treatment, and disease management are introduced.

Porphyria - when to think about how to clarify and treat?

Porphyria - when to think about how to clarify and treat? Abstract. Porphyrias are a group of metabolic disorders that are mostly hereditary. They manifest either as abdominal colic or as skin changes at light-exposed areas. During the symptomatic phase the diagnosis of porphyria can be made by cost-effective screening tests. If the screening gives a positive result, further testing is required to determine the exact type of porphyria and to establish the best therapeutic option for the patient in a specialized porphyria center.

The Patient Odyssey to Confirmed Acute Hepatic Porphyria Diagnosis: Clinical Characteristics and Healthcare Utilization of Patients Preceding Diagnosis of Acute Hepatic Porphyria

Introduction: Acute hepatic porphyrias (AHPs) are rare, genetic diseases caused by deficient activity of specific enzymes involved in hepatic heme biosynthesis, with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) being the most common subtype. Accumulation of neurotoxic heme intermediates can cause debilitating chronic symptoms and potentially life-threatening acute attacks, often requiring immediate medical attention. Patients with AHPs commonly report nonspecific symptoms, leading to misdiagnosis, delays in diagnosis, and inappropriate therapy. The study objective was to follow patients' healthcare journeys from first suspected symptom to AHP/AIP diagnosis. Methods: IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental Databases were used to identify AHP/AIP patients between 1Jan2010-30Jun2010 using a previously defined claims algorithm: 1) ICD-9 277.1 porphyria diagnosis claim, symptoms, and AHP/AIP lab test, 2) ICD-9 277.1 porphyria diagnosis claim and hemin, or 3) ICD-10 E80.21 AIP claim. Patients were required to have 5 years continuous enrollment prior to the index date, defined as the date of first AHP/AIP claim. The observation period (OP) was defined as the period between first AHP/AIP symptom(s) and index date. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), medications, symptoms, and diagnoses were analyzed during the OP. Results: 126 unique patients with AHP/AIP were identified with a mean (SD) age of 47 years (18), 63% were female, mean OP was 3.9 years (1.3). The most common first AHP-related symptoms identified were abdominal pain and hypertension (Tab1). Symptoms observed frequently throughout the OP were abdominal, chest, and back pain, nausea/vomiting, and malaise/fatigue (Tab1). During the OP, patients had a mean of 3 attacks (4.3); 1.6 attacks/year (2.9) among those with ≥1 attack. 51% had ≥1 hospitalization (mean, SD annualized: 1.2, 2.9), 73% had ≥1 emergency department (ED) visit (mean, SD annualized: 1.9, 3). The most commonly seen specialist was gastroenterologist (49% had ≥1 visit). The most commonly observed condition was acute abdomen (Tab2), and the most commonly observed outpatient medications were opioid analgesics (86%) (Tab2). Conclusion: Prior to AHP/AIP diagnosis, patients exhibited symptoms commonly associated with AHP/AIP, high HCRU, including hospitalizations and ED visits, and were frequently treated with opioid analgesics. Opportunity exists for earlier recognition of AHP/AIP based on patient history of neurovisceral and gastrointestinal symptoms and specific HCRU.900_A Figure 1 No Caption available.900_B Figure 2 No Caption available.

Secret Underlying Unexplained Abdominal Pain, Neurological Symptoms and Intermittent Hypertension: Acute Intermittent Porphyria

Abstract A 21-year-old female patient with abdominal pain, vomiting and constipation was admitted to the hospital with the possible diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis. Due to increased abdominal pain and constipation the patient underwent a surgery with the diagnosis of ileus. However, no pathological findings were found in the abdominal organs apart from serous fluid in the abdominal cavity. The patient became hypertensive, tachycardic and had an episode of seizures postoperatively. Neurological manifestations with unexplained abdominal pain indicated a diagnosis of acute intermittent porphyria (AIP). Acute intermittent porphyria diagnosis is based on elevated urinary δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and porphobilinogen (PBG) levels as well as hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) IVS13-2 A&gt;G heterozygous mutation. Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) gene mutations were not confirmed. Porphyria should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with recurrent abdominal pain, neurological symptoms and lack of FMF gene polymorphism.